Implication Juridical Decision of The Constitutional Court No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Concerning Wanprestasi In the Fiducia Agreement

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-21
Author(s):  
Soleh Hasan Wahid ◽  
Harum Mudrikah Mahsun
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Security Holder ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Research Type

The purpose of this paper is to criticize the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019, which determines that the phrases "executorial power" and "are the same as court decisions having permanent legal force" in Article 15 paragraph (2) of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning The Fiduciary Guarantee contradicts the 1945 Constitution. From the norms contained in this article, there is a power of execution that the fiduciary security holder can carry out (creditors), which then causes many problems, both related to the constitutionality of norms and implementation. Thus, the authors question two things, first how is the juridical analysis of the Constitutional Court decision No. 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 regarding breach of contract in the fiduciary agreement? Second, what is the juridical implication of MK Decision No. fiduciary? The writer's research type is library research, a literature study (library research) with a descriptive qualitative research type. The data collection technique used was documentation techniques, and the approach method used in this study was juridical normative. The results of this study conclude that 1) The Constitutional Court's decision has not provided a sense of justice as in Article 27 paragraph (1) and Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, because in this Constitutional Court decision gives more exclusive rights to the debtor because in this case, the creditor does not get legal protection rights in the event of undesirable things (2) This decision has implications for various parties, namely the Court, which now often receives requests for execution and the process will be lengthy, for notaries must add and clarify default clauses in detail. For business people whose creditors (fiduciary recipients) cannot carry out unilateral execution of the object of fiduciary security but must submit a request for performance to the Court. There is a concern that lousy faith will occur from the community's debtor when the creditor is submitting a request for execution to the Court.

scholarly journals Peranan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) Terhadap Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris Di Kabupaten Tegal

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Dwikky Bagus wibisono ◽  
Umar Ma’ruf
Keyword(s):  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Social Institutions ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

AbstrakLembaga Kenotariatan adalah salah satu lembaga kemasyarakatan yang ada di Indonesia, lembaga ini timbul dari kebutuhan dalam pergaulan sesama manusia yang menghendaki adanya suatu alat bukti mengenai hubungan hukum keperdataan yang ada dan atau terjadi diantara mereka.Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris, spesifikasi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, teknik pengumpulan data ini menggunakan penelitian lapangan dan studi kepustakaan.Notaris sebagai pejabat umum dalam menjalankan jabatannya perlu diberikan perlindungan hukum, antara lain pertama untuk tetap menjaga keluhuran harkat dan martabat jabatannya termasuk ketika memberikan kesaksian dan berproses dalam pemeriksaan dan persidangan. Kedua, merahasiakan akta keterangan yang diperoleh guna pembuatan akta dan ketiga, menjaga minuta atau surat-surat yang dilekatkan pada minuta akta atau protokol Notaris dalam penyimpanan Notaris. Ketiga hal inilah yang menjadi dasar dalam Pasal 66 UUJN dalam hal pemanggilan Notaris untuk proses peradilan, penyidikan, penuntut umum atau hakim dengan persetujuan Majelis Pengawas.Kata Kunci: Majelis Pengawas Daerah, Pengawasan,Jabatan Notaris AbstractsThe Notary Institution is one of the existing social institutions in Indonesia, this institution arises from the needs in the association of fellow human who wants a proof of the relationship of civil law existing and / or occur between them.The approach method used in this research is empirical juridical, the specification used in this research is analytical descriptive, this data collection technique using field research and literature study.Notary as a general official in carrying out his / her position needs to be given legal protection, among others, first to maintain the nobility of dignity and dignity of office including when giving testimony and proceeding in examination and trial. Second, to keep secret deeds obtained for making the deed and third, to keep the minuta or letters attached to the Minutes of Notary or Notary's protocol in the Notary's depository. These are the basic principles of Article 66 of the UUJN in the case of calling a Notary to the judicial, investigative, prosecutorial or judicial process with the approval of the Supervisory Board.Keywords:  Regional Supervisory Board,Supervision,Notary Position

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 11-017/PUU-I/2003 TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK DIPILIH

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Ketut Ngastawa
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
The Body ◽  
State System ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Right

Paper that had the title: "Juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the Legal Protection for the Rights to be Eelected." This explores two issues: 1) how the legal protection of the settings selected in the state system of Indonesia ; 2) what are juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected. To solve both problems, this paper uses normative legal research methods. Approach being used is the statute approach, case approach, and a conceptual approach. Further legal materials collected were identified and analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. Legal protection for the right to be elected in the state system of Indonesia can be traced from the 1945 opening, the articles in the body of the 1945 Constitution, Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28D (1) and paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (3) 1945 Second Amendment, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1998, Article 43 of Law Number 39 of 1999, Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 25 of the International Covenant  on Civil and Political Rights. Discussion of the juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected have been included: a) only on the juridical implications of representative institutions no longer marked with specified requirements as stipulated in Article 60 letter g of Law Number 12 Year 2003 in Law Number 10 Year 2008; b) juridical implications of the political field for the right to be elected is the absence of any discriminatory treatment in legislative product formed by the House of Representatives and the President as well as products of other legislation forward.

scholarly journals PELINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK TERKENAL (WELL-KNOWN MARK) ATAS PASSING OFF PADA DIGITAL PLATFORM MARKETPLACE

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1688
Author(s):  
Karenina Aulia Puti Chaidir ◽  
Ranti Fauza Mayana ◽  
Tasya Safiranita Ramli
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Passing Off ◽  
Digital Platform ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Digital Disruption ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Full Protection

Adanya fenomena disrupsi digital menyebabkan praktik passing off tidak hanya ditemukan dalam pasar konvensional namun juga dalam perdagangan elektronik, yaitu pada bentuk digital platform marketplace. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk, pertama, mendapatkan pemahaman mengenai pelindungan hukum merek terkenal terhadap passing off atas merek terkenal pada digital platform marketplace di Indonesia. Kedua, mendapatkan pemahaman mengenai tindakan hukum yang dapat dilakukan pemilik merek terkenal terhadap pedagang dan penyedia digital platform marketplace terhadap passing off pada digital platform marketplace. Penelitian ini berbentuk deskriptif-analitis yang menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif serta menganalisis data dengan metode normatif-kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang dilakukan yaitu studi kepustakaan dengan mengakaji data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2016 tentang MIG dan Undang-Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE, pemilik merek terkenal memiliki pelindungan hukum atas praktik passing off yang dilakukan dalam digital platform marketplace dan dapat melakukan tindakan-tindakan seperti mengajukan gugatan ganti rugi dengan memohon ganti rugi baik materil maupun immateril serta dapat mengajukan gugatan kepada Pengadilan Niaga sebagai bentuk ultimatum remedium. Namun untuk mendapatkan pelindungan lebih komprehensif pemilik merek terkenal haruslah mendaftarkan mereknya terlebih dahulu dan juga sebelum mengajukan gugatan dapat melakukan pengaduan kepada masing-masing digital platform marketplace. The phenomenon of digital disruption causes the practice of passing off not only found in conventional markets but also in electronic commerce, which is a digital platform marketplace. This research aims to, first gain an understanding of the legal protection of well-known marks against passing off on the digital platform marketplace in Indonesia and second, gains an understanding of legal actions that can be done by well-known marks owners towards traders and digital platform marketplace providers towards passing off on the digital platform marketplace. This research is in the form of descriptive-analytical using a juridical-normative approach and analyzing data with normative-qualitative methods. The data collection technique used is library research by assessing secondary data. The results showed that based on Law No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and GI and Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 on EIT, it said that the owner of well-known marks has legal protection for the practice of passing off carried out in the digital platform marketplace and can take actions such as filing a claim for compensation by requesting compensation both material and immaterial and can file a lawsuit to the Commercial Court as a form of ultimatum remedium. In order to have full protection, the owner of the well-known mark must register the trademark first and also before filing a lawsuit can make a complaint to each digital platform marketplace.

scholarly journals DISKURSUS SOSIOLOGI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2021 ◽  
pp. 236-246
Author(s):  
Dwi Sakti Muhamad Huda ◽  
Dodi Alaska Ahmad Syaiful ◽  
Desi Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
Kinship System ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sociological Discourse ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Broad Scale

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 annulled the provisions of Article 43 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law because it contradicts the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and does not have binding legal force. The legal reason behind the rechtfinding is to emphasize that children born outside of marriage have the right to legal protection. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 on one of the judges' judicial duties. This study uses a socio-legal approach with data collection techniques for study documents of literature materials. Based on the results of the analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, it does not contradict and intersect with the sociological discourse in accordance with the argumentum a contrario method. Then have coherence between the parental or bilateral kinship system with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 in its application in Indonesia. This condition demands the intellectuality of Judges who are required to think on a broad scale and consider other disciplines in their legal findings.

scholarly journals Perubahan Makna terhadap Pasal 2 dan 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 502
Author(s):  
Vidya Prahassacitta
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Original Meaning ◽  
Before And After

Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, pertama: makna Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra dan pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Kedua, penerapan Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Ketiga, efek dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut dalam meminimalisir kriminalisasi perbuatan pegawai negeri sipil atau pejabat publik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Sebagai penelitian kualitatif maka data yang dipergunakan merupakan data sekunder yang terdiri dari data hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut telah mengubah rumusan delik dari formil menjadi materiil yang menjadikan makna pasal tersebut semakin menjauh dari makna awalnya. Pada akhirnya, keluarnya putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat memecahkan permasalahan hukum yang telah ada sebelumnya bahkan putusan tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan permasalahan baru yang dapat menghambat proses penegakan hukum dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia.The problems on this research are, first: the meaning of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before and after Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Second, the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016. Third, the effects of Constitutional Court Decision in minimizing criminal actions conducted by civil servants and public officials. This research is a legal research using normative legal approach. As qualitative research, this research uses secondary data consist of primary, secondary, tertiary legal data collected from literature study. The results show that the constitutional court decision has changed the formulation of the offense from formal to material which makes the meaning of the article different from its original meaning. At last, the constitutional court deciasion could not solve the existing legal problem, but contrary it potentially creates a new problem which obstructs law enforcement process in combating corruption in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Hak Mantan Narapidana Menjadi Calon Kepala Daerah Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Kontitusi Nomor: 56/PUU-XVII/2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-267
Author(s):  
Mastura Mastura ◽  
Said Sampara ◽  
Nurul Qamar
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Equal Rights ◽  
Waiting Period ◽  
The Public ◽  
Former Prisoners ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Research Type

Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis dari putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 56/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap hak mantan narapidana menjadi calon kepala daerah. Penelitian ini adalah meggunakan tipe penelitian Hukum Normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa: 1) pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim dalam Putusan mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 56/PUU-XVII2019 untuk menjadi calon kepala daerah dengan syarat setelah mejalani masa tunggu selama 5 tahun sejak di bebaskan serta terbuka dan jujur mengemukakan kepada publik bahwa yang bersangkutan mantan narapidana. Atas dasar itu Mahkamah Konstitusi memberikan hak kepada mantan narapidana untuk mencalonkan diri menjadi kepala daerah. 2) hak mantan narapiana untuk mencalonkan diri dalam pemilihan kepala daerah dalam putusan MK telah mengembalikkan hak-hak mantan narapidana yakni hak untuk ikut berpartipasi dalam politik dan hak yang sama dihadapan hukum. The research aims to analyze the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 56 / PUU-XVII / 2019 on the rights of ex-convicts to become candidates for regional head. This research is to use the Normative Law research type. The results of this study conclude that: 1) the legal considerations of the panel of judges in the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 56 / PUU-XVII2019 to become a candidate for regional head with the conditions after undergoing a waiting period of 5 years since being released and openly and honestly telling the public that the person concerned ex-convict. On that basis, the Constitutional Court gives the right to ex-convicts to run for regional head. 2) The right of former prisoners to run for regional head elections in the Constitutional Court decision has restored the rights of former prisoners, namely the right to participate in politics and equal rights before the law.

scholarly journals Comparasion Of Insult Regulation Towards President/Vice President In The Decree of The Constitutional Court

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-38
Author(s):  
Robinsius Asido Putra Nainggolan
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Government

The reform of criminal law in Indonesia, which has become one of the discourses, is the Article regarding insults to the President and Vice President in the 2019 RUUKUHP. The government re-included several articles of insulting the president in the Draft Criminal Code formulation, which the Constitutional Court deleted through Decision Number: 013.022/PUU IV/2006. So the problem in this research is how the policy formulation of offense against the President and Vice President is following the formulation of the RUUKUHP and how the comparison of articles on insulting the President and Vice President in the formulation of the Draft Criminal Code with the Constitutional Court Judge Decision No: 013.022/PUU IV/2006. The research method used is juridical normative based on secondary data through library research data collection and data analysis. The discussion results show that the policy for the formulation of offense against the President/Vice President following the formulation of the RUUKUHP is an effort to provide legal protection to the President/Vice President as a symbol in state life. Comparing articles regarding insults to the President and Vice President in the formulation of the RUUKUHP with the Constitutional Court Decision No: 013.022/PUUIV/2006 have both similarities and differences.

scholarly journals Legal Certainty for the Provision of Employee Services as the Intent of Protection of Labor Rights based on Labor Rights and Its Implementation in PT. Semen Padang

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 568
Author(s):  
Robie Brilliando Sukanda ◽  
Khairani Khairani ◽  
Yussy Adelina Mannas
Keyword(s):  
Service Providers ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Exploratory Research ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Business Policy ◽  
Applicable Law

Outsourcing was born as a side effect of the implementation of business process reengineering (BPR). Another problem that arises from outsourcing practices is the elimination of labor rights by employers. Based on the Constitutional Court Decision (MK Decision No. 27 / PUU-IX / 2011), the Court emphasized that Outsourcing is a reasonable business policy of a company in the context of business efficiency. However, workers who carry out work in an outsourcing company may not lose their rights which are protected by the constitution. Following up on the Constitutional Court Decision, the Ministry of Manpower and Transmigration has issued Circular Letter Number B.31 / PHIJSK / I / 2012 concerning Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 27 / PUU-IX / 2011 dated January 17, 2012. Based on this, there are 3 (three ) The legal issues that the author will examine are: (1) How is the suitability of the implementation of the provision of worker services at PT. Semen Padang with the applicable law; (2) How to fulfill workers' rights in the implementation of Worker Service Provision at PT. Semen Padang; and (3) What are the negative and positive consequences of the implementation of the Provision of Worker Services on workers' rights at PT. Semen Padang. This exploratory research reveals how the application of legal norms from Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration Number 19 of 2012 concerning Requirements for Submission of Part of Work Implementation to other companies at PT. Semen Padang. From the results of the study concluded that: (1) Implementation of the provision of employee services at PT. Semen Padang has not complied with the applicable law. On the one hand, PT. Semen Padang has implemented the provisions of Article 66 paragraph (3) of the Manpower Act. PT. Semen Padang has set one of the most basic requirements, namely the vendor must have an Operational Permit (SIO) for Manpower Providers issued by the Department of Manpower (Disnaker) of West Sumatra Province. PT Semen Padang has also complied with the provisions of Article 17 Paragraph (3) of the Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration No. 19 of 2012. On the other hand, PT. Semen Padang still uses worker service providers for jobs that are not regulated in Article 17 of the 2012 Minister of Manpower Regulation or even doing work that should be done by employees of PT Semen Padang itself; (2) The fulfillment of the rights of outsourcing workers at PT Semen Padang has been carried out quite well, where this can be proven by PT Semen Padang providing legal protection to Outsourcing Workers through the Decree of the Board of Directors of PT.Semen Padang No. 0000143 / HK.00.02 / SKD / 50003853/3000 / 12.2017 dated 21 December 2017 concerning Changes in the Value Structure of PT Semen Padang's Outsourcing Labor Contract, and (3) Implementation of Provision of Worker Services at PT. Semen Padang has negative consequences and positive consequences. The negative consequence is the high level of jealousy of the outsourcing workers towards organic workers, both in terms of the type of work performed, the uniforms worn, and differences in workers' rights. One of the positive consequences of employing outsourcing workers, labor costs can be reduced in one way through the provision of worker services.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGATURAN IDEAL PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA PIDANA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 34/PUU-XI/2013

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agung Barok Pratama ◽  
Aminah . ◽  
Mohammad Jamin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Ideal

<p>Abstract<br />This article  discusses the ideal setting reconsideration after the Constitutional Court decision No. 34/PUU-XII/2013. This research is legal (judicial) normative, namely by reviewing library materials (literature study). Therefore, the data used in this research is secondary data, which includes the primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. The results of this study showed that realizing an ideal regulatory application for review should be conducted, first, the MA should retract SEMA 7 2014 it is necessary to avoid confusion law enforcement officials and people seeking justice so as to interfere with the judicial system. If want to make additional rules to facilitate the course of justice, the MA should be poured in the form of PERMA. Second, by accelerating the process of PK and execution. Thirdly, provision PK in the future submission must be adapted to the Constitutional Court decision No. 34/PUU-X/2013. That way the material truth and justice will actually be realized.</p><p>Keywords: Judicial Review; Justice; Rule of Law; Supreme Court Decisions.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini meneliti tentang pengaturan ideal peninjauan kembali pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 34/PUU-XII/2013.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum (yuridis) normatif, yaitu dengan mengkaji bahan-bahan pustaka (studi kepustakaan). Karena itu, data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data skunder, yang mencakup bahan hukum primer, skunder, dan tersier. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa, demi menwujudkan suatu peraturan yang ideal permohonan peninjauan kembali maka perlu dilakukan, pertama, MA harus menarik kembali SEMA No.7 Tahun 2014 hal ini ini diperlukan agar tidak terjadi kebingungan aparat penegak hukum dan masyarakat pencari keadilan sehingga dapat mengganggu sistem peradilan. Kedua, dengan mempercepat proses PK dan eksekusinya. Ketiga, ketentuan pengajuan PK kedepanya harus disesuaikan dengan putusan MK No. 34/PUU-XI/2013. Dengan begitu keadilan dan kebenaran materiil akan benar-benar dapat diwujudkan.<br />Kata kunci: Peninjauan Kembali, Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum, Putusan Mahkamah Agung</p>

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE PARTIES IN CREDIT AGREEMENT WITH FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE AFTER THE ISSUENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-77
Author(s):  
Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti
Keyword(s):  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Credit Agreement ◽  
Wheeled Vehicles ◽  
Legal Consequences

Fiduciary Guarantee Law is one of the material guarantees specifically regulated in Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guarantees that realizes the public's need for legal certainty but guaranteed objects still have economic value.  Article 15 of Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees is felt burdensome to debtors, because creditors make forced efforts to take fiduciary guarantee objects in the form of 2-wheeled and 4-wheeled vehicles. The purpose of this study is (1) Finding and analyzing the basis of the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (2) Finding and explaining the legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on legal protection for parties to credit agreements with fiduciary guarantees (3) Finding and explaining constraints on Financial Service Institutions (LJK) in the implementation of constitutional court decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.  The research method used is juridical normative and empirical with a case study approach so that achievements are more comprehensive related to the principle of legal protection for parties in fiduciary guarantees. The result obtained that since the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, the executive confiscation cannot be done directly by creditors must go through a court decision. The executorial confiscation in Article 15 of Law Number 42 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee has been contrary to Article 1 (3), Article 27 (1), Article 28D (1), Article 28G (1) and Article 28H (4) of the Constitution of 1945. It takes good faith from the parties so that the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 guarantees justice, legal certainty and provides legal protection. An agreement is required in accordance with the principle of freedom of proportionate contract, there is a balance of position between the debtor and the creditor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document