scholarly journals Anak Luar Nikah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Berkaitan Dengan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Keperdataan Anak Di Luar Perkawinan

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhan Asyhadi
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010, yang merubah/menambah norma hukum Pasal 43 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan adalah salah satu bukti nyata akan peran lembaga Pengadilan dalam memikirkan nasib dan masa depan anak yang lahir diluar perkawinan itu terhadap laki-laki sebagai ayah biologisnya, maka dengan norma hukum baru itu, Hakim-hakim pengadilan Agama sesuai dengan kewenangannya diharapkan mampu menjabarkan hak-hak keperdataan anak luar nikah dalam putusan-putusannya, agar kedepan hak-hak keperdataan anak seperti itu terhadap laki-laki sebagai ayah biologisnya terjamin sehingga dapat menjalani kehidupannya dengan wajar sebagaimana mestinya tanpa diskriminasi. Kata Kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Perkawinan Children Married Outside After The Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number: 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 Relating To Protection Against Civil Rights Child Outside Of Marriage Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, which modified / legal norm of Article 43 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage is one of the first concrete evidence of the role of the Court in thinking about the fate and future of children born outside the marriage of a man as the biological father, then the norms of the new law, judges court religion in accordance with the authority is expected to describe the civil rights of children out of wedlock in its decisions, that future civil rights to children as against men as the biological father assured so as to live it to the fair as it should without discrimination. Keywords: The Constitutional Court, Marriage

scholarly journals The Right of a Child Outside the Legal Marriage of a Biological Father: The Analysis of Ḥifẓ Al-Nafs as Law `Illat

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Ali Abubakar ◽  
Juliana Juliana ◽  
Maisyarah Rahmi Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
The Right ◽  
Biological Fathers ◽  
Legal Marriage ◽  
Protection Of Life

This article aims to analyze the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) as the law reason (`illat) of the rights of children outside of legal marriage (ALPS) of biological fathers. Ḥifẓ al-nafs is assumed to be `illat emerging from many neglected ALPS phenomena and resulting in negative stigma and discrimination. This research is a study of Islamic law using the theory of `illat in analyzing the problem of children's rights outside of legal marriage. The research concludes that the presence of the 2010 Constitutional Court decision regarding the civil rights of ALPS with biological fathers reveals new spaces in seeing the nature of ALPS rights. This is different from the fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council and classical fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) arguments, which tend to only link the child to the mother. Based on the Constitutional Court decision, the essence of ALPS rights from biological fathers is limited to civil rights. The responsibility of the biological father to ALPS is in the form of physical and mental support, while denying other rights such as guardianship of marriage; ALPS rights today have been largely abandoned. Thus, the protection/care is necessary. `Illat (the reason of law) in ḥifẓ al-nafs (protection of the life) is real and can be juxtaposed with `illat ḥifẓ al-nasl (protection of heredity). Ḥifẓ al-nasl does not completely fulfill the real requirements of an `illat which can abolish the abandonment of ALPS.

scholarly journals THE BIOLOGICAL FATHERS HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS WITH EVIDENCE AND CONVICTION OF THEIR CHILDREN

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Anwar Hafidzi ◽  
Nadiyah Khalid ◽  
Rina Septiani
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Comparative Aspect ◽  
Biological Children ◽  
Biological Fathers ◽  
Correct Data

This paper aims to prove that Biological Children can provide Civil Relations with their fathers if they have an apparent legal force. This study differs from other researchers in the comparative aspect of normative Law and Islamic Law. This difference lies in the Constitutional Court decision results, which states that children produced outside of marriage have a civil relationship with the mother and family of their mother, father, and family of their biological father, which can be proven by DNA testing between them. Meanwhile, according to Islamic Law, children outside of marriage (Zina) only have a civil relationship or blood relationship with the mother and the mother's family. The method used in this research is a literature review with a normative approach to the Constitutional Court decision and the Scholar's opinion on children outside of marriage (Siri). This research found that children can biologically provide civil relations with their parents if done in marriage and proven by clear legalities such as witnesses and marriage documents. The presence of a decision of the Constitutional Court is a legal assurance or defense of the human rights of a citizen, whether they have the correct data and facts to their civil relations.

scholarly journals Fulfillment of civil rights of extramarital children and its effect on social dimensions

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-252
Author(s):  
Alfian Qodri Azizi ◽  
Ali Imron ◽  
Bagas Heradhyaksa
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Moral Responsibility ◽  
Social Condition ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Social Dimensions ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Library Research

This article examines the fulfillment of the civil rights of extramarital children which has become a controversy since the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision no. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, which is considered as a progressive and responsive measure to guarantee children's rights. However, the content of this decision is considered to violate Islamic norms in giving family lineage to extramarital children for it will create a stigma that one does not need a sacred marriage institution if he only wants to establish a civil or lineage relationship with his biological father; instead, it only requires evidence based on science and technology or others in court. This article answers the questions of how to interpret the concept of the civil rights of extramarital children to avoid conflicts with Islamic norms and what are the philosophical and sociological benefits of fulfilling civil rights for extramarital children. This study is qualitative in nature. It is focused more on conceptual ideas based on library research using conceptual and case approaches. It was found that (1) the civil rights of extramarital children are not a lineage right but compensation from their biological father as a form of moral responsibility; (2) philosophically, the civil rights of extramarital children are to fulfill the value of social justice which is distributive and, sociologically, these rights create a prosperous social condition for society by fulfilling the civil rights of the next generation of the nation covering their physical, mental, spiritual, and intellectual needs.

scholarly journals Primary law in medicine, its legal nature

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 01002
Author(s):  
K. Zarins
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Economic Interests ◽  
Economic Opportunities ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right

Thework will discuss the problems arising from the thesis that the economic opportunities are incompatible with the person's primary law - the right to life and equality of treatment. An actively maintained hypothesis claims that the country's economic opportunities and funding should not restrict or reduce a person's right to life and health. In this aspect, it will also study the role of the constitutional court. The author points to the fact that the adoption of such, here the Supreme Court decision, successive constitutional court for a preliminary inaccurate claim and interpretation of the country's economic interests, could deny the right of people to life only after the consideration that they are of no use and financially expensive to be maintained.

scholarly journals KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ANAK ASTRA DALAM HUKUM ADAT BALI

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Pasek Pramana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law

This research aims to analyze about the significance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU-VIII/2010 the position of anak astra in Bali customary law. The research method used is a normative study by selecting the type of statue approach and the conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials that were examined in this study consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and techniques were analyzed with the description, systematic, evaluation and argumentation. Based on the perspective ( review ) Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak astra have a civil relationship with her biological father and his family along can be proved by science and technology and / or other evidence according to the law. The juridical consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 to the norms of Bali customary law about anak astra Bali is must conform to the directions of law in the Decision of the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals Keadilan Bagi Anak Luar Kawin dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Ahmad Farahi ◽  
Ramadhita Ramadhita
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Medical Evidence ◽  
The West ◽  
Personal Law

This article intents to examine the civil rights of children outside of married arising from Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 review by justice aspects. This article is normative juridical research with a qualitative approach to the primary legal materials, namely Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the constitutional Court Decision No.46 / PUU-VIII / 2010. While the secondary legal materials such as books, journals, research related to children outside of married. Before the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 was issued, children outside of marriage do not get the personal law rights, both the principles of Islamic justice and the West, as well as human rights perspective. After the emergence of Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, children outside married have the same status as a legitimate child, with the requirement to have medical evidence.<br />Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji hak-hak keperdataan anak luar kawin yang muncul akibat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ditinjau dari aspek keadilan. Artikel ini merupkan hasil penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan bahan hukum primer yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku, jurnal, penelitian terkait anak luar kawin. Sebelum putusan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 dikeluarkan, anak luar kawin tidak mendapatkan hak-hak keperdataannya secara adil. Baik menurut prinsip keadilan Islam, Barat, maupun perspektif HAM. Pasca munculnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak luar kawin memiliki kedudukan yang sama dengan anak sah, dengan syarat memiliki bukti medis.

scholarly journals Legitimacy on Inter-Faith Marriages: An Analysis of the Role of Religious Councils on the Legal Policy in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosdiana Rosdiana ◽  
Ummu Hanah Yusuf Saumin ◽  
Masayu Mashita Maisarah
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Religious Leaders ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Religious Traditions ◽  
Legal Policies ◽  
Observable Fact

The legal vacuum for of inter-faith marriage is one of the unresolved issues in Indonesia, especially with regard to civil rights. Indonesia’s Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 has not accommodated the legal policy of marriage between different religions. Moreover, there are some different views between religious leaders on the permissibility of the inter-faith marriage. This study attempts to analyse the relations between Indonesia’s Religious Councils and the legal policies on inter-faith marriages. Data was collected through observation and semi-structured interviews with the representatives of Indonesia’s religious councils from six religions. It finds that Indonesia’s Religious Councils have no role by any means in the formation of legal policies related to inter-faith marriage in Indonesia since the Marriage Law had been created before the Religious Councils established. Regarding the legitimacy of inter-faith marriage, the religious leaders offered conflicting statements. Several religious leaders still decided to stay with the prohibition of interfaith marriage based on the popular religious traditions and the constitutional realm. Albeit religious leaders favour or disfavour inter-faith marriage, the practice is still widely flourished and rapidly increased. This observable fact should be an important reason for the Constitutional Court either to grant or deny the practices of inter-faith marriage in Indonesia. Terkait hak-hak sipil, terdapat kekosongan  landasan hukum dalam kasus perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia. Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia No. 1 Tahun 1974 tidak mengakomodasi kebijakan hukum perkawinan beda agama. Selain itu, ada perbedaan pandangan antara para pemimpin agama tentang diizinkannya pasangan dari agama yang berbeda, misalnya dalam hal peninjauan materi Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU Perkawinan. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menganalisis hubungan antara Dewan Agama Indonesia dan kebijakan hukum tentang pernikahan antar agama. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah observasi dan wawancara semi-terstruktur dengan perwakilan dari Dewan Agama Indonesia dari lima agama yang diakui di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Dewan Agama Indonesia tidak memiliki peran apa pun dalam penentuan kebijakan hukum pernikahan beda agama. Hal ini  karena UU Perkawinan telah dibuat sebelum adanya Dewan Agama. Dalam topik legitimasi  pernikahan lintas agama, para pemimpin agama menyatakan pernyataan yang bertentangan. Sejumlah pemimpin agama masih memutuskan melarang  pernikahan antar agama berdasarkan tradisi keagamaan populer dan ranah konstitusional sedangkan bebera  lainnya memberikan sebaliknya. Meskipun belum ada kesepakatan  para pemimpin agama tentang  pernikahan antaragama, praktik ini masih terjadi bahkan meningkat pesat. Fakta ini harus menjadi alasan penting bagi Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk memberikan atau menolak praktik pernikahan antaragama di Indonesia. 

scholarly journals Civil Relationship of Children Born without Marriage with Biological Father based on Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Cok Gede Mega Putra
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Relationship Of

The purpose of this study is to analyze the civil relationship between the children born without marriage with his biological father and the arrangement about the civil relationship between the children whose mothers did not have marriage. This study is a normative juridical which is the approach used in this is is the statute approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach. The legal material comes from document studies. This study is analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study showed that the children born outside marriage initially have only a civil relationship with their mother and mother's family according to Article 43 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage on what is meant by a child outside of marriage but with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/ 2010, then a child born outside marriage can have a civil relationship with father and his father's family. The father and mother have rights and obligations to the born, even if the child is born outside of marriage. In this study, it can be concluded that children born without marriage have civil relations with their biological father as stipulated in Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010. The arrangement of civic relationships between children whose mothers are not married as in Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, but by Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the child has a civil relationship with his mother and father.

The Status of Outside Marriage Children (The Study of Constitutional Court Regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 Based on the Fuqaha' Perspective)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-584
Author(s):  
Hamam Hamam
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right

Fornication is a kind of jarimah (felony) resulting in confusion of the biological father. However, nowadays, there is clarity on the status of the children out of marriage. The Constitutional Court issued a decision of regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 about the out wedlock children who have a civil relationship and the blood rapport with their biological father as long as it can be proven biologically. This regulation drives some criticisms from various parties; the pro-side of the Court Regulation will claim it in the term of the doer of the adultery, while the contra-side of the Court Regulation will review it in the term of legalized the adultery. Furthermore, the aims of this study are: First, to know the opinion of jurists' law (fuqaha‟) about the status of the out of wedlock children; Second, to find the legal implications of the out of wedlock children after the application of the Constitutional Court regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 based on the Fuqaha' perspective?. Moreover, this study uses the library research. The data are collected through the documentary of the primary and secondary data sources. The collected data are, then, analyzed qualitatively by using the content analysis. The results of this study are: Firstly, This according by the Shafi'i jurists' of four and the ad-Dzahiri the out of wedlock children (bastard) are not related to their biological father, but they are related to their biological mother and her family. Secondly, This according by some groups of Hanafi and Shaykh of Islam Ibn Taymiyah corroborated by ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyyah the wedlock children (bastard) are related to the men as their biological father and their father's family. Thirdly, the Constitutional Court (MK) regulations do not have any legal implications associated on the civil relationships of the out wedlock children (natural children) with their biological father. Moreover, the attitude of the biological father is classified as a jarimah (felony), and it is entitled to a penalty of the ta'zir; it is an obligation to provide the children, which the amount is considered to the fit and proper in accordance income of his; while the other civil rights includes the right of lineage, inheritance, and the rights of guardians. The ta'zir punishments in the provision of livelihood can be executed after the filing of a lawsuit and obtain an order from the Religion Court. The provision of the living is solely to satisfy the justice and legal protection for the interests of children's rights.

scholarly journals THE LEGAL STANDING & INHERITANCE RIGHTS FOR OUT-OF-WEDLOCK CHILD IN RELATION TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S DECISION IN TERMS OF CIVIL INHERITANCE LAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-77
Author(s):  
Arinie Sherlita Cholis
Keyword(s):  
Science And Technology ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Biological Parents ◽  
The Relationship

The problems regarding the legal standing of an out-of-wedlock child that demands inheritance rights from both biological parents. The purpose of this thesis are to find out about the legal standing regarding the relationship between out-of-wedlock children and how the inheritance rights of an out-of-wedlock child in the distribution of inheritance by both biological parents are related to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in terms of civil inheritance law. The type of research used in this journal is Normative Juridical. The problem approaches used in writing this paper are the Statutory Approach and the Conceptual Approach. The legal material used is primary legal material and secondary legal material. This research of the problem after the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 can be concluded that the out-of-wedlock child has not only a civil relationship with his mother but also with his biological father if he/she can prove it with science and technology and in inheritance issues, the child out of wedlock in terms of civil law must be recognized by his biological father so that he/she can become an heir, but with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the out-of-wedlock child can get not only a share of the inheritance from his mother who is without recognition but also inheritance from his/her biological father if it is proven to have a civil relationship as evidenced by science and technology

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document