scholarly journals KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ANAK ASTRA DALAM HUKUM ADAT BALI

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gede Pasek Pramana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law

This research aims to analyze about the significance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU-VIII/2010 the position of anak astra in Bali customary law. The research method used is a normative study by selecting the type of statue approach and the conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials that were examined in this study consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and techniques were analyzed with the description, systematic, evaluation and argumentation. Based on the perspective ( review ) Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, anak astra have a civil relationship with her biological father and his family along can be proved by science and technology and / or other evidence according to the law. The juridical consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 to the norms of Bali customary law about anak astra Bali is must conform to the directions of law in the Decision of the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals THE LEGAL STANDING & INHERITANCE RIGHTS FOR OUT-OF-WEDLOCK CHILD IN RELATION TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S DECISION IN TERMS OF CIVIL INHERITANCE LAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-77
Author(s):  
Arinie Sherlita Cholis
Keyword(s):  
Science And Technology ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Biological Parents ◽  
The Relationship

The problems regarding the legal standing of an out-of-wedlock child that demands inheritance rights from both biological parents. The purpose of this thesis are to find out about the legal standing regarding the relationship between out-of-wedlock children and how the inheritance rights of an out-of-wedlock child in the distribution of inheritance by both biological parents are related to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in terms of civil inheritance law. The type of research used in this journal is Normative Juridical. The problem approaches used in writing this paper are the Statutory Approach and the Conceptual Approach. The legal material used is primary legal material and secondary legal material. This research of the problem after the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 can be concluded that the out-of-wedlock child has not only a civil relationship with his mother but also with his biological father if he/she can prove it with science and technology and in inheritance issues, the child out of wedlock in terms of civil law must be recognized by his biological father so that he/she can become an heir, but with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the out-of-wedlock child can get not only a share of the inheritance from his mother who is without recognition but also inheritance from his/her biological father if it is proven to have a civil relationship as evidenced by science and technology

scholarly journals An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Xavier Nugraha ◽  
Kusuma Wardani Raharjo ◽  
Ahmad Ardhiansyah ◽  
Alip Pamungkas Raharjo
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Guardian

The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution and the guardian of human rights has the duty to ensure that the Law does not contradict the constitution and does not violate human rights. One of the manifestations of this can be seen in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013, where the Constitutional Court removed the element "Some other deeds or unpleasant treatment/act" in Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. With the removal of the core elements of Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, raises questions related to the existence of the offense whether it still exists or not. Based on this, this study will examine 1) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code Before the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 and 2.) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013. This research is a normative legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Based on this research, it was found that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 that offenses of unpleasant acts had been reconstructed into forced offenses.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP AKAD YANG MEMUAT KLAUSUL PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH MELALUI PENGADILAN NEGERI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 93/PUU-X/2012

SASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 286
Author(s):  
Rahman Hasima
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Research Method ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

This research aims to determine the legal implications of the agreement on which the sharia banking dispute resolution clause was submitted through the state court's post-decision of the Constitutional Court No. 93/PUU-X/2012. The research method used normative research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach and analyzed descriptive qualitative. The results of the study show that the contract that contains the clause for the settlement of Islamic banking disputes through the District Court after the Constitutional Court decision has the implication of being null and void because it contradicts the contract or causa that is lawful, so that the parties make an addendum so that no future disputes occur.

scholarly journals STATUS HUKUM ANAK LUAR KAWIN PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Martinelli
Keyword(s):  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Civil Status ◽  
The Law

Decision of Constitutional Court gives the child outside the civil status married to the biological father, the purpose of which provide legal protection to children outside of mating, so that the child’s rights as a whole can be obtained. The legal relationship between the child outside of mating with her biological father must be proven with science and technology and/or other evidence according to the law have blood relations.

scholarly journals Civil Relationship of Children Born without Marriage with Biological Father based on Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Cok Gede Mega Putra
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Relationship Of

The purpose of this study is to analyze the civil relationship between the children born without marriage with his biological father and the arrangement about the civil relationship between the children whose mothers did not have marriage. This study is a normative juridical which is the approach used in this is is the statute approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach. The legal material comes from document studies. This study is analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study showed that the children born outside marriage initially have only a civil relationship with their mother and mother's family according to Article 43 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage on what is meant by a child outside of marriage but with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/ 2010, then a child born outside marriage can have a civil relationship with father and his father's family. The father and mother have rights and obligations to the born, even if the child is born outside of marriage. In this study, it can be concluded that children born without marriage have civil relations with their biological father as stipulated in Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010. The arrangement of civic relationships between children whose mothers are not married as in Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, but by Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the child has a civil relationship with his mother and father.

scholarly journals UPAYA PENGADILAN DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ANAK LUAR NIKAH BERDASARKAN SILA KE-5 PANCASILA

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Dzanurusyamsyi Dzanurusyamsyi
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Illegitimate Child ◽  
The Law

In accordance with the Marriage Law Article 43 paragraph (1) and Article 100 Compilation of Islamic Law, that child out of wedlock obtain a civil relationship with her mother and her mother’s family. The provisions of article 43 paragraph (1) that the Court’s decision the Constitution of No. 046/PUU-VIII/2010 amended with the new norm, that “children born out of wedlock have links civil with her mother and her mother’s family as well as with men as a father to proven by science and technology and/ or other evidence under the law have blood relations, including civil relations with his father’s family’’ provisions of the new norm is still debatable and the pros and cons in the community that have not been finalized. Therefore, it is necessary to do research on: How Construction illegitimate child protection today; factors that affect the construction of the legal protection of a child out of wedlock is not justice at this time. This study used a qualitative approach with sosiolegal research. Factors that affect the protection of children out of wedlock is not justice due to several factors: -First; Factors Differing perceptions Ulama’ and Judges of children out of wedlock and protection against him; Factors Court decision is very diverse/ varied against illegitimate child protection issues; Factors diversity of perceptions on Registration of Population Administration in Indonesia. Then the provisions of the Marriage Law Article 43 paragraph (1)which has judicial review by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 046/PUU-VIII/2010 and Article 100 of the Compilation of Islamic Law must be reconstructed with the editor of a new article as follows: “a child born out of wedlock has relations civil with her mother and her mother’s family as well as with men as a father who can be proved by science and technology and/ or other evidence under the law have blood relation to the determination/ instruction judge and the Court’s decision, the Muslim Religious Court andbesides Islam in the District Court, including a civil relationship with his family “and there should be an affirmation form of additional chapters in the Marriage Law Article 43 with the editorial article as follows; “If it turns out according to a court ruling that the children who sought their origin was proven seedlings men and women and was born in/ from the marriage valid, then the child becomes legitimate child and have a relationship of civil full and relationships biological children with both parents and get inheritance rights.

scholarly journals Analisis Tentang Wewenang Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Sebagai Penegak Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-212
Author(s):  
Yunan Andika Putra ◽  
Lauddin Marsuni ◽  
Abd Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Research Initiatives

Penelitian betujuan mengetahui penegakan hukum persaingan usaha yang dilakukan oleh KPPU di Indonesia. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa : (1) Kewenangan Penyelidikan yang dimiliki oleh KPPU adalah atribusi melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dan telah dikuatkan melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85/PUU-XIV/2016, yang dalam pelaksanaanya, Komisi memberikan mandat Penyelidikan kepada Investigator Pemeriksaan untuk mendapatkan alat bukti yang cukup, tetapi hambatannya KPPU tidak mempunyai upaya paksa seperti penggeledahan dan penyitaan untuk mendapatkan dokumen/surat yang dapat menjadi alat bukti; (2) Hukum persaingan usaha dapat berjalan dikarenakan telah memuat norma primer yang bersifat larangan dan norma sekunder tentang tata cara penanganan perkara yang dilakukan melalui empat tahapan, yaitu pertama, klarifikasi terhadap laporan atau penelitian inisiatif, kedua, penyelidikan untuk mendapatkan alat bukti yang cukup, ketiga, pemeriksaan Majelis Komisi untuk membuktikan dugaan pelanggaran, dan keempat, penjatuhan Putusan Komisi. The research aims to find out the enforcement of business competition law conducted by KPPU in Indonesia. The research method uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that: (1) The Investigative Authority possessed by KPPU is attribution through Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and has been strengthened through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85 / PUU-XIV / 2016, which in its implementation, the Commission mandates Investigation to Investigate Investigators to obtain sufficient evidence, but the obstacle is that KPPU does not have compelled efforts such as searches and confiscation to obtain documents / letters that can serve as evidence; (2) The law of business competition can run because it contains primary norms that are prohibited and secondary norms concerning the procedures for handling cases which are carried out in four stages, namely first, clarification of reports or research initiatives, second, investigations to obtain sufficient evidence, third, examination of the Commission Council to prove the alleged violation, and fourth, the imposition of the Commission's Decision.

scholarly journals Fulfillment of the Principle of Justice in Making Birth Certificates for Children Born Outside of Legal Marriage Between Both Parents

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 259
Author(s):  
RR. Alysia Gita Purwasaputri ◽  
Sudarsono Sudarsono ◽  
Moh. Fadli
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Birth Certificates ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
The Status ◽  
Illegitimate Children

The problem in this study is related to the fulfillment of the principle of justice in making birth certificates intended for children born outside of marriage which is carried out legally between the two parents.  This article is normative juridical research with a statutory and conceptual approach.  The results of this legal research show that the principle of justice for illegitimate children can be fulfilled by adjusting the provisions regarding the making and issuance of birth certificates for illegitimate children based on the provisions on the status of illegitimate children in the Indonesia Constitutional Court Decision Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Its cause in contrast to the provisions of the Indonesia Marriage Law regarding the distributive status of children outside of marriage, justice for children in the provisions of the status of children outside of marriage in the Indonesia Constitutional Court Decision Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 is more commutative. Furthermore, the provisions regarding the status of children out of wedlock in the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 are teleologically more able to provide benefits and fulfill the purpose of establishing the rule of law and in line with the principle of child protection, namely the best interests of the child. The decision of the Indonesia Constitutional Court Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 can be implemented by creating a civil relationship between the child out of wedlock and the biological father and the family of the father. In addition, the Indonesia Constitutional Court Decision Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 also has an impact on the administrative field, namely by being able to issue birth certificates for children out of wedlock by including the name of the biological father, so that it is not limited to only including the name of the biological mother.

scholarly journals MAKNA GARIS MIRING (/) PADA FRASA “UU/PERPPU”

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-104
Author(s):  
Samriananda Septiyani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

AbstractArticle 22 paragraph (1) Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 gives the President attributive authority to determine PERPPU in compelling emergencies. The position of PERPPU is regulated in Article 7 paragraph (1) letter c of Law No. 12 of 2011 with the formulation of the phrase "UU/Perppu." The use of the slash (/) raises several interpretations, so in this study, there are two problem formulations, namely the meaning of the slash (/) and the legal implications of the use of the slash (/). This legal research is a normative study using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a historical approach. Sources of standard materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary, which are collected by the method of inventory and categorization and using the method of literature study. The analysis technique used in this research is the normative analysis technique, with legal interpretation to obtain answers and prescriptions related to the legal issues raised in this study. The results of this legal research are related to the meaning of the slash line in the phrase "UU/Perppu" in Article 7 paragraph (1) of Law No. 12 of 2011 is defined by a punctuation mark that states the alternative nature in a sentence. Judging from the hierarchy of statutory regulations, it is can detect that UU/Perppu has an equal or equal position, so it is considered similar because the contents, functions, and content of the range are the same. Second, the legal implications that arise, by equalizing the position of the contents, processes, and content of the Perppu content with the Law, all provisions regulated in the Law should also be controlling by Perppu, including the regulation of criminal conditions. Apart from that, concerning the Perppu examination, the Constitutional Court decision No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 stated that the Constitutional Court had the authority to review Perppu.Keywords: government regulation instead of law (Perppu); legal implications; slash lineAbstrakPasal 22 ayat (1) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 memasrahkan kewenangan atributif pada Presiden untuk memutuskan Perppu dalam hal ikhwal kegentingan yang mendesak. Kedudukan Perppu diatur dalam Pasal 7 ayat (1) huruf c UU No. 12-2011dengan rumusan frasa “UU/Perppu”. Penggunaan tanda baca garis miring (/) tersebut menimbulkan beberapa penafsiran, maka pada penelitian ini ada dua rumusan masalah yakni makna garis miring (/) dan implikasi hukum yang ditimbulkan terhadap penggunaan garis miring (/) tersebut. Penelitian hukum ini ialah penelitian normatif dengan memakai pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, serta historis. Sumber hukum yang dipakai yakni primer, sekunder serta tersier yang dikumpulkan dengan metode inventarisasi dan kategorisasi serta menggunakan metode studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis yang dipakai pada penelitian ini ialah teknik analisis normatif yang menggunakan metode penafsiran hukum sehingga diperoleh jawaban dan preskripsi terkait rumusan masalah yang diajukan pada penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian hukum ini, pertama terkait makna garis miring dalam frasa “UU/Perppu” pada Pasal 7 ayat (1) UU No. 12-2011diartikan bagaikan sebuah tanda baca yang menyatakan sifat alternatif dalam suatu kalimat. Dilihat dari hierarki peraturan peraturan perundang-undangan dapat diketahui jika UU/Perppu mempunyai perananan yang setara maka dianggap sejenis karena isi, fungsi serta materi muatannya adalah sama. Kedua, implikasi hukum yang ditimbulkan, dengan disamakannya kedudukan isi, fungsi, dan materi muatan Perppu dengan UU maka seluruh ketentuan yang diatur dalam UU seharusnya juga diatur dalam Perppu termasuk pengaturan ketentuan pidana. Selain itu terkait dengan pengujian Perppu, dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi K No.138/PUU-VII/2009 mengungkapkan jika Mahkamah Konstitusi berwenang untuk melaksanakan pengujian terhadap Perppu.

scholarly journals Judicial Consistency dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Penodaan Agama

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 080
Author(s):  
Zaka Firma Aditya
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Prevention Act ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
The Law ◽  
Prevention Law

Tulisan ini hendak membahas mengenai konsistensi putusan-putusan mahkamah konstitusi dalam pengujian undang-undang berdasarkan asas preseden. MK beberapa kali dipandang tidak konsisten karena kerap mengeluarkan putusan yang bersifat overrulling. Namun, sebenarnya tidak sedikit juga putusan MK yang konsisten mengikuti preseden. Meskipun penggunaan asas preseden hanya dikenal di negara yang menganut tradisi common law, MK ternyata juga menerapkannya. Putusan MK tentang pengujian UU Pencegahan Penodaan Agama adalah salah satu bentuk dianutnya asas preseden di MK. Putusan ini secara konsisten menyatakan bahwa UU Pencegahan Penodaan Agama tetap konstitusional karena akan terjadi kekosongan hukum apabila UU Pencegahan Penodaan Agama diputus inkonstitusional. Dalam perkara tersebut, MK mempertahankan ratio decidendinya terhadap konstitusionalnya UU Pencegahan Penodaan Agama karena meskipun MK sadar bahwa UU a quo banyak mengandung kelemahan. Konsistensi standing MK terhadap UU Pencegahan Penodaan Agama ini merupakan salah satu bentuk dari dipraktekannya doktrin preseden.This paper will discuss the consistency of the constitutional court decision in the judicial review cases based on the principle of precedent. MK several times deemed inconsistent because often issued a ruling that is overruling. However, there were actually a lot of MK decisions that consistently followed the precedent. Although the use of the precedent principle is only known in common law tradition, the Constitutional Court apparently also applies it. The Constitutional Court’s decision regarding the Blasphemy Prevention Act was one form of the principle of precedent in the Constitutional Court. This decision consistently states that the Blasphemy Prevention Act remains constitutional because a legal vacuum will occur if the Blasphemy Prevention Law was decided to be unconstitutional. In this case, the Court retained its ratio decidendi to the constitutionality of the Blasphemy Prevention Law, even though the Court was aware that the Law contained many weaknesses. The consistency of the Constitutional Court on the judicial review of the Blasphemy Prevention Act is one form of the practice of precedent doctrine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document