The Improvement Effect of Different Doses of Gamma Globulin on the Disease Condition of Infants with Hemolytic Disease of Newborn and Their Effects on Immune Factors in Serum

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuwen HUANG ◽  
Lin LIU ◽  
Guanglei QIAN ◽  
Wenxue LIU ◽  
Jialiang WANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Gamma Globulin ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Serum Total Bilirubin ◽  
Hemolytic Disease ◽  
Group A ◽  
Immune Factors ◽  
Group B ◽  
Different Doses

Background: To explore the effect of different doses of Gamma Globulin (GG) on the condition of children with Hemolytic Disease of Newborn (HDN) and the influence of immune factors in serum. Methods: Overall, 180 infants with hemolytic disease of newborn in the People’s Hospital of Zhangqiu Area, Jinan, China from April 2016 to August 2018 were divided into group A (88 cases) and group B (92 cases). Group A was given intravenous low-dose GG on the basis of phototherapy, and group B was given intravenous high-dose GG on the basis of phototherapy. The level of serum total bilirubin of the infants, the levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, IgA, IgG and IgM of the infants, the time of jaundice disappearance and the length of hospital stay, hemoglobin and reticulocyte levels were recorded before treatment and after treatment. The number and condition of adverse reactions were recorded. Results: After treatment, the levels of TBiL, hemoglobin and reticulocyte, the time of jaundice disappearance and hospital stay in group B were significantly lower than those in group A. The level of immune cells in group B was significantly higher than that in group A after 7 days of treatment, and the levels of IgA / IgG / IgM in group B were significantly higher than those in group A after 28 days of treatment. Conclusion: Intravenous high-dose GG has a better effect on the condition of neonatal hemolytic disease patients, and more effectively improve the immune function of children.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of nebulised 3% saline versus nebulised 0.9% saline in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1182
Author(s):  
Pragalatha Kumar A. ◽  
Indhuja Rajarathinam ◽  
Aruna Gowdra
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Clinical Severity Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Acute bronchiolitis is the most common respiratory tract infection in young children. Despite the high prevalence of acute bronchiolitis, no consensus exists on the management. Studies have shown that except oxygen therapy, no other treatment found to be effective. Hence, the present study was conducted to find out the efficacy of nebulised 3% saline versus is 0.9% saline for the treatment of acute bronchiolitis.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study of 150 children between the age group of 2 months to 24 months with signs and symptoms of Acute Bronchiolitis admitted to Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore from January 2016 to December 2016 formed the study group, they were randomized into 2 groups, one received 3% saline nebulization and the other received 0.9% saline.Results: A total of 150 children were enrolled in the study, 75 children (group A) received 0.9% saline and 75 children (group B) received 3% saline. At 24 hours, the mean clinical severity score for group A was 2.49±1.03 and group B was 2.16±0.49 (P=0.013). The duration of hospital stay was shorter (1-3 days) in 3% saline with a mean of 2.35 days and was longer (3-5 days) in 0.9% saline with mean value of 4.04 days which was statistically significant (p <0.001).Conclusions: 3% saline nebulization can be used as an effective treatment for acute bronchiolitis. It significantly reduced the clinical severity score and length of hospital stay compared to 0.9% normal saline.

scholarly journals Comparison of conventional fenestration discectomy with Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation:minimum 2-year long-term follow-up in 1100 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanyi Li ◽  
Yongchun Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Purpose To compare the efficacy of conventional interlaminar fenestration discectomy (IFD) with transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods The clinical data of 1100 patients who had been diagnosed with LDH between January 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. IFD was performed on 605 patients in Group A, whereas TELD was performed on 505 patients in Group B. The Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analogue Scale for pain and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the outcomes. The surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative off-bed activity and postoperative length of hospital stay were recorded. Results The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 60 months, with an average of 43 months. The excellent and good outcome rates were 93.5% in Group A and 92.6% in Group B. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the groups (P > 0.05). However, Group B had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter bed rest duration and postoperative length of hospital stay than Group A (P < 0.05). There were two cases of postoperative recurrence in Group A and three in Group B. Conclusions Although conventional IFD and TELD had similar levels of efficacy in treating LDH, TELD had several advantages. There was less intraoperative bleeding, shorter length of hospital stay and shorter bed rest duration. It can be considered a safe and effective surgical option for treating LDH.

scholarly journals Adrenaline and Dexamethasone, vs Adrenaline and Fluticasone, vs Adrenaline alone in Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Jayendra R. Gohil ◽  
Atul M. Sheladiya ◽  
N. B. Adithya ◽  
Ratna D. Bhojak
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background and Objectives: There is no consensus over which drug best reduces symptoms in Bronchiolitis syndrome. The primary objective of our study is to establish comparative effect of adrenaline nebulisation alone and combination of adrenaline nebulisation plus injectable dexamethasone and adrenaline nebulisation plus fluticasone nebulisation in the treatment of clinical cases of bronchiolitis. Methods: 100 patients diagnosed clinically as bronchiolitis were enrolled in study from 1 month to 24 months of age. Patients were enrolled by purposive sampling. Patients with respiratory distress assessment instrument score [RDAI] of 4 to 15 were chosen, randomized into three groups and treatment given till patient fullfilled discharge criteria. Group A (n=33) were given nebulised adrenaline alone, Group B (n=34) were given nebulised adrenaline plus injectable dexamethasone and Group C (n=33) were given nebulised adrenaline plus nebulised fluticasone. Results: The mean reduction in clinical severity-RDAI score was 1.75 ±0.86 in Group A, 2.30 ± 0.68 in Group B and 1.42 ± 0.9 in Group C when measured in terms of difference in clinical scores between day 1 and 2 (p=0.0003). Mean duration of hospital stay in the group A was (4.93±1.95 days), Group C (4.78±1.83) and Group B (3.91 ±1.37 days). The difference of stay between the Groups A and B was 1.02±0.58 days vs 0.87± 0.46 days in groups B and C (p-0.0048). Reduction in the length of hospital stay in group B was 22% compared to Group A & 19% compared to Group C (p-0.0048). Side effects were tachycardia in six patients. Conclusion: Combination of adrenaline nebulization and injectable dexamethasone was found significantly better as compared to nebulised adrenaline plus nebulised fluticasone and nebulised adrenaline alone in patients of clinical bronchiolitis in reducing severity of clinical symptoms and duration of hospitalization.

Alvimopan as an essential component of ERAS protocol to decrease length of hospital stay.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 517-517
Author(s):  
Peter Hanna ◽  
Arveen Kalapara ◽  
Subodh Regmi ◽  
Kalyana Srujana ◽  
Joseph Zabell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Eras Protocol

517 Background: Radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer is the gold standard. However, it is frequently associated with a prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). We study the effect of ERAS protocol implementations and Alvimopan use in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and its impact on length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: Retrospective cohort study involving consecutive patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer at our institution from 2010 through 2018. We evaluated Alvimopan use plus an ERAS protocol post radical cystectomy versus patients who underwent ERAS protocol alone versus those who were managed prior to ERAS protocol implementation. Primary outcome of interest was LOS, controlling for age, sex, smoking status and Charleson comorbidities index. Results: 146 patients (49.32 %) received standard care (non-ERAS) (group A), 102 patients (34.45 %) underwent ERAS protocol alone (group B) and 47 patients (15.87 %) underwent ERAS protocol plus Alvimopan (group C). There was no significant difference in length of stay between group A and group B (p=0.856). However, group C experienced a shorter LOS (16.6%) compared to group A (p=0.015). Similarly, group B was not significantly associated with the days to bowel movements compared to group A (p=0.112), however, group C demonstrated a significantly shorter time (16.3%) to bowel movements compared to group A (p=0.015). On other hand, group c wasn’t significantly associated with time tolerance to regular diet (p=0.068). Limitations include retrospective nature of some of the data, non-randomized approach and confounders such as a mix of robot and open approaches to cystectomy. Conclusions: Of all ERAS protocol components, Alvimopan appeared to be the most significant contributor in accelerating GI recovery and decrease LOS in our cohort.

Comparison of 3% saline and 0.9% normal saline nebulization as diluent in children with bronchiolitis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Shobha Sapkota ◽  
Ammara Kaleem ◽  
Suffura Huma ◽  
Muhammad Aleem Ud-Din ◽  
Shabbir Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Chloride ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
Key Words 3 ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Objective: To compare the outcome in terms of mean time to disappearance of cough, wheezing, crackles and length of hospital stay in patients treated with sodium chloride 3% with sodium chloride 0.9% as nebulisation diluent in children for suffering from bronchiolitis. Methods: The prospective study was conducted at the Department of Paediatric Medicine Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from November 2014 to April 2015, and comprised children aged between 6 weeks and 24 months having bronchiolitis. Group A received 3% sodium chloride and Group B received 0.9% of the same solution. Duration of cough, wheezing, crackles and duration of stay at hospital were compared between the groups. Data was analysed using SPSS 17. Results: Of the 100 patients, there were 50(50%) in Group A with a mean age of 7.17±4.46, and as many in Group B with a mean age of 6.6±3.74. Overall, there were 55(55%) boys and 45(45%) girls. Mean cough and wheezing remission time as well as length of hospital stay was significantly different between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: In children having bronchiolitis, 3% saline as nebuliser solution was found to be more effective than 0.9% saline solution. Key Words: 3% saline solution, Bronchiolitis, Wheezing, Crepitations, Hospital stay.

Routine Ultrasound Control after Successful Intussusception Reduction in Children: Is It Really Necessary?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Delgado-Miguel ◽  
Antonella García ◽  
Bonifacio Delgado ◽  
Antonio Jesús Muñoz-Serrano ◽  
Miriam Miguel-Ferrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Oral Tolerance ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Intussusception Reduction ◽  
Group A ◽  
Laboratory Variables ◽  
Group B ◽  
Enema Reduction

Abstract Introduction Recurrence of ileocolic intussusception (ICI) has been related to residual bowel wall edema after enema reduction. Early oral tolerance has been associated with a higher risk of re-intussusception, so an imaging test (ultrasound) has traditionally been performed before restarting oral tolerance. Our aim is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of performing a routine ultrasound in patients who remain asymptomatic after successful enema reduction. Materials and Methods A retrospective observational study was performed in patients with ICI who underwent a successful enema reduction between 2005 and 2019 and distributed in two groups according to whether or not a routine ultrasound was performed before restarting oral tolerance: group A (ultrasound) or B (no ultrasound). We analyzed demographic, clinical and laboratory variables, length of hospital stay, and recurrence rate. Results We included 366 patients who presented 373 ICI episodes (165 in group A and 208 in group B), without significant differences in gender and age. Group A patients presented a higher percentage of vomiting and bloody stools than those in group B without differences in the other clinical features studied, time of evolution, or laboratory variables. Group A presented a higher length of hospital stay than group B (36 vs. 24 hours), although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.30). No statistically significant differences were observed in the recurrence rate between both groups (10.3% A vs. 10.8% B; p = 0.83). Conclusion Performing routine ultrasound before restarting oral tolerance in asymptomatic patients after successful ICI reduction does not decrease the risk of re-intussusception and should not be routinely encouraged.

scholarly journals Comparison of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty with standard approach total knee arthroplasty in terms of length of post-operative hospital stay.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (08) ◽  
pp. 1246-1250
Author(s):  
Muhammad Usman Haider ◽  
Raja Umar Liaqat ◽  
Junaid Khan ◽  
Islam Ud Din ◽  
Muhammad Imran Aftab
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Standard Approach ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Group A ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Group B

To compare the minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty with standard approach total knee arthroplasty in terms of mean length of post-operative hospital stay. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Orthopaedics, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi. Period: 06 months i.e. from 21st March 2018 to 20th September 2018. Materials and Methods: A total of one hundred (n=100) patients between age 30-80 years who were planned to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enrolled and randomly allocated to two groups. The patients in group A were operated through minimally invasive technique and in group B, were operated through standard approach. Outcome was measured in terms of mean length of hospital stay in both groups. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable in both the groups. In group A, mean length of hospital stay was 4.4±0.64 days while in group B it was 5.6±0.63 days (p=0.001). Similar trend was noted when data was stratified with respect to age, gender, anatomical side and BMI. Conclusion: Minimally invasive TKA resulted in shorter length of hospital stay following when compared with standard approach TKA.

scholarly journals EPIDURAL ANAESTHESIA;

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 894-904
Author(s):  
CHOUDRY AMJAD ALI ◽  
RAHEEL AZHAR KHAN ◽  
AMJAD IQBAL ◽  
Tasadaq Khurshid
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Epidural Anaesthesia ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the, post op analgesia, vomiting, shivering, length of hospital stay, peri-operative haemodynamicchanges and recovery time in patient under going open cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia versus those receiving epiduralanaesthesia. Study design: Quasi experimental study. Place and duration of study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi from 15 October2007 to 15 April 2008. Methodology: American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) physical status (PS) I and II patient of either genderundergoing un-complicated open cholecystectomy were randomly divided into two groups, group A (n=30) received general anaesthesia (GA)and group B (n=29) received thoracic epidural anaesthesia (EA). Patients of both the groups were assessed for peri-operative haemodynamicchanges, recovery time, post op analgesia, vomiting and length of hospital stay. Chi-square test was applied to compare the two groups andobtain P-value. P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 9 out of 30 patients (30%) of group “A” (general anaesthesia) and4 out of 29 patients (13.79%) in group “B” (epidural anaesthesia) had vomiting. Shivering was seen in 3 out of 30 (10%) in group “A” (generalanaesthesia) and 1 out of 29 (3.44%) patient in group “B” (epidural anaesthesia). Urinary retention was seen in 1 out of 30 (3.33%) in group “A”(general anaesthesia) and 8 out of 29 (27.5%) in group “B” (epidural anaesthesia). Urinary retention was relieved by psychotherapy. None ofthe patient required catheterization. Post operative recovery from surgery was determined by gastrointestinal motility (passage of flatus andstart of oral sips). In group “A” (general anaesthesia) 6 patients (20%) started oral sips in first post operative day, 16 patients (53.33%) onsecond post operative day, 8 patients (26.66%) in third post operative day. In the group “B” (epidural anaesthesia) 13 patients (44.8%) startedoral sips on first post operative day, 15 (51.72%) on second post operative day and one patient (3.44%) on third post operative day. Regardingthe length of hospital stay 17 patient (56.66%) of group “A” (general anaesthesia) were discharge by third post operative day and 22 patient(75.77) were discharge by third post operative day in group “B” (epidural anaesthesia). Conclusions: The use of intra-operative epiduralanaesthesia combined with postoperative epidural analgesia was found to be associated with reduction in the post operative pain and vomitingin patients under going open cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals Local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma in elderly patients above 70 years old

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ashry ◽  
Hieder Al-Shami ◽  
Medhat Gamal ◽  
Ahmed M Salah
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Subdural Hematoma ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Chronic Subdural Hematoma ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) evacuation by two burr-hole craniostomies under local versus general anesthesia (GA) in elderly patients over 70 years. Methods: This retrospective study included 45 patients with CSDH aged over 70 years old treated from March 2018 to April 2020. The cases were subdivided into Group A (n = 22) that underwent evacuation under local anesthesia and Group B (n = 23) that was treated under GA. Patients’ demographics and history of comorbidities were recorded. Variables including pre- and post-operative neurological status and Markwalder’s score, complication rate, operative time, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Results: The mean and standard deviation of patients’ age of groups (A) and (B) were 74.3 ± 2.5 and 73.2 ± 1.7 years, respectively. Postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale of group (A) was statistically higher than Group B at postoperative day 1 (P = 0.01). Operative time was statistically shorter in Group A than B (P < 0.0001). The length of hospital stay was found to be longer in group (B) than (A) (P = 0.0001). The complication rate was found to be higher in group (B) than (A) (P = 0.044). Conclusion: Evacuation of CSDH under local anesthesia in elderly patients over 70 years is effective, safe, and economic with less complication rate than the traditional technique with GA.

scholarly journals Protective Effect of Enterococcus faecium SF68 and Saccharomyces boulardii in Acute Severe Diarrhea in Infants: Randomized Controlled Trial

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4 (oct 2020 - dec 2020)) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariha Ahmad Khan ◽  
Muhammad Zeeshan Khan ◽  
Abdul Mudabbir Rehan ◽  
Zoobia Irum ◽  
Fouzia Perveen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enterococcus Faecium ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Saccharomyces Boulardii ◽  
Severe Diarrhea ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives: This study was done to observe the effect of Enterococcus faecium SF68 and Saccharomyces boulardii in acute severe diarrhea in infants. Methods: It was a single blind, randomized controlled clinical trial done in Children Hospital, Lahore. The infants were selected between 6 months to 12 months of age. All the infants were suffering from acute diarrhea with severe dehydration. Total 105 infants were selected and randomly divided into three groups having 35 infants in each group. Infants in group A received standard treatment of diarrhea. Infants in group B and C received Enterococcus faecium SF68 and Saccharomyces boulardii respectively twice daily for five days along with standard treatment of diarrhea. All the infants were monitored for five days. The treatment response was observed in terms of frequency of diarrhea, duration of diarrhea, stool consistency and length of hospital stay. Results: The frequency of diarrhea, duration of diarrhea and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced in both group B and C as compared to group A. Conclusion: Enterococcus faecium SF68 and Saccharomyces boulardii helped to reduce the stool frequency, duration of diarrhea, length of hospital stay and also improved the stool consistency in acute severe diarrhea in infants. Key Words: Probiotics, Enterococcus faecium SF68, Saccharomyces boulardii, Acute severe Diarrhoea How to Cite: Ahmad F.K, Zeeshan M.K, Mudabbir A.R, Irum Z, Perveen F, Chiragh S. Protective Effect of Enterococcus Faecium Sf68 and Saccharomyces Boulardii in Acute Severe Diarrhea in Infants: Randomized Controlled Trial. Esculapio.2020;16(04):59-65.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document