scholarly journals Radiotherapy-induced depigmentation in breast cancer patients without prior history of vitiligo: A review

2016 ◽  
Vol 03 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Roshankumar A Patil ◽  
Tabassum A Wadasadawala ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Rare Occurrence ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Psychological Outcome ◽  
Koebner Phenomenon ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Supraclavicular Fossa ◽  
History Of ◽  
New Onset

Background: Vitiligo is a relatively common pigment disorder. Exacerbation or complete depigmentation within the radiation portals as a result of the Koebner phenomenon in patients with preexisting vitiligo has been reported in the literature. However, new-onset vitiligo triggered by radiation in patients without prior history of the disorder is a rare occurrence. Methods: The authors report one such occurrence in a breast cancer patient wherein the depigmentation remained localised within the radiotherapy target volume without generalisation. This young lady had received adjuvant radiotherapy to the right breast and ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa to a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions followed by 15 Gy in 6 fractions to the tumour bed. Discussion: The authors present a short review of the literature and discussion on the etiopathogenesis and therapeutic implication of the condition in cancer management. Conclusion: This rare occurrence highlights the importance of taking decision on radiotherapy on a case-to-case basis in patients known to have vitiligo as it has direct bearing on the ultimate cosmetic and psychological outcome. However, it is also equally important to be aware that radiation-induced depigmentation be a precursor of subsequent new-onset generalised vitiligo.

scholarly journals Burning Questions in the Oncofertility Counseling of Young Breast Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117822342095417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Arecco ◽  
Marta Perachino ◽  
Alessandra Damassi ◽  
Maria Maddalena Latocca ◽  
Davide Soldato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
Anticancer Treatment ◽  
Young Breast Cancer

The improved prognosis of breast cancer patients makes survivorship issues an area of crucial importance. In this regard, an increased attention is needed toward the development of potential anticancer treatment-related long-term side-effects, including gonadal failure and infertility in young women. Therefore, fertility preservation and family planning are crucial issues to be addressed in all young women of reproductive age with newly diagnosed cancer. Despite a growing availability of data on the efficacy and safety of fertility preservation options and the fact that conceiving after prior history of breast cancer has become more accepted over time, there are still several gray zones in this field so that many physicians remain uncomfortable to deal with these topics. The purpose of this review is to answer some of the most controversial questions frequently asked by patients during their oncofertility counseling, in order to provide a detailed and up-to-date overview on the evidence available in this field to physicians involved in the care of young women with breast cancer.

scholarly journals MEDALT: single-cell copy number lineage tracing enabling gene discovery

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Wang ◽  
Qihan Wang ◽  
Vakul Mohanty ◽  
Shaoheng Liang ◽  
Jinzhuang Dou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Speciation Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Lineage Tracing ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Lineage Tree ◽  
History Of ◽  
A Cell

AbstractWe present a Minimal Event Distance Aneuploidy Lineage Tree (MEDALT) algorithm that infers the evolution history of a cell population based on single-cell copy number (SCCN) profiles, and a statistical routine named lineage speciation analysis (LSA), whichty facilitates discovery of fitness-associated alterations and genes from SCCN lineage trees. MEDALT appears more accurate than phylogenetics approaches in reconstructing copy number lineage. From data from 20 triple-negative breast cancer patients, our approaches effectively prioritize genes that are essential for breast cancer cell fitness and predict patient survival, including those implicating convergent evolution.The source code of our study is available at https://github.com/KChen-lab/MEDALT.

Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients With a History of Mantle Radiation for Hodgkin Lymphoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. S46-S50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan K. Wong ◽  
Shane D. Morrison ◽  
Arash Momeni ◽  
Matthew Nykiel ◽  
Gordon K. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
History Of

scholarly journals Clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients with history of tonsillectomy

The Breast ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Metin Isik ◽  
Sercan Aksoy ◽  
Didem S. Dede ◽  
Omer Dizdar ◽  
Atilla Kara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Pathological Characteristics ◽  
History Of

scholarly journals Evaluating the Effect of Health Education Intervention on the Health Beliefs and Behaviors of First-Degree Female Relatives of Breast Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sule Olgun ◽  
Berna Dizer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Beliefs ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
And Behaviors

Abstract Background Breast cancer risk increases by 80% in the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in the same family. In particular, a woman whose sister or mother has breast cancer has a 2- to 5-fold higher risk of developing breast cancer compared with other women. For this reason, recommendations should have been made regarding breast cancer prevention and/or early detection for women with first-degree family history of breast cancer. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of health education, which was provided to first-degree female relatives of breast cancer patients, on their health beliefs and behaviors. Study Design and Methods The study sample included 50 women with a first-degree relative being treated for breast cancer in the chemotherapy and radiotherapy unit of a university hospital. A one-group pretest-posttest design was used. The pretest consisted of the health belief model scale and a questionnaire regarding the women’s sociodemographic information and breast cancer screening behaviors. After the pretest, the patients received health education regarding breast cancer risk factors and screening methods. The posttest was conducted 3 weeks after the education using the same assessment tools. Results After education, there were statistically significant increases in rates of practicing breast self-examination, having clinical breast examinations, and undergoing breast ultrasound/mammography compared with pretest results. Conclusions Health workers should possess knowledge and experience about breast cancer which will enable them to effectively undertake an educational role, especially for high-risk groups such as women with first-degree family history of breast cancer.

Abstract 16083: Risk of Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction in Women With and Without History of Breast Cancer: The Pathways Heart Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamal S Rana ◽  
Heather Greenlee ◽  
Richard Cheng ◽  
Cecile A Laurent ◽  
Hanjie Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
White Women ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Incidence of heart failure (HF), specifically with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is rising in the general population, yet is understudied. To provide a population-based estimate of HF in breast cancer (BC) survivors, we compared risk of HF in women with and without BC history in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) integrated health system. Methods: Data were extracted from KPNC electronic health records. All invasive BC cases diagnosed from 2005-2013 were identified and matched 1:5 with non-BC controls on birth year, race/ethnicity, and KPNC membership at BC diagnosis. Cox regression models assessed the hazard of HF by EF status: HFpEF (EF ≥ 45%), HF with reduced EF (HFrEF; EF < 45%), and unknown EF. Women with prior history of HF were excluded. Models were adjusted for factors known to affect BC risk or CVD and for prevalent CVD at BC diagnosis. We also examined case subgroups who received cardiotoxic chemotherapy, left-sided radiation therapy, and/or endocrine therapy, versus their controls. Results: A total of 14,804 women diagnosed with invasive BC and with no history of HF were identified and matched to 74,034 women without BC history. Women were on average 61 years at BC diagnosis and 65% white. Women with HFpEF were older and more likely to have hypertension (p<0.05). Among all cases vs. controls, there was increased risk of HFrEF (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.98) but not HFpEF or unknown EF (figure). Compared to their controls, women treated with chemotherapy were more than 3-times likely to develop HFrEF (HR: 3.26, 95% CI: 2.2, 4.8) and more than 1.5-times likely to develop HFpEF (HR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.24). Women who received left-sided radiation therapy had nearly double the risk of developing HFrEF (HR=1.85, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.84). No associations were found among women who received endocrine therapy. Conclusions: Increased surveillance is warranted for women with BC receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy for development of both HFrEF and HFpEF.

COVID-19 outcomes in patients with a history of breast cancer: A diverse multicenter Los Angeles cohort study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12544-e12544
Author(s):  
Nikhita Kathuria-Prakash ◽  
Lauren Antrim ◽  
Alexander W Sun ◽  
Irene Kang ◽  
Maria De Lourdes Garcia-Jimenez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hospitalization Rate ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Treatment History ◽  
History Of ◽  
Extent Of Disease

e12544 Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 has affected over 100 million individuals during the current pandemic. Cancer is a reported risk factor for worse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection and its clinical syndrome COVID-19. However, risk associated with specific cancer subtypes, extent of disease, and treatment history remains unclear. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and is treated with multiple modalities that may affect COVID-19 severity and outcomes, including surgery, radiation (RT), hormone therapy (HT), and chemotherapy (CT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and history of breast cancer at two academic centers in Los Angeles, CA between January – September, 2020. Demographic information, cancer diagnosis, treatment history, comorbid conditions, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 were reviewed. The primary outcome was rate of hospitalization for COVID-19. Associations were evaluated for significance by chi-square test or Student’s T test, with a = 0.05. Results: Our cohort included 61 patients with history of breast cancer. 19 (31.1%) required hospitalization and 3 (4.9%) died from COVID-19. Median age was 61 years. 44% of patients were White/Caucasian, 37.7% Hispanic/Latinx, 8% Black/African American, 5% Asian, and 5% were of another race. 87% of patients had local or regional disease and 13% had distant metastases. 53% of patients had ever received CT historically, 66% HT, and 53% RT. 25% of patients received cancer treatment (surgery, CT, or RT) within 90 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. 38% were on HT at time of COVID-19 diagnosis. Patients with prior RT were more likely to be hospitalized from COVID-19 than those with no prior RT (44% vs 14%, p = 0.02), as were patients with 2 or more comorbidities (p = 0.01). In addition, there was a trend toward lower hospitalization rates for patients on HT [24% vs. 42% (p = 0.17)] and a trend toward higher hospitalization rate for non-white ethnicity [35% vs. 25% (p = ns)]. Extent of disease, history of CT, or receipt of any cancer treatment (e.g. surgery, RT, CT) within 90 days of COVID-19 diagnosis were not associated with hospitalization rate. Conclusions: In our diverse cohort of breast cancer patients with COVID-19 a history of RT and presence of multiple comorbidities were both associated with increased risk of hospitalization, while a history of HT was not. Further investigation is needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts. These findings may inform recommendations for breast cancer patients during the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Getting It Wrong Most of The Time: Comparing Trialists’ Choice of Primary Outcome With What Patients And Health Professionals Want

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun Treweek ◽  
Viviane Miyakoda ◽  
Dylan Burke ◽  
Frances Shiely
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Breast Cancer Management ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Background: Randomised trials support improved decision-making through the data they collect. One important piece of data is the primary outcome – so called because it is what the investigators decide is the most important. Secondary outcomes provide additional information to support decision-making. We were interested in knowing how important patients and healthcare professionals consider the outcomes (especially the primary outcome) measured in a selection of published trials. Methods: The work had three stages: 1. We identified a body of late-stage trials in two clinical areas, breast cancer management and nephrology. 2. We identified the primary and secondary outcomes for these trials. 3. We randomly ordered these outcomes and presented them to patients and healthcare professionals (with experience of the clinical area), and we asked them to rank the importance of the outcomes. They were not told which outcomes trial authors considered primary and secondary. Results: In our sample of 44 trials with 46 primary outcomes, 29 patients, one patient representative and 12 healthcare professionals together ranked the primary outcome as the most important outcome 13/46 times, or 30%. Breast cancer patients and health care professionals considered the primary outcome to be the most important outcome for 8/21 primary outcomes chosen by trialists. For nephrology, the equivalent figure was 5/25. The primary outcome appeared in a respondent’s top 5 ranked outcomes 151/178 (85%) times for breast cancer and 225/259 (87%) times for nephrology even if the primary wasn’t considered the most important outcome. Conclusions: The primary outcome in a trial is the most important piece of data collected. It is used to determine how many participants are required, and it is the main piece of information used to judge whether the intervention is effective or not. Our study found that in the view of patients and healthcare professionals, teams doing trials in breast cancer management and nephrology got their choice of primary outcome wrong 70% of the time.

Suggested modifications in the management of breast cancer patients in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: a web-based survey. (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shereef Elsamany ◽  
Mohamed Elbaiomy ◽  
Ahmed Zeeneldin ◽  
Emad Tashkandi ◽  
Fayza Hassanin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Breast Cancer Management ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND Management of cancer patients in the current era of COVID-19 pandemic poses a significant challenge on health care systems. OBJECTIVE We explored the views of oncologists for the management of breast cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS A web-based questionnaire using SurveyMonkey was submitted to licensed oncologists involved in breast cancer management in Saudi Arabia, Egypt and United Arab Emirates. The survey focused on characteristics of participants, infection risk among cancer patients and possible treatment modifications related to different types of breast cancer RESULTS The survey was completed by 82 participants. For early HR positive, HER2-negative breast cancer,74.4% supported using neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in selected patients, and 58.0% preferred giving 6 over 8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy when indicated. Only 42.7% preferred CDK4/6 inhibitor with hormonal therapy as first line in all patients with metastatic HR-positive disease. 67.1% of participants supported using adjuvant trastuzumab for 6 instead of 12 months in selected patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. For metastatic HER2-positive, HR-positive breast cancer, 80.5% of participants supported the use of hormonal therapy with dual anti-HER2 blockade in selected patients. The preferred choice of 1st line treatment in metastatic triple negative patients with BRCA mutation and PDL1<1%, was PARP inhibitor according to 42.5% of the participants, and atezolizumab with nabpaclitaxel if the PDL1>1% according to 70.4% of the participants. CONCLUSIONS Several modifications in breast cancer management is supported by the survey participants. These modifications need to be discussed on local basis taking into account the local infrastructure and available resources. CLINICALTRIAL none

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document