scholarly journals Logopedia a metodologia badań nauk społecznych

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Hamerlińska‑Latecka
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
The Social ◽  
Present Text

The present text is an attempt to connect the speech therapy with the research methodology of the social science. In it an outline of the research and described strategies of quality inspections were presented and quantitative which can be taken in this area. The author made characteristics of chosen research methods as well as is emphasizing the weight of ethics of examinations in the speech therapy.

scholarly journals Post Qualitative Inquiry in an Ontology of Immanence

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. St. Pierre
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
History Of Science ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Social Science Research ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Qualitative Inquiry ◽  
Research Practices ◽  
Social Theories ◽  
History Of

Because post qualitative inquiry uses an ontology of immanence from poststructuralism as well as transcendental empiricism, it cannot be a social science research methodology with preexisting research methods and research practices a researcher can apply. In fact, it is methodology-free and so refuses the demands of “application.” Recommendations for those interested in post qualitative inquiry include putting methodology aside and, instead, reading widely across philosophy, social theories, and the history of science and social science to find concepts that reorient thinking. Post qualitative inquiry encourages concrete, practical experimentation and the creation of the not yet instead of the repetition of what is.

Research Methods and Methodologies Used in Studies on Social Accounting

2022 ◽  
pp. 32-52
Author(s):  
Maria da Conceição da Costa Tavares ◽  
Alcina Portugal Dias
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Institutional Context ◽  
Social Accounting ◽  
Subjective Reality ◽  
Accounting Research ◽  
Accounting Practice ◽  
The Social

Accounting as a social science considers an objective and subjective reality that must be seen and understood under the institutional context where it is developed. Thus, this chapter discusses the roles and effects of the paradigms in accounting research, in general, and social accounting research, in particular, aiming to know and understand the research lines that better define a theoretical scope of analysis for the social accounting practice. This research tries to better fit the answers to some questions about social accounting. The results argue for the importance of keeping a theoretical paradigm alive in order to foster multidimensional openness and true scholarship in accounting research and application. A multi-disciplinary appreciation with different perspectives will enrich the research in social accounting.

Paradygmat konstrukcjonizmu społecznego w badaniach nad starością i starzeniem się

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-65
Author(s):  
Marcin Muszyński
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Old Age ◽  
Social Constructionism ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Aging Research ◽  
Secondary Importance ◽  
The Social ◽  
The World ◽  
Methods And Techniques

Research methodology has recently been reduced to using research methods and techniques that are perceived only as ready-to-use tools. Paradigmatic issues become of secondary importance and left unsaid in research work or replaced by a multi-paradigm approach characterised by pluralist ontology and epistemology. The paradigm consists of assumptions and fundamental beliefs and represents a worldview that defines the nature of the world. It helps to justify the use of selected methods and techniques. The article aims to present the social constructionism paradigm and its application in old age and aging research.

What Methods Do Social Scientists Use to Study Disasters? An Analysis of the Social Science Extreme Events Research Network

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 1066-1094
Author(s):  
Lori Peek ◽  
Heather Champeau ◽  
Jessica Austin ◽  
Mason Mathews ◽  
Haorui Wu
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Workforce Development ◽  
Extreme Events ◽  
Social Consequences ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Professional Status ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Ethical Practices ◽  
The Social

Methods matter. They influence what we know and who we come to know about in the context of hazards and disasters. Research methods are of profound importance to the scholarly advancement of the field and, accordingly, a growing number of publications focus on research methods and ethical practices associated with the study of extreme events. Still, notable gaps exist. The National Science Foundation-funded Social Science Extreme Events Research (SSEER) network was formed, in part, to respond to the need for more specific information about the status and expertise of the social science hazards and disaster research workforce. Drawing on data from 1,013 SSEER members located across five United Nations (UN) regions, this article reports on the demographic characteristics of SSEER researchers; provides a novel inventory of methods used by social science hazards and disaster researchers; and explores how methodological approaches vary by specific researcher attributes including discipline, professional status, researcher type based on level of involvement in the field, hazard/disaster type studied, and disaster phase studied. The results have implications for training, mentoring, and workforce development initiatives geared toward ensuring that a diverse next generation of social science researchers is prepared to study the root causes and social consequences of disasters.

scholarly journals From methodology to methodography?

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 205979912097699
Author(s):  
Martyn Hammersley
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Science And Technology Studies ◽  
Practical Reasoning ◽  
Social Research ◽  
Sociological Research ◽  
Social Phenomena ◽  
Qualitative Approaches ◽  
The Social

This article examines the character of a small but detailed observational study that focused on two teams of researchers, one engaged in qualitative sociological research, the other developing statistical models. The study was presented as investigating ‘the social life of methods’, an approach seen by some as displacing conventional research methodology. The study drew on ethnomethodology, and was offered as a direct parallel with ethnographic and ethnomethodological investigations of natural scientists’ work by Science and Technology Studies scholars. In the articles deriving from this study, the authors show how even the statisticians relied on background qualitative knowledge about the social phenomena to which their data related. The articles also document routine practices employed by each set of researchers, some ‘troubles’ they encountered and how they dealt with these. Another theme addressed is whether the distinction between quantitative and qualitative approaches accurately characterised differences between these researchers at the level of practical reasoning. While this research is presented as descriptive in orientation, concerned simply with documenting social science practices, it operates against a background of at least implicit critique. I examine its character and the closely associated criticism of social research methodology and conventional social science.

scholarly journals Methodology of legal phenomenon research: concept, structure, tools

2020 ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
Vasyl Kopcha
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Legal Aspect ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Social Audit ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approaches ◽  
The Social ◽  
Research Concept ◽  
Systematic Understanding

This article is aimed at exploring the methodology of the legal phenomenon. Particular attention was paid to such aspects as clarifying the main approaches to understanding the methodology and how it relates to the research methodology; study of the scope and structure of the concept of methodology; outlining the main research methods. The author draws conclusions from the results of the study. First, the methodology for the study of legal phenomena needs to be updated based on a change in the legal paradigm associated with the understanding of law (relation to the state and its functions) and the formation of legal reality at the beginning of the 21st century both at national and international level. the legal aspect. Secondly, the current methodology of legal research continues to be in the co-ordinates of an important dilemma regarding the correlation of "purely" legal research methods and so-called "interdisciplinary" approaches. Third, the methodological tools (specific research methods) of legal science remain inexhaustible in content and, in particular, in the possible combinations of their application to achieve a cognitive result. The extension of their catalog is influenced by the development of jurisprudence and other sciences, their epistemological components, and the processes of globalization and internationalization of legal life. Concerning the optimal research methodology (as opposed to its methodology), it should be noted that in the course of legal research the algorithm of actions is as follows: 1) selection of the research coordination center; 2) literature review; 3) hypothesis formulation; 4) research design; 5) data collection; 6) data analysis; 7) interpretation of data; report. Of course, it should be borne in mind that law is not in a vacuum, it operates in a complex social context. It reflects and controls attitudes and behaviors. However, as these rules are also temporal and spatial, that is, they change with time and space, it is desirable that law can adapt and be dynamic to cope with change. Important is the social audit of law (law) in order to identify the distance between the legal ideal and social reality, as well as to find out the reasons that led them. After all, legal research is a systematic understanding of law in order to improve it and, given that law operates in society, in the process they influence one another.

Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-258
Author(s):  
Sawsan Abutabenjeh ◽  
Raed Jaradat
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Comparison Analysis ◽  
Specific Design ◽  
New Public ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Impact

Research design is a critical topic that is central to research studies in science, social science, and many other disciplines. After identifying the research topic and formulating questions, selecting the appropriate design is perhaps the most important decision a researcher makes. Currently, there is a plethora of literature presenting multiple approaches to the formulation of research design. Although the existence of multiple approaches is a powerful source in the development of a research design, new public administration (PA) researchers and students may see it as a source of confusion because there is a lack of clarity in the literature about the approaches to research design, research methods, and research methodology in the social sciences. The purpose of this research paper is to lessen the confusion over research design and offer a better understanding of these approaches. The comparison analysis obtained in this research can provide guidance for PA researchers, students and practitioners when considering the research design most appropriate for their study. To achieve the research purpose, a comparison analysis was conducted to study the differences in research design perspectives and approaches. Three dominant works related to research design, by Earl R. Babbie, Elizabethann O’Sullivan et al., and John W. Creswell, were selected as representative of the wide array of approaches in the PA literature. In identifying similarities and differences across the scholars’ approaches, the analysis includes: (a) definitions of and steps in research design, and (b) the perspectives on research methods and research methodology. The analysis showed that research design approaches are convergent and divergent and that it is necessary for PA researchers and students to be knowledgeable about the various research design approaches before selecting a specific design for their research. An example scenario was provided to show the impact of different perspectives on research design in the PA literature.

scholarly journals Professional Training of Social Work Specialists in the Secondary Professional Education System

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
B.Sh. Tleukina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Education System ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
The Social ◽  
Pedagogical Analysis ◽  
The Subject

the article considers the system of professional training of specialists in social work of secondary professional education (SPE). The subject of the study is the features of the system of professional training of social work specialists in SPE. The aim of the study is to analyze and generalize foreign and domestic experience of professional training of specialists in social work. The research methodology is based on the scientific concepts of well- known Russian scientists on designated problem. The article is analytical in nature. The research methods are socio-pedagogical analysis of existing approaches in the system of professional training of specialists in the social sphere. The result of the study is formulated provisions concerning the construction of more effective educational activities in the field of training specialists in social work in the system of secondary special education.

Triangulation in Organizational Research

2015 ◽  
pp. 93-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Tran
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Social Research ◽  
Organizational Setting ◽  
Organizational Research ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative Methods ◽  
Types Of Knowledge ◽  
The Social ◽  
Accepted Practice

The use of qualitative and quantitative methods in studying the same phenomenon has received attention among the scholars and researchers. As a result, it has become an accepted practice to use some form of triangulation in social research. In the social sciences, the use of triangulation can be traced back to Campbell and Fiskel. This was later developed by Webb and elaborated by Denzin beyond its conventional association with research methods and designs in science. The objective of science is to discover, describe, and explain the fact, whereas in the case of social science it is to observe, verify, and conclude. This chapter also covers the positivist view and the postmodernism and post-positivism paradigms of triangulation as well as the types of knowledge derived from the usage of triangulation in organizational research. This chapter concludes with how triangulation validates knowledge in human competence within an organizational setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document