scholarly journals The Legal Policy of Judicial Power: The Idea of Implementation of Small Claim Courts in Religious Courts

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam Sukadi ◽  
Erfaniah Zuhriah

Abstract: Religious Court is a judicial environment under the Supreme Court as a perpetrator of judicial power independent of organizing religious court to enforce the law and justice. The implementation of a small claim court in religious courts following simple, quick, and low-cost principles. The Small Claims Court is a simple judicial mechanism outside of the regular judicial mechanisms to resolve disputes quickly and cost lightly. The purpose of this study was to determine the meaning of the principle of fast, simple, and low cost and the legal politics of applying a simple lawsuit in a religious court. This type of research is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The technique of analyzing legal materials uses prescriptive. The study results found that the principle of simple, fast, and low cost in religious courts must meet the expectations of justice seekers who always want a speedy, fair, and low-cost trial. Applying the principle of a simple, fast, and low-cost justice has an intrinsic value of justice, inseparable from the service function. The legal politics of implementing a small claims court in a religious court is a breakthrough step, the proceedings are also fast and inexpensive, decided by a single judge, and the trial mechanism is simple So that implementation of Small Claims Court will be able to help the dispute burden in religious courts.Keywords: legal policy; small claim court, religious court.Abstrak: Peradilan Agama adalah lingkungan peradilan di bawah Mahkamah Agung sebagai pelaku kekuasaan kehakiman yang mandiri menyelenggarakan peradilan agama untuk menegakkan hukum dan keadilan. Penyelenggaraan sidang gugatan kecil di pengadilan agama menganut asas sederhana, cepat, dan murah. Small Claims Court adalah mekanisme peradilan sederhana di luar mekanisme peradilan biasa untuk menyelesaikan sengketa dengan cepat dan biaya ringan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengertian asas cepat, sederhana, dan biaya rendah serta politik hukum penerapan gugatan sederhana di pengadilan agama. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa asas sederhana, cepat, dan biaya rendah dalam peradilan agama harus memenuhi harapan para pencari keadilan yang selalu menginginkan peradilan yang cepat, adil, dan berbiaya rendah. Penerapan asas peradilan sederhana, cepat, dan berbiaya rendah memiliki nilai keadilan yang hakiki, tidak terlepas dari fungsi pelayanan. Politik hukum pelaksanaan peradilan gugatan kecil di pengadilan agama merupakan langkah terobosan, proses beracara juga cepat dan murah, diputuskan oleh hakim tunggal, dan mekanisme persidangan sederhana Sehingga pelaksanaan peradilan gugatan kecil akan dapat membantu beban sengketa di pengadilan agama.Kata Kunci: kebijakan hukum; small claim courts; pengadilan agama.

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-333
Author(s):  

Abstract Since 2001, based on the mandate of Article 49 paragraph (1) of Law no. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, BPSK (Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen/Consumer Dispute Resolution Institution) has been established based on Presidential Decree No. 90/2001 on the establishment of BPSK in several cities in Indonesia. In some countries that embrace the Anglo Saxon legal system, consumer dispute cases are resolved by an institution called The Small Claims Court (SCC) and The Small Claims Tribunal (SCT). The difference in settlement through three institutions is that BPSK is a formal institution which resolves small disputes with low-cost, but does not limit the size of the lawsuit filed by consumers. On the other hand, SCT provides clear restrictions on claims that can be filed by consumers. At the completion done by SCC, the assemblies that resolved the case come from active and retired judges, while in BPSK the assemblies come from government, businessman and consumer with different backgrounds.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Adi Nur Rohman ◽  
Sugeng Sugeng

Hukum acara formil yang berlaku di Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris relatif memakan waktu yang cukup lama. Hal ini mengakibatkan waktu serta biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi lebih besar. Mekanisme small claim court yang diatur oleh Mahkamah Agung melalui PERMA No. 2 tahun 2015 tentang tata cara penyelesaian sengketa sederhana dalam sistem peradilan umum menjadi titik terang. Konsep small claim court tersebut diharapkan dapat diaplikasikan dalam sistem peradilan agama sehingga mampu memangkas waktu yang lama dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan terobosan baru dalam sistem peradilan agama di Indonesia khususnya terkait penyelesaian sengketa waris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan sebagai alat analisis bahan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama dengan konsep small claim court dipandang mungkin untuk diimplementasikan sebagai bagian dari pembaharuan hukum acara peradilan agama. Namun demikian, hal itu perlu diiringi dengan pengklasifikasian perkara waris ke dalam perkara besar dan kecil dilihat dari nilai harta warisan yang disengketakan. Oleh karenanya, perluasan pengaturan mekanisme small claim court ke dalam sistem peradilan agama menjadi penting guna memangkas mekanisme penyelesaian perkara yang terlalu lama.The formal procedural law that applies in the Religious Courts in resolving inheritance disputes takes a relatively long time. This results in greater time and costs. The small claim court mechanism regulated by the Supreme Court through Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning the procedure for resolving simple disputes in the general justice system to become a bright spot. The concept of small claim court is expected to be applied in the religious justice system so that it can cut down the long time in resolving inheritance disputes in the Religious Courts. This study aims to offer a new breakthrough in the system of religious justice in Indonesia, especially in relation to the resolving of inheritance disputes. This research is a normative juridical research with a law and conceptual approach by using literature study as a legal material analysis tool. The results showed that the resolving of dispute of inheritance in the Religious Court with the small claim court concept was considered possible to be implemented as part of the renewal of the religious court procedural law. However, this needs to be accompanied by the classification of inheritance cases into large and small cases seen from the value of the disputed inheritance. Therefore, the expansion of the small claim court mechanism into the religious justice system is deemed necessary in order to reduce the mechanism for resolving cases that are too long.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-96
Author(s):  
Sofian Syaiful Rizal

This study aims to analyze court decisions, in divorce lawsuits that use simple, fast and low-cost judicial principles at the Pamekasan Religious Court. The problems that arise from this study are, First, what is the legal foundation of judge in resolving divorce claims in religious courts using simple, fast and low-cost judicial principles? Second, what are the legal considerations of religious courts in examining, hearing, and deciding divorce cases in religious courts? The research method uses a normative juridical approach. The results of the study show that: First, the principle of justice is simple, fast, and low cost refers to Law No. 4 of 2004 concerning Judicial Power article 4 paragraph (2), and article 5 paragraph (2). Also contained in Law No. 7 of 1989 in article 57 paragraph (3), as well as in article 58 paragraph (2). Second: The legal considerations of the extreme religious court in rejecting a divorce lawsuit in a religious court are in accordance with the legal basis of state legislation and syar'i law. Considering, based on the testimonies of the witnesses, that the dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant only happened once, so that it did not meet the criteria of article 19 letter C, namely continuous disputes and arguments so that there was no hope of living in harmony again. Keywords: Judicial Principles, Divorce Lawsuit, Judge's Decision


FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-194
Author(s):  
Anita Afriana ◽  
Hazar Kusmayanti

One of the absolute competencies of the Religious Court revolves around resolving sharia economy disputes. Quick, simple and inexpensive principles of the court must persist within Religious Court procedures, such as in sharia economy disputes relating to business disputes as regulated in Supreme Court Decree No. 14 of 2016 on Procedures in Sharia Economic Disputes. The solution in this way should be able to speed up commercial Shia dispute, but in fact, various obstacles were found. This article reviews the resolution of sharia economy disputes in Religious Court within the perspective of Small Claims Court implied through SC Decree No. 14 of 2016, along with the possible issues of Small Claims Court in Religious Court procedures. This research was conducted with a normative approach. Juridically SC Decree No. 14 of 2016 conforms with SC Decree No. 2 of 2015, now replaced with SC Decree No. 4 of 2019, permits parties to resolve certain nominal claims through a quicker dispute settlement procedure. Judges participate actively throughout the dispute resolution as Small Claims Court provides flexible interaction within formal courts. In practice, limitations such as the amount of sharia economy certified judges show that sharia economy cases are better resolved through standard procedure within the Civil Court. Other limitations, such as the insufficient electronic court (e-court) systems, limit dispute resolution capacity with further substantial limitations such as executorial clauses that are not yet regulated and can take more than 25 (twenty-five days).


JURISDICTIE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Muharrom Ainul Yaqin

This article aims to formulate the concept of small claims procedure that can be used to check the examination of civil cases in the court petition religion, as well as describe the types of cases that can be checked by using a system of small claims procedure. The concept of small claims procedure can be applied in religious courts, to examine and decide cases petition (volunteer) with consideration of the substance of the case filed is simple. Nevertheless, the judges who hear cases iniharus memeliki experience and proficiency in handling the case of the petition. For the system to be enforced in court, this concept needs to be formulated in the form of Supreme Court Regulation. An application includes a simple matter if it has the value of materials or rights that are simple, the application is simple, and it is possible to be examined in one trial. Based on these criteria, there are eight types of cases that can be checked using a system of small claims procedure are: the permit application mating, pleas guardian adhol, request dispensation mating, pleas prevention marriage, request the establishment of origin of the child, the request istbat marriage, requesting to change the identity of marriage, and request the appointment of a guardian. <br />Artikel ini bertujuan merumuskan konsep small claim procedure yang dapat digunakan untuk memeriksa pemeriksaan perkara perdata permohonan di pengadilan agama, serta mendeskripsikan jenis perkara yang dapat diperiksa dengan menggunakan sistem small claim procedure. Konsep small claim procedure dapat diterapkan di pengadilan agama, untuk memeriksa dan memutus perkara permohonan (volunter) dengan pertimbangan substansi perkara yang diajukan bersifat sederhana. Meskipun demikian, hakim yang memeriksa perkara iniharus memiliki pengalaman dan kecakapan dalam menangani perkara permohonan. Agar sistem ini dapat diberlakukan di pengadilan, konsep ini perlu dirumuskan dalam bentuk Peraturan Mahkamah Agung. Suatu permohonan termasuk perkara yang sederhana jika memiliki nilai materi atau hak yang sederhana, permohonannya sederhana, dan sangat memungkinkan untuk diperiksa dalam satu kali sidang. Berdasarkan kriteria tersebut, ada delapan jenis perkara yang dapat diperiksa menggunakan sistem small claim procedure yaitu: permohonan izin kawin, permohonan wali adhol, permohonan dispensasi kawin, permohonan pencegahan perkawinan, permohonan penetapan asal-usul anak, permohonan istbat nikah, permohonan perubahan identitas nikah, dan permohonan pengangkatan wali.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seno Adhi Wibowo ◽  
Massulthan Rafi Wijaya

Dispute settlement through the courts (litigation) is perceived as ineffective and costly. The dispute resolution process through the courts is prolonged and time-consuming due to its very formal and very technical review procedure, high costs of the case, and the likelihood of repeated trials. The number of complaints made against citizens unwilling to deal with the judiciary. The Supreme Court with its authority to address the problems of the courts (litigation), namely by ratifying the 2015 Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 concerning the procedures for the settlement of the Small Claims Court, to allow all elements of society to take a new direction of litigation, namely through Small Claims Court a simple, fast and low-cost lawsuit. With this, it hopes that the judicial process in Indonesia will be well underway in the future.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc W. Patry ◽  
Veronica Stinson ◽  
Steven M. Smith

2020 ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
PHITCHAPHORN KHAMMEE ◽  
YUWALEE UNPAPROM ◽  
UBONWAN SUBHASAEN ◽  
RAMESHPRABU RAMARAJ

Recently, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) have concerned significant attention attributable to their material preparation process, architectural and environmental compatibility, also low cost and effective photoelectric conversion efficiency. Therefore, this study aimed to use potential plant materials for DSSC. This research presents the extraction of natural pigments from yellow cotton flowers (Cochlospermum regium). In addition, the natural pigments were revealed that outstanding advantages, including a wide absorption range (visible light), easy extraction method, safe, innocuous pigments, inexpensive, complete biodegradation and ecofriendly. Methanol was used as a solvent extraction for the yellow cotton flower. The chlorophylls and carotenoid pigments extractions were estimated by a UV-visible spectrometer. The chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, and carotenoid yield were 0.719±0.061 µg/ml, 1.484±0.107 µg/ml and 7.743±0.141 µg/ml, respectively. Thus, this study results suggested that yellow cotton flowers containing reasonable amounts appealable in the DSSC production.


Buildings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Hosang Hyun ◽  
Moonseo Park ◽  
Dowan Lee ◽  
Jeonghoon Lee

Modular construction, which involves unit production in factories and on-site work, has benefits such as low cost, high quality, and short duration, resulting from the controlled factory environment utilized. An efficient tower crane lifting plan ensures successful high-rise modular project completion. For improved efficiency, the lifting plan should minimize the reaching distance of the tower crane, because this distance directly affects the tower crane capacity, which is directly related to crane operation cost. In situations where units are lifted from trailers, the trailer-to-tower crane distance can have a significant impact on the tower crane operation efficiency. However, optimization of this distance to improve efficiency has not been sufficiently considered. This research proposes a genetic algorithm optimization model that suggests optimized tower crane and trailer locations. The case study results show that through the proposed model, the project manager can reflect the optimal location selection and optimal tower crane selection options with minimal cost.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-85
Author(s):  
Alasman Mpesau

In the General Election and Regional Head Election Law, the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) has the authority supervisory to each Election stages, it is the center for law enforcement activities of the Election (Sentra Gakkumdu) to criminal acts and carrying out the judicial functions for investigating, examining, and decided on administrative disputes of General Election and Regional Head Election.  With the Bawaslu’s authority then placed as a super-body institution in the ranks of the Election Management Body, due to its essential role in building a clean and credible electoral system, it also has potential for abuse of power within it. In Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power has defined state institutions that have the authority to administrate judicial functions. These are the Supreme Court and Judicial Bodies that under its lines of general court, Religious Courts, Military Courts, Administrative Court (PTUN) and the Constitutional Court. The research method is normative juridical, that focuses on the analysis of the laws and regulations on General Election, Regional Head Elections and the Law on Judicial Power. The analytical tool is descriptive analysis, by describing the main issues, an analysis is carried out that was supported by case-approach related to the research. The study concludes that Bawaslu in carrying out judicial functions in its position as a semi-judicial institution has not a hierarchical relationship to the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK); however, what does exist is functional relationship.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document