scholarly journals PROBABILITAS MEKANISME SMALL CLAIM COURT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA / PROBABILITY OF SMALL CLAIM COURT MECHANISM IN RESOLVING INHERITANCE DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Adi Nur Rohman ◽  
Sugeng Sugeng
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Bright Spot ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Religious Courts

Hukum acara formil yang berlaku di Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris relatif memakan waktu yang cukup lama. Hal ini mengakibatkan waktu serta biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi lebih besar. Mekanisme small claim court yang diatur oleh Mahkamah Agung melalui PERMA No. 2 tahun 2015 tentang tata cara penyelesaian sengketa sederhana dalam sistem peradilan umum menjadi titik terang. Konsep small claim court tersebut diharapkan dapat diaplikasikan dalam sistem peradilan agama sehingga mampu memangkas waktu yang lama dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan terobosan baru dalam sistem peradilan agama di Indonesia khususnya terkait penyelesaian sengketa waris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan sebagai alat analisis bahan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama dengan konsep small claim court dipandang mungkin untuk diimplementasikan sebagai bagian dari pembaharuan hukum acara peradilan agama. Namun demikian, hal itu perlu diiringi dengan pengklasifikasian perkara waris ke dalam perkara besar dan kecil dilihat dari nilai harta warisan yang disengketakan. Oleh karenanya, perluasan pengaturan mekanisme small claim court ke dalam sistem peradilan agama menjadi penting guna memangkas mekanisme penyelesaian perkara yang terlalu lama.The formal procedural law that applies in the Religious Courts in resolving inheritance disputes takes a relatively long time. This results in greater time and costs. The small claim court mechanism regulated by the Supreme Court through Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning the procedure for resolving simple disputes in the general justice system to become a bright spot. The concept of small claim court is expected to be applied in the religious justice system so that it can cut down the long time in resolving inheritance disputes in the Religious Courts. This study aims to offer a new breakthrough in the system of religious justice in Indonesia, especially in relation to the resolving of inheritance disputes. This research is a normative juridical research with a law and conceptual approach by using literature study as a legal material analysis tool. The results showed that the resolving of dispute of inheritance in the Religious Court with the small claim court concept was considered possible to be implemented as part of the renewal of the religious court procedural law. However, this needs to be accompanied by the classification of inheritance cases into large and small cases seen from the value of the disputed inheritance. Therefore, the expansion of the small claim court mechanism into the religious justice system is deemed necessary in order to reduce the mechanism for resolving cases that are too long.

scholarly journals Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This paper aims to find the basis for the philosophical rationality of applying sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes in religious courts as well as the prerequisites required by religious court judges to apply sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is normative legal research to find philosophical rationality and the institutionalization of sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. The research results obtained first, the philosophical rationality of the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in line with the first and third principles of Pancasila. Second, the institutionalization of sharia principles becomes effective if there are prerequisites that must be met, firstly enough information for judges to understand sharia principles, secondly the obstacles that come from the judges themselves who are still oriented towards the flow of legism / positivism will have an effect on providing legal basis and third the speed of instilling the institutionalization of sharia principles can be done through education and training organized by the Supreme Court for Religious Court judges.

scholarly journals SMALL CLAIM COURT : PRINCIPLE CONCRETIZATION IN LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
Peni Rinda
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Simple Action ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Trial Evidence

The purpose of this research is to examine the provisions of civil procedural law in settling a lawsuit, to know the form of simple, fast, and low-cost concretization in simple lawsuit settlement. The research method uses the research object of simple, fast, and low-cost concretization in the settlement of a simple claim, normative juridical approach, the type of data used in this study is secondary data, which is sourced from the literature. Secondary data consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, legal material collection techniques carried out by literature and the internet, while the data analysis method is analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results show that the provisions of civil procedural law in resolving claims in court so far have been using the basis of HIR, which do not differentiate between complicated and simple case examinations so that the time for settlement is the same. The process starting from submitting/registering a lawsuit, determining the day of trial by the head of the panel of judges, the parties being summoned appropriately, the trial, evidence to the verdict took a long time, namely 6 months (SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR No. 6 of 1992), so the Supreme Court issued SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR No. 2 of 2014 which provides a time limit for completing the case of five (5) months. The simple, fast, and low-cost principles of concretizing a small claim court can be seen in the settlement stage. Settlement of a simple lawsuit is divided into 4 (four) stages, namely: 1), preliminary stage, 2) stage of case examination, 3). The objection request stage and 4), the simple action decision stage. This simple lawsuit settlement process should take a maximum of 25 (twenty-five) days. The simple principle is embodied in the shortened settlement process mechanism, the fast principle is realized within 25 days of completion, a peace that does not use the provisions of Supreme Court rules No.1 of 2016, while the principle of low cost is realized from a simple settlement mechanism, will be affected by the cost of the case.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN HUKUM ISBAT NIKAH LUAR NEGERI

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramdani Wahyu Seruri
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Work Abroad ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper is motivated by the number of Indonesian Workers (TKI) who work abroad to get married in Sirri, some of them occurred in Malaysia. Based on this background, the authors interested in explaining the legal position validation of marriage in outside the country. That is the legal basis for the implementation of validation of marriage outside the country, referring to the legislation, ranging from generalist like regulations of Law Number 48 Of 2009 about The Judicial Authorities of clause 60B and Law about Religious Courts, as well as the rule of lex specialist like Circular Supreme Court Number 10 Of 2010, appendix B SK Supreme Court Nomor 084/KMA/ SK/V/2011 on Permit Session Establishment Marriage (isbat nikah/validation of marriage) in The embassies of the Republic of Indonesia. procedures of case examination about validation of marriage in outside the country followed the procedural law applicable in the Religious Court, whereas KUA which the authorities listed about validation of marriage in outside the country is PPN (The Registrar of Marriage) located in The embassies of the Republic of Indonesia in each country.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC TRIAL (E-LITIGATION) ON THE CIVIL CASES IN INDONESIA COURT AS A LEGAL RENEWAL OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
M. Beni Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Negative Impression ◽  
Rule Out

Civil case trial based on HIR/RBg takes months or even more than a year, which sets a bad precedent for judicial institution because it tends to be complicated, and closed. A proverb voiced, “Reporting the loss of goats instead of missing cows,” increasingly the public’s negative impression towards judicial institution. Responding to these conditions, the Supreme Court issued a Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2019 concerning Case Administration and Court Trials Electronically. The research questions, how is the implementations of electronic trial (e-litigation) on civil cases in Indonesia judicial institutions? The research method used is literature study, in particular normative legal research, which is descriptive analytical. PERMA No 1 of 2019 has provided benefits for internal judiciary and justice seekers. Where case registration is done electronically without needing go to court. The payment of court fees is simply by transferring to a virtual account and the summons of parties are carried out electronically to an electronic domicile. It is not just limited to that the trial is also carried out electronically, from the first trial until the reading of the judge’s verdict. However, there are challenges for the successful of electronic litigation from the aspect of legal substance, the electronic trial regulated at PERMA rule out HIR/R.Bg whose hierarchy is above of that PERMA. In aspects of legal structure, It is needed the completed infrastructure and human resources. As well as aspects of legal culture, the enthusiasm of justice seekers who use e-court services.

scholarly journals The Legal Policy of Judicial Power: The Idea of Implementation of Small Claim Courts in Religious Courts

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam Sukadi ◽  
Erfaniah Zuhriah
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsic Value ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
Small Claims Court ◽  
Religious Courts

Abstract: Religious Court is a judicial environment under the Supreme Court as a perpetrator of judicial power independent of organizing religious court to enforce the law and justice. The implementation of a small claim court in religious courts following simple, quick, and low-cost principles. The Small Claims Court is a simple judicial mechanism outside of the regular judicial mechanisms to resolve disputes quickly and cost lightly. The purpose of this study was to determine the meaning of the principle of fast, simple, and low cost and the legal politics of applying a simple lawsuit in a religious court. This type of research is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The technique of analyzing legal materials uses prescriptive. The study results found that the principle of simple, fast, and low cost in religious courts must meet the expectations of justice seekers who always want a speedy, fair, and low-cost trial. Applying the principle of a simple, fast, and low-cost justice has an intrinsic value of justice, inseparable from the service function. The legal politics of implementing a small claims court in a religious court is a breakthrough step, the proceedings are also fast and inexpensive, decided by a single judge, and the trial mechanism is simple So that implementation of Small Claims Court will be able to help the dispute burden in religious courts.Keywords: legal policy; small claim court, religious court.Abstrak: Peradilan Agama adalah lingkungan peradilan di bawah Mahkamah Agung sebagai pelaku kekuasaan kehakiman yang mandiri menyelenggarakan peradilan agama untuk menegakkan hukum dan keadilan. Penyelenggaraan sidang gugatan kecil di pengadilan agama menganut asas sederhana, cepat, dan murah. Small Claims Court adalah mekanisme peradilan sederhana di luar mekanisme peradilan biasa untuk menyelesaikan sengketa dengan cepat dan biaya ringan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengertian asas cepat, sederhana, dan biaya rendah serta politik hukum penerapan gugatan sederhana di pengadilan agama. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa asas sederhana, cepat, dan biaya rendah dalam peradilan agama harus memenuhi harapan para pencari keadilan yang selalu menginginkan peradilan yang cepat, adil, dan berbiaya rendah. Penerapan asas peradilan sederhana, cepat, dan berbiaya rendah memiliki nilai keadilan yang hakiki, tidak terlepas dari fungsi pelayanan. Politik hukum pelaksanaan peradilan gugatan kecil di pengadilan agama merupakan langkah terobosan, proses beracara juga cepat dan murah, diputuskan oleh hakim tunggal, dan mekanisme persidangan sederhana Sehingga pelaksanaan peradilan gugatan kecil akan dapat membantu beban sengketa di pengadilan agama.Kata Kunci: kebijakan hukum; small claim courts; pengadilan agama.

scholarly journals ANALISIS HUKUM E-LITIGASI JO. PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PERKARA DAN PERSIDANGAN DI PENGADILAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 JO. UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2006 JO. UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 50 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PENGADILAN AGAMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Annisa Annisa
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

 Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk memaparkan berkenaan dengan analisi hukum e-litigasi. Persidangan dengan e-litigasi yang dasar hukumnya berupa PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 dianggap telah melampaui hukum acara yang termuat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pengadilan Agama. Pnelitian ini membahas kedudukan PERMA dalam hierarki perundang-undangan agar dapat diketahui posisi PERMA dan batasan PERMA dalam menyusun peraturannya.Kata kunci: e-litigasi, PERMA, Hukum This study aims to analyze the law of e-litigation. Trials with e-litigation, the legal basis of which is Supreme Court Regulations (PERMA) Number 1 of 2019, are considered to have exceeded the procedural law contained in Law Number 7 of 1989 jo. Law Number 3 of 2006 jo. Law Number 50 of 2009 concerning Religious Courts. This study discussed the position of PERMA in the hierarchy of legislation in order to find out the position of PERMA and the limitations of PERMA in formulating its regulations.Keywords: e-litigation, PERMA, Law

scholarly journals THE DUALISM OF THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISIONS ON THE POSITION OF NON-MARITAL CHILD

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Nurhadi Nurhadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Unmarried Child

Since the birth of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the legal experts have discussed the positions of marriage children through articles, papers, books and seminars, pros and cons when interpreting the non-marital child, judges also gave birth to many interpretations. The Supreme Court (MA) has two views in adjudicating the marriage case, Supreme Court Decision Number 329 K/AG/2014 states that the ratification of an unmarried child is not a jurisdiction of the Religious Courts, whereas in Decision of Supreme Court Number 597 K/AG/2015 states that the non-marital children are legitimate even though the marriage of their parents only carries out marriage under Islamic law. The formulation of the problem is how the criteria of marital legitimacy in Indonesia? How is the outsider interpretation of the two Supreme Court decisions? The research method used is literature study, with the type of normative legal research, which is descriptive analytical. The conclusion is that in Supreme Court Decision Number 329 K/AG/2014 considered the marriage to be legitimately religious, but because it is not recorded so that the marriage does not get the certainty and protection of the law, consequently the child born from the marriage is not a legal child, whereas in Decision Number 597 K/AG/2015 The Supreme Court considers that although the marriage is not recorded, the child born from the marriage must still have legal certainty and protection so that the child is considered a legal child.

scholarly journals Virtual Court Policy For Criminal Justice on Corona Virus Disease Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Sandhy Handika ◽  
Muhammad Ibnu Fajar Rahim ◽  
Rudi Pradisetia Sudirdja
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
System Development ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
South Wales

The Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic that has plagued the world has changed the mindset, how to behave and how to act, not only in social interaction but also has influenced the law enforcement system. Development in Information Technology (IT) has found a teleconference system as a means of conducting virtual courts as a reaction to social or physical distancing movements which is one way to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Although in practice the use of a virtual court in a trial is considered capable of preventing the spread of viruses, the use of a virtual court must keep be based on applicable laws and regulations. This paper is a normative legal research with legislation approach, case approach, comparative legal approach, and conceptual approach to legal material collected through literature study and then analyzed using grammatical, systematic, and extensive interpretation methods. Based on the results of the study, several countries such as the United Kingdom, China, Australia (New South Wales) and America (New York) and Indonesia (although limited to the examination of witnesses) have applied virtual courts in the justice system. Implementation of the trial using the virtual court method by teleconference did not violate the provisions of the trial set out in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). According to the Draft Law KUHAP has accommodated the trial using the virtual court method as an embodiment of legal principles in the judiciary that is carried out quickly, simply, and at a low cost. The use of virtual court is not the first or primary choice in examining criminal cases in Indonesia, in abnormal emergency conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic as it is today, an examination by the virtual court method is a solution so that the criminal justice system continues to run without reducing the efforts to prevent the spread of the virus. Trials using virtual court facilities continue to accommodate the human rights of victims, witnesses and defendants through their virtual presence so that a fair trial continues in the courtroom.

Inside the Judicial Mind: Exploring Judicial Methodology in the Mixed Legal System of Quebec

2013 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalie Jukier
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Institutional Setting ◽  
Supreme Court Of Canada ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Justice System

This article explores judicial methodology in the mixed legal system of Quebec and examines, in particular, how the nature of its legal system as a mixed legal system influences the judicial methodology of its judges, especially with respect to the de facto use of precedent. Features of the mixity, including the institutional setting of Quebec courts as courts of inherent jurisdiction, the nature of Quebec’s civil justice system and procedural law, as well as the judicial role and the effect of a supreme precedential authority (in the Supreme Court of Canada) are examined in turn as influential factors.

THE COMPARISON OF EVIDENCE IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Fadli Zaini Dalimunthe
Keyword(s):  
Historical Development ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
The South ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
South Korean ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Religious Courts

The judiciary under the supreme court consists of general courts, religious courts, military courts, and state administrative courts. In each procedural law court, the provisions concerning evidence are regulated. Evidence is the stage where the parties try to convince the panel of judges about the truth of the arguments put forward in a dispute based on valid evidence. Evidence has an important role because the results of evidence can be the basis for consideration by the panel of judges in making a decision. Evidence in the procedural law of the state administrative court is not only carried out in the Indonesian state administrative court but also in the South Korean Administrative Court. The historical development and organizational structure of the South Korean Administrative Court are the basis for analyzing the Evidence in the South Korean Administrative Court. Lessons from the South Korean Administrative Court can see the similarities and differences in the concept of evidence and type of evidence used in the South Korean Administrative Court with the Indonesian State Administrative Court. The approach used in this study is the statutory approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document