scholarly journals Konsep Small Claim Procedure Untuk Menyelesaikan Perkara Perdata Permohonan (Volunter) Di Pengadilan Agama

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Muharrom Ainul Yaqin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Simple Matter ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
Permit Application ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Religious Courts

This article aims to formulate the concept of small claims procedure that can be used to check the examination of civil cases in the court petition religion, as well as describe the types of cases that can be checked by using a system of small claims procedure. The concept of small claims procedure can be applied in religious courts, to examine and decide cases petition (volunteer) with consideration of the substance of the case filed is simple. Nevertheless, the judges who hear cases iniharus memeliki experience and proficiency in handling the case of the petition. For the system to be enforced in court, this concept needs to be formulated in the form of Supreme Court Regulation. An application includes a simple matter if it has the value of materials or rights that are simple, the application is simple, and it is possible to be examined in one trial. Based on these criteria, there are eight types of cases that can be checked using a system of small claims procedure are: the permit application mating, pleas guardian adhol, request dispensation mating, pleas prevention marriage, request the establishment of origin of the child, the request istbat marriage, requesting to change the identity of marriage, and request the appointment of a guardian. <br />Artikel ini bertujuan merumuskan konsep small claim procedure yang dapat digunakan untuk memeriksa pemeriksaan perkara perdata permohonan di pengadilan agama, serta mendeskripsikan jenis perkara yang dapat diperiksa dengan menggunakan sistem small claim procedure. Konsep small claim procedure dapat diterapkan di pengadilan agama, untuk memeriksa dan memutus perkara permohonan (volunter) dengan pertimbangan substansi perkara yang diajukan bersifat sederhana. Meskipun demikian, hakim yang memeriksa perkara iniharus memiliki pengalaman dan kecakapan dalam menangani perkara permohonan. Agar sistem ini dapat diberlakukan di pengadilan, konsep ini perlu dirumuskan dalam bentuk Peraturan Mahkamah Agung. Suatu permohonan termasuk perkara yang sederhana jika memiliki nilai materi atau hak yang sederhana, permohonannya sederhana, dan sangat memungkinkan untuk diperiksa dalam satu kali sidang. Berdasarkan kriteria tersebut, ada delapan jenis perkara yang dapat diperiksa menggunakan sistem small claim procedure yaitu: permohonan izin kawin, permohonan wali adhol, permohonan dispensasi kawin, permohonan pencegahan perkawinan, permohonan penetapan asal-usul anak, permohonan istbat nikah, permohonan perubahan identitas nikah, dan permohonan pengangkatan wali.

scholarly journals Procedures for Completing Small Claims Lawsuit of Civil Cases in District Court in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Marjo ◽  
Nanik Rofikoh
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases

The development of legal relations in the economic and other civil sectors in community highly requires a faster and less costly dispute resolution process, especially in small civil disputes. In connection with this matter, Indonesian Supreme Court issued various Supreme Court regulations, including Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Completion of Small Claims. The issuance of this regulation was to resolve special civil disputes regarding the acts against the law. In a small claim court lawsuit, it is required that the plaintiff and defendant be in the same jurisdiction. The value of the material suit in a small claim lawsuit is at most IDR 200 million or equal to 13,811 USD. Furthermore, for a small claim examination and verification of a lawsuit, it is carried out in a small manner, where the period of completion is determined a maximum of 25 days from the first trial day to the decision.  

scholarly journals PROBABILITAS MEKANISME SMALL CLAIM COURT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA / PROBABILITY OF SMALL CLAIM COURT MECHANISM IN RESOLVING INHERITANCE DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Adi Nur Rohman ◽  
Sugeng Sugeng
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Bright Spot ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Religious Courts

Hukum acara formil yang berlaku di Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris relatif memakan waktu yang cukup lama. Hal ini mengakibatkan waktu serta biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi lebih besar. Mekanisme small claim court yang diatur oleh Mahkamah Agung melalui PERMA No. 2 tahun 2015 tentang tata cara penyelesaian sengketa sederhana dalam sistem peradilan umum menjadi titik terang. Konsep small claim court tersebut diharapkan dapat diaplikasikan dalam sistem peradilan agama sehingga mampu memangkas waktu yang lama dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan terobosan baru dalam sistem peradilan agama di Indonesia khususnya terkait penyelesaian sengketa waris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan sebagai alat analisis bahan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama dengan konsep small claim court dipandang mungkin untuk diimplementasikan sebagai bagian dari pembaharuan hukum acara peradilan agama. Namun demikian, hal itu perlu diiringi dengan pengklasifikasian perkara waris ke dalam perkara besar dan kecil dilihat dari nilai harta warisan yang disengketakan. Oleh karenanya, perluasan pengaturan mekanisme small claim court ke dalam sistem peradilan agama menjadi penting guna memangkas mekanisme penyelesaian perkara yang terlalu lama.The formal procedural law that applies in the Religious Courts in resolving inheritance disputes takes a relatively long time. This results in greater time and costs. The small claim court mechanism regulated by the Supreme Court through Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning the procedure for resolving simple disputes in the general justice system to become a bright spot. The concept of small claim court is expected to be applied in the religious justice system so that it can cut down the long time in resolving inheritance disputes in the Religious Courts. This study aims to offer a new breakthrough in the system of religious justice in Indonesia, especially in relation to the resolving of inheritance disputes. This research is a normative juridical research with a law and conceptual approach by using literature study as a legal material analysis tool. The results showed that the resolving of dispute of inheritance in the Religious Court with the small claim court concept was considered possible to be implemented as part of the renewal of the religious court procedural law. However, this needs to be accompanied by the classification of inheritance cases into large and small cases seen from the value of the disputed inheritance. Therefore, the expansion of the small claim court mechanism into the religious justice system is deemed necessary in order to reduce the mechanism for resolving cases that are too long.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI GUGATAN SEDERHANA DALAM LITIGASI DI PASAR MODAL SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN (INVESTOR) PASAR MODAL INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Ema Rahmawat
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Court System ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
Market Transaction ◽  
Civil Justice System

Capital market sector is one of the financial services which quite dynamic in progress. Capital market transactions have varied characteristics and complexity. In its practices, many factors may motivate legal dispute in capital market in which mostly not settled in litigation way. The investors avoid settle their dispute through litigation mostly because of its formalistic procedure, time consume, and uncertainty of the result because of distrust against court system. The Indonesian Supreme Court has enacted Supreme Court Regulation No. 5 of 2015 concerning Small Claims Procedure as an effort to reform civil justice system which is simplify and expedite. The small claim procedure may offer dispute settlement which simple and quick, however it is limited with the claim value up to Rp200 millions, while mostly capital market transaction has greater value than Rp200 millions. This article will discuss the implementation of the small claims procedure in investor dispute settlement in the capital market. Moreover, this article also elaborates the advantages and disadvantages of small claims procedure in settling investor dispute as a protection to the consumer in capital market.

scholarly journals The Legal Policy of Judicial Power: The Idea of Implementation of Small Claim Courts in Religious Courts

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam Sukadi ◽  
Erfaniah Zuhriah
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsic Value ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
Small Claims Court ◽  
Religious Courts

Abstract: Religious Court is a judicial environment under the Supreme Court as a perpetrator of judicial power independent of organizing religious court to enforce the law and justice. The implementation of a small claim court in religious courts following simple, quick, and low-cost principles. The Small Claims Court is a simple judicial mechanism outside of the regular judicial mechanisms to resolve disputes quickly and cost lightly. The purpose of this study was to determine the meaning of the principle of fast, simple, and low cost and the legal politics of applying a simple lawsuit in a religious court. This type of research is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The technique of analyzing legal materials uses prescriptive. The study results found that the principle of simple, fast, and low cost in religious courts must meet the expectations of justice seekers who always want a speedy, fair, and low-cost trial. Applying the principle of a simple, fast, and low-cost justice has an intrinsic value of justice, inseparable from the service function. The legal politics of implementing a small claims court in a religious court is a breakthrough step, the proceedings are also fast and inexpensive, decided by a single judge, and the trial mechanism is simple So that implementation of Small Claims Court will be able to help the dispute burden in religious courts.Keywords: legal policy; small claim court, religious court.Abstrak: Peradilan Agama adalah lingkungan peradilan di bawah Mahkamah Agung sebagai pelaku kekuasaan kehakiman yang mandiri menyelenggarakan peradilan agama untuk menegakkan hukum dan keadilan. Penyelenggaraan sidang gugatan kecil di pengadilan agama menganut asas sederhana, cepat, dan murah. Small Claims Court adalah mekanisme peradilan sederhana di luar mekanisme peradilan biasa untuk menyelesaikan sengketa dengan cepat dan biaya ringan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengertian asas cepat, sederhana, dan biaya rendah serta politik hukum penerapan gugatan sederhana di pengadilan agama. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa asas sederhana, cepat, dan biaya rendah dalam peradilan agama harus memenuhi harapan para pencari keadilan yang selalu menginginkan peradilan yang cepat, adil, dan berbiaya rendah. Penerapan asas peradilan sederhana, cepat, dan berbiaya rendah memiliki nilai keadilan yang hakiki, tidak terlepas dari fungsi pelayanan. Politik hukum pelaksanaan peradilan gugatan kecil di pengadilan agama merupakan langkah terobosan, proses beracara juga cepat dan murah, diputuskan oleh hakim tunggal, dan mekanisme persidangan sederhana Sehingga pelaksanaan peradilan gugatan kecil akan dapat membantu beban sengketa di pengadilan agama.Kata Kunci: kebijakan hukum; small claim courts; pengadilan agama.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILU DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN ADMINISTRASI DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PERADILAN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-85
Author(s):  
Alasman Mpesau
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Electoral System ◽  
General Election ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts

In the General Election and Regional Head Election Law, the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) has the authority supervisory to each Election stages, it is the center for law enforcement activities of the Election (Sentra Gakkumdu) to criminal acts and carrying out the judicial functions for investigating, examining, and decided on administrative disputes of General Election and Regional Head Election.  With the Bawaslu’s authority then placed as a super-body institution in the ranks of the Election Management Body, due to its essential role in building a clean and credible electoral system, it also has potential for abuse of power within it. In Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power has defined state institutions that have the authority to administrate judicial functions. These are the Supreme Court and Judicial Bodies that under its lines of general court, Religious Courts, Military Courts, Administrative Court (PTUN) and the Constitutional Court. The research method is normative juridical, that focuses on the analysis of the laws and regulations on General Election, Regional Head Elections and the Law on Judicial Power. The analytical tool is descriptive analysis, by describing the main issues, an analysis is carried out that was supported by case-approach related to the research. The study concludes that Bawaslu in carrying out judicial functions in its position as a semi-judicial institution has not a hierarchical relationship to the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK); however, what does exist is functional relationship.

scholarly journals Direito constitucional de recorrer e a judicialização da ineficiência empresarial

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-432
Author(s):  
Joaquim Falcão ◽  
Ivar Hartmann
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Consumer Rights ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Small Claims

Resumo: A judicialização das questões consumeristas atinge o Supremo Tribunal Federal por via dos juizados especiais há vários anos. Recentemente uma empresa do ramo de telefonia, a Oi, destacou-se pelo volume desproporcional de processos que levou ao tribunal. Ao analisar o perfil da litigância de direito do consumidor da Oi no Supremo, identificamos que a empresa envia o dobro de processos do segundo colocado no ranking de maiores litigantes, apesar de ter taxa de sucesso menor do que 0,07%. No contexto da necessidade de adequada proteção dos direitos do consumidor, esse comportamento pode ser caracterizado como bullying processual e demanda novas atitudes por parte dos órgãos reguladores e do próprio Supremo.Palavras-chave: Direito do consumidor. Judicialização. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Abstract: The consumer rights lawsuits have reached the Brazilian Supreme Court through small claims courts for years. Recently, one phone company, Oi, stood out for the disproportional number of appeals it took to the court. We found that Oi brought double the number of appeals of the second most frequent appellant in consumer rights at the Supreme Court, even though Oi’s success rate is lower than 0,07%. In the context of appropriate consumer rights protection, this behavior can be characterized as lawsuit bullying and calls for a new attitude by the regulating agencies and the Supreme Court itself.Keywords: Consumer rights. Lawsuits. Brazilian Supreme Court.

scholarly journals Ukrainian-English Translation of Legal Terms: Case Study of Insignificant Cases and Small Claims

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 232-242
Keyword(s):  
English Translation ◽  
Concept Analysis ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Legal Translation ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
Simplified Procedures ◽  
Surface Similarity ◽  
The Eu

The article is devoted to the problem of translating legal terms from Ukrainian into English on the basis of a case study of a newly-coined term in Ukrainian legislation – ‘maloznachna sprava’. The relevance of the topic of legal translation from English into Ukrainian and vice versa has become especially acute in light of the Ukraine-EU approximation agreement. The author emphasises the necessity to perform concept analysis between the terms in the EU and Ukraine simplified procedures and comes to the conclusion that despite having surface similarity to the EU term ‘small claim’, the Ukrainian term ‘maloznachna sprava’ is, in fact, a much wider concept. A range of translations of legal neologisms are described in the article, and the need to use a literal translation of the term is substantiated. As a result of the analysis of possible translation options and the ECtHR translation precedent, it is recommended that the term ‘maloznachna sprava’ should be translated as ‘insignificant case’ within the sphere of Ukrainian civil procedure. Keywords: legal translation, Ukrainian-English translation, small claim, insignificant case.

scholarly journals MENGGALI ‘ILLAT HUKUM PERBEDAAN AGAMA SEBAGAI HALANGAN WARIS

EMPIRISMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Isna Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

Kompilasi Hukum Islam does not regulate interfaith inheritance distinctly. It only requires the testator and the heirs have the same religion. At court, judges of religious courts employ obligatory bequest (waṣiat wājibah) to divide inheritance to non-Muslim heirs, based on jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Number 368 K/AG/1995. As the result, different faith still become hindrance for Muslim and non-Muslim to inherit each other due to law enforcement without considering the legal reasoning (ratio legis) of the law. In this case, it is important to investigate the legal reason (ratio legis) of the hadith that prohibits the interfaith inheritance as this article tries to do. To do the investigation, the author employs Islamic legal theories (uṣūl fikih) and hermeneutics approach. As the result, the author comes to the conclusion that the ratio legis of the hadith that prohibits the interfaith inheritance is due to hostility and crime element and not due to different faith. Keywords: Interfaith Inheritance, Ratio Legis, Equality

scholarly journals CREATING A STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT FOR COURT ACCREDITATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Zulfia Hanum Alfi Syahr
Keyword(s):  
Service Quality ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Accreditation Standard ◽  
Satisfaction Index ◽  
Accreditation Standards ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Assessment Standards ◽  
The Military ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
The Ideal

The improvement of court’s quality has been done through various efforts, one of them is an accreditation program. Before the implementation of internal accreditation policies, the courts under the Supreme Court had used ISO standards to maintain the service quality. Along with the development of judiciary innovations especially the dream toward the great judiciary, the Supreme Court has developed special accreditation standards for each judicial environment. General Court (Badilum) has implemented the Quality Assurance Accreditation (APM) programme in 7 assessment areas. Afterward, the Religious Courts (Badilag) in addition to 7 APM areas as in Badilum also applied 9 other assessment standards. Furthermore, the Military and Administration Agency (Badilmiltun) has 7 different accreditation assessment areas with Badilum and Badilag. The problem that will be examined is how to determine the ideal criteria for assessing court accreditation. Given that the ideal accreditation standard is not only improving the quality of court services but also being able to meet the needs and expectations of justice seekers, as indicated by the community satisfaction index. The court accreditation standard used today is the adoption of the International Framework of Court excellent (IFCE) and is adapted to the area of Bureaucratic Reform and the oversight function of the Supreme Court. The method of determining accreditation criteria is done by comparing court accreditation standards that have been used with the SERVQUAL model. The SERVQUAL model is an initial model that appears to measure service quality. The results of the study found that a number of court accreditation assessment standards has been represented the dimensions of service quality at SERVQUAL.

18. Remedies and Appeals

2021 ◽  
pp. 640-668
Author(s):  
Alisdair A. Gillespie ◽  
Siobhan Weare
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Complicated Structure ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Civil Courts ◽  
Usual Rule

This chapter discusses the remedies that can be sought from the civil courts and how an appeal is made against a decision. It covers interim and final remedies; route of appeals; leave; the hearing; appeals to the Supreme Court; and examples of appeals. There are many different types of remedies that a court can award to a successful litigant. The most common form of remedy is that which is known as ‘damages’. Appeals in the civil courts follow a slightly more complicated structure than in criminal cases. In order to appeal in the civil cases it is usually necessary to seek permission before proceeding with a civil appeal. Save where it is a final decision in a multi-track case, the usual rule is that the appeal will be heard by the next most senior judge.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document