A Study on Legal and Institutional Support in relation to the Exercise of the Right to Execute Civil Judgment in China - Focusing on judicial practice and the newest judicial interpretation in relation to civil enforcement and collateral system -

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-170
Author(s):  
ZHEN AI JIN ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Support ◽  
Judicial Interpretation ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Civil Judgment ◽  
The Right ◽  
Collateral System

On the Consideration of a Criminal Case Against a Minor by Jury

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 90-96
Author(s):  
E. V. Markovicheva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Case ◽  
Jury Trial ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Scientific Discussion ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
A Minor

The functioning of the jury in Russia has demonstrated not only effectiveness, but also a number of problems that need to be resolved. Such problems include the personal jurisdiction of criminal cases by jury. The article reveals the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation regarding the right of minors to trial a criminal case in a jury. The approaches to solving this issue that have developed in the judicial practice of individual foreign states are analyzed, the main directions for further scientific discussion regarding the right of minors to a jury trial are outlined. The purpose of the article is to disclose various approaches to the administration of criminal justice in the relations of minors with the participation of lay judges. The theoretical basis of the study was Russian and foreign scientific works in the field of criminal procedure law, devoted both to the consideration of criminal cases with the jury, and the specifics of juvenile criminal proceedings. Using the comparative legal research method has allowed to reveal various approaches to the access of minors to jury trials in individual states. In Russian legislation and judicial practice the question of the right of minors to have a criminal case against them considered by a jury remains unresolved. The position of the Constitutional Court of Russia regarding the jurisdiction of such criminal cases is also controversial. The experience of foreign countries indicates that there is no universal way to ensure the right of a minor to a proper court. This issue is decided depending on the type of criminal process, the presence or absence of specialized juvenile courts. Any direct borrowing in this regard cannot be considered effective, but a generalization of foreign experience can create the necessary basis for optimizing both the work of the jury and criminal proceedings against minors.

scholarly journals On Issue of Civil and Legal Liability of the Insolvency Officer for Actions (Inaction) of Third Parties in a Bankruptcy Case

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Staritsyn
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
District Courts ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Illegal Behavior ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

Considering the right of the insolvency officer to involve other persons, including employees of the debtor, to ensure his powers, the article examines the possibility of bringing the officer to civil and legal liability in the form of recovering damages for actions (inaction) of such persons. It summarizes and analyzes the judicial practice at the level of the Arbitration District Courts and the Judicial Panel on Economic Disputes of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. A conclusion is made of admissibility in certain cases of bringing the insolvency officer to civil and legal liability for the actions of the persons involved by him. The illegal behavior and the fault of the insolvency officer can be expressed in improper control over the actions (inactions) of third parties, in selecting an incompetent person. The article offers to regulate at the legislative level the issue of the possibility of bringing the insolvency officer to liability for actions of other persons, by including such rules in the Bankruptcy Law.

scholarly journals Reasonable time frame in bankruptcy proceedings: Analysis of cases from the judicial practice of the Commercial Court in Niš

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (90) ◽  
pp. 97-118
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Mojašević ◽  
Aleksandar Jovanović
Keyword(s):  
Case Law ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Reasonable Time ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Reasonable Time Frame ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time, which took effect in 2016, has created the conditions in our legal system for the protection of the right to a trial within a reasonable time, as one of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia and related international documents. Although the legislator does not explicitly provide for the application of this Act in the context of bankruptcy proceedings, it has been used in judicial practice as a mean for the bankruptcy creditors to obtain just satisfaction in cases involving lengthy bankruptcy proceedings and a violation of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time. The subject matter of analysis in this paper is the right to a trial within a reasonable time in bankruptcy cases. For that purpose, the authors examine the case law of the Commercial Court in Niš in the period from the beginning of 2016 to the end of 2019, particularly focusing on the bankruptcy cases in which complaints (objections) were filed for the protection of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time. The aim of the research is to examine whether the objection, as an initial act, is a suitable instrument for increasing the efficiency of the bankruptcy proceeding, or whether it only serves to satisfy the interests of creditors. The authors have also examined whether this remedy affects the overall costs and duration of the bankruptcy proceeding. The main finding is that there is an increasing number of objections in the Commercial Court in Niš, which still does not affect the length and costs of bankruptcy. This trend is not only the result of inactivity of the court and the complexity of certain cases but also of numerous external factors, the most prominent of which is the work of some state bodies.

scholarly journals Judicial Error: Responsibility, but not the Right

2019 ◽  
pp. 4-17
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Kurchenko
Keyword(s):  
Professional Experience ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
European Court ◽  
Gradual Accumulation ◽  
Judicial Errors ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Error

In the article, the causes of judicial errors are discussed. The author examines the possibilities of imposing discipline sanctions on judges for their errors, considers a range of questions. In particular, should a judge seek the truth while hearing a case? Is a judge responsible for not only his or her errors but also for the errors of investigators, experts, and other participants of a proceeding? The author indicates various types of judicial errors and comes to a conclusion that gradual accumulation of ordinary or insignificant errors in the judge’s activity inevitably leads to systematic (or unordinary) errors. They indicate that the judge is unfair or incompetent. Drawing on personal professional experience and judicial practice, positions of the Russian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights, the author makes a link between judicial errors and the quality of justice. He emphasizes that the judge should follow the legal rules concerning adjudication and maintain his or her level of competence.

scholarly journals BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW DISPUTES

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (40) ◽  
Author(s):  
Njegoslav Jović
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
State Courts ◽  
Property Law ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Primary Activity ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Right

In this paper, the author analyzes the benefits and limitationsof international arbitration in disputes that are subject to intellectual propertyrights. Intellectual property law disputes have special characteristics. In theevent of a dispute with an international element, there is a problem with thejurisdiction of state courts due to the principle of the territoriality of intellectualproperty rights. The titular of the right must initiate court proceedings in allcountries individually, leading to delays in procedures, multiplication of costsand uneven judicial practice. For these reasons, the author analyzes alternativedispute resolution through arbitration to determine whether this method ofdispute resolution is more acceptable to foreign courts.The author particularly pays attention to the WIPO Center for Arbitrationand Mediation as a permanent arbitration institution whose primary activity isthe resolution of disputes in the field of intellectual property rights.

scholarly journals SALE OF LAND AS A FUTURE THING

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
O.A. Rozhkova ◽  
S.V. Voronina
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Land Plot ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right

The contract of sale of the future thing in which the land is the product deserves special attention. Atthe moment, it has developed a uniform judicial practice regarding the individualization of an unformedland plot as the subject of a contract of sale of a future immovable. In cases where, in accordance with thelaw, a land plot acquires the qualities of a divisible thing, the object of civil turnover can be not only thecorresponding land plot as a whole, but also its part, which in this case acquires the status of an independentland plot for the formation of a land plot. It seems that only after establishing (changing) the location of theboundaries of the land, i. e. formation of a land plot, it may be an object of land and civil law relations, maybe an object of ownership and other rights to land. The current legislation does not contain a ban on thepurchase and sale of a land plot, the right of ownership for which at the time of conclusion of the contractof sale was not registered in the established manner, however, the individualization of a land plot by landsurveying and cadastral registration is a prerequisite for the land the plot became the subject of a contractof sale of a future immovable.

scholarly journals Аgroecological aspects of institutional support for land reform in Ukraine at the present stage

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Kovaliv
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
Land Reform ◽  
Institutional Support ◽  
Central Character ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
National Interests ◽  
Rational Use ◽  
Absolute Property ◽  
Natural Objects ◽  
The Right

All natural objects (resources), which are declared as the absolute property of the Ukrainian people (all citizens) is established to be the main national wealth and the main unborrowed capital of the nation, including soils and other life-giving natural resources of Ukraine, which need rational use, require professional description, characteristics and classification (national accounting) in the process of institutional support for land reform in Ukraine. Emphasis is placed on the central character in ensuring the rational use of nature as an indispensable part of the constitutionally motivated requirements from the standpoint of national interests and each citizen in particular, which is recognized as «citizen-owner». It is proved that due to the unjustified absence for a quarter of a century of the constitutionally declared special Law of Ukraine «On the right to use natural objects of property of the Ukrainian people», which unpunished use of the nation’s capital. As a result, the rights, obligations and responsibilities of users of natural objects, as well as full-fledged requirements for their rational use and protection are not regulated on a paid basis according to the established regulations. This is especially true of fertile soils and other natural resources of the agrosphere. It is established that accomplished fact is cognitive land science and practice formulated by us in specific conditions of Ukrainian reality, which is the basis of our scientific and practical substantiation of institutional support for land reform in Ukraine as a new paradigm through «cognitive land economy» in terms of agri-environmental aspects.

scholarly journals FORMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHT PROTECTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 106-112
Author(s):  
N.Sh. Gadzhialieva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Broad Sense ◽  
Organic Unity ◽  
Healthy Environment ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Favorable Environment ◽  
The Subject ◽  
State Coercion ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article analyzes various forms of protecting the right to a favorable environment, examines the concept of a form of protecting rights as a legal category. Based on the analysis of regulatory and scientific sources, the author has classified the forms of protection of the right to a favorable environment provided for in the law. Depending on the endowment of the subject carrying out the defense with the authority to use state coercion, the author identifies two large independent forms of protection: state and non-state. The author notes the legal uncertainty regarding the content of the right to a healthy environment, which complicates its protection. The positions of scientists who consider the right to a favorable environment in a narrow and broad sense are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the fact that the mechanism for protecting the right and the content of the right to a favorable environment are in organic unity and thus in the aggregate affect the formation of forms and methods of protecting the right to a favorable environment by a person. In conclusion, the author formulates the conclusions of the study, relying not only on the current legislation of the Russian Federation, but also on the established judicial practice, as well as on the scientific dogmas of Russian scientists in the field under study.

Land withdrawal for state and municipal needs

2020 ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
M. N. Gavrilyuck
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Territorial Planning ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Right

The topical issues of land plots withdrawal for state and municipal needs are considered in this paper. Judicial practice on this issue is analyzed, as well as the problems of searching for the right holders of the seized real estate. In addition, the article discusses the "guarantees" of compliance with the principle of withdrawal impossibility if the placement of real estate objects is not provided for by documents of territorial planning.

ON THE PROBLEMS OF EXERCISING THE AUTHORITY OF THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CLAIMANT TO RECEIVE THE AWARDED FUNDS: ALL DOUBTS ARE NOT IN FAVOR

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 294-316
Author(s):  
E.V. ZAICHENKO
Keyword(s):  
Bank Account ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Special Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive

The author examines the problematic aspects of the implementation by the representative of the claimant under the enforcement document of a special power to receive funds both in the course of enforcement in the presence of enforcement proceedings initiated in the relevant division of bailiffs, and in the order of presenting the writ of execution directly to a Bank or other credit organization. It is stated that there is no uniformity of judicial practice on the issue of recognizing the right of a representative to demand the transfer of funds due to the recoverer to the account of the recoverer’s representative in the event of the exercise of this power during the initiated enforcement proceedings. The article substantiates the provision on the involuntary nature of the Bank’s actions carried out in accordance with Article 8 of the Law on Enforcement Proceedings, as well as on the unreasonableness of the ban on transferring funds to the personal Bank account of the representative in the case of applying with an enforcement document to the Bank for the purpose of collecting in a simplified manner. It is concluded that there are no significant grounds for differentiating the considered options for collecting funds in order to determine whether the representative of the recoverer has the right to receive the money awarded to the recoverer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document