scholarly journals PROFIL BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP KELAS VIII DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

KadikmA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Egha Fitriyah Ningsih

The purpose of this study was to describe the creative thinking profile of grade VIII junior high school students in terms of learning styles in solving quadrilateral problems. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research were students VIII A at SMPN 1 Genteng, namely two students from each different type of learning style. Collecting data using questionnaires, test methods, and interview methods. Students' creative thinking is categorized into four indicators, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The results showed that students in visual learning styles could fulfill all indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Auditory learning style students can fulfill three indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, originality, and elaboration.

Author(s):  
Niswatul Mufarihah ◽  
Rita Yuliastuti ◽  
Edy Nurfalah

Research on profiles of mathematical problem solving ability in junior high school students on the opportunities material in terms of learning styles aimed to obtain a description of the mathematical problem solving skills based learning styles of students, that learning styles were visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. This type of research was a qualitative descriptive. The subject of research were nine students, each type of learning style consisted of 3 students. The results showed that mathematical problem solving ability of students with the type of visual learning style was superior than the students with the type of auditory and kinesthetic.


MaPan ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 280
Author(s):  
Ahmad Aas Syamsuadi ◽  
A. Aspar ◽  
Andi Alim Syahri

This study aims to describe and determine students' abilities to solve mathematical problems that focus on visual and auditory learning styles. Subjects are eighth-grade students from junior high school in Bulukumba district. This research is descriptive qualitative, which seeks to determine and describe the mathematical problem solving ability in terms of student learning styles. Data is collected using questionnaires, tests, and interviews. The use of questionnaires describes visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. Two numbers of the test determine mathematics problem solving ability in Polya's step, and interviews confirm mathematics problem solving ability. The data analysis techniques are reduction, presentation, and verification. Based on the results, the first subject with a visual learning style can fulfill all the indicators of Polya's steps, but another one is just three indicators. The first subject with an auditory learning style can meet all Polya's steps, but the other can fulfill three indicators.


Author(s):  
Zakiatus Qurrotul A'yun ◽  
Dwi Juniati ◽  
Ismail Ismail

study aims to describe the creativity skills of Junior High School students in solving cube and cuboid problems based on student learning styles. The research instruments used were creativity skills tests, a learning style questionnaire, and interviews. As many as three seventh graders who have different learning styles: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic, working on a cuboid/cube problem. Their performances on such a problem were then assessed regarding fluency, flexibility, and novelty. The results showed that the visual learner produced two different solutions with two different methods/strategies and completed his solution by providing a lot of illustrations/representations although they could not be categorized as novelty solutions. Meanwhile, the auditory learner provided two different solutions with two different methods/strategies. More particularly, he determined the appropriate size and found a suitable size by using a three-variable linear equation for the cube and cuboid problem although he produced some mistakes and uncompleted on the work procedures. Lastly, the kinesthetic learner provided two different solutions with one method/strategy, such as by directly determining the various correct sizes for the problem-solution although the answers could not be categorized novelty for creativity skill. Further studies are suggested to involve more participants to get a wider insight on the students’ creativity for different learning styles.


KadikmA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Lukman Jakfar Shodiq ◽  
Warsosi Apritasona

The purpose of this study was to describe the problem-solving ability of eighth-grade junior high school students in terms of cognitive style in solving two-variable linear equations. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this study were students of class VIII SMPN 1 Senduro, namely four students from each of two different types of cognitive styles. Collecting data using questionnaires, test methods, and interview methods. According to Polya, there are four steps in the problem-solving ability of students, namely understanding, planning, implementing, and re-checking. The results showed that students with a field-dependent cognitive style had difficulty in analyzing a problem because they could not apply the four Polya problem solving while the field independent type cognitive style was very able to apply the four problem-solving steps according to Polya, namely, understanding, planning, implementing, and doing recheck.  


Author(s):  
Louise M Saija

This descriptive and comparative study aims to see the students learning styles and mathematics achievements. The respondent are fifty junior high school students in Lembang, West Bandung, Indonesia. The research instruments are Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ) and mathematics problem solving test. The result of this study are: (1) Only twenty percent of the students have exactly  one learning style and most of the students has kinesthetic learning style; (2) Students who have  three or less major learning styles perform good mathematics achievement,  and  students who have minor learning styles only, perform better mathematics achievements averagely, comparing with students who have major learning styles; (3) Students perform better mathematics achievement when they have more than one learning style, (4) There is no significant difference in the students’ mathematics achievement, between students who have three or less major learning styles and students who have more than three major learning styles.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noushin Asadipiran

The purpose of this study was to identify preferred perceptual learning styles of Iranian young learners. To accomplish this aim, a Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ) used to measure the students’ preferred learning styles. The participants of the current study were 60 high school students. They were first-year high school male students studying in Tehran, Iran. The analysis of data revealed that the most preferred learning style was visual learning style (30% of the participants), and the less preferred one was group learning style (5%). The second to fifth place belonged to tactile (25%), auditory (20%), individual (15%) and kinesthetic (10%) learning style, respectively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Made Ananda Ramaniya

The current study investigated EFL students’ learning style. The study was a survey study followed by 30 junior high school students in Singaraja Bali. In identifying students’ learning style, the updated Index of Learning Styles (ILS) developed by Felder and Silverman (1988) was used. The result of data analysis found that the majority of students prefer visual (76.7%), active (66.7%), sensing (60%), and global (53.3%). The result of this study implied that teachers should adjust their way of teaching to accommodate students’ learning style. They can apply various learning media such as video, animated pictures to motivate the students in learning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Fitriani Fitriani

This study aims to determine the profile of cognitive abilities of high school students in solving trigonometric identity problems based on learning styles. The level of cognitive ability in this research is to remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create, while learning style used is visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. Based on the purpose of this type of research is descriptive research with kulaitatif approach. Subjects in this study were X-1 students of SMA Negeri 1 Jayapura which amounted to 3 people. Subjects taken were one subject with visual learning style, one subject with auditorial learning style, and one subject with kinesthetic learning style, the selection of this subject using purposive sampling technique. The data were collected by using questionnaire of learning style, written test, and interview. Based on the results of research subjects with visual learning styles have the ability to cognitive remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate and create. Subjects with auditorial learning style have cognitive abilities to apply and evaluate. subjects with kinesthetic learning styles have a cognitive ability to understand, apply, and evaluate. Learning styles are not the only factors that influence the different cognitive abilities of each subject. Teachers, individual abilities, and the state of the learning environment also influence the differences in cognitive abilities in each subject. The ability of teachers to create diverse learning strategies can develop students' cognitive abilities even when teachers teach in the classroom with students who have different learning styles.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
Meliyani Meliyani ◽  
Rahmawati Darussyamsu ◽  
Relsas Yogica ◽  
Ramadhan Sumarmin

Learning styles are a combination of absorbing, regulating, and processing learning by students. There are three types of learning styles namely visual learning styles, auditory and kinesthetic. Based on the results of observations that the authors did at senior high school 7 Padang, it was revealed that the teacher still did not practice the relationship between the learning styles of students in their learning. This can lead to the learning styles are not synchronized with learning models, methods and media applied by teachers so that students' cognitive competency become low. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between learning styles and cognitive competency of students. This research is a descriptive research. This study uses a correlation study approach, namely the independent variable in the form of student learning styles and the dependent variable in the form of cognitive competency of students.To find out the relationship between variables stated with correlation coefficients used the Spearman-Rank correlation formula.Based on the research that has been done, it is found that the relationship between learning styles and cognitive competency of students does not mean and the correlation value is in the category of very weak to moderate. In the visual learning style for the second daily test there is a significant relationship and the correlation value is 0.75 with a strong correlation category. The conclusion of this study is that there is no significant relationship between learning styles and learners' cognitive competency.


Author(s):  
Widia Indra Kartika ◽  
Syifa Lailatul Mutmainnah ◽  
Nurlia Agustina ◽  
Moh Salimi

<p><em>Educators need to understand student learning styles so that the delivery of material or the learning process becomes smooth and successful. Educators need to understand also ways to facilitate students according to learning styles. The purpose of this study is to (1) describe student learning styles; (2) describe ways to facilitate student learning styles. The results of this study are: (1) learning style is a learning process of students in accordance with their skills and abilities which consist of visual learning styles, auditory learning styles, and kinesthetic learning styles. (2) ways to facilitate visual learners through vision or depiction, auditory learners learn through hearing, and kinesthetic learners learn through motion or touch.</em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document