scholarly journals PROFIL KEMAMPUAN KOGNITIF SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL IDENTITAS TRIGONOMETRI KELAS X-1 SMA NEGERI 1 JAYAPURA BERDASARKAN GAYA BELAJAR

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Fitriani Fitriani
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
School Students ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning

This study aims to determine the profile of cognitive abilities of high school students in solving trigonometric identity problems based on learning styles. The level of cognitive ability in this research is to remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create, while learning style used is visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. Based on the purpose of this type of research is descriptive research with kulaitatif approach. Subjects in this study were X-1 students of SMA Negeri 1 Jayapura which amounted to 3 people. Subjects taken were one subject with visual learning style, one subject with auditorial learning style, and one subject with kinesthetic learning style, the selection of this subject using purposive sampling technique. The data were collected by using questionnaire of learning style, written test, and interview. Based on the results of research subjects with visual learning styles have the ability to cognitive remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate and create. Subjects with auditorial learning style have cognitive abilities to apply and evaluate. subjects with kinesthetic learning styles have a cognitive ability to understand, apply, and evaluate. Learning styles are not the only factors that influence the different cognitive abilities of each subject. Teachers, individual abilities, and the state of the learning environment also influence the differences in cognitive abilities in each subject. The ability of teachers to create diverse learning strategies can develop students' cognitive abilities even when teachers teach in the classroom with students who have different learning styles.

scholarly journals PROFIL BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP KELAS VIII DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

KadikmA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Egha Fitriyah Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
School Students ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Interview Methods

The purpose of this study was to describe the creative thinking profile of grade VIII junior high school students in terms of learning styles in solving quadrilateral problems. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research were students VIII A at SMPN 1 Genteng, namely two students from each different type of learning style. Collecting data using questionnaires, test methods, and interview methods. Students' creative thinking is categorized into four indicators, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The results showed that students in visual learning styles could fulfill all indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Auditory learning style students can fulfill three indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, originality, and elaboration.

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Thailand di Universitas Islam Riau

GERAM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mukhlis
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Foreign Students ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Lecture Material ◽  
Lecture Method ◽  
Good Learning

Learning styles are the ways, attitudes, and habits undertaken by students to gain comfort in learning. In this case, the researcher analyzed the foreign students’ learning style from Thailand who are studying at the Islamic University of Riau. The result of study showed that foreign students’ learning style from Thailand tended to use Kinesthetic learning style. This was based on research findings, learning style that has the highest value of kinestetik with an average of 84.6%, followed by an auditory learning style with an average of 76.9% and then visual learning style with an average of 61.5 %. As the findings in research are: First, for visual learning style students prefered to use the media in the lecture process. They were more able to concentrate when the lecturer explains the lecture material when looking at the face. Students could not memorize the material while listening to music. Students understood the material written on the board rather than read more quickly. Second, for auditory learning style, students prefered their lecturers by using lecture method. Students more easily remembered well the lecture material during the discussion. Students will lose concentration, when they heard a noise. Students prefered to discuss with friends if they find problems learning. Third, for students' kinesthetic learning styles along with. Students were more interested in lectures that are in practice. Students memorized the material while walking more dominant. when studying students could not read quickly. The findings could certainly be an input for educators in order to absorb, organize, and suit the learning strategies with learning styles, so as to show good learning outcomes and will be in accordance with lecture objectives

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

scholarly journals PROSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA REALISTIK MATERI GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Finsensius Yesekiel Naja ◽  
Agustina Mei ◽  
Sofia Sa'o
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Thinking Processes

The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of students' critical thinking in solving realistic mathematical problems of geometry material in terms of learning styles. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Critical thinking in this study refers to critical thinking with FRISCO criteria. In this study, subjects were taken from students of class VII SMP N 2 Ende Selatan. Each student's research subjects have visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection is done by providing a Problem Solving Test (TPM) and an interview. The results obtained, subjects who have a visual learning style, critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems, able to understand problems, the subject has not been able to determine ways to solve problems, the subject has not been able to carry out the settlement and the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have auditory learning styles, critical thinking profiles in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, but the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have kinesthetic learning styles of critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, are able to plan problems, subjects can carry out well and check the results.

scholarly journals Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP pada Materi Peluang Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Niswatul Mufarihah ◽  
Rita Yuliastuti ◽  
Edy Nurfalah
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
School Students ◽  
Problem Solving Skills

Research on profiles of mathematical problem solving ability in junior high school students on the opportunities material in terms of learning styles aimed to obtain a description of the mathematical problem solving skills based learning styles of students, that learning styles were visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. This type of research was a qualitative descriptive. The subject of research were nine students, each type of learning style consisted of 3 students. The results showed that mathematical problem solving ability of students with the type of visual learning style was superior than the students with the type of auditory and kinesthetic.

scholarly journals Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMK Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-59
Author(s):  
Elsa Komala ◽  
Asri Maulani Afrida
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Mathematical Representation ◽  
School Students ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Student Questionnaire

This research aims to describe the mathematical representation abilities of vocational school students in terms of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles, as well as learning styles that have the best representational abilities in mathematics learning. The research was conducted at SMK Negeri 2 Cilaku Cianjur. The research method used is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The subjects in this study were all 29 students of class X TKJ 2 with purposive sampling technique. The data used are written tests to reveal mathematical representation abilities, observation and questionnaires to classify students based on learning styles, interviews with students. Data processing used descriptive analysis of the percentage of posttest scores, learning styles by looking at the percentage of observation statements and answers to student questionnaire statements. The results of the data analysis showed that the percentage of achievement of the mathematical representation ability of students with a visual learning style was 71.43% in the sufficient category, students with the auditory learning style 71.25% in the sufficient category, and students with the kinesthetic learning style 73.89% with the sufficient category. The kinesthetic learning style has the best representation ability in mathematics learning with a percentage of 73.89% with a sufficient category.

scholarly journals Analisis Kesalahan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-358
Author(s):  
Emi Lara Safitri ◽  
Sudi Prayitno ◽  
Laila Hayati ◽  
Hapipi Hapipi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Transformation Process ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Process Skill ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Word Context ◽  
Causes Of Errors

This study aims to describe the errors and the causes of errors in solving mathematics word context problem in the topic of absolute value. Based on Newman’s Error Analysis terms of  student’s lerning styles. Error analysis must continue to be carried out so that teachers know the types, causes, and solutions to overcome student errors. This type of research is descriptive qualitative.The research subjects of class X MIA 1 SMAN 1 Janapria academic year 2020/2021 were selected by purposive sampling. To deepen the research results, 2 students were selected from each type of learning style. Data collection techniques used are learning style questionnaire, diagnostic tests, and interviews. Data analysis technique used data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. Based on the  results of the data is (i) students with visual learning style and audits mostly made errors in stage of transformation, process skill, and encoding. While  students with kinesthetic learning style mostly made errors in stage of comprehension, transformation, process skill, and encoding, (ii) the causes of mistakes for both students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles are that students less understanding of the prerequisite lessons, cannot make mathematical models, and not know the steps to solve problems.

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mul Iadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scientific Approach

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN MIND MAP DAN EKSPOSITORI DENGAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR TEKNOLOGI PERKANTORAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Darmauli .
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Map Learning ◽  
Technology Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Technology Students

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X, berjumlah 145 orang yang berasal dari 4 kelas. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran . Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci:strategi pembelajaran, mind map, ekspositori, teknologi perkantoran Abstract: The research objectives are: differences in office technology learning outcomes between students taught with mind map learning strategies and student learning outcomes taught with expository learning strategies, differences in office technology learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles with which has a kinesthetic learning style, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on the learning outcomes of office technology. The population of this study was all students of class X, totaling 145 people from 4 classes. The sampling technique is done by cluster random sampling. The research method that uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis techniques using two-way ANOVA at a significance level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: the learning outcomes of office technology students taught with mind map learning strategies are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with expository learning strategies, learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles rather than student learning outcomes that have a visual learning style, there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes of office technology. The calculation of further tests with the scheffe test shows the learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles when taught with mind map learning strategies, whereas office technology learning outcomes of students who have higher visual learning styles when taught with expository learning strategies. Keywords: learning strategies, mind maps, expository, office technology

scholarly journals Profil Kemampuan Representasi Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Aula Amalia ◽  
Nurina Happy ◽  
FX Didik Purwosetiyono
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
School Students ◽  
Verbal Representation ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Student Learning Styles

This study aims to determaine the profile of the representation ability of juniorhigh school students in terms of learning styles. This type of research wasdescriptive qualitative research. The subjects taken were three junior highschool students of eight grade, each of whom had a visual learning style, andauditory learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. The data was collectedusing a learning style scale, written tests, interviews and documentation. Thedata analysis technique was carried out in 3 stages, reduction, datapresentation, and drawing conclucions or verification. The validity of the dataused time triangulation, comparaing the results of the representation abilitytest with the results of interviews in the first and second stages. The analysiswas developed based on indicators of representational ability by taking inroaccount student learning styles. Based on the results of the analysis, it isknown that subjects with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles havelow verbal representation abilities. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document