scholarly journals Crisis matrimoniales, imperatividad de la norma de conflicto y Derecho extranjero = Marital crisis, imperativeness of the choice of law rule and Foreign Law

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
Luis F. Carrillo Pozo
Keyword(s):  
Public Interests ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Conflict Rule ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
El Sistema ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right ◽  
Marital Crisis

Resumen: El sistema español de tratamiento de la ley extranjera se construye sobre tres pilares, el que sanciona la imperatividad de la norma de conflicto, las reglas sobre medios de prueba y la previsión de las consecuencias de la falta de prueba de tal ley. La interacción de estos pilares debe traducirse en respuestas diferenciadas según el sector del Derecho en el que nos encontremos. En los procesos matrimoniales no existe espacio para la libertad de los particulares y sí fuertes intereses públicos, lo que significa que el órgano judicial tiene que aplicar no sólo la norma de conflicto sino también el ordenamiento reclamado por ésta, investigándolo de oficio si no lo aportan los litigantes. Único condicionante es el respeto del contradictorio y la interdicción de la indefensión.Palabras clave: procesos matrimoniales, derecho extranjero, imperatividad de la norma de con-flicto, reglamentos europeos.Abstract: The Spanish system of procedural treatment of foreign law is built on three main pillars: the one which sanctions the imperativeness of the choice of law rule, the rules on means of evidence, and the forecast of the consequences of the lack of evidence of such a law. The interaction of these pillars has has to be translated into differentiated responses according to the material sector of the Law in which we find ourselves. In matrimonial proceedings there is no room for the freedom of individuals, because of the strong public interests. Consequently, this means that the judicial body has to apply not only the conflict rule, but also the regulation claimed by it, even investigating it ex officio if it has not been brought by any of the parties. The only constrains are the respect of the right to an adversarial proceeding and the interdiction of the lack of defence.Keywords: matrimonial causes, Foreign Law, mandatory application of the Choice of Laws Ru-les, EU Regulations.

Grotius and the Origin of the Ruler's Right to Punish

Grotiana ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 396-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustaaf van Nifterik
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
John Locke ◽  
Thomas Hobbes ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Theory ◽  
War And Peace ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

AbstractAn important aspect of any constitutional theory is the state's power to punish transgressions of the law, or the ius gladii. Although Grotius never formulated a complete, comprehensive constitutional theory, traces of such a theory can be found in many of his writings not explicitly devoted to constitutional law. Punishment even plays an important role in his books on war (and peace), since to punish transgressions of the law is ranked among the just causes of war.Given the fact that a state may punish transgressions of the law – transgressions by individuals within and even outside the state, but also transgressions of the law by other states – the question may arise concerning the origin of such a right to punish. It will be shown that Grotius did not give the same answer to this question in his various works. As the right to punish is concerned, we find a theory that seems to be akin to the one of John Locke in the De iure praedae (around 1605), one akin to the theories of the Spanish late-scholastics in De satisfactione and De imperio (around 1615), and a theory coming close to what Thomas Hobbes had said on the ruler's right to punish in the De iure belli ac pacis (around 1625).Of course, Grotius can only have been familiar with the theory of the Spanish late-scholastics, since those of Locke and Hobbes were still to be written by the time Grotius had passed away.

scholarly journals Australia's Response to Illegal Foreign Fishing: A Case of winning the Battle but losing the Law?

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-124
Author(s):  
Rachel Baird
Keyword(s):  
Case Law ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
International Tribunal ◽  
Illegal Fishing ◽  
The Past ◽  
Fishing Vessels ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

AbstractThe right of prompt release has been interpreted by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea as a safeguard, balancing the right of the coastal State to detain and deal with arrested fishing vessels and crew on the one hand, with the interests of the flag State to secure the release of detained vessels on the other. As the incidence of illegal fishing within national fishing zones has increased in the past decade, many coastal States, such as Australia, have implemented increasingly harsh penalties aimed at deterring the fishers. One such measure involves the operation of an automatic forfeiture regime whereby the detained vessel, gear and catch are forfeited to the Commonwealth. This regime operates in the absence of any judgement on the merits. This paper examines the details of the Australian legislation in addition to recent case law and concludes that the operation of the automatic forfeiture regime has the potential to upset the balance established in Article 73 of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

scholarly journals How to deal with conflict without using violence? Analysis of the colombian state and the law of victims, taking away arguments to illegal armed groups

Ad-gnosis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
Nelson Cano Holguín ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Western World ◽  
Peace Treaty ◽  
Armed Groups ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Political Will ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Military ◽  
The Impact

The Colombian conflict has been one of the longest running disputes in the Western world. Although the signing of the peace treaty in 2016 gave hope back to the territory, this process did not happen overnight, so it was necessary to go through a historical journey to get the results today, where one of its fundamental milestones was the law of victims and the framework for peace. Through a review of the literature, this article seeks to analyze the impact on the Colombian conflict and the dynamics of the actors involved from the perspective of the law of victims. Among the most significant findings is that the Victims’ Law should not be seen as a panacea to solve all the country’s problems. Few recognize that it is a first step in the right direction, and the government’s courage to take it must be stressed. In that sense, the authorities must show good intentions, imagination and political will to allow the military response on the one hand, and generate and implement initiatives and policies with facts on the other hand.

scholarly journals The Common Law Choice of Law Rules for Resulting and Constructive Trusts

2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 855-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adeline Chong
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Hague Convention ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Hague ◽  
English Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Hague Convention ◽  
Rules Set

There is a dearth of authority and in-depth discussion concerning what the choice of law rules are for claims involving the assertion that property is held on a resulting or constructive trust. It is usually thought that the choice of law rules set out by the Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on their Recognition (hereafter the ‘Hague Trusts Convention’), as enacted into English law by the Recognition of Trusts Act 1987, apply. However, it is arguable that this is not so for some types of resulting and constructive trusts, namely those governed by a foreign law; or, at the very least, that some doubt exists as to whether the Hague choice of lawrules apply to all resulting and constructive trusts. It is therefore important that the common law choice of law rules for such trusts is clearly elucidated. Unfortunately, this is an area of the law that is distinctly undeveloped. The aim of this article is to consider what are or should be the common law choice of law rules for resulting and constructive trusts.

scholarly journals The Legality of Providing Legal Aid to Perpetrators of the Crime of Murder in the Perspective of the Theory of Dignified Justice

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-604
Author(s):  
Muhlis Safi’i
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Main Element ◽  
Legal Services ◽  
Spiritual Values ◽  
Theory Of Justice ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

The Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is a state of law. In accordance with Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945). As a state of law, Indonesia must guarantee the rights of its citizens to equality and guarantees of justice, including human rights. As stated by Salim, quoting Fredrich Julius Stahl, that the main element of a state based on law is the protection, as well as the recognition of Human Rights (HAM), and upholding dignified justice. Also in Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945) reads: "Everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection, and fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law". This means that the constitution itself has accommodated, the state guarantees the fulfillment of individual rights of citizens and is treated equally before the law. In a state of law, the law is used as the main shield in the movement of government, state, and society. As an effort to realize justice and the spiritual values ​​of humanity (fair and dignified), there is assistance in the form of legal services for every citizen. The existence of a dignified justice theory is a justice provided by a legal system that has spiritual and material dimensions. This theory is a theory of justice that is based on noble values ​​that are rooted in the second principle of Pancasila, "Just and Civilized Humanity" and is inspired by the first principle, "Belief in the One Supreme God". 

scholarly journals AGREEMENT OF THE WILLS FROM THE CONTRACTUAL PARTIES AS ONE OF THE CONDITIONS TO MAKE A DEAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1953-1957
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Patoska
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Written Text ◽  
Theoretical Structure ◽  
Frequent Use ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Law ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

Every agreement of the wills among two or more persons who make mutual law relation or changes or calls of the existing law relation is named as a contrast in the theory of law. According its characteristics, the law relations may be different - obligatorious, familliarious, hereditorious, administrativ, merchanditorious etc., because of what the contracts as instruments of law regulations of that relationships are published in different law branches, like: familly law, heretige law, administrative law, merchandise law etc. Regarding its theoretical structure and frequent use and meaning in the law practice, the obligatory contracts are separated - those which may make obligatory relationships.The obligatory relationships are law connection among two or more parties from which one of them has the right to ask for, and the other is obligated to give the asked or to do, or not to do, or to bear it. The essence of the obligatory relation is in the right of the creditor to ak from the debtor to fulfille his obligation, which means - basicly - they are in creditor - debtor's relationships. Therefore, the obligatory contracts are double law acts according to which, in the agreement of the wills between two parties, the one part obeys to give something, to do or not to do something, or to bear something in the benefit of the other part, the part which takes that obligation as its right.The agreement of the wills of the contractual parties is one of the four common conditions of the genezes of a contract. It is realized by equality of the different whishes and different aims which the parties like to reach by making an agreement. There are the questions which I am trying to answer in my written text: about law relevant will, the atributes which the will should possesse, the ways of giving the will and, at the end, coordinating the wills of the two parts which goes to make the contact. The coordinating of the wills should be done on a legalized or usual way, frequently or usually by giving an offer from the first part and reaching the offer from the other one. That is the most usual mode of implementation the reunification of the wills between the contractual parts.

scholarly journals Analytical Exposition of 'Right to Life' with Reference to Judicial Decisions in Pakistan and India

2021 ◽  
Vol VI (I) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Sunbal Islam Chaudhary ◽  
Bakhtawar Manzoor ◽  
Gul Sher Butt
Keyword(s):  
Meaning Of Life ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

The right to life is an integral right which basically is a necessary requisite to enjoy other rights. This paper begins with an overview of the basic and essential right in which the meaning of life is analyzed and then focuses on how the right to life gains importance in every legislative document and world's perspective to enhance its scope and also its application. On the one hand, this paper analyses the inviolable nature of this fundamental right, but on the flip side, it focuses on the non-absoluteness of this right. Moreover, this article discusses landmark cases decided by the Indian and Pakistani judiciary, which encompass such utilities and facilities that naturally a free-born person in a sovereign country is entitled to enjoy, but all such amenities are subjected to the law of their lands.

scholarly journals Secular and Theological Education: Interaction or Confrontation?

2005 ◽  
pp. 220-224
Author(s):  
Vitaliy I. Docush ◽  
Ya. Poznyak
Keyword(s):  
Theological Education ◽  
The Other ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Religious Organization ◽  
Secular Education ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive ◽  
The Church

If we analyze our legislation in detail, we can see that there are so-called “legal scissors”. On the one hand, the law guarantees freedom by equalizing the rights of all citizens of the state (Article 24 of the Constitution), and on the other - leaves believers outside the legal field (Article 35 of the Constitution and Article 6 of the Law of Ukraine "On Freedom of Conscience and Religious organizations ") declaring separation from the church. It should be noted that even the Law on Education does not guarantee the right to receive alternative (not secular) education for children of believers, regardless of their affiliation with a religious organization, in educational institutions. It should also be noted that even in the years of Ukraine's independence, the issue of granting theological education a proper status that would equate it to secular rights has not yet been resolved. Again, the principle is the separation of the school and the church. Here are some questions.

Procedure

2019 ◽  
pp. 225-238
Author(s):  
V.C. Govindaraj
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Remedial Measures ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Substantive Law

This chapter begins with a brief discussion of the jurisprudential distinction between substance and procedure. Substance relates to rights and obligations of the parties to a dispute, whereas procedure is the means employed to determine such rights and obligations. Matters of substantive law are governed by the lex causae (that is, the law that governs the cause of action), the law found applicable under the concerned country’s rules for the choice of law. Matters of procedure, on the other hand, are governed by the lex fori (that is, the law of the forum), the law of country where the action is brought. The chapter covers procedural matters of interlocutory character; remedial measures for enforcing a right; conflict of laws and the law of limitations; matters of enforcement; underlying norms and principles of stay of proceedings; and proof of foreign law.

The Constitutional Position of the Partito Nazionale Fascista

1937 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-242
Author(s):  
H. Arthur Steiner
Keyword(s):  
Communist Party ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Theory ◽  
Nazi Regime ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right ◽  
Indirect Reference

In the one-party states, of which the U.S.S.R., Germany, and Italy may be taken as the best examples, the definition of relationships between the party and the state has presented a major problem of constitutional theory. No two of these states have solved the problem in the same way. The C.P.S.U., engineering the dictatorship of the proletariat, depends upon methods which are constitutionally indirect. Only in the Commission for Soviet Control is there a constitutionalized inter-relationship between the mechanisms of the party and the state; for the rest, the party relies upon its political discipline over the public personnel. Indirect reference to the Communist party is contained in the new Soviet constitution, in the guarantee to citizens of the right of “uniting in the Communist party of the U.S.S.R.,” and in the incorporation of the hammer and sickle and the slogan of the party into the emblem of the state. On the other hand, the Nazi régime in Germany prohibited the formation of other parties than the N.S.D.A.P. by the law of July 14, 1933, and, by the law of December 1, 1933, proclaimed the formal union of the party and the state.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document