scholarly journals Avaliação de desempenho da revista Terræ Didatica na área de Geociências

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-108
Author(s):  
Flávio Lopes Linquevis ◽  
Celso Dal Ré Carneiro ◽  
Pedro Wagner Gonçalves

This article describes results of a research about the editorial performance of Terræ Didatica (TD). It puts in evidence that the educational journal of the University of Campinas has been well accepted by the community. The research sought to evaluate whether the journal effectively acts as a dissemination tool of geoscientific knowledge. The instruments are Likert questionnaires and interviews with readers, authors, editors and editorial board members, aimed at measuring a series of aspects of interest for Geosciences teaching. The answers strongly support the effort of TD for disseminating high quality articles, both technical and didactic, as has been rightly done so far. The data shows the existence of a critical mass of researchers, teachers, students and other interested parties capable of actively promoting the dissemination of Geosciences in Brazilian society and even forming a recognizable community at the international level. It was suggested the journal to go beyond the context of public institutions of higher education.

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. FNL35
Author(s):  
Kate Lovesey

To all our readers, we are delighted to welcome you to the fifteenth volume of Future Neurology. We are also excited to welcome you to the second Open Access issue of the journal. Since the launch of this title, we have continued to publish high-quality scientific research and commentary, and the open access model will allow us to share our great content with an even bigger audience. 2019 was another exciting year for Future Neurology with the continued publication of timely, high quality manuscripts. We are proud to present some of our content highlights within this article. We would also like to take this opportunity to thank all of our valued Editorial Board members, readers and contributors for their continued support. As we move into 2020, we very much look forward to seeing the journals continuous progression and development.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-4
Author(s):  
Geraldine E. Lefoe ◽  

With this second issue of Volume 9 of the Journal of Teaching and Learning Practice we bring a warm welcome to new members of the Editorial board. The board will be strengthened by their contributions. The Senior Editors are Associate Professor Geraldine Lefoe, University of Wollongong, Australia and Dr Meg O'Reilly, Southern Cross University, Australia. Our editorial board includes members of the host institution (University of Wollongong), Dr Lynne Keevers, Ms Lucia Tome, Associate Professor Greg Hampton, Dr. Michael Jones, Associate Professor Anne Porter, and Dr. Dominique Parrish. Our external board members include Ms Jude Carroll, Associate Professor Andrew Furco, Professor Terence Lovat, and Ms Carolyn Webb. We have particularly appreciated the support of the University of Wollongong’s Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic) Professor Rob Castle who has recently retired. His patronage and support of our journal has seen it move from a small internal journal to a much larger international journal. He has been a great champion for teaching and learning in the local and national arena and his contributions to the institution and to the sector have been greatly valued. We wish him well in his retirement and know that he will continue his contributions to the sector in the years to come.


Author(s):  
Dr. Manuel Gil Antón

A lo largo de esta ponencia el Dr. Gil Antón desarrolla un cuestionamiento fundamental en la discusión por la transparencia en las universidades: “¿Cómo se relacionan la transparencia y la reforma – la vida misma – de nuestras universidades e instituciones de educación superior públicas?” alrededor de esta interrogante va entrelazando elementos de la vida universitaria relacionados con la temática, tales como la autonomía y el derecho a la información. Sobre este último puntualiza que es un derecho que existe, que se debe divulgar y ejercer, para avanzar en la construcción de ciudadanos sabedores de sus posibilidades de acción ante la autoridad.AbstractThroughout this lecture Gil Antón develops a fundamental question in the discussion by the transparency in the universities: “How the transparency and the reform - the same life - of our universities and public institutions of higher education are related?” Around this question the author interrelates elements of the university life related to the thematic, such as the autonomy and the right to the information. On this last the author emphasizes that it is a right that exists, that is due to disclose and to exert, to advance in the construction of knowledgeable citizens of its action possibilities against the authority.


2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. ix
Author(s):  
Iva Adlerová

<p>My seven years with Acta Polytechnica ended on June 30. The opportunity to lead this journal from a local list of reviewed periodicals to the prestigious databases – Web of Science, Scopus, Inspec, CAS and more – was a rewarding experience and privilege for me.</p><p>All this would have not been possible without the continual cooperation and understanding of many individuals, who contribute to putting the journal together.</p><p>In the first place there are authors of excellent submissions and reviewers who contributed their time, expertise, knowledge and experience to help the authors to improve their manuscripts and, through their comments and questions, gave them an inspiration for their further research. During my tenure I saw very satisfying trends in our submissions, mainly the increasing quality of the manuscripts submitted by young researchers.</p><p>I very appreciate the continual support of all the members of the editorial board. As experts in their field they contributed to the editorial process, provided invaluable advices and recommendations. In particular I would like to thank the internal board members, who collaborated with their colleagues from faculties and institutes. Without this motivating communication and cooperation across the university the AP would not be what it is.</p><p>A special thanks belongs to Tomáš Hejda. Seven years ago he created the image of the journal and set up typographic rules and standards. Last but not least, AP could not grow without the work of the language editors, especially Robin Healey.</p><p>And, of course, I would like to thank all the colleagues from the CTU Central Library for their support and intensive cooperation. Without them it would not be possible to set the necessary publishing standards and processes. Especially I would like to thank Lenka Němečková for being a source of energy and inspiration for the AP, and thank to the director of the CTU Central Library Marta Machytková for her support.</p><p>Finally, I would like to introduce and welcome an outstanding colleague and the new Editor-in-Chief Tereza Karlová. I very respect her professional skills, I am convinced that she has the right motivation for the successful management of Acta Polytechnica and I wish her all the best.</p><p>Iva Adlerová Outgoing Editor-in-Chief</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
André Dioney Fonseca

Muitos estudos já analisaram o impacto do neoliberalismo nos sistemas de ensino superior no Brasil e em outros países. O tema, contudo, continua atualíssimo, até mesmo porque uma das características mais marcantes do ideário neoliberal é sua capacidade, diante de injunções históricas, de adaptação. Assim, este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar alguns debates teóricos sobre o neoliberalismo e analisar os principais estratagemas de interferência da dogmática neoliberal na organização das instituições públicas de ensino superior, reconhecendo que essa intervenção, à vista do que preveem os manuais neoliberalizantes, é uma obra ainda longe de estar completa e que tende, no atual contexto, a se aprofundar. Buscaremos, por fim, apontar algumas estratégias de confrontação cotidiana ao gerencialismo neoliberal no espaço universitário a partir de ações coletivas pautadas por um fazer pedagógico crítico e emancipador.Palavras-chave: Neoliberalismo. Ensino superior. Formas de resistência.Neoliberalism in University Education: “surviving in the ruins”ABSTRACTMany researches have already analyzed the impact of Neoliberalism in the university education apparatus in Brazil and many other countries. Nevertheless, the subject remains very current, because one of the most remarkable characteristics of the neoliberal ideology is its capacity of adaptation in face of historical impositions. Thus, this article aims to present some theoretical debates about Neoliberalism and to analyze the main stratagems of disruption used by the neoliberal dogma in the organization of public institutions of higher education. It acknowledges the fact that this intervention is a work in progress, far from being complete, and which tends to be enhanced in the current context, regarding what the neoliberalizing manuals envision. Finally, we intend to indicate some strategies of ordinary confrontation with the neoliberal managerialism in the academic environment, stemming from collective actions ruled by critical and emancipatory pedagogical practice.Keywords: Neoliberalism. University education. Forms of resistance.El neoliberalismo en la Educación Superior: “sobreviviendo en las ruinas”RESUMENMuchos estudios ya analizaron el impacto del neoliberalismo en los sistemas de enseñanza superior en Brasil y en otros países. El tema, sin embargo, sigue siendo actual, incluso porque una de las características del ideario neoliberal es su capacidad, ante las imposiciones históricas, de adaptación. Así, este artículo tiene como objetivo presentar algunos debates teóricos sobre el neoliberalismo y analizar los principales estratagemas de interferencia de la dogmática neoliberal en la organización de las instituciones públicas de enseñanza superior, reconociendo que esa intervención, a la vista de lo que prevean los manuales neoliberales, es una obra aún lejos de estar completa y que tiende, en el actual contexto, a profundizarse. Buscaremos, por fin, apuntar algunas estrategias de confrontación cotidiana al gerenciamiento neoliberal en el espacio universitario a partir de acciones colectivas pautadas por un hacer pedagógico crítico y emancipador.Palabras clave: Neoliberalismo. Enseñanza superior. Formas de resistencia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chief Editor Of Borneo J Pharm

Alhamdulillahirabbil �alamin. The next edition of Borneo Journal of Pharmacy (Borneo J Pharm), has been published at November 2019. Starting from this edition, Borneo J Pharm make changes to the template in the article that will be published. The amendment aims to make it easier for readers to observe essential parts of each page of the article. The aim of this journal is to publish high-quality articles dedicated to all aspects of the latest outstanding developments in the field but not limited to Pharmacology-Toxicology, Pharmacognosy-Phytochemistry, Pharmaceutical, Analytical Pharmacy-Medicinal Chemistry, Natural Product Development, Clinical-Community Pharmacy, Management Pharmacy, and other Pharmacy aspects. This edition contains 13 articles consisting of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Pharmacognosy-Phytochemistry, Pharmaceutical, Analytical Pharmacy-Medicinal Chemistry, Natural Product Development, and Clinical-Community Pharmacy topics. Editorial boards are fully aware that there are still room for improvement in this edition, hence with all humility willing to accept constructive suggestions and feedback for improvements to the publication for the next editions. The editorial board would like to thank the University, all editors and reviewers, and contributors of the scientific articles who have provided the repetoire in this issue. We hope that all parties, especially the contributors of the articles, could re-participate for the success of the publication in the next edition on May 2020


2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-412
Author(s):  
Yoon K. Pak ◽  
Christopher M. Span ◽  
James D. Anderson

Before we expound on our brief “farewell” essay, we wish to extend our deepest gratitude to those colleagues who contributed as authors, reviewers, associate editors, and editorial board members in sustaining the high quality of scholarship in the history of education. You have been indispensable in this process. I hope you realize the extent to which your role as reviewers serves as a means of mentoring, in contributing to the development of a community of scholars through your topical expertise. The majority of authors, junior and senior faculty alike, shared how appreciative they were of the thoughtful and lengthy feedback offered by the reviewers. They did not view the critiques in a punitive way but rather as a place for creating dialogue. This spirit of collegiality is what also helps our field to thrive.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1785-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Peters ◽  
Kevin Daniels ◽  
Gerard P. Hodgkinson ◽  
S. Alexander Haslam

Many lists that purport to gauge the quality of journals in management and organization studies (MOS) are based on the judgments of experts in the field. This article develops an identity concerns model (ICM) that suggests that such judgments are likely to be shaped by the personal and social identities of evaluators. The model was tested in a study in which 168 editorial board members rated 44 MOS journals. In line with the ICM, respondents rated journal quality more highly to the extent that a given journal reflected their personal concerns (associated with having published more articles in that journal) and the concerns of a relevant ingroup (associated with membership of the journal’s editorial board or a particular disciplinary or geographical background). However, judges’ ratings of journals in which they had published were more favorable when those journals had a low-quality reputation, and their ratings of journals that reflected their geographical and disciplinary affiliations were more favorable when those journals had a high-quality reputation. The findings are thus consistent with the view that identity concerns come to the fore in journal ratings when there is either a need to protect against personal identity threat or a meaningful opportunity to promote social identity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. v-vi
Author(s):  
Linda E. Mitchell

With this first issue of Volume 44, I have some announcements to make. First, I am very sorry to report the death earlier this year of one of our long-standing members of the Editorial Board, Vicki L. Eaklor. Vicki was a professor of US history at Alfred University for 30 years before retiring in 2014. She served as a guest editor, peer reviewer, and contributor to the journal for most of her tenure at AU. A terrific colleague, talented musician, creative scholar, and brilliant teacher, Vicki will be missed by all who knew her zest for life, intellectual rigor, sense of humor, and love of good bourbon.Second, as of this issue, I am announcing my retirement from the position of senior editor of Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques.Third, I have the distinct pleasure of announcing that one of our Editorial Board members, Dr. Elizabeth Macknight, of the University of Aberdeen, Scotland, will be taking on the duties of senior editor beginning with the second issue of the year, and that W. Brian Newsome will be remaining as coeditor.


Author(s):  
Homer L. Bates ◽  
Bobby E. Waldrup ◽  
Vincent J. Shea ◽  
Whitney L. Heflin

The primary purpose of this article is to examine whether the university affiliation of faculty members on the editorial boards of three top academic accounting journals is related to the university affiliation of the faculty that publish in these journals. The journals selected The Accounting Review (AR); The Journal of Accounting Research (JAR); and, Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS), were identified by Chan, et al. (2009) as the top three accounting research journals. The board members (as of January 1, 2007) of these three journals were categorized by university affiliation (both current employer and doctoral-degree granting), and cross referenced with the authors (including co-authors) of all main articles published in these three journals during the calendar years of 2007-2009. The results indicate that the majority of the authors at JAR and AOS had academic affiliations different from the editorial board members. In the AR, however, over 60% of the authors had the same academic affiliations as the 101 members of the AR editorial review board. Secondary results provide that a small handful of university affiliations dominate the U.S.-based journal boards, however this connection was not as strong in the non-U.S. AOS. Overall, less than 11% of AACSB accredited business programs are represented on these collective boards, although AACSB accounting specific accreditation does increase this ratio to a 14% representation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document