scholarly journals Analysis of Soft Tissue Cephalometry in Skeletal Class I with Post Operation Unilateral and Bilateral CLP

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Ardan Fitrianto ◽  
Thalca Hamid ◽  
Ida Bagus Narmada
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Class I ◽  
Congenital Defects ◽  
Cephalometric Analysis ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Angle

Background: Facial appearance is an important diagnostic criterion that must be considered in orthodontics treatment plan. Orthodontics treatment is one of the dental treatments to prevent or correct tooth position abnormalities so that optimal function can be achieved including occlusion, proportional arrangement of the teeth and facial profile, as well as the harmony of facial profiles. Common facial abnormality cases include cleft lip and palate. Cleft lip and palate are caused by congenital defects and environmental factors. Purpose: The study was aimed to determine post-operative soft tissue cephalometric analysis of skeletal class I with post-operative of unilateral and bilateral CLP. Methods: This was a descriptive observational study. The subjects were secondary data from radiographic cephalometry obtained from the CLP Center Premier Hospital Surabaya and Universitas Airlangga Dental Hospital. Result: There was a significant difference in line angle parameters in both groups with a significant value of 0.002 (p <0.05). There were also significant differences in the Li-H line parameters in both groups with a significant value of 0.000 (p <0.05). There were H line angle and Li-H line differences in soft tissue cephalometric analysis between skeletal class I group with post-operative unilateral and bilateral CLP group. Conclusion: There was no difference in soft tissue cephalometric analysis between the post-operative of unilateral CLP and bilateral CLP on all parameters.

scholarly journals Broadening the Scope and Utility of Frontal Sinus Morphology for Predicting the Growth Pattern and Skeletal Malocclusion in Cleft Lip and Palate Cases

2021 ◽  
pp. 173-179
Author(s):  
Vikrant V. Jadhav ◽  
Pallavi Daigavane ◽  
Ranjit Kamble ◽  
Sunita Shrivastav ◽  
Meenakshi Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
Growth Pattern ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Malocclusion ◽  
Chisquare Test

Introduction: The three dimensionally affected growth and development of craniofacial structures in CLCP leads to problems dealing with facial appearance, skeletal and dental malocclusion, feeding, airway, hearing, and speech. Objectives: Evaluation and utilisation of fs morphology as a forecast of future growth for growth pattern and skeletal malocclusion in CLCP cases. Methodology: A 30 Cases from Skeletal Class I, III and CLCP will be selected from Department of Orthodontics. Dimensions and area of frontal sinus is evaluated using 3DVT. Parameters are evaluated in sagittal and coronal section. The measurement's dependability will be determined using a reliability test (Cronbach alpha test). Chisquare Test, One Way ANOVA, and Multiple Comparison will be used to do descriptive and analytical statistics. The Tukey Test is a statistical test that is used. Expected Results: Frontal sinus dimensions when observed for Class III will be found greater. Average dimensions will be observed for skeletal Class I cases. Based on the dimensions of frontal sinus observed in cleft lip and palate, we can predict the skeletal malocclusion and growth pattern. Conclusion: The morphology of the fs is evaluated in cleft cases for the upcoming growth pattern and skeletal malocclusion if is known during formulating a treatment plan for the three dimensionally affected jaw bases and craniofacial structure the requirement for later surgical intervention can be prevented.

Mesiodistal Angulation of Each Whole Tooth in Patients With Nonsyndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Is it Symmetrical?

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562096753
Author(s):  
Yağmur Lena Sezici ◽  
Furkan Dindaroğlu ◽  
Abdülkadir Işık ◽  
Servet Doğan
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Asymmetry Index ◽  
T Test ◽  
Class I ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mandibular Teeth

Objective: To assess the symmetry of the mesiodistal angulations of maxillary and mandibular teeth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and compare with the class I control group without cleft lip and palate (CLP). Design: A retrospective study. Setting: University department. Patients, Participants: The panoramic radiographs of 45 orthodontically untreated individuals with nonsyndromic UCLP (mean age 14.13 ± 0.75 years) and 45 skeletal class I individuals without CLP (mean age 14.01 ± 0.74 years). Interventions: The line passing through the most superior points of the condyles was taken as the reference. The angle between the long axes of the maxillary and mandibular teeth and reference line was measured digitally. With the purpose of determining condylar symmetry, mandibular asymmetry index measurements were utilized. Independent samples t test and paired samples t test were used for the statistical analyses. Main Outcome Measure(s): The mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary and mandibular teeth in patients with UCLP was measured. The differences between the contralateral sides were determined and compared to class I individuals without CLP. Results: No statistically significant difference was found among the condylar asymmetry in both groups ( P > .05).The significant differences between the cleft and noncleft sides in the UCLP group was observed in the maxillary central, canine, first premolar and second molar teeth ( P < .001, P = .002, P = .013, P = .012, respectively). The mean differences were found to be higher in the central and lateral incisors, canines and first premolars in the UCLP group ( P < .001, P = .006, P = .001, respectively). Conclusions: Although the cleft-side maxillary central incisors tipped in a distal direction in patients with UCLP, the canine and first premolar showed more inclinations toward the mesial direction.

Vertical and Sagittal Growth in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate—A Retrospective Cephalometric Evaluation

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra I. Holst ◽  
Stefan Holst ◽  
Emeka Nkenke ◽  
Matthias Fenner ◽  
Ursula Hirschfelder
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Class I ◽  
Growth Spurt ◽  
Pubertal Growth Spurt ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Pubertal Growth ◽  
Facial Height ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Male Patients

Objective: To investigate whether the craniofacial vertical and sagittal jaw relationship in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) differed from that of age-matched noncleft controls, before and after the pubertal growth spurt. Design: Retrospective observational study. Patients: The study group comprised 126 patients with CLP, subdivided according to gender and cleft type, and the control group comprised 53 age-matched skeletal class I patients. Methods: Angular and linear measurements were taken from prepubertal and postpubertal lateral cephalograms of all patients. Results: In patients with cleft lip and palate, the maxillary retrognathism became more remarkable with increasing age; whereas, the retrognathic position of the mandible became less pronounced as compared with controls. Reduced posterior midfacial height, a common prepubertal finding in patients with cleft lip and palate, was significant in postpubertal girls and young women with unilateral cleft lip and palate (p  =  .002). The total anterior facial height in male patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate was larger than in control patients (p  =  .002) after the pubertal growth spurt due to an increased anterior midfacial height. In male patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, this finding was due to an increased anterior lower facial height (p < .001). Conclusions: Patients with cleft lip and palate treated according to a standardized treatment concept had adequate craniofacial jaw relationships after puberty. Despite a measured skeletal class I in both male and female patients with cleft lip and palate regardless of cleft type, there was a slight tendency toward a skeletal class III. Findings were similar for all groups of cleft lip and palate patients irrespective of the type of orthodontic treatment performed.

scholarly journals Cephalometric Approach to Vertical Facial Height

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
Suvit Maskey ◽  
Rosha Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Class I ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cephalometric Analysis ◽  
Prosthetic Rehabilitation ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Facial Height ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Face ◽  
Edentulous Patients ◽  
Vertical Height

Introduction: The vertical heights and the proportions are very important for balance of the face and attractiveness along with the good smile. Harmonious vertical proportions and the Antero-posterior relations contribute to aesthetics. Therefore it is necessary to determine the vertical facial height and the ratios in treatment planning of the patients. The aims and objectives of this study are to compare the vertical facial heights of patients considering the Lower Anterior Facial Height (LAFH), the Upper Anterior Facial Height (UAFH), Total Anterior Facial Height (TAFH) and Posterior Facial Height (PFH) among the sexes in Class I skeletal group obtained from cephalometric analysis. Materials & Method: The study material comprised of 52 patients (24 males and 28 females) and lateral cephalometric radiographs were traced with Skeletal Class I relationship. Cephalometric analysis was performed by using hand tracing. Independent t tests were used for comparisons. Result: The total anterior facial height (TAFH), lower anterior facial height (LAFH), upper anterior facial height (UAFH), total posterior facial height (TPFH) measurements showed no significant differences between both sexes in Skeletal Class I group but statistically significant difference in ratios of posterior facial height and total anterior facial height and also there was statistically significant differences in the ratio between upper facial height and the total anterior facial height (p value <0.05). Conclusion: This cephalometric analysis can be applied to determine the vertical height of occlusion which can be helpful in prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients.

P-A Cephalometric Analysis of Nonoperated Adult Cleft Lip and Palate

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyoshi Motohashi ◽  
Takayuki Kuroda ◽  
Leopoldino Capelozza Filho ◽  
José Alberto De Souza Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Cephalometric Analysis ◽  
Facial Morphology ◽  
Facial Deformity ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
The Comparative Study

P-A cephalometric analysis was performed on the craniofacial morphology in 88 Brazilian men with nonoperated and operated cleft lip and palate. For the comparative study, these subjects were divided into the following four groups: (1) 31 nonoperated unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), (2) 24 nonoperated bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), (3) 16 operated UCLP, (4) 17 operated BCLP. Thirty Brazilian men without cleft lip and palate were used as control subjects. In comparison with the control subjects, nonoperated BCLP and UCLP showed remarkable facial deformity characterized by Increased width of various facial parts. Facial morphology of surgically treated BCLP and UCLP, however, was very similar to that of noncleft subjects, apart from the Immediate cleft region. There was no remarkable difference in the facial morphology between nonoperated BCLP and UCLP, except for the cleft width and the deviation of nasal septum base, while the only significant difference between operated BCLP and UCLP was in the cleft width.

A Retrospective Comparison of Craniofacial Form in Northern Irish Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 402-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan G. Leonard ◽  
Brian Kneafsey ◽  
Stephen Mckenna ◽  
Chris D. Johnston ◽  
Donald J. Burden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Cephalometric Analysis ◽  
Northern Irish ◽  
Ranking System ◽  
Facial Contour ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile

Objective This study evaluated the craniofacial form of a sample of Northern Irish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). The quality of the outcomes achieved was compared with the outcomes reported for the six centers involved in the European multicenter study (Mars et al., 1992; Mølsted et al, 1992). Design Retrospective analysis. Patients All children born with complete skeletal UCLP in Northern Ireland during the years 1983 to 1987. Main outcome Measures Cephalometric analysis was used to determine the craniofacial form and soft tissue profile. The quality of the dental arch relationships was independently assessed using the Goslon ranking system. Results The sample comprised 25 children with complete skeletal UCLP who had cephalometric radiographs and study casts recorded at a mean age of 9.4 years (range, 8 to 11 years). Cephalometric analysis revealed no important skeletal differences between the Northern Irish UCLP children and the published results from the six Eurocleft centers. The soft tissue profile of the Northern Irish UCLP children was significantly more convex than the soft tissue profile recorded for center D in the Eurocleft study. The Goslon ranking system revealed that 18 (72%) of the Northern Irish UCLP children had good or satisfactory dental arch relationships. Conclusions No clinically important differences were detected between the mean cephalometric skeletal parameters of the Northern Irish UCLP children and those published for the six cleft centers involved in the Eurocleft study. On average, the Northern Irish UCLP children were found to differ significantly from Eurocleft's center D in their soft tissue facial contour and sagittal lip profile. The quality of the dental arch relationships of the Northern Irish sample was between the best and the less good Eurocleft centers.

Functional Analysis of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with Modified Rakosi Method

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104
Author(s):  
M. Okan Akcam ◽  
Tunç Altiok ◽  
F. Erhan Özdiler
Keyword(s):  
Functional Analysis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Mouth Opening ◽  
Class I ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Joint Disorder ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the mandibular functions of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) by means of modified Rakosi Functional Analysis and to test whether there was a risk of tendency to temporo-mandibular joint disorder when compared with Angle Class I non-CLP patients. Design Fifteen patients with unilateral CLP with a mean age of 12.2 ± 1.91 years and randomly selected 15 Angle Class I orthodontic patients with a mean age of 10.5 ± 2.01 years as a control group. None of the subjects had complaint of symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorder in their histories. All subjects were evaluated using modified Rakosi Functional Analysis method in accordance with a scoring system of the findings. Main outcome Measures Intra- and extracapsular clinical functional surveys were taken. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences between the CLP and non-CLP groups. Results and Conclusion There was a significant difference (p < .01) between the distributions of the total scores of the two groups. A significant difference (p < .05) in right lateral movement was also observed between the two groups. However, there were no significant but borderline differences in clicking, crepitus, and maximum mouth opening findings between the two groups. Because these results do not explain the reason for the aforementioned differences, further studies seem essential.

Palatal and Alveolar Tissue Deficiency in Infants With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy A. Bednar ◽  
David S. Briss ◽  
Mohamed S. Bamashmous ◽  
Barry H. Grayson ◽  
Pradip R. Shetye
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Surface Areas ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Alveolar Tissue

Objective: To investigate intrinsic palatal and alveolar tissue deficiency in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) as compared to age-matched individuals without UCLP using surface area measurements on 3D scans of plaster casts. Methods: 22 maxillary casts of infants with UCLP from the Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery of NYU Langone Medical Center and 37 maxillary casts from infants without clefts from Sillman’s longitudinal study were scanned by Ortho Insight 3D by Motion View Software, LLC (Chattanooga, TN) and measured using Checkpoint software (Stratovan, Davis, CA). The palatal and alveolar surface areas of each cast were measured. The most superior point of the alveolar ridge in front of the incisive papilla and the most superior point of each maxillary tuberosity were connected by a line that ran along the highest part of the alveolar ridge. This line was used to set boundaries for the palatal surface area measurements. The surface areas of greater and lesser segments were measured independently on UCLP casts. A total palatal surface area for the UCLP sample including width of the cleft gap was also measured. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in surface area ( P > .001) when we compared the UCLP area of the cleft segments alone with the non-cleft sample. There was a positive correlation (determine the statistical significance) between the surface area of the cleft segments and cleft gap. In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between UCLP plus cleft area and the non-cleft samples in surface area ( P < .0001). Conclusion: An intrinsic palatal and alveolar tissue deficiency exists in patients born with UCLP. The amount of tissue deficiency for a patient with UCLP should be considered when developing and executing a patient-specific treatment plan.

Photogrammetric Evaluation of Soft Tissue Profile and Frontal Photographs in Repaired Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 566-573
Author(s):  
Shabnam Ajami ◽  
Neda Babanouri ◽  
Roya Afshinpoor
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Normal Population ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip

Objective: To evaluate the soft tissue profile and frontal photographs of 8- to 12-year-old patients with repaired complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Methods: The profile and frontal photographs obtained from 31 nonsyndromic BCLP children (aged 8-12 years: 14 boys and 17 girls) were analyzed and compared with an age- and sex-matched normal population (18 boys and 32 girls). In each patient, 12 soft tissue angular and proportional parameters on the frontal photograph and 12 angular parameters for the profile photographs were developed and measured. Student t test was used to compare the mean value of the parameters between both sexes. Results: In the frontal view, there was a significant difference between the 2 study groups in the facial symmetry angle ( P < .001), lower facial height proportion ( P < .001), upper lip proportion ( P < .001), and interalar width/distance between the inner canthus of the eyes ( P < .001). In the profile view, there was a significant difference between the control group and the patients with cleft lip and palate in terms of nasofrontal angle ( P < .001), nasal angle ( P < .001), angle of the inferior facial third ( P = .032), head position angle ( P < .001), facial convexity angle ( P < .001), total facial convexity angle ( P < .001), and vertical nasal angle ( P < .001). Conclusion: In comparison with the normal population, the face of patients with repaired BCLP showed several soft tissue deformities, especially in the nasofrontal region, even after a surgical repair.

A Three-Dimensional Comparison of Nasolabial Soft Tissue between Children with Repaired Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate and Unaffected Children in Khon Kaen, Thailand

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-450
Author(s):  
N Kumjan ◽  
A Manosudprasit ◽  
A Pisek ◽  
K Winaikosol ◽  
M Manosudprasit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Khon Kaen

Objectives: The objectives were to assess the treatment outcomes of unilateral cleft lip and palate after primary surgery on nasolabial soft tissue of children ages 4–5 years old as compared with unaffected children and to establish a nasolabial soft tissue norm within Khon Kaen. Study design: This cross-sectional study consisted of 60 unaffected subjects living in Khon Kaen province and 20 subjects with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who were treated at Srinagarind Hosipital, Khon Kaen, Thailand. 3D images were taken by a Morpheus 3D Scanner and measured by the Morpheus 3D program. Independent t-tests and paired t-tests were used to analyze the significant differences between subjects with cleft and unaffected subjects. Results: There were statistically significant differences (p&lt;0.05) of nasolabial measurements between affected subjects and unaffected subjects. Unilateral measurements showed decreased nostril height, columella lengths, and nose protrusion from ala base and ala length in the affected group. In addition, bilateral measurements found decreased upper lip protrusion, philtrum length, upper lip height, upper vermillion thickness, and lip angle. Conclusion: This study attempted to establish a norm for evaluating the treatment outcome of cleft lip and cleft palate repair at Srinagarind Hospital in relation to unaffected or noncleft individuals. The results suggest that the noncleft side in affected patients is not an optimal surgical guide for cleft repair and the surgeon should correct both sides of lip and nose features according to the norms. A surgical treatment plan should emphasize correcting nostril height, columella length, nose protrusion from ala base, ala length, and upper lip features.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document