scholarly journals Pengaruh Kepemilikan Keluarga dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kualitas Laba dan Kinerja Perusahaan

Author(s):  
Anna Mathova ◽  
Halim Dedy Perdana ◽  
Isna Putri Rahmawati

This research is purposed to find out the effect of family ownership and Good Corporate Governance toward the earning quality and firm performance of the company listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2012 up to 2014. The sample of this research is using 153 companies for the earning quality model and 137 companies for firm performance model in Indonesia from 2012 up to 2014. The sampling is done using purposive sampling method. The analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis method using SPSS version 21.00. The result of the regression testing of earning quality model shows that only debt ratio influent the earning quality, while family ownership, institutional ownership, independent commissioner, type audit and payout ratio do not.  The test for the firm performance shows that the institutional ownership, independent commissioner, type audit and payout ratio are influencing the firm performance while the family ownership and debt ratio are not.

Author(s):  
Charlie Charlie

<p class="Style1"><em>The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance </em><em>(GCG) which is proxied through managerial ownership and institutional ownership, as </em><em>well as earnings management on firm value. The sample used is LQ 45 company with </em><em>observation period from 2011 to 2015. Data analysis method uses multiple linear </em><em>regression. The results of this study are that there are positive and significant effects of </em><em>managerial ownership, institutional ownership and earnings management on firm </em><em>value.</em></p><p class="Style1"><strong><em><br /></em></strong></p>


This study aims to determine how the influence of firm size and good corporate governance on the occurrence of financial distress in various industrial sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2012-2017. The research method used is descriptive and verifiative. The sample used were 5 sector companies which were done by purposive sampling. Data analysis method used was panel data regression analysis using Eviews 9. The results showed that simultaneously the size of the company and good corporate governance have effect on the occurrence of financial distress conditions about 69.2%. Partially the size of the company has an effect of 39.7%, institutional ownership has an effect 22.4% on the occurrence of financial distress, while managerial ownership has an effect of 7.1% but not significant.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhmad Samhudi

This research aims to examines variables influencing cost of debt in banking companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Independent variables are Good Corporate Governance (independent commissioner, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and audit quality) and voluntary disclosure.There are 19 banking companies which taken as samples during period 2013 to 2015. Analysis method in this research is multiple regression analysis which used SPSS program 16.0 version. Simultaneously testing used F-test and partially testing used t-test.The result shows that partially, independent variables which significantly influencing cost of debt are audit quality and voluntary disclosure with each significant value 0.003 and 0.049 (less than 0.05). Simultaneously, independent commissioner, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit quality and voluntary disclosure significantly influencing cost of debt in banking companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange with significant value 0.000 (below from 0.05). Adjusted R2 value 0,305 shows that 30,5% variation of companies cost of debt can be explained by independent commissioner, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit quality and voluntary disclosure and the explained by variables which not used in this research. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Voluntary Disclosure, Cost of Debt 


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 947
Author(s):  
Achmad Sutarmin

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan bukti empiris mengenai pengaruh penerapan mekanisme good corporate governance terhadap manajemen laba. Mekanisme good corporate governance dalam penelitian ini diproksikan dengan ukuran komite audit, ukuran dewan komisaris, dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial dan kepemilikan institusional. Manajemen laba dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan conditional revenue model yang dikembangkan oleh Stubben (2010). Penerapan ukuran komite audit, dan kepemilikan manajerial diukur menggunakan variabel dummy. Adapun kepemilikan Institusional diukur menggunakan persentase kepemilikan saham, ukuran dewan komisaris diukur menggunakan indikator jumlah anggota dewan komisaris baik yang berasal dari internal perusahaan maupun jumlah dari eksternal perusahaan, sedangkan dewan komisaris independen diukur dengan membagi jumlah dewan komisaris independen dengan total anggota dewan komisaris. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel dari seluruh perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2014-2015. Penarikan sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode sensus (sampling jenuh) dan diperoleh 151 perusahaan yang digunakan sebagai sampel. Metode analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda. Kata kunci: ukuran komite audit, ukuran dewan komisaris, dewan komisaris independen,  kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, manajemen laba. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to provide empirical evidence about the influence of mechanisms application of good corporate governance toward profit management. Good corporate governance mechanisms in this research are proxied with audit committee standard, commissioners board standard, independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership and institutional ownership. The profit management in this research is measured by the conditional revenue model developed by Stubben (2010). The Implementation of audit committee standard and managerial ownership is measured by using dummy variables. The institutional ownership is measured by using the percentage of share ownership, the board of commissioners standard is measured by using the total indicators of the board commissioners members , both internal and external, while the independent board commissioner is measured by dividing the number of independent board commissioners with total members of the board of commissioners. This research uses samples from all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2014-2015. The sampling in this research by using census method (saturated sampling) and obtained 151 companies used as samples. The analysis method in this research using multiple regression analysis.Keywords: audit committee standard, board commissioners standard, independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, profit management.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-39
Author(s):  
Achmad Tjahjono ◽  
Siti Chaeriyah

The Company was founded with the goal of increasing the value of the company as well as to provide prosperity for the owners or shareholders. Good Corporate Governance and profitability is an effort to enhance company value. This study aims to determine the influence of good corporate governance to company value with profitability as intervening variable. The population of this research is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010 - 2014. The sample is taken by using purposive sampling method. Under this method, as many as 123 companies were obtained. The analysis tool to test the hypothesis is path analysis with AMOS software version 21. Data analysis method is descriptive analysis, path analysis, and sobeltest. The results of this study indicate that managerial ownership, the audit committee and the profitability have positive impact toward the of the company value, institutional ownership has positive impact but not significant, non-executive director with negative effect tendency on the company value. The results of this study also showed that profitability cannot mediate the effect of good corporate governance mechanisms on company value. It can be suggested to replace the intervening variable with other variables such as quality of earnings instead of profitability since it is declined as an intervening variable. non-executive director and institutional ownership does not contribute any positive and significant effect on company value and profitability. The following research can use another proxy in the measurement process and consider other theories that could explain comprehensively.


Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-105
Author(s):  
Dede Dahlan

There are many understanding of society, that cash waqf it should not be legal. So is the trust factor of people's money management institutions waqf (Nazhir) is still a constraint. Research conducted in Tabung Wakaf Indonesia (TWI) and Wakaf Al Azhar this analysis method, namely the principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). Here researchers using purposive sampling, followed by giving a score using the Likert Scale. To determine whether the data obtained in the field is valid or not, the researchers used a method tri angular source. The results of the assessment of GCG in TWI and Wakaf Al-Azhar obtain a total score of at Tabung Wakaf Indonesia amounting to 3.15. Then the bias is said that the implementation of GCG at TWI and Wakaf Al-Azhar declared "GOOD ENOUGH". While the results of the evaluation tri angular mention, that the data obtained from the results of research in the field both TWI and in Wakaf Al-Azhar, when compared with the corporate governance principles can be declared invalid according to the KNKG.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Habibatur Ridhah

The primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity.. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner. Tujuan utama dari penulisan studi ini adalah untuk melakukan pengujian hubungan simultan antara aktivitas pengawasan dewan komisaris dan kinerja perusahaan dengan menggunakan sampel sebanyak 156 perusahaan. Penelitian ini menemukan bukti bahwa aktivitas pengawasan perusahaan dapat mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan, begitu juga sebaliknya, kinerja perusahaan dapat mempengaruhi aktivitas pengawasan perusahaan yang dilakukan oleh dewan komisaris. Studi ini juga menemukan bahwa jumlah kepemilikan keluarga, dan tingkat hutang mempengaruhi frekuensi aktivitas pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh dewan komisaris.


Author(s):  
Jun aidi ◽  
Nurd iono ◽  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Icuk Rangga Bawano

This study examines the effect of good corporate governance and sustainability report on company performance. Good corporate governance is dependent on the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the audit committee, institutional ownership, management ownership. Sustainability report is facilitated by economic, environmental and social aspect as well as disclosure index. While Company performance is generated by Return on Assets (ROA). This research was conducted on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2014-2018. The purposive sampling technique was used. Hypothesis testing was done by linear regression analysis. The results of testing the first variable showed that institutional ownership affects ROA and has a negative relationship direction. While the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent directors, the size of the audit committee, and management ownership have no effect on ROA. However, the result of the second variable showed that the disclosure of economic aspects affects ROA and has a positive relationship direction. While disclosure of environmental and social aspects does not affect ROA.


Author(s):  
Yugi Maheswari ES ◽  
Iwan Fakhruddin ◽  
Azmi Fitriati ◽  
Bima Cinintya Pratama

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) yang diproksikan oleh dewan direksi, dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan dewan pengawas syariah terhadap risiko pembayaran yang diukur dengan rasio Non Performing Financing (NPF) pada Bank Umum Syariah. Populasi penelitian adalah Bank Umum Syariah Yang Terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa laporan tahunan Bank Umum Syariah periode 2015-2019. Sampel yang dikumpulkan adalah 14 bank syariah sebayak 70 data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dewan direksi berpengaruh negative erhadap NPF. Dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan dewan pengawas syariah tidak berpengaruh terhadap NPF.  The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) which is proxied by the board of directors, the board of independent commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and the sharia supervisory board against payment risk as measured by the Non Performing Financing (NPF) ratio at the Bank Sharia General. The study population was a Sharia Commercial Bank Registered at Financial services Authority. The data used was secondary data in the form of reports annual Sharia Commercial Bank for the period 2015-2019. The samples collected were 14 Islamic banks as much as 70 data. The results showed that the board of directors has a negative effect on NPF. Independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and sharia supervisory board have no effect on NPF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document