scholarly journals Relasi Agama dan Moralitas Masyarakat Postsekular Negara: Telaah atas Pemikiran Juergen Habermas

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-270
Author(s):  
Otto Gusti Madung
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Weber

Critical theory in the Frankfurt School mould has made various inroads into IR theorising, and provided many a stimulus to attempts at redressing the ‘positivist’ imbalance in the discipline. Many of the conceptual offerings of the Frankfurt School perspective have received critical attention in IR theory debates, and while these are still ongoing, the purpose of this discussion is not to attempt to contribute by furthering either methodological interests, or politico-philosophical inquiry. Instead, I focus on the near omission of the social-theoretic aspect of the work especially of Juergen Habermas. I argue that a more in-depth exploration of critical social theory has considerable potential in the context of the ‘social turn’ in IR theory. The lack of attention to this potential is arguably due in part to the importance of Habermas' contribution to cosmopolitan normative theory, and the status held by the cosmopolitan-communitarian debate as a key site of critical IR debate for many years throughout the 1990s. The productivity of the Habermasian conception of the discourse theory of morality within this set of concerns has been obvious, and continues.


Author(s):  
Alexander Pavlov

The present article considers the problematical nature of social philosophy’s interdisciplinary character. The author considers that we can discover its specification as an independent area of the humanities, with exarticulation of adjacent to social philosophy disciplines like political philosophy, historic sociology and social theory. If it will be done, we will be able as the scientists to prove that social philosophy, which if often considering as the synonymous of social theory, has right to exist. The author comes to conclusion that the most part of social theory supporters try to ignore valuative dimension in “theories” of thinkers they research (Georg Simmel, Hanna Arendt, Juergen Habermas, Zygmunt Bauman). In fact it is а duty of social philosophy which nature is valuative. In author’s point of view, such a trend in theoretical sociology as “cultural sociology,” which use not only explanatory and descriptive methods but also interpretations, reflects the differences between social theory and social philosophy because it emphasizes the cultural dimension of social processes. For example, cultural sociology deals with issues that are more relevant to philosophy than to sociology, in particular, it concerns the problem of evil.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-310
Author(s):  
Ilca Menezes
Keyword(s):  

Habermas discute as chances para a instituição de uma cidadania mundial na sociedade contemporânea, marcada pelo multiculturalismo e pelo processo de globalização. Habermas identifica a configuração histórica da constelação pós-nacional, e partir daí tematizada a transição do direito internacional para o direito de cidadãos do mundo, que alinha o conceito de cidadania à ideia de direitos humanos. Habermas analisa a ideia kantiana de estado cosmopolita em que os cidadãos são sujeitos jurídicos de seus respectivos Estados e membros de uma entidade cosmopolita. Kant elabora o conceito de república mundial, que Habermas discorda, mas oferece o exemplo da União Européia para uma discussão sobre a realização de uma ordem internacional justa e pacífica. A partir da orientação kantiana de constituição de uma ordem de cidadania mundial, Habermas discute a conformação e a viabilidade dessa ideia na contemporaneidade. Para Habermas, é possível soletrar a ideia de cidadania cosmopolita. A partir da União Européia, a cooperação entre Estados e cidadãos mostra que se faz necessária uma comunidade cosmopolita em complementação a uma comunidade internacional de Estados.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung

This article tackles the problem of religious radicalism. Religious radicalism is here interpreted as a protest against the pathology of secularism characterized by the privatization of religion. The privatization of religion is a process in which religion is regarded as an irrational and personal element, so that it cannot play a public role. In order to meet the pathology of privatization, this article offers the paradigm of post-secularism as proposed by Juergen Habermas that opens up the possibility for religion to actively participate in the public sphere. Furthermore, this writing argues that in post-secular society characterized by the public role of religion, it is essential to build a democratic and rational dialogue between religion and philosophy, faith and reason. A bridge that connects both is public reason. This article also shows that the post-secular condition opens up opportunities for theology to promote tolerance in a pluralistic society and to strengthen the public engagement of religion. This can avoid reducing religion to private piety without public responsibility while promoting the public engagement in religion in order to liberate the marginalized and oppressed.


Author(s):  
Jaime Tadeu Oliva

Traçando paralelos entre algumas elaborações de Henri Lefebvre e Juergen Habermas, o artigo destaca a emergência dos conceitos de cotidiano e mundo vivido no campo filosófico e nas ciências humanas (em especial, na Geografia). Constata também que as concepções de verdade vigentes sofrem mudanças e ampliaçào incluindo o papel da estética -, pois, permitir que o cotidiano (e/ou mundo vivido) insira-se nos estudos sociais revela a existência de diferenças e de outras racionalidades desprezadas com a prática convencional das ciências e da filosofia


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Manggara Bagus Satriya Wijaya ◽  
Hermanu Joebagio ◽  
Sariyatun Sariyatun

<p align="center"><em>Learning History in the Curriculum as a whole emphasizes the importance of collective memory so that inhibits the growth of critical reasoning in the Student.</em> <em>This review covers an alternative approach in teaching history subjects applied in senior high school. The use of the concept of critical questions and emancipatory models of "ways of knowing" by Juergen Habermas is a strategy taken by teachers in teaching history lessons that can arouse the critical awareness of student. In-depth research is done by qualitative method to know the activity of teachers and learners thoroughly at the time of learning about the history of Shaykh Ahmad Mutamakkin and the settlement of his case stipulated in the Kajen manuscript and Cebolek manuscript as enrichment of the material history Mataram Islamic Kingdom.</em> <em>The results showed that during the learning prose took place the teacher has succeeded in creating the creation of the process of emancipation in the students themselves.</em> <em>Such emancipation enables an increase in the interest of learners to create their own knowledge on the material discussed in a historical perspective</em></p><p>Kata kunci: <em>local wisdom in history, critical pedagogy in teaching history, </em><em>emancpatory reserach</em></p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Hien ◽  
Christian Joerges

The immediate effects of the Euro crisis have been tamed but the crisis has soured the relations between Southern and Northern Member states for many years to come. Comparative political economy explains the frictions between North and South as a result of different institutional configurations of national economies (Varieties of Capitalism), different interests of capital and labor coalitions (growth model perspective) or ideational traditions (ordoliberal vs dirigisme). We argue that the exclusive focus of these approaches on either, rational institutionalism, interest coalitions or economic ideas obscures that these three factors come together in a long-term evolutionary trajectory that has formed national economic cultures within the Eurozone since the 1950s. We examplify our cultural political economy approach showing empircally how the German and Italian political economies developed in different ways since the end of WWII. In the second part of our contribution we develop a conflicts law perspective offering it as a third way that can mediate between the two extreme positions of Wolfgang Streeck (back to the nation state) and Juergen Habermas (federation) in the debate on the future of the European Union. We show how the culturally grounded diversities of European capitalisms can be accommodated through a conflicts law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document