scholarly journals The The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping Method to Improve Child Development Assessment

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-186
Author(s):  
Yuli Pujianti ◽  
Hapidin Hapidin ◽  
Indah Juniasih

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of using mind mapping method in improving early childhood educator’s skill in mastering the child development assessment. This research is quasi-experimental using a pre-test and post-test design. The population was the entire classes of early childhood education training held by LPK Yayasan Indonesia Mendidik Jaka Sampurna at Cileungsi, Bogor. The participants were 45 early childhood educators. This study used three research methods which are implemented from learning methods in child development assessment was as pre-test and post-test. Data were collected by using two instruments to measure early childhood educators for child development assessment. The data were analysed by using t-test to measures the differences data in pre-test and post-test. The results showed that the use of mind mapping methods can help early childhood educators to improve their mastery of the development assessment concept which averages 51.9 percent. It showed significant results with  ttest value is 18,266 (N = 10, α = 0,0). This capacity building is reinforced by various qualitative findings which arise from early childhood educators’ awareness to change the old learning style into learning by mind mapping method as a learning method that follows how the brain works. This study also found that early childhood educators as adults who are in the stage of formal thinking have shown an understanding that mind mapping method are appropriate, fast, easy and practical in mastering various development assessment concepts. Early childhood educators believe that they can use the method for mastering other material concepts.  Keywords: Assessment, Brain-based teaching, Mind mapping  References Anthony, J. N. (2001). Educational Assesment of Student. New Jersey: Merril Prentice Hall. Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiples Intelligences in the Classroom. Virginia: SCD. Bagnato, S. J. (2007). Authentic Assessment for Early Childhood Intervention. New York: The Guilford Press. Bellman, M., & Byrne, O. (2013). Developmental assessment of children, (January), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8687 Blessing, O. O., & Olufunke, B. T. (2015). Comparative Effect of Mastery Learning and Mind Mapping Approaches in Improving Secondary School Students’ Learning Outcomes in Physics. Science Journal of Education, 3(4), 78–84. Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (2001). Eager to Learn. Eager to Learn. Washington DC: NAtional Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9745 Bricker, D., & Squires, J. (1999). Ages and stages questionnaires: A parent completed, child-monitoring system (2nd editio). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing. Buzan, T. & Buzan, B. (1996). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. New York: Plume. Buzan, T. (1974). Use Your Head. Innovative Learning and Thinking Techniques to Fulfil Your Mental Potential. BBC books. Choo, Y. Y., Yeleswarapu, S. P., How, C. H., & Agarwal, P. (2019). Developmental assessment: practice tips for primary care physicians. Singapore Medical Journal, 60(2), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2019016 DIKMAS, D. (2015). Pedoman Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran. Jakarta, Indonesia. Feeney, S. D. C., & Moravcik, E. (2006). Who Am I in The Live Of Children. New Jersey: Pearson Merill Prentice Hall. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (4th ed.). New York: Longman Inc. Goel, P. S., & N. Singh. (1998). Creativity and innovation in durable product development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 35(1–2), 5–8. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360- 8352(98)00006-0 Hartati, S. (2012). Tingkat Pengetahuan Guru TK tentang Asesmen Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini di TK Kelurahan Rawamangun, DKI Jakarta. Jakarta. Indonesia, D. P. dan K. Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Pub. L. No. No. 146 (2014). Indonesia. Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-Based Learning. Pembelajaran Berbasis Kemampuan Otak. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Jones, B. D., Ruff, C., Tech, V., Snyder, J. D., Tech, V., Petrich, B., … Koonce, C. (2012). The Effects of Mind Mapping Activities on Students ’ Motivation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). Kostelnik, M. J., Soderman, A. K., & Whiren, A. P. (2007). Developmentally Approriate Curriculum, Best Practice In Early Childhood Education. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Lienhard, D. A. (n.d.). Roger Sperry ? s Split Brain Experiments ( 1959 ? 1968 ). The Embryo Project Encyclopedia. Meisels, S. J. (2001). Fusing assessment and intervention: Changing parents’ and providers’ views of young children. ZERO TO THREE, 4–10. NAEYC. (2003). Early Childhood Curriculum, Assessment, and Program Evaluation. Riswanto, & Putra, P. P. (2012). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in the Teaching of Writing at SMAN 3 Bengkulu , Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 60–68. Sandy, M. G. (1992). Pice of Mind. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Slentz, K. L. (2008). A Guide to Assessment in Early Childhood. Washington: Washington State. Suyadi, S. (2017). Perencanaan dan Asesmen Perkembangan Pada Anak Usia Dini. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 65–74. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/index.php/goldenage/article/view/1251 Thomas, H. S. (2007). Today’s topics on creativity engineering system division. Massachusetts. Thornton, S. (2008). Understanding Human Development. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan. Windura, S. (2013). Mind Map Langkah Demi Langkah. Jakarta: Elex Media Computindo. Wortham, S. C. (2005). Assesment in Early Childhood Education. NewJersey: Pearson. Wycoff, J. (1991). Mindmapping: Your Personal Guide to Exploring Creativity and Problem-Solving. Berkley; Reissue edition. Yunus, M. M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) Writing. Creative Education, 76, 619–662.

Author(s):  
Muhammad Taufiqurrahman

Early childhood education is one of the efforts made by the government to start education in the early stages of child development. Through a psychological and educational approach, educators in early childhood must have the characters and competencies that have been implemented by the government in Government Regulation No.27 of 1990 Article 14 Paragraphs (1) and (2). This is a literature research which gathers theories dealing with early childhood educators referring to the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad SAW which is summarized in the terms of Prophetic Parenting. The results of the study are presented in the form of important points for person who is dedicated to becoming an early childhood educator. These points are some forms of character that must be owned by early childhood educators based on several Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad SAW. The characteristics of the educator who wants to succeedin his field are not in a hurry, gentle, compassionate, tolerant, not easy to get angry, proportionate and able to give advice. The results of this study are expected to be used by the head of PAUD to create the characters of early childhood educators in accordance with the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad SAW. Keywords: Prophetic Parenting, Character, Early Childhood Educator


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-85
Author(s):  
Nurbiana - Dhieni ◽  
Sofia Hartati ◽  
Sri Wulan

This research aimed to map the quality curriculum used of kindergartens in Jakarta. The mapping curriculum was done by looking at the suitability curriculum with the stages of child development, needs of children, using the child-centered learning process, and taking ad-vantage of technological development. Subjects were 32 kindergarten institutions in Jakarta (North Jakarta and Jakarta Central), from 14 districts. Kindergarten institutions selected by representing every district. In collecting data, the researchers conducted an analysis content of curriculum and interview with respondents and informants in kindergarten institutions ei-ther principals or teachers in schools who selected as samples. The research team conducted a meeting to gather information that recorded as a result of observation and described in-depth interviews in the diary of researchers — the data collected from 16 kindergartens that are willing to research subject. The data consisted of curriculum documents, curriculum evaluation instruments and interviews’ result that analyzed qualitatively from the beginning of the data collection process including data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion.  Keyword: Content, Curriculum, Evaluation, Kindergarten References Burchinal, M. (2018). Measuring Early Care and Education Quality. Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12260 Dhieni, N., & Utami, A. D. (2013). Evaluasi Konten Kurikulum Taman Kanak-Kanak di DKI Jakarta Tahun ke 1 dari rencana 3 tahun. Jakarta: FIP press. Dodge, D. T. (2004). Early Childhood Curriculum Models Why What and How Programs Use them. Exchange Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, (February), 71–75. Eliason, C., & Jenkins, L. (2008). A Practical Guide to Early Childhood Curriculum 8th. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Fox-turnbull, W. (2007). Implementing Digital Technology in The New Zealand Curriculum. Gestwicki, C. (2007). Developmentally Appropriate Practice Curriculum, and Development in Early Education 3rd Ed. New York: Thomson Delmar. Hainstock, E. G. (2002). Montessori untuk Prasekolah. Jakarta: Pustaka Delapratasa. Hasan, S. H. (2008). Evaluasi Kurikulum. (U. & R. Rosdakarya, Ed.). Bandung. Haslip, M. J., & Gullo, D. F. (2018). The Changing Landscape of Early Childhood Education: Implications for Policy and Practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0865-7 Jackman, H. L. (2012). Early Education Curriculum: A Child’s Connection to the World Fifth Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning. Jacman, H. (2012). Early Education Curriculum. Pedagogical Development Unit, (FEBRUARY 2011), 163. Retrieved from https://www.eursc.eu/Syllabuses/2011-01-D-15-en-4.pdf Kostelnik, M. J., Soderman, A. K., & P, A. (2007). Whiren, Developmentally Appro-priate Curriculum: Best Practices in Early Childhood Education 4th. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Mak, B., Keung, C., & Cheung, A. (2018). Analyzing Curriculum Orientations of Kindergarten Curriculum. In Teacher Education, Learning Innovation and Accountability, (pp. 135–153). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2026-2 Odom, S. L., Butera, G., Diamond, K. E., Hanson, M. J., Horn, E., Lieber, J., … Marquis, J. (2019). Efficacy of a Comprehensive Early Childhood Curriculum to Enhance Children’s Success. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419827654 Plowman, L., Stephen, C., & Mcpake, J. (2010). Growing Up with Technology (pp. 1–169). London and New York: Routledge. Roopnarine, J. L., & Johnson, J. E. (2005). Approaches to Early Childhood Education 4th Ed,. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2019). From Cognition to Curriculum to Scale. Cognitive Foundations for Improving Mathematical Learning. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815952-1.00006-2 Wood, E., & Hedges, H. (2016). Curriculum in early childhood education: critical questions about content, coherence, and control. Curriculum Journal, 27(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1129981 Yang, W., & Li, H. (2019). Changing culture, changing curriculum: a case study of early childhood curriculum innovations in two Chinese kindergartens. Curriculum Journal, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1568269


Author(s):  
Pushpita Rajawat

The relative effectiveness of different pedagogical approaches and pedagogies in early childhood has raised substantial debate. While the other are associated with the acquisition of basic skills and knowledge and some of them are associated with socio-emotional development and problem-solving abilities. In general, research revealed both positive and negative effects of pedagogical approaches, without favouring specific pedagogical approaches over mainstream ones. However, it is important to note that research evidence and studies considering the same approaches in the same context are very limited. On the other hand, specific pedagogical practices are found to enhance child development, including high-quality interactions involving sustained-shared thinking methods, play-based learning, scaffolding, as well as a combination of staff- and child initiated activities. Research impacts pedagogy and pedagogical practices in the sense that research findings can inform policy makers and practitioners on best practices and what works best in enhancing staff performance, process quality and child development. Research on pedagogy and practices is usually not conducted at the national level, but focuses on particular programmes. So, research review has been used as a guide or manual to provide pedagogical guidance for Early Childhood Education (ECE) staff not only in India but also worldwide. The main focus of the study is that how of the best pedagogical practices and approaches across the country can be useful and implemented in early childhood education


2021 ◽  
pp. 183693912199808
Author(s):  
Beth Mozolic-Staunton ◽  
Josephine Barbaro ◽  
Jacqui Yoxall ◽  
Michelle Donelly

Autism is a developmental condition that can be detected in early childhood. Early intervention can improve outcomes, though many children are not identified until they reach primary school. Early childhood educators are well placed to monitor children’s development and identify those who may benefit from additional supports, though implementation of standardised tools and processes is limited. The National Disability Insurance Scheme in Australia has increased the onus on educators to support families to access funded services. A workshop on evidence-informed practice in early detection for autism was provided for early childhood professionals. The theory of practice architectures informed development and analysis of pre- and post-workshop surveys to explore changes in early childhood educators’ perspectives on factors influencing universal developmental monitoring and referrals to early intervention supports using an evidence-based tool, the Social Attention and Communication Surveillance-Revised (SACS-R). Post-workshop increases in early childhood educators’ perceived knowledge and confidence are evident, though recent policy reforms present challenges. Population surveillance using SACS-R in early childhood education is effective for identification and referral for children who have autism, and capacity building for professionals to use SACS-R is recommended.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lehmann

Welcome to our first Issue of Children Australia for 2018. We hope you have had a wonderful Christmas and entered the New Year with energy and enthusiasm for the challenges ahead. We also welcome back many of our Editorial Consultants and especially want to make our new members of the team feel engaged in the journal's activities for 2018. One of our new Editorial Consultants is Shraddha Kapoor who is Associate Professor at Department of Human Development and Childhood Studies, Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi. Dr Neerja Sharma, now retired, who has supported Children Australia for some years, was Shraddha's Professor before becoming her colleague and now a dear friend. Shraddha herself has been teaching in the department for last 27 years in the subjects of developmental psychology, child development, wellbeing, family and gender. Her particular interests are childcare, early childhood education and gender.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document