scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN TANPA ADANYA PERJANJIAN PISAH HARTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-263
Author(s):  
Adhitya Dimas Pratama

Intermarriage is a phenomenon that is rife with the development of increasingly rapid technology weapons. Implementation of mixed marriages must not be separated from the constraints and risks will dihadi offender Mixed Marriage itself. One of the problems that arise are related to the occurrence of the Joint Treasure especially over land rights as legal consequences arising from the holding of intermarriage intermarriage especially if implemented without prenuptial agreement. The author of this thesis wants to study and analyze more about the law as a result of intermarriage without severance agreement treasure to land ownership and settlement of land ownership issues arising from mixed marriage without separation agreement treasure. The method used is a normative legal research, namely legal research done by researching library materials or secondary law while in locating and collecting data is done by two approaches, namely legislation and conceptual approaches. The results showed that the legal consequences of intermarriage in the absence of agreement separating property to the ownership rights to the land after the enactment of Law No. 1 of 1974 About the marriage, property acquired during the marriage is community property as engaging joint property so that if it is not made an prenuptial agreement the property rights to land shall be released within a period of one (1) year or the land falls to the state. The resolution attempts to do to the problems of land ownership arising from mixed marriages without the agreement split the treasure is in the form of drafting of a treaty mate after marriage or reduction of land rights from property rights into rights of use in accordance with the provisions of that kind of tenure, which may possess by someone follow the status of their land rights subjects in accordance with the provisions of the legislation

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
Agnes Geraldine Olga Supriyana ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana

Indonesian citizens who have transferred citizenship due to mixed marriages with other citizens who obtain property rights due to inheritance should be obliged to relinquish this right within one year. If it is not released then the right is lost because the law and the land fall to the state. However, in reality some of these property rights have not been released. This research is formulated to determine the status of land ownership rights that are not released by heirs who become foreign nationals and to find out the legal efforts taken by heirs who have transferred citizenship to become foreign citizens in releasing their ownership rights over land acquired due to inheritance. The research method used in this research is normative legal research method. The results showed that the status of land ownership rights that were not released by heirs who became foreign citizens was lost due to the law. This occurs after a period of one year, and the land becomes State land. Then, the legal effort made by the heirs in releasing ownership rights over the land obtained due to inheritance is to apply for more Indonesian citizenship or to remain a foreign citizen residing in Indonesia, so after one year they can obtain use rights or transfer of property rights. It can be done through buying and selling.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Kadek Megah Bintaranny ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya

The problem faced by the couple of a mixed marriage in Indonesia is that there are provisions in Indonesian law regarding the incorporating of assets immediately into joint property after the marriage. But on the other hand, there are laws regulating that foreigners may not own property rights in Indonesia, so joint property involving a number of properties in the form of movable or immovable property will be impossible for foreigners to own. This study examines two issues: the legal protection for third party, the bank creditors relating to the status/property status of a married couple in mixed marriages in a marriage agreement and the legal consequences of non-performing loans related to the couple’s property if they commit defaults. To uncover these two matters, the study was conducted using the normative legal research method. The results show that creditors are protected in a preventive and repressive manner. Legal consequences for husband or wife property for bank creditors if the debtor is bound in the mixed marriage defaults depend on the form of the marriage agreement made. A husband or wife who is an Indonesian citizen as a debtor is permitted to guarantee the material security of his assets freely and can be taken as collateral for repayment by the bank’s creditors if the debtor is in default.


NOTARIUS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Ulfia Wijaya ◽  
Fifiana Wisnaeni

The implementation of inheritance rights for children born of mixed marriage with a prenuptial agreement can not be executed before they are 18 (eighteen) years old or already married and they have declared themselves to choose to become an Indonesian citizens. With regard to the ownership of land rights, the Agrarian Law (UUPA) explicitly provides that only Indonesian citizens can own property rights to land as defined in Article 21 paragraph (1). This means that what can be the subject of property rights is only Indonesian citizens. The transfer of ownership of land ownership in any way to children born of mixed marriage will cause any form of the transfer to become null and void. When dual-citizen children obtain an inheritance from one parent in the form of land with a proprietary title, their right to inheritance is certainly not wiped out. However, they must wait until 18 (eighteen) years old and choose to become an Indonesian citizen then they have the right according to the rules. Keywords: Mixed Marriages, Dual Citizenship, Children's Rights With Dual Citizenships Abstrak Pelaksanaan hak waris atas tanah bagi seorang anak yang lahir dari perkawinan campuran dengan perjanjian kawin tidak dapat dilaksanakan sebelum anak tersebut berusia 18 (delapan belas) tahun atau sudah menikah dan anak tersebut telah menyatakan diri untuk memilih menjadi warga negara Indonesia. Berkaitan dengan kepemilikan hak atas tanah, UUPA secara tegas mengatur bahwa hanya WNI yang dapat memiliki hak milik atas tanah sebagaimana ditegaskan dalam Pasal 21 ayat (1). Ini berarti bahwa yang dapat menjadi subyek hak milik hanyalah WNI. Pengalihan kepemilikan hak milik atas tanah dengan cara apapun kepada anak yang lahir dari perkawinan campuran akan menyebabkan segala bentuk pengalihan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum. Bilamana anak yang berkewarganegaraan ganda memperoleh warisan dari salah satu orang tuanya berupa tanah dengan status hak milik, maka hak anak tentang warisan tersebut tentunya tidak hapus. Akan tetapi ia harus menunggu sampai usia 18 (delapan belas) tahun, sampai memilih menjadi WNI maka barulah ia memiliki haknya sesuai peraturan yang berlaku.  Keyword: Perkawinan Campuran, Kewarganegaraan Ganda, Hak Waris Anak 


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
Siti Alfisyahrin Lasori

This research discusses the mechanism of sharing joint assets for mixed marriage partners. The results of the study illustrate the applicable provisions with the facts that occur in the community regarding land ownership for Indonesian husbands or wives in mixed marriages. The research method used in this research is normative research method. The statutory approach and the conceptual approach The statutory approach is an approach using legislation and regulations. And the conceptual approach is to refer to legal principles. These principles can be found in scholarly views or legal doctrines . This study aims to analyze the mechanism for sharing joint assets in marriage, is based on the prevailing laws and regulations and provides legal certainty for the husband or wife of Indonesian citizens regarding the status of land ownership in joint assets for mixed marriages. Based on the results of the research, a conclusion is obtained that land ownership for Indonesian citizens due to mixed marriages without being equated with land rights for their foreign partners, which is only limited to use rights. Legal certainty for current Indonesian citizens to be entitled to land with ownership rights.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Sonny Dewi Judiasih

Many Indonesians have committed themselves into a mixed marriage, both in Indonesia and outside the country. Mixed marriage would mean that there are differing nationalities who abide under two different state laws and as consequence of this, issues of private international law in joint property would emerge. On the status of ownership on immovable assets such as land, the nationality principle must be paid attention to, because according to Indonesian law, only Indonesian citizens may have access to Land Ownership Rights. Thus, in mixed marriages, foreign spouses (husband or wife) may not have land ownership rights. Masyarakat Indonesia banyak yang melakukan perkawinan campuran, baik yang dilakukan di Indonesia maupun di luar negeri. Pelaksanaan perkawinan campuran menyebabkan adanya perbedaan kewarganegaraan dimana mereka tunduk pada sistem hukum yang berlainan sehingga melahirkan masalah hukum perdata internasional dalam pengaturan harta bersama. Mengenai status kepemilikan atas benda tidak bergerak seperti tanah, terdapat asas nasionalitas yang harus diperhatikan, yaitu hanya WNI saja yang boleh mempunyai Hak Milik Atas Tanah. Oleh karena itu, dalam perkawinan campuran, suami atau istri yang berkewarganegaraan asing tidak boleh mempunyai hak milik atas tanah.


Author(s):  
Ario Patra Nugraha ◽  
Chamim Tohari

This research discusses about the status of land rights whose ownership has been not clear yet, which is the object of cooperation in utilization between the Sawir Village Government and PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk, according to the laws and principles in force in Indonesia. The problems that will be answered in this study include: (1) What is the status of land rights that are used as objects of utilization between the Sawir Village Government and PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk? (2) How is the land use cooperation between Sawir Village Government and PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk according to Western and Islamic Covenant Law? This type of research is a qualitative research, while the approach used is an empirical juridical approach, namely legal research that functions to see the laws that apply in the community. The results of this research are: (1) According to the Sawir Village Government, the land belongs to the Village Government as evidenced by the existence of a field map in the village C book. Meanwhile, according to the Tuban Regency Government, the Tuban Regency National Land Agency, and PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk, the land ownership is not registered and cannot be claimed as an asset of Sawir Village. According to Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles article 19 paragraph 1, the land cannot be referred to as land belonging to Sawir Village until the certification is completed on behalf of the village. And to get the ownership certificate, the Sawir Village Government must register or submit an application for ownership of the land to the National Land Agency of Tuban Regency. (2) According to the Islamic Covenant Law, the status of the land does not meet the requirements as an object of the agreement. This is because the land has not been legally proven to be owned by the Sawir Village Government. Whereas one of the main requirements for the validity of an agreement is that the object of the agreement must be legally owned by one of the parties who entered into the agreement.Keywords: Utilization, Non-Certified Land, Covenant Law, Customary Rights


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Eko Puji Hartono ◽  
Akhmad Khisni

ABSTRAK BPHTB adalah pajak yang dikenakan atas peralihan hak atas tanah dan/atau bangunan, yang mengakibatkan terjadinya peralihan hak atas tanah dan/atau bangunan dari yang mempunyai hak kepada yang memperoleh hak atas tanah dan/atau bangunan, sedangkan hak atas tanah adalah sebagaimana yang dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria. Untuk membuktikan adanya peralihan hak atas tanah dan/atau bangunan kecuali pemindahan hak melalui lelang, sebagaimana yang dikehendaki UUPA harus dibuktikan dengan akta otentik yang dibuat oleh PPAT.Sebagai salah satu Pejabat yang berwenang untuk membuat akta peralihan hak aias tanah dan/atau bangunan, PPAT tunduk pada ketentuan Pasal 91 ayat (1)Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah jo Peraturan Daerah Nomor 13 Tahun 2010 tentang Pajak Daerah. Atas dasar hal tersebut dipandang perlu melakukan penelitian berkenaan dengan implementasinya dalam praktek, terutama terkait dengan peranan PPAT dalam pembayaran BPHTB oleh Wajib Pajak dan akibat hukum terhadap PPAT yang menandatangani akta peralihan hak atas tanah dan/atau bangunan bekas hak milik adat, dan bagaimana keabsahan terhadap akta peralihan hak atas tanah dan/atau bangunan bekas hak milik adat tersebut.Metode pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan bersifat yuridis empiris, pengumpulan data dilakukan secara primer dan sekunder, sehingga diperoleh pembahasan yang sistematis, yang selanjutnya dianalisis secara kualitatif.Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan peranan PPAT dalam pembuatan akta peralihan hak atas tanah dan/atau bangunan bekas Hak Milik Adat berkaitan dengan Pembayaran Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan/atau Bangunan Bekas hak Milik Adat di Kabupaten Magelang berperanan dalam membantu tugas Kantor Pajak Daerah guna mengamankan Penerimaan Daerah dari sektor Pajak Daerah yaitu BPHTB. Konsekuensi hukum terhadap akta peralihan hak atas tanah dan/atau bangunan bekas hak milik adat yang telah ditandatangani oleh PPAT sebelum dilaksanakannya pembayaran BPHTB atas peralihan hak atas tanah daniatau bangunan bekas hak milik adat tersebut dan sanksi hukum apa yang diberikan kepada PPAT tidak mempengaruhi keabsahan akta tersebut.Kata Kunci : PPAT, BPHTB, Tanah Bekas Hak Milik Adat. ABSTRACTBPHTB is a tax imposed on the transfer of rights to land and / or buildings, resulting in the transfer of rights to land and / or buildings from those who have rights to those who have rights to land and / or buildings, while land rights are referred to in Law Number 5 Year 1960 on Basic Regulation of Agrarian Principles. To prove the transfer of rights to land and / or buildings except the transfer of rights through auctions, as required by the BAL shall be proven by an authentic deed made by PPAT.As one of the Officials authorized to make a land / building title transfer deed, PPAT subject to the provisions of Article 91 paragraph (1) of Law Number 28 Year 2009 regarding Regional Tax and Regional Levy jo Local Regulation Number 13 Year 2010 on Regional Taxes. On the basis of this matter, it is deemed necessary to conduct research related to its implementation in practice, especially related to the role of PPAT in the payment of BPHTB by the Taxpayer and the legal effect on the PPAT signing the deed of transfer of land rights and / or the building of customary property rights, and how the legality deed of transfer of rights over the land and / or the former building of customary property rights.The research method used is empirical juridical, data collection is done in primary and secondary, so that obtained a systematic discussion, which then analyzed qualitatively.The result of the research reveals the role of PPAT in making the deed of transfer of rights to the land and / or the building of the former Customary Property in relation to the Payment of Acquisition of Land Ownership and / or Used Customary Rights in Magelang Regency to assist the Regional Tax Office duty to secure the Regional Revenue of the Regional Tax Sector ie BPHTB. Legal consequences to the deed of transfer of land rights and / or buildings of customary property rights that have been signed by PPAT prior to the implementation of the payment of BPHTB over the transfer of land rights and or the building of the former customary property rights and the legal sanction given to the PPAT does not affect the validity of the deed .Keywords: PPAT, BPHTB, Land Used Indigenous Rights.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Bayu Sagita

Abstract : In the process of buying and selling land as the basis for the transition of land rights from the seller to buyers in the area of Bolaang Mongondow, especially in Lolak Village District Lolak is done in two ways, namely the process of buying and selling as in general the sale and purchase of land ownership is a unity of land and buildings and plants above it and the process of buying and selling of land is not a unity between the land and buildings and plants above it or the sale and purchase by using the principle of separation horizontal is separate sale and purchase. However, in the development of the practice of the process of buying and selling land that is considered as part of the process of buying and selling property rights on customary land or customary law, it raises legal problems, the process of buying and selling property rights on land that can not provide legal protection of the status of property in full for the buyer in the land and enjoy the benefits and functions of the land itself.


2017 ◽  
pp. 154-166
Author(s):  
Bayu Sagita Damopolii Bayu Sagita Damopolii ◽  
Imam Koeswahyono Imam Koeswahyono ◽  
Moh. Fadli Moh. Fadli

In the process of buying and selling land as the basis for the transition of land rights from the seller to buyers in the area of Bolaang Mongondow, especially in Lolak Village District Lolak is done in two ways, namely the process of buying and selling as in general the sale and purchase of land ownership is a unity of land and buildings and plants above it and the process of buying and selling of land is not a unity between the land and buildings and plants above it or the sale and purchase by using the principle of separation horizontal is separate sale and purchase. However, in the development of the practice of the process of buying and selling land that is considered as part of the process of buying and selling property rights on customary land or customary law, it raises legal problems, the process of buying and selling property rights on land that can not provide legal protection of the status of property in full for the buyer in the land and enjoy the benefits and functions of the land itself.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-275
Author(s):  
Desak Putu Kania Pratiwi ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini

Humans are naturally born as individual and social beings, destined to have a life partner to have offspring and made a happy family. In marriages, both marriages between countries or different nationalities have legal problems regarding injustice in exercising the rights and obligations of the husband or wife. The existence of a marriage promise is very important to protect these rights and obligations. This research explains how legal the status of the marriage agreement in marriage and the responsiveness the law of an agreement that is not registered. This research used normative legal research and analysis uses interpretative, systematic, and argumentative methods. Sources of data in this study are sources of primary and secondary legal materials. The result of the research is the legal position of the marriage agreement in mixed marriages, which is to provide legal certainty in carrying out legal actions on assets under control, either inherited or acquired after or during marriage, as well as providing protection for the rights and obligations of each party in managing the house stairs. Second, the legal consequence of a marriage agreement that does not register in a mixed marriage is that the marriage agreement is still binding on both parties, but the marriage agreement does not bind a third party or there is a legal action committed against the property under their respective control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document