scholarly journals Mechanism for collective property sharing in mixed marriage

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
Siti Alfisyahrin Lasori

This research discusses the mechanism of sharing joint assets for mixed marriage partners. The results of the study illustrate the applicable provisions with the facts that occur in the community regarding land ownership for Indonesian husbands or wives in mixed marriages. The research method used in this research is normative research method. The statutory approach and the conceptual approach The statutory approach is an approach using legislation and regulations. And the conceptual approach is to refer to legal principles. These principles can be found in scholarly views or legal doctrines . This study aims to analyze the mechanism for sharing joint assets in marriage, is based on the prevailing laws and regulations and provides legal certainty for the husband or wife of Indonesian citizens regarding the status of land ownership in joint assets for mixed marriages. Based on the results of the research, a conclusion is obtained that land ownership for Indonesian citizens due to mixed marriages without being equated with land rights for their foreign partners, which is only limited to use rights. Legal certainty for current Indonesian citizens to be entitled to land with ownership rights.

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Sonny Dewi Judiasih

Many Indonesians have committed themselves into a mixed marriage, both in Indonesia and outside the country. Mixed marriage would mean that there are differing nationalities who abide under two different state laws and as consequence of this, issues of private international law in joint property would emerge. On the status of ownership on immovable assets such as land, the nationality principle must be paid attention to, because according to Indonesian law, only Indonesian citizens may have access to Land Ownership Rights. Thus, in mixed marriages, foreign spouses (husband or wife) may not have land ownership rights. Masyarakat Indonesia banyak yang melakukan perkawinan campuran, baik yang dilakukan di Indonesia maupun di luar negeri. Pelaksanaan perkawinan campuran menyebabkan adanya perbedaan kewarganegaraan dimana mereka tunduk pada sistem hukum yang berlainan sehingga melahirkan masalah hukum perdata internasional dalam pengaturan harta bersama. Mengenai status kepemilikan atas benda tidak bergerak seperti tanah, terdapat asas nasionalitas yang harus diperhatikan, yaitu hanya WNI saja yang boleh mempunyai Hak Milik Atas Tanah. Oleh karena itu, dalam perkawinan campuran, suami atau istri yang berkewarganegaraan asing tidak boleh mempunyai hak milik atas tanah.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 829
Author(s):  
Riyanto Riyanto ◽  
Arief Cholil

Abstract. The bride and groom's candidate before the marriage takes place, can make a "Marriage Agreement" to provide legal certainty related to property and for legal protection against third parties. Primarily for mixed marriages, the bride and groom are subject to two different legal systems according to their nationality. , the agreement made by the Marriage Agreement has been amended by the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 dated October 27, 2016. The positive implication for the intermarriage is that it can have land rights in the form of Ownership Rights (HM) and Right to Build (HGB) without having to divorce first. Then, this research intends to discuss the practice of the Implementation of Mixed Marriage Agreements based on Act No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015. The purpose of this study was to describe the role of the notary in the deed Mating Agreement and its implementation after the decision of the Court in question, and to know the legal implications of the couples in mixed marriages. The method in this research is juridical empirical research methods.Keywords: Mating Agreement; Marriage Commingling; Deed; Decision of the Constitutional Court; Marriage Act.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-263
Author(s):  
Adhitya Dimas Pratama

Intermarriage is a phenomenon that is rife with the development of increasingly rapid technology weapons. Implementation of mixed marriages must not be separated from the constraints and risks will dihadi offender Mixed Marriage itself. One of the problems that arise are related to the occurrence of the Joint Treasure especially over land rights as legal consequences arising from the holding of intermarriage intermarriage especially if implemented without prenuptial agreement. The author of this thesis wants to study and analyze more about the law as a result of intermarriage without severance agreement treasure to land ownership and settlement of land ownership issues arising from mixed marriage without separation agreement treasure. The method used is a normative legal research, namely legal research done by researching library materials or secondary law while in locating and collecting data is done by two approaches, namely legislation and conceptual approaches. The results showed that the legal consequences of intermarriage in the absence of agreement separating property to the ownership rights to the land after the enactment of Law No. 1 of 1974 About the marriage, property acquired during the marriage is community property as engaging joint property so that if it is not made an prenuptial agreement the property rights to land shall be released within a period of one (1) year or the land falls to the state. The resolution attempts to do to the problems of land ownership arising from mixed marriages without the agreement split the treasure is in the form of drafting of a treaty mate after marriage or reduction of land rights from property rights into rights of use in accordance with the provisions of that kind of tenure, which may possess by someone follow the status of their land rights subjects in accordance with the provisions of the legislation


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
Agnes Geraldine Olga Supriyana ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana

Indonesian citizens who have transferred citizenship due to mixed marriages with other citizens who obtain property rights due to inheritance should be obliged to relinquish this right within one year. If it is not released then the right is lost because the law and the land fall to the state. However, in reality some of these property rights have not been released. This research is formulated to determine the status of land ownership rights that are not released by heirs who become foreign nationals and to find out the legal efforts taken by heirs who have transferred citizenship to become foreign citizens in releasing their ownership rights over land acquired due to inheritance. The research method used in this research is normative legal research method. The results showed that the status of land ownership rights that were not released by heirs who became foreign citizens was lost due to the law. This occurs after a period of one year, and the land becomes State land. Then, the legal effort made by the heirs in releasing ownership rights over the land obtained due to inheritance is to apply for more Indonesian citizenship or to remain a foreign citizen residing in Indonesia, so after one year they can obtain use rights or transfer of property rights. It can be done through buying and selling.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-55
Author(s):  
Irman Widi Kurniawan ◽  
Etty Mulyati ◽  
Betty Rubiati

ABSTRAKDi dalam bagian kedua UUPA mengatur tentang pelaksanaan konversi hak atas tanah menjadi wujud kepastian hukum sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Namun kepastian hukum terhadap konversi Hak atas tanah barat terutama sertifikat Hak Eigendom Verponding masih menjadi problematika tersendiri bagi masyarakat yang memiliki bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah barat tersebut apabila dijadikan sebuah jaminan guna memperoleh fasilitas kredit. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif dengan kajian bahan hukum primer, sekunder serta tersier. Berdasarkan pembahasan tersebut bahwa Kepastian Hukum terkait konversi hak Eigendom Verponding telah memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat dengan ketentuan diperlukan konversi sehingga dapat dijadikan objek jaminan namun dalam prakteknya masih terdapat objek jaminan dengan tidak memperhatikan asal mula objek jaminan tersebut serta akibat hukum terhadap konversi hak atas tanah tersebut adalah pemberlakuan UUPA menjadi dasar bahwasanya prinsip status quo hak atas tanah terdahulu memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dengan ketentuan hak-hak lama menjadi tidak diakui keberadaannya. Kata Kunci: hak atas tanah; hak barat; kepastian hukum jaminan; konversi ABSTRACTIn the second section of the UUPA regulates the conversion of land rights into a form of legal certainty as stipulated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. But the legal certainty of the conversion of the Right to western land, especially the Eigendom Verponding Rights certificate, remains a problem for people who have proof of ownership of the western land if it is used as a guarantee to obtain credit facilities. The research method used is normative juridical with the study of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the discussion that legal certainty related to the conversion of rights Eigendom Verponding has had a binding legal force with the necessary provisions of conversion so that it can be used as an object of guarantee but in practice there is still an object of guarantee by not taking into account the origin of the object of the guarantee and the legal consequences of the conversion of the right to land is the enactment of the UUPA being the basis that the principle of the status quo of the former land rights provides a guarantee of legal certainty with the provisions of old rights to be unclaimed civility. Keywords: conversion; guarantee legal certainty; land rights; western rights


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Fatimiah Azzahra

This article aims to discuss the conflict of tenure rights between Perhutani and the community and the status of land held by the community after the entry into force of Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agraria Reform. The study uses a sociological juridical method. The location of the study is in the forest area of   Perhutani Public Corporation, Malang Regency. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the study show that conflicts over ownership of land rights between Perhutani and the community have been going on for a long time. Physically the land has been controlled by the community since the Dutch colonial era and passed down from generation to generation. The granting of permission to manage the land and payment of land tax strengthened the community’s argument about land ownership. The land status which is the object of the dispute is based on Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agrarian Reform became the authority of Perhutani Public Corporation. Communities can get ownership rights or get land compensation if the Ministry of Forestry releases the land.


LEGALITAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Amin Slamet

The purpose of this research is: First, to find out the implementation of the transfer of ownership of the inherited land in Samarinda. Second, to find out the inhibiting factors in the registration of the transfer of title to inherited land in Samarinda. To find out the purpose above, then determined the research method is The Qualitative Descriptive Method, with sampling techniques by purposive sampling. Data collection techniques such as interviews with observations and study documents relevant to the problem under study.Therefore it is hoped that the National Land Agency as the only body that regulates land in Indonesia is expected to be able to better socialize land regulations so that people can better understand the importance of registering land rights transfers using deeds to provide legal certainty and protection for right holders. as well as the main purpose of land registration itself.Keywords: Land Ownership, Inheritance


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Kadek Megah Bintaranny ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya

The problem faced by the couple of a mixed marriage in Indonesia is that there are provisions in Indonesian law regarding the incorporating of assets immediately into joint property after the marriage. But on the other hand, there are laws regulating that foreigners may not own property rights in Indonesia, so joint property involving a number of properties in the form of movable or immovable property will be impossible for foreigners to own. This study examines two issues: the legal protection for third party, the bank creditors relating to the status/property status of a married couple in mixed marriages in a marriage agreement and the legal consequences of non-performing loans related to the couple’s property if they commit defaults. To uncover these two matters, the study was conducted using the normative legal research method. The results show that creditors are protected in a preventive and repressive manner. Legal consequences for husband or wife property for bank creditors if the debtor is bound in the mixed marriage defaults depend on the form of the marriage agreement made. A husband or wife who is an Indonesian citizen as a debtor is permitted to guarantee the material security of his assets freely and can be taken as collateral for repayment by the bank’s creditors if the debtor is in default.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-205
Author(s):  
Ana Silviana

Abstract This study aims to study normatively to see the implementation of the one map policy in the land sector and prevent land administration conflicts. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the study show that the One Map Policy or One Map Policy in order to realize the Land Administration Order is still a roadblock because there are still many problems that arise related to ownership disputes and duplicate disputes as evidence of land ownership. In an effort to accelerate the development of quality spatial data, efforts have been made through the implementation of land registration to ensure the legal certainty of land rights. Keywords: One Map Policy, Agrarian Conflict, Land Administration Abstrak  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara normatif untuk melihat implementasi kebijakan one map policy di bidang pertanahan dan mencegah konflik administrasi pertanahan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Kebijakan Satu Peta atau One Map Policy dalam rangka mewujudkan Tertib Administrasi Pertanahan masih dipersimpangan jalan, karena masih banyaknya permasalahan yang muncul terkait dengan sengketa kepemilikan dan sengketa duplikasi alat bukti kepemilikan tanah. Dalam upaya untuk percepatan pembangunan data spasial yang berkualitas telah dilakukan usaha-usaha melalui penyelenggaraan pendaftaran tanah untuk menjamin kepastian hukum hak-hak atas tanah. Kata Kunci: Kebijakan Satu Peta, Konflik Agraria, Administrasi Pertanahan


Author(s):  
Khairul Ikhsan, Adji Suradji Muhammad

The The focus of the discussion in this paper will examine leadership theoretically and case studies are seen as an important element in bringing stakeholders to direct them to carry out collaborative processes or what we call Facilitative Leadership. But this concept of leadership is not a traditional leadership concept that has been known. Jokowi-Jusuf Kalla's leadership contains the agenda of the Agrarian Reform which starts from the regions and villages. In the Nine Priority Agenda, also known as Nawacita, it was stated that agrarian reform in the form of direct pledging guarantees legal certainty in land ownership rights, resolving land disputes and opposing the criminalization of the resumption of community land rights. It is interesting to study how the correlation of the National Agrarian Reform Program by the Government of President Joko Widodo is if we relate it to the concept of facilitative leadership.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document