scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL) PADA BNI SYARIAH TAHUN 2014-2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Maya Nurwijayanti ◽  
Lukman Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Profit Sharing ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Knowing How ◽  
Fund Managers ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

Abstract: Islamic banks with profit sharing systems have been designed to establish cooperation in bearing business risks and profit sharing between business owners (Shahibul Maal) and fund managers (mudarib). The bank under study is BNI Syariah. This study aims: 1) Knowing how the rating of Bank BNI Syariah's health level is reviewed from the Risk Profile in 2014-2017? 2) Knowing how to assess the soundness of Bank BNI Syariah in terms of Good Corporate Governance in 2014-2017? 3) Knowing how the rating of Bank BNI Syariah's health level is reviewed from Earnings in 2014-2017? 4) Knowing how the soundness rating of Bank BNI Syariah is reviewed from Capital in 2014-2017? This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach, the data collection techniques used are documentation techniques. The method of data analysis uses the RGEC method. The data is taken from the published annual financial reports at BNI Syariah. The analysis results obtained by the Risk Profile Level on BNI Syariah in 2014-2017 are "Adequate". The level of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) of BNI Syariah in 2014-2017 was ranked second in line with the criteria of "good", based on the results of bank BNI Syariah self assessment obtained from the corporate governance report. Level of Earnings (Rentability) in BNI Syariah Year 2014-2017 is "Adequate". Capital Level at BNI Syariah in 2014-2017 is "Very Adequate". Keywords: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital الملخص: المصرفية الإسلامية هو نظام مصرفي تم تطويره على أساس الشريعة الإسلامية تم تصميم البنوك الإسلامية التي لديها نظم مشاركة الأرباح من أجل تأسيس التعاون في تنفيذ المخاطر التجارية ومشاركة نتائج الأعمال بين:  صاحب المال الذي يحتفظ بأمواله في المؤسسة و المضارب كمدير صندوق البنوك بحاجة إلى تقييم لصحتهم حتى يتمكنوا من كسب ثقة المجتمع البنك قيد الدراسة هو BNI Syariah تهدف هذه الدراسة إلى: 1. معرفة كيف يتم تقييم مستوى الصحة من بنك BNI Syariah من ملف المخاطر في 2014-2017؟. 2. معرفة كيفية تقييم سلامة بنك BNI Syariah من حيث حوكمة الشركات الجيدة في 2014-2017؟.3 . معرفة كيف يتم تقييم مستوى الصحة من بنك BNI Syariah من الأرباح في 2014-2017؟.4 . معرفة كيف يتم تقييم تصنيف سلامة بنك BNI Syariah من رأس المال في 2014-2017؟. تستخدم هذه الدراسة المنهج الوصفي الكمي، وتقنيات جمع البيانات المستخدمة هي تقنيات التوثيق. طريقة تحليل البيانات المستخدمة هي طريقة .RGECالبيانات المستخدمة تأتي من البيانات المالية للنهاية الصادرة عن بنك BNI Syariah. من نتائج التحليل التي تم الحصول عليها مستوى المخاطر الشخصية في BNI Syariah في 2014-2017 هو "كافية". وقد تم تصنيف مستوى حوكمة الشركات الجيدة (GCG) في BNI Syariah في 2014 و 2015 و 2016 و 2017 في المرتبة الثانية بمعايير "جيدة" ، بناءً على نتائج التقييم الذاتي للبنك الإسلامي للشريعة الإسلامية الذي تم الحصول عليه من تقرير حوكمة الشركات مستوى الأرباح (القابلية للإستثمار) في BNI Syariah في عام 2014 كافٍ ، في 2015 كان "كافية "، في عام 2016 كان "كافية"، وفي 2017 كان "كافية". مستوى رأس المال (رأس المال) من BNI Syariah في عام 2014 كان "كافية جدا"، في عام 2015 كان "كافية جدا"، في عام 2016 كان "كافية جدا"، وفي عام 2017 كان "كافية جدا". Abstrak: Bank syariah dengan sistem bagi hasil dirancang untuk terbinanya kebersamaan dalam menanggung risiko dan bagi hasil usaha antara: pemilik dana (shahibul maal) dengan pengelola dana (mudharib). Bank yang diteliti adalah BNI Syariah. Penelitian ini bertujuan: 1) Mengetahui bagaimana penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank BNI Syariah ditinjau dari Risk Profile pada tahun 2014-2017? 2) Mengetahui bagaimana penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank BNI Syariah ditinjau dari Good Corporate Governance pada tahun 2014-2017? 3) Mengetahui bagaimana penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank BNI Syariah ditinjau dari Earnings pada tahun 2014-2017? 4) Mengetahui bagaimana penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank BNI  Syariah ditinjau dari Capital pada tahun 2014-2017? Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif, teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah teknik dokumentasi. Metode analisis data menggunakan metode RGEC. Adapun datanya berasal dari laporan keuangan akhir tahun BNI Syariah yang dipublikasikan. Hasil analisis diperoleh Tingkat Risk Profile (Profil Risiko) pada BNI Syariah Tahun 2014-2017 adalah “Memadai”. Tingkat Good Corporate Governance (GCG) BNI Syariah pada tahun 2014-2017 berturut-turut menempati peringkat 2 dengan kriteria “baik”, berdasarkan hasil self assessment bank BNI Syariah yang diperoleh dari laporan tata kelola perusahaan. Tingkat Earnings (Rentabilitas) pada BNI Syariah Tahun 2014-2017 adalah “Memadai”. Tingkat Capital (Permodalan) pada BNI Syariah Tahun 2014-2017 adalah “Sangat Memadai”.

scholarly journals Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan RGEC (Studi pada PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero), Tbk dan PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk Periode 2014-2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Marissa Putriana ◽  
Susi Artati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Risk Indicators ◽  
Risk Indicator ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Value Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This research aims to analyse how the health level comparison of PT Bank Mandiri (Persero), Tbk with PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) approach In 2014-2018. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. Research results show the health level of Bank Mandiri and BNI in 2014-2018 overall healthy. Risk Profile Bank Mandiri and BNI bank with the credit risk indicator gained a healthy predicate and with the risk indicators of the liquidity of both banks earned a fairly healthy predicate. Assessment of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) based on Self Assessment showed that Bank Mandiri obtained very good predicate while BNI Bank obtained good predicate. The Earnings assessment of the ROA and NIM ratio analysis and Capital valuation based on the CAR value analysis showed that Bank Mandiri and BNI Bank gained a very healthy predicate.

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) (Studi Pada Bank yang Termasuk Saham LQ45 Sub Sektor Perbankan Tahun 2010–2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Net Interest Margin ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio

This paper seeks to find out the health level of banks in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index. It used descriptive methods with qualitative approach that is Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) model. RBBR model consists of 4 factors among others: risk profile, good corporate governance (GCG), earnings and capital factor.The analytical tool used in this study is the assessment of the level of health of banks in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index against the risk factor using the ratio of net performing loans (NPLs) and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), a factor of corporate governance by using the self-assessment report of good corporate governance, the earnings factor using the ratio of return on assets (ROA) and net interest margin (NIM) and the factor of capital using the ratio of capital adequacy ratio (CAR). The results showed that there are several banks which have "Less Healthy", "Healthy Enough", "Pretty Good". Bank Mandiri, BRI and BNI received the predicate of "Pretty Good" in risk profile factor for liquidity risk, whereas Bank BTN received the predicate of "Healthy Enough". Also, Bank BTN received the predicate of "Healthy Enough" and "Pretty Good" in earnings factor specifically ROA and GCG factor. Keywords:Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index, Health Level of Banks, Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) Model.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNING, CAPITAL (RGEC)

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-27
Author(s):  
Auliya Rokhmatika ◽  
Chairil Afandy
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Financial Condition ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level

This research is conducted to detect the health level of Bank listed in indonesian stock exchange using RGEC period 2014-2015. RGEC is the aspect that most influence on the financial condition of banks, which also affect the health of banks. By using the NPL, LDR, IRR, NPM, ROA, NIM and CAR. Population in this study are all companies of Bank listed on stock exchange totaling 42 companies. Based on sampling criteria finally obtained sample is 21 companies of bank publish financial reports continuously in the period 2014-2015. The results obtained that the NPL from overall of bank sampel in 2014-2015 categorized is healthy. The results obtained that the LDR from sampel there’s counted 6 healthy categorized company enough. Companies categorized as unhealthy counted 6 bank. The results obtained from IRR variable there’s counted 2 healthy expressed bank and there’s counted 9 bank categorized as unhealthy. NPM variable obtained get result counted 8 bank categorized as unhealthy, there’s counted 7 bank categorized very healthy and 2 bank categorized healthy. ROA variable there’s counted 2 bank categorized as unhealthy and 3 bank categorized very healthy. NIM variable there’s counted 4 bank categorized healthy and 17 bank categorized as very healthy. CAR variable there’s counted 1 company categorized healthy and 20 company categorized very healthy.

Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Mandiri Syariah Dengan Metode Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governace, Earnings and Capital

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 724
Author(s):  
Anik Anik ◽  
Suhesti Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Production Factors ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
Health Rating

The purpose of this research is to see the soundness level of Bank Syariah Mandiri with the method of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital. The research method uses quantitative methods. Production factors in the RGEC method are the risk profile using credit risk (NPF), liquidity risk (FDR), income (ROA, ROE and BOPO) and capital (CAR). On the results of Good Corporate Governance using data processed and obtained from PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri. The object of this research is PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri. The sampling technique in this study using purposive sampling. This research period is 2013-2017. The data analysis technique used in this research is quantitative descriptive and using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Car), as for the benchmarks to determine the soundness level of a bank after each examination, namely by determining the results of the study classified into the bank's health rating. The results showed that the health of PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri which uses the Risk Profile approach, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital as a whole can be said that Bank Syariah Mandiri is a fairly healthy bank.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENERAPAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS DAN CAPITAL) PADA PT.BANK BENGKULU

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91
Author(s):  
Yun Fitriano ◽  
Ririn Marlina Sofyan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the health level of PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period if measured using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Based on the results of the assessment of bank soundness by applying the RGEC method at PT. Bank Bengkulu is seen from factors, namely 1. Risk Profile, the results of the 2014 NPL ratio of 0.39%, in 2015 amounted to 0.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 0.33% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the LDR ratio in 2014 amounted to 85.79%, in 2015 amounted to 91.05%, and in 2016 amounting to 93.31% this could be said to be quite healthy. 2. Good Corporate Governance in the 2014-2016 period of 89.33% can be said to be very healthy. 3. Eanings, the results of the 2014 ROA ratio amounted to 3.69%, in 2015 amounted to 3.29%, and in 2016 amounting to 3.02% this could be said to be very healthy. The results of the BOPO ratio in 2014 amounted to 74.10%, in 2015 amounted to 80.54%, and in 2016 amounting to 77.71% this could be said to be very healthy. 4. Capital, the results of the 2014 CAR ratio amounted to 16.99%, in 2015 amounted to 21.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 19.07% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the health research at PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period showed that PT. The Bengkulu Bank gets PK 1, which is very healthy.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK UMUM KONVENSIONAL DAN BANK UMUM SYARIAH MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, DAN CAPITAL)

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-653
Author(s):  
Zara Zettyra R. D ◽  
Evi Mutia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
T Test ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Significant Difference

The purpose of this study was to see a comparison of the health levels of conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks using the RGEC method in the 2014-2017 period. The sample of this study were 30 conventional commercial banks and 11 sharia commercial banks. The assessment used uses the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) Risk Profile seen through the NPL and NPF indicators for conventional commercial banks while Islamic banks use LDR and FDR. Corporate governance is measured through Self Assessment. Earnings are measured through ROA and NIM indicators. Capital is measured based on the CAR indicator. Testing the hypothesis in this study using the Independent T-Test and Mann-Wnithey Test samples. The results of this study indicate that there is a difference between conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks seen from the ratio of NPL, LDR, and ROA. While the ratio of GCG, NIM, and CAR does not have a significant difference between conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks.

scholarly journals Pengaruh RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, dan Capital) terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Perusahaan Perbankan di BEI 2016-2018)

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-85
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Sita Prabawati ◽  
◽  
Norma Dewi Abdi Pradnyani ◽  
Desak Putu Suciwati ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Net Interest Margin ◽  
Interest Margin

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh Profil Risiko, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital, dan pengaruh RGEC secara bersama-sama terhadap nilai perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2016-2018. Penelitian ini menggunakan 44 bank dengan jumlah sampel 132. Pengumpulan data menggunakan metode observasi non partisipan. Profil risiko diukur dengan Non Performing Loans (NPL) dan Loans to Deposit Ratio. GCG diukur dengan self assessment, sedangkan Earnings diukur dengan ROA, dan Net Interest Margin (NIM). Modal diukur dengan Capital Adequancy Ratio (CAR), sedangkan nilai perusahaan dihitung menggunakan rumus Tobin's Q. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah teknik analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: (1) Profil Risiko berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. (2) Good Corporate Governance berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. (3) Laba berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. (4) Modal berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. (5) RGEC secara bersama-sama berpengaruh signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.

scholarly journals Penilaian Kesehatan Bank (Studi Pada PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. Tahun 2016- 2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Citra Puspa Permata
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Financial Health ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Financial Condition ◽  
Financial Conditions ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

This study aims to determine the financial health of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk from four aspects in RGEC which is Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital. This research is a descriptive study with a quantitative approach. The main data of this study comes from the Annual Report of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. from 2016 to 2019, the so-called secondary data were analyzed using the RGEC method. The results showed that in the period 2016-2019, the risk profile aspect of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia with the NPF and  FDR Indicator on average is in a healthy financial condition, but the CR indicator showed unhealthy financial conditions. The GCG aspect using self-assessment showed a fairly healthy financial condition, the earnings aspect. with NOM, ROA and average ROE showed unhealthy financial conditions, as well as the capital aspect with average CAR and PR ratios is in very healthy financial conditions.

scholarly journals Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document