scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENERAPAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS DAN CAPITAL) PADA PT.BANK BENGKULU

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91
Author(s):  
Yun Fitriano ◽  
Ririn Marlina Sofyan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the health level of PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period if measured using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Based on the results of the assessment of bank soundness by applying the RGEC method at PT. Bank Bengkulu is seen from factors, namely 1. Risk Profile, the results of the 2014 NPL ratio of 0.39%, in 2015 amounted to 0.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 0.33% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the LDR ratio in 2014 amounted to 85.79%, in 2015 amounted to 91.05%, and in 2016 amounting to 93.31% this could be said to be quite healthy. 2. Good Corporate Governance in the 2014-2016 period of 89.33% can be said to be very healthy. 3. Eanings, the results of the 2014 ROA ratio amounted to 3.69%, in 2015 amounted to 3.29%, and in 2016 amounting to 3.02% this could be said to be very healthy. The results of the BOPO ratio in 2014 amounted to 74.10%, in 2015 amounted to 80.54%, and in 2016 amounting to 77.71% this could be said to be very healthy. 4. Capital, the results of the 2014 CAR ratio amounted to 16.99%, in 2015 amounted to 21.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 19.07% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the health research at PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period showed that PT. The Bengkulu Bank gets PK 1, which is very healthy.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (BRI) SYARIAH BERDASARKAN METODE RGEC

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Muhamad Manarul Hidayat ◽  
Usep Deden Suherman ◽  
Hendra Syafri
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Rank One ◽  
Bank Soundness ◽  
Quantitative Approaches

AbstractEvery bank must have a bank soundness level from all aspects with very healthy criteria, as well as PT. BRI Syariah. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the factors that affect the health level of PT. BRI Syariah uses Bank Indonesia regulations, namely PBI No.13 / 1 / PBI / 2011 and criteria guidelines for using SE. No.13 / 24 / DPNP. In accordance with these provisions, the soundness of a bank is measured by the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). This article uses descriptive methods and quantitative approaches to determine the health level of PT. BRI Syariah is also compared to two state-owned sharia banks, namely PT. BNI Syariah and BSM. The results showed that using the RGEC method the assessment factors used were NPF, FDR, ROA, BOPO, CAR, and ROE. It appears that PT. The health level of BRI Syariah is still below BNI Syariah and BSM. This indicates that BRI Syariah still has to improve its financial performance to have a healthy rating at rank one, which is very healthy.   Keywords: Health Level, RGEC Method, BRI Syariah AbstrakSetiap bank harus memiliki tingkat kesehatan bank dari segala aspek dengan kriteria sangat sehat, begitupula dengan PT. BRI Syariah. Maka dari itu, artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah menggunakan ketentuan Bank Indonesia yaitu PBI No.13/1/PBI/2011 dan pedoman kriteria menggunakan SE. No.13/24/DPNP. Sesuai ketentuan tersebut, tingkat kesehatan bank diukur dengan metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Artikel ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah yang mana juga dibandingkan dengan dua bank syariah milik BUMN yaitu PT. BNI Syariah dan BSM.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dengan menggunakan metode RGEC faktor penilaian yang digunakan adalah NPF, FDR, ROA, BOPO, CAR, dan ROE. Terlihat bahwa Tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah masih berada di bawah BNI Syariah dan BSM. Hal ini menandakan bahwa BRI Syariah masih harus meningkatkan kinerja keuangannya untuk memiliki peringkat yang sehat pada peringkat satu yaitu sangat sehat. Kata kunci: Tingkat Kesehatan, Metode RGEC, BRI Syariah

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK UMUM SYARIAH BERDASARKAN METODE RGEC RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, AND CAPITAL PADA PT. BANK MUAMALAT INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jumriaty Jusman
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Ranking Criteria ◽  
Bank Soundness ◽  
Final Composite

Abstract: This research was conducted on the basis of observations of events that occurred at PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, where the bank is spread, issues will experience liquidity. So the purpose of this study is to determine the health level of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia using the RGEC method (risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital) for the 2015-2017 period. This research will be conducted by collecting data in accordance with the provisions stipulated in Bank Indonesia regulations No.13 / 1 / PBI / 2011 and SE No.13 / 24 / DPNP. The research subject in this study was PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. The object of this research is the financial statements and publications of PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk 2015-2017 period. The results of the study showed that the health level of Bank Muamalat Indonesia using RGEC showed the predicate of bank health in accordance with the standards set by Bank Indonesia, with the results of financial ratios obtained from annual reports adjusted to the RGEC Component Ranking Criteria Matrix (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance , Earning and Capital) and the calculation of the final composite value on average 60%, it can be concluded that PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia in 2015-2017 ranked 4 (four) with the title "LESS HEALTH". Keywords: Bank soundness, RGEC Abstrak: Penelitian ini dilakukan atas dasar pengamatan terhadap peristiwa yang terjadi pada PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, dimana bank tersebut tersebar isu akan mengalami likuiditas.  Maka tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia dengan menggunakan metode RGEC (risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital) periode 2015-2017.  Penelitian ini akan dilakukan dengan mengumpulkan data- data sesuai dengan ketentuan yang telah diatur dalam peraturan Bank Indonesia No.13/1/PBI/2011 dan SE No.13/24/DPNP. Subjek penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah PT Bank Muamalat  Indonesia,Tbk. Objek penelitian ini adalah laporan keuangan dan tata kelolah publikasi PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia,Tbk Periode 2015-2017. Hasil penelitian bahwa tingkat Kesehatan Bank Muamalat Indonesia dengan menggunakan RGEC yang menunjukkan predikat kesehatan bank sesuai dengan standar yang telah ditetapkan oleh Bank Indonesia, dengan hasil rasio keuangan yang diperoleh dari laporan tahunan kemudian disesuaikan dengan Matriks Kriteria Peringkat Komponen RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning dan Capital) dan perhitungan nilai komposit akhir rata-rata 60% maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia pada tahun 2015 -2017 memperoleh peringkat 4 (empat) dengan predikat “KURANG SEHAT” Kata kunci : Tingkat kesehatan Bank, RGEC.

TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE RGEC PADA BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH DIY

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Edy Anan ◽  
Roni Albarqis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Profitability Assessment ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACTThis study is aimed to determine the soundness of commercial bank at PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY during the years 2011 until 2015 based on RGEC method that consisted of risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital. The method that used to collect data isnonparticipant observation by documenting. Descriptive analysis technique based on the Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 13/24/DPNP about Assessment of Commercial Bank Soundness. The results show that the soundness level of Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 wasproved. NPL and LDR that measured Risk Profile factor prove a well executed risk management. Good Corporate Governance factor shows BPD DIY has applied corporate governance well. Earnings factor or profitability assessment consist of ROA and NIM has increased and this sign of theincreasing of total assets owned by BPD DIY that followed by increasing of profit gained by BPD DIY. Using the CAR indicator, the author proved that BPD DIY has good Capital factor, which is above Bank Indonesia provision that 8%. Conclution of the result showed that soundness level ofBank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 overall was in the first place of composite ranked with a very healthy predicate and the total of composite score for each year is 93%, 93% , 97%, 97% and 97%.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan bank pada PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY selama tahun 2011 hingga 2015 berdasarkan metode RGEC yang terdiri dari risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings dan capital. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi nonpartisipan dengan cara dokumentasi. Teknik analisis deskriptif dengan berpedoman pada Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 13/24/DPNP tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan BPD DIY pada tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2015 secara keseluruhan dapat dikatakan bank yang sehat. Faktor Risk Profile yang dinilai melalui NPL dan LDR secara keseluruhan menggambarkan pengelolaan risiko yangtelah dilaksanakan dengan baik. Faktor Good Corporate Governance, BPD DIY sudah menerapkan tata kelola perusahaan dengan baik. Faktor Earnings atau rentabilitas yang penilaiannya terdiri dari ROA dan NIM mengalami kenaikan dan hal ini menandakan bertambahnya jumlah aset yang dimiliki BPD DIY diikuti dengan bertambahnya keuntungan yang didapat oleh BPD DIY. Dengan menggunakan indikator CAR, peneliti membuktikan bahwa BPD DIY memiliki faktor Capital yang baik, yaitu diatas ketentuan Bank Indonesia sebesar 8%. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY pada tahun 2011 hingga 2015 secara keseluruhan berada pada peringkat komposit satu dengan predikat sangat sehat serta masing-masing total nilai komposit sebesar 93%, 93%, 97% , 97% dan 97%

scholarly journals MENILAI TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN ANALISIS METODE RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL PADA BANK SYARIAH DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-160
Author(s):  
Hendra Galuh Febrianto ◽  
Amalia Indah Fitriana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Optimal Level ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Business Strategies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Risk Profiles ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Financial Research ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACT In the banking world of soundness, banks are very important for the formation of trust. Trust and loyalty to banks is a very helpful factor and makes it easier for bank management to develop good business strategies. Bank Soundness Levels are results issued by banks which are carried out on bank risk and performance (Bank Indonesia Regulation Number: 13/1 / PBI / 2011). If more than conventional banking with Islamic banking, conventional banking finance is better than Islamic banking. This is blessed with poor sharia banking (corporate governance) management. In order to be able to carry out its functions properly, banks must have sufficient capital, ensure the quality of their assets properly, be well managed and managed based on the principle of prudence, generate sufficient profits to maintain an increase, and support liquidity so that it can be adjusted to their needs. Therefore banks are required to be able to achieve and maintain a good and optimal level of performance, because the level of bank performance can increase the level of trust and loyalty needed by the wider community to use the products, services and financial activities of the bank. The purpose of this study is for advanced financial research with analysis of Risk Profiles (Risk Profiles), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Profitability (Income), and Capital (Capital) which is hereinafter abbreviated as RGEC with the final aim of research for the needs of Sharia banking management in accordance with the latest Bank Indonesia and OJK regulations. This type of research uses descriptive research proposed in the RGEC analysis (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, and Capital) at Islamic Banks in Indonesia. from 2013 to 2017. Keywords: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, Capital, Bank Soundness   ABSTRAK Dalam dunia perbankan tingkat kesehatan bank sangat penting bagi pembentukan kepercayaan. Kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah terhadap bank merupakan faktor yang sangat membantu dan mempermudah pihak manajemen bank untuk menyusun strategi bisnis yang baik. Tingkat Kesehatan Bank adalah hasil penilaian kondisi bank yang dilakukan terhadap risiko dan kinerja bank (Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 13/1/PBI/2011). Jika dibanding antara perbankan konvensional dengan perbankan syariah, kinerja keuangan perbankan konvensional lebih baik daripada perbankan syariah. Hal ini dikarena tatakelola (good corporate governance) perbankan syariah yang masih buruk. Agar dapat menjalankan fungsinya dengan baik, bank harus mempunyai modal yang cukup, menjaga kualitas asetnya dengan baik, dikelola dengan baik dan dioperasikan berdasarkan prinsip kehati-hatian, menghasilkan keuntungan yang cukup untuk mempertahankan kelangsungan usahanya, serta memelihara likuiditasnya sehingga dapat memenuhi kewajibannya. Oleh karena itu bank dituntut untuk bisa mencapai dan mempertahankan tingkat kinerja yang baik dan optimal, karena tingkat kinerja bank yang baik dapat meningkatkan kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah maupun masyarakat luas untuk menggunakan produk, jasa dan aktivitas keuangan dari bank tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai tingkat kesehatan keuangan dengan analisis Profil Risiko (Risk Profile), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Rentabilitas (Earnings), dan Permodalan (Capital) yang selanjutnya disingkat RGEC dengan tujuan akhir merekomendasikan kebijakan untuk memperbaiki manajemen perbankan Syariah yang sesuai peraturan Bank Indonesia dan OJK yang terbaru. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif yang berfokus pada analisis RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital) pada Bank Syariah di Indonesia. dari tahun 2013 sampai 2017. Kata kunci: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital, Tingkat Kesehatan Bank

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) (Studi Pada Bank yang Termasuk Saham LQ45 Sub Sektor Perbankan Tahun 2010–2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Net Interest Margin ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio

This paper seeks to find out the health level of banks in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index. It used descriptive methods with qualitative approach that is Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) model. RBBR model consists of 4 factors among others: risk profile, good corporate governance (GCG), earnings and capital factor.The analytical tool used in this study is the assessment of the level of health of banks in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index against the risk factor using the ratio of net performing loans (NPLs) and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), a factor of corporate governance by using the self-assessment report of good corporate governance, the earnings factor using the ratio of return on assets (ROA) and net interest margin (NIM) and the factor of capital using the ratio of capital adequacy ratio (CAR). The results showed that there are several banks which have "Less Healthy", "Healthy Enough", "Pretty Good". Bank Mandiri, BRI and BNI received the predicate of "Pretty Good" in risk profile factor for liquidity risk, whereas Bank BTN received the predicate of "Healthy Enough". Also, Bank BTN received the predicate of "Healthy Enough" and "Pretty Good" in earnings factor specifically ROA and GCG factor. Keywords:Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index, Health Level of Banks, Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) Model.

scholarly journals Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank: Pendekatan CAMEL Dan RGEC

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Amelia ◽  
Astiti Chandra Aprilianti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Sound Level ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the risk based bank rating at PT. Bank Maybank SyariahIndonesia if measured using CAMEL (Capital, Asset, Management, Earning,Liquidity) method and RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning,Capital) in 2011-2016 and also aims to know differences in ratios used in CAMELSand RGEC methods. The research method used in this research is literature researchor study desk study. The data used in this research is secondary data using financialstatements of Bank Maybank Syariah Indonesia Period 2011-2016. The results showthat the bank can be said to be adequately sound because almost all the ratios usedmeet the specified requirements and there are still some ratios that have not met therequirements, but in both methods have different results. In the year 2011-2014 therisk based bank rating of Maybank Syariah Bank is calculated using CAMEL methodof bank is in the sound level. In 2015 -2016, the calculation of bank soundness showsthat bank condition is in an sound level. In Maybank Syariah Bank the state of thebank is in the sound level is in 2011-2013 if calculated using the RGEC method. Inthe year 2014-2016 the condition of the bank shows a adequately sound level.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL)? Studi pada PT BPR SINAR KUTA Periode 2016-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Komang Gede ◽  
Tri Ratnawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Good Management ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Soundness

The results of this study indicate that based on the analysis of the BPR Sinar Kuta NPL formula in 2018 increased every year 2016 = 2.55%, 2017 = 3.12%, and 2018 =3.75%. and Liquidity risk using two ratios, namely LDR and LAR, has increased anddecreased. This shows that BPR Sinar Kuta has good profitability towards third partyrefunds. GCG Bank Sinar Kuta also has very good management as evidenced from 2016 -2018 showing a good composite predicate by determining a healthy bank valuation matrixbased on Bank Indonesia Regulation No.13 and the predicate is that all the compositevalues are still in greater or equal rules with (?) 1.5. When viewed from CAR, BankSinar Kuta is ranked 5th, it shows that Bank Sinar as a BPR Bank has a reasonable levelof health. Keywords: Factor Analysis, Bank Soundness, Bank Performance, RGEC

scholarly journals Analisis Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC Pada PT. Bank Mega Syariah Tbk. Periode 2016-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-97
Author(s):  
Ade Ponirah ◽  
Faridha Nurazizah ◽  
Yesa Tiara Purnama Sari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Material Evaluation ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level

The level of health of the bank is very important for various related parties. Because it becomes information as a material evaluation of the performance of a bank. Bank Indonesia has issued rules as a basis for assessing the bank's health level. The method that is now widely used is RGEC consists of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital. In this method is assessed using predetermined provisions and comsits. In this study aims to analyze the level of health of banks in PT. Bank Mega Syariah Tbk for the period 2016-2019. The approach used is descriptive with quantifiable data from the annual report downloaded from the official web. The results of the study based on aspects of the bank's Risk Profile assessment measured by NPF are included in the healthy category, and then measured also by using FDR within four years included in the healthy category. In the good corporate governance (GCG) aspect, the bank is included in the composite two, namely healthy. Then on the overall Earnings aspect for four years the bank is included in the very healthy category. Then on the overall Earnings aspect for four years the bank is included in the very healthy category. Lastly on the Capital aspect the bank belongs to the very healthy category. Overall PT. Bank Mega Syariah Tbk within four years is at a composite value of 2 which means it falls into the healthy category.

PENERAPAN RGEC SEBAGAI INDIKATOR TINGKAT KESEHATAN PT BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA TBK TAHUN 2018-2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Tomy Rizky Izzalqurny ◽  
Aldi Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Governance Analysis

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to determine the level of bank health level using the RGEC indicator. The research method used is descriptive quantitative. The variables used as research measurements are the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital variables. The data used is the annual report of PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia AgroNiaga Tbk 2018-2020. Risk Profile analysis shows that the level of banking health can be said to be healthy. Good Corporate Governance analysis shows that the soundness of banking is said to be very good. Earnings analysis shows that the soundness of banking can be said to be unhealthy. Capital analysis shows that the soundness of banking can be said to be healthy.Keywords: Bank Health, BRI Agro, COVID-19, RGECABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan bank dengan menggunakan indikator RGEC. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Variabel yang digunakan sebagai pengukuran penelitian adalah variabel profil risiko, good corporate governance, earnings, dan capital. Data yang digunakan adalah laporan tahunan PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia AgroNiaga Tbk 2018-2020. Analisis profil risiko menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan perbankan dapat dikatakan sehat. Analisis good corporate governance menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan perbankan dapat dikatakan sangat baik. Analisis laba menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan perbankan dapat dikatakan tidak sehat. Analisis permodalan menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan perbankan dapat dikatakan sehat.Kata kunci: Kesehatan Bank, BRI Agro, COVID-19, RGEC

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL) PADA BNI SYARIAH TAHUN 2014-2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Maya Nurwijayanti ◽  
Lukman Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Profit Sharing ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Knowing How ◽  
Fund Managers ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

Abstract: Islamic banks with profit sharing systems have been designed to establish cooperation in bearing business risks and profit sharing between business owners (Shahibul Maal) and fund managers (mudarib). The bank under study is BNI Syariah. This study aims: 1) Knowing how the rating of Bank BNI Syariah's health level is reviewed from the Risk Profile in 2014-2017? 2) Knowing how to assess the soundness of Bank BNI Syariah in terms of Good Corporate Governance in 2014-2017? 3) Knowing how the rating of Bank BNI Syariah's health level is reviewed from Earnings in 2014-2017? 4) Knowing how the soundness rating of Bank BNI Syariah is reviewed from Capital in 2014-2017? This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach, the data collection techniques used are documentation techniques. The method of data analysis uses the RGEC method. The data is taken from the published annual financial reports at BNI Syariah. The analysis results obtained by the Risk Profile Level on BNI Syariah in 2014-2017 are "Adequate". The level of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) of BNI Syariah in 2014-2017 was ranked second in line with the criteria of "good", based on the results of bank BNI Syariah self assessment obtained from the corporate governance report. Level of Earnings (Rentability) in BNI Syariah Year 2014-2017 is "Adequate". Capital Level at BNI Syariah in 2014-2017 is "Very Adequate". Keywords: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital الملخص: المصرفية الإسلامية هو نظام مصرفي تم تطويره على أساس الشريعة الإسلامية تم تصميم البنوك الإسلامية التي لديها نظم مشاركة الأرباح من أجل تأسيس التعاون في تنفيذ المخاطر التجارية ومشاركة نتائج الأعمال بين:  صاحب المال الذي يحتفظ بأمواله في المؤسسة و المضارب كمدير صندوق البنوك بحاجة إلى تقييم لصحتهم حتى يتمكنوا من كسب ثقة المجتمع البنك قيد الدراسة هو BNI Syariah تهدف هذه الدراسة إلى: 1. معرفة كيف يتم تقييم مستوى الصحة من بنك BNI Syariah من ملف المخاطر في 2014-2017؟. 2. معرفة كيفية تقييم سلامة بنك BNI Syariah من حيث حوكمة الشركات الجيدة في 2014-2017؟.3 . معرفة كيف يتم تقييم مستوى الصحة من بنك BNI Syariah من الأرباح في 2014-2017؟.4 . معرفة كيف يتم تقييم تصنيف سلامة بنك BNI Syariah من رأس المال في 2014-2017؟. تستخدم هذه الدراسة المنهج الوصفي الكمي، وتقنيات جمع البيانات المستخدمة هي تقنيات التوثيق. طريقة تحليل البيانات المستخدمة هي طريقة .RGECالبيانات المستخدمة تأتي من البيانات المالية للنهاية الصادرة عن بنك BNI Syariah. من نتائج التحليل التي تم الحصول عليها مستوى المخاطر الشخصية في BNI Syariah في 2014-2017 هو "كافية". وقد تم تصنيف مستوى حوكمة الشركات الجيدة (GCG) في BNI Syariah في 2014 و 2015 و 2016 و 2017 في المرتبة الثانية بمعايير "جيدة" ، بناءً على نتائج التقييم الذاتي للبنك الإسلامي للشريعة الإسلامية الذي تم الحصول عليه من تقرير حوكمة الشركات مستوى الأرباح (القابلية للإستثمار) في BNI Syariah في عام 2014 كافٍ ، في 2015 كان "كافية "، في عام 2016 كان "كافية"، وفي 2017 كان "كافية". مستوى رأس المال (رأس المال) من BNI Syariah في عام 2014 كان "كافية جدا"، في عام 2015 كان "كافية جدا"، في عام 2016 كان "كافية جدا"، وفي عام 2017 كان "كافية جدا". Abstrak: Bank syariah dengan sistem bagi hasil dirancang untuk terbinanya kebersamaan dalam menanggung risiko dan bagi hasil usaha antara: pemilik dana (shahibul maal) dengan pengelola dana (mudharib). Bank yang diteliti adalah BNI Syariah. Penelitian ini bertujuan: 1) Mengetahui bagaimana penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank BNI Syariah ditinjau dari Risk Profile pada tahun 2014-2017? 2) Mengetahui bagaimana penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank BNI Syariah ditinjau dari Good Corporate Governance pada tahun 2014-2017? 3) Mengetahui bagaimana penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank BNI Syariah ditinjau dari Earnings pada tahun 2014-2017? 4) Mengetahui bagaimana penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank BNI  Syariah ditinjau dari Capital pada tahun 2014-2017? Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif, teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah teknik dokumentasi. Metode analisis data menggunakan metode RGEC. Adapun datanya berasal dari laporan keuangan akhir tahun BNI Syariah yang dipublikasikan. Hasil analisis diperoleh Tingkat Risk Profile (Profil Risiko) pada BNI Syariah Tahun 2014-2017 adalah “Memadai”. Tingkat Good Corporate Governance (GCG) BNI Syariah pada tahun 2014-2017 berturut-turut menempati peringkat 2 dengan kriteria “baik”, berdasarkan hasil self assessment bank BNI Syariah yang diperoleh dari laporan tata kelola perusahaan. Tingkat Earnings (Rentabilitas) pada BNI Syariah Tahun 2014-2017 adalah “Memadai”. Tingkat Capital (Permodalan) pada BNI Syariah Tahun 2014-2017 adalah “Sangat Memadai”.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document