EOR Consideration in Marginal Field Operations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chukwunonso Uche ◽  
Samuel Esieboma ◽  
Jennifer Uche ◽  
Ibrahim Bukar

Abstract "Marginal field" was introduced to the oil and gas industry to identify those fields that have negative economic effects in its development. More specifically it is possible to define a marginal field as a field that is cost ineffective to develop with conventional oil and gas means of technology. Economic development of marginal fields in most cases requires the use of existing processes to minimize cost of finding evolving technologies in development of reserves. This paper generally evaluates the feasibility of using the enhanced oil recovery technique to improve reserves in a marginal field operating environment. A marginal heavy oil field in the offshore environment of the Niger Delta region which started production in 2011 is used as a case study to evaluate the feasibility of the use of enhanced oil recovery method to improve recovery. Due to poor mobility ratio in this heavy oil field and its associated big aquifer sizes, pockets of unrecovered oil have been left behind the water fronts and water cut has risen above 80% in most of the producing wells. Recent integrated field evaluation shows that the recovery factor is poor compared to the size of oil originally in place and this triggered the need to process subsurface assessments of developing such reserves that exist in any marginal field using enhanced oil recovery technique. This paper therefore goes through the fundamental scope of an enhanced oil recovery study process to determine the applicability of this technology in a marginal oil field.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 751-761
Author(s):  
Abdelrahman El-Diasty ◽  
◽  
Hamid Khattab ◽  
Mahmoud Tantawy ◽  
◽  
...  

The use of nanofluids has been investigated and established for several applications in the oil and gas industry. Using nanoparticles for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) applications underlines their small size in comparison with the size of the rock pore throats; consequently, they could easily transport into porous rocks with minimum retention effect and permeability reduction. Nanoparticles can significantly increase the oil recovery by enhancing both the fluid properties and fluid-rock interaction properties. In this study, commercial silica nanoparticles dispersions were used in standard core flooding experiments to evaluate the effect of the nanofluid injection on the incremental oil recovery. This will open the door for taking the nanotechnology from the lab to the oil field.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abiola Oyatobo ◽  
Amalachukwu Muoghalu ◽  
Chinaza Ikeokwu ◽  
Wilson Ekpotu

Abstract Ineffective methods of increasing oil recovery have been one of the challenges, whose solutions are constantly sought after in the oil and gas industry as the number of under-produced reservoirs increases daily. Water injection is the most extended technology to increase oil recovery, although excessive water production can pose huge damage ranging from the loss of the well to an increase in cost and capital investment requirement of surface facilities to handle the produced water. To mitigate these challenges and encourage the utilization of local contents, locally produced polymers were used in polymer flooding as an Enhanced Oil Recovery approach to increase the viscosity of the injected fluids for better profile control and reduce cost when compared with foreign polymers as floppan. Hence this experimental research was geared towards increasing the efficiency of oil displacement in sandstone reservoirs using locally sourced polymers in Nigeria and also compared the various polymers for optimum efficiency. Starch, Ewedu, and Gum Arabic were used in flooding an already obtained core samples and comparative analysis of this shows that starch yielded the highest recovery due to higher viscosity value as compared to Ewedu with the lowest mobility ratio to Gum Arabic. Finally, the concentration of Starch or Gum Arabic should be increased for optimum recovery.


2013 ◽  
Vol 734-737 ◽  
pp. 1434-1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Wu ◽  
Fu Ping Ren ◽  
Jing You ◽  
Ji Liang Yu ◽  
Ya Tuo Pei ◽  
...  

Based on the low-temperature and heavy oil reservoir of conventional injection well pattern separated two strains of oil degradation bacteria LC and JH which had satisfactory compatibleness with BaoLige oill field. In order to study the feasibility of enhancing oil recovery rate of the two strains, the experiment of huff and puff with 15 wells were carried out. The average concentration of bacteria increase from 4.7×102cells/ml to 8.1×106cells/ml. The average reduction of surface tension and viscosity is 33.1% and 31.9%. The accumulative total was 1163.2t. The ratio of input to output was 1:2.12. Microbial enhanced oil recovery can improve the low-temperature and heavy oil production status, which provide a effective method for the similar oil field.


Author(s):  
M. Chukunedum Onojake ◽  
T. Angela Waka

The petroleum industry includes the global processes of exploration, extraction, refining, transportation and marketing of natural gas, crude oil and refined petroleum products. The oil industry demands more sophisticated methods for the exploitation of petroleum. As a result, the use of oil field chemicals is becoming increasingly important and has received much attention in recent years due to the vast role they play in the recovery of hydrocarbons which has enormous  commercial benefits. The three main sectors of the petroleum industry are Upstream, Midstream and Downstream. The Upstream deals with exploration and the subsequent production (drilling of exploration wells to recover oil and gas). In the Midstream sector, petroleum produced is transported through pipelines as natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids. Downstream sector is basically involved in the processing of the raw materials obtained from the Upstream sector. The operations comprises of refining of crude oil, processing and purifying of natural gas. Oil field chemicals offers exceptional applications in these sectors with wide range of applications in operations such as improved oil recovery, drilling optimization, corrosion protection, mud loss prevention, drilling fluid stabilization in high pressure and high temperature environment, and many others. Application of a wide range of oilfield chemicals is therefore essential to rectify issues and concerns which may arise from oil and gas operational activities. This review intends to highlight some of the oil field chemicals and  their positive applications in the oil and gas Industries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (03) ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
Trent Jacobs

As the oil and gas industry scans the known universe for ways to diversify its portfolio with alternative forms of energy, it might want to look under its own feet, too. For inside every oil reservoir, there may be a hydrogen reservoir just waiting to get out. The concept comes courtesy of Calgary-based Proton Technologies. Founded in 2015, the young firm is the operator of an aging heavy oil field in Saskatchewan. There, on a small patch of flat farm-land, Proton has been producing oil to pay the bills. At the same time, it has been experimenting with injecting oxygen into its reservoir in a bid to produce exclusively hydrogen. Proton says its process is built on a technical foundation that includes years of research and works at the demonstration scale. Soon, the firm hopes to prove it is also profitable. While it produces its own hydrogen, Proton is licensing out the technology to others. In January, fellow Canadian operator Whitecap Resources secured a hydrogen production license of up to 500 metric tons/day from Proton. Whitecap produces about 48,000 B/D, and thanks to carbon sequestration, the operator has claimed a net negative emissions status since 2018. Proton says it has struck similar licensing deals with other Canadian operators but that these companies have not yet made public announcements. Where these projects go from here may end up representing the ultimate test for Proton’s innovative twist on the in-situ combustion process known so well to the heavy-oil sector. “In-situ combustion has been used in more than 500 projects worldwide over the last century. And, they have all produced hydrogen,” said Grant Strem, a cofounder and the CEO of Proton. Strem is a petroleum geologist by back-ground who spent the majority of his career working on heavy-oil projects for Canadian producers and research analysis with the banks that fund the upstream sector. While his new venture remains registered as an oil company, the self-described explorationist has come to look at oil fields very differently than he used to. “In an oil field, you have oil—hydrocarbons, which are made of hydrogen and carbon. The other fluid down there is H2O. So, an oil field is really a giant hydrogen-rich, energy-dense system that’s all conveniently accessible by wells,” Strem explained. But, in those past examples, the hundreds of other in-situ combustion projects, hydrogen production was merely a byproduct, an associated gas of sorts. It was the result of several reactions generated by air injections that producers use an oxidizer to heat up the heavy oil and get it flowing. What Proton wants to do is to super-charge the hydrogen-generating reactions by using the oil as fuel while leaving the carbon where it is. That ambition includes doing so at a price point that is roughly five times below that of Canadian natural gas prices and an even smaller fraction of what other hydrogen-generation methods cost.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoel L. R. de Farias ◽  
Elisabete F. Campos ◽  
Antônio Luiz S. de Souza ◽  
Marcio S. Carvalho

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document