scholarly journals Dietary Fiber Powder Made from Purple Wheat “Jizi439” Bran: An Effective Health Food and Its Processing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaning Meng ◽  
Suque Lan ◽  
Yelun Zhang ◽  
Xingpu Li ◽  
Zhenhua Niu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Different processing approaches could usually alter contents of different nutritional ingredients for wheat grains which benefits human health. The present study is aimed to assess the dietary fiber and other nutritional ingredients of purple wheat (Jizi439) bran via proper processing and to analyze its benefits to prevent diseases and enhance health so as to prove the dietary fiber powder made from purple wheat (Jizi439)to be an effective health food. Methods: Approach I Pulverizing: Purple wheat bran was put into blade pulverizer to get the pulverized bran into particles with a 60-meshdiameter. Puffing: The pulverized bran was sprayed with pure water to moisten the bran, making its moisture reach 22%. The moistened bran was put into twin-screw bulking machine under a temperature of 135 ℃ , and puffed at 400 r/min, to get puffed pellets. Milling: The puffed bran pellets were put into wall mill under 32℃ and 6 – 7 MPa and at 350 r/min to get dietary fiber powder (DFP) in particles with a 130-mesh diameter. Approach II: Except for the processing parameters, the procedure of Approach II was the same as Approach I. Results: The significant increase of nutritional elements contents in dietary fiber powder have been found when it is processed via different approaches. Different processing treatment and processing parameters bring forth different effects on the nutritional elements which are released from purple wheat bran. It is indicated that the contents of SDF produced via Approach I is greatly higher than that of the SDF produced via Approach II ( p ≤0.01), which suggests that Approach I is much effective for processing purple wheat bran for producing solvable dietary fiber Conclusions: Purple wheat bran is a high-effective health food, but only it is properly processed. Different processing has different impacts on the active substances of the purple wheat bran powder related to health function. In this study, only Approach I helps to increase the health nutritional ingredients which bring forth positive effects on the enhancement of health function, while Approach II fail to improve the function on health enhancement. Keywords: Dietary fiber powder, Purple wheat bran; Health food; Disease prevention

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqian Lyu ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Jinrong Wang ◽  
Zhenyu Wang ◽  
Shuai Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dietary fiber can be fermented in gut of pigs and the end products of fermentation were short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). The SCFA had positive effects on gut bacteria and host immune system. In addition, SCFA can provide a part of available energy for pigs. However, there were limited reports on the relationship between dietary fiber, gut bacteria, and energy metabolism. Therefore, this study investigated how dietary fiber and enzyme addition impacted energy metabolism by acting on the microbial community and SCFA. Methods Wheat bran (WB) was added to the corn-soybean meal-based diet at the levels of 12% and 27%, and oat bran (OB) at 15% and 36%. One of each diet was supplemented with or without 5000 U/kg feed of xylanase, so a total of 10 diets were allotted to 60 growing pigs (initial body weight: 27.2 ± 1.2 kg) using a randomized complete block design. The experiment was conducted in 10 consecutive periods using 6 similar open-circuit respiration chambers. Each pig was used for one 20-day period. During each period, six pigs were allowed 14 d to adapt to the diets in metabolic cages followed by 6 d (from d 15 to d 20) in respiration chambers to measure heat production (HP). Results Pigs fed 36% OB diets had greater (P <  0.05) nutrient digestibility and net energy (NE) values compared to those fed 27% WB diets. Apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) were lower (P < 0.05) in pigs fed 27% WB diets compared with those fed 12% WB diets. Enzyme addition improved (P < 0.05) the NE values (11.37 vs. 12.43 MJ/kg DM) in diets with 27% WB. Supplementation of xylanase did not affect NE values for basal diets, OB diets and 12%WB diets. Compared with diets with 36% OB, pigs fed 27% WB-based diets excreted more total SCFA, acetate and propionate (expressed as g/kg feed DM) in fecal samples of pigs (P < 0.05). Pigs in the WB diets had greater proportion of phylum Bacteroidetes while phylum Firmicutes were greater in pigs fed OB diets (P < 0.05). Pigs fed WB diets had greater (P < 0.05) abundance of Succinivibrio and Prevotella, which were associated with fiber degradation and SCFA production. Conclusion Our results indicated diets supplied by high level of OB or WB promote the growth of fiber-degrading bacteria. The differences in fiber composition between WB and OB led to differences in nutrient digestibility and bacterial communities, which were ultimately reflected in energy metabolism. Enzyme supplementation improved nutrient digestibility as well as NE values for 27% WB diets but not for other diets, which indicated that effects of enzyme were related to type and level of dietary fiber in diets.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aynur Gunenc ◽  
Christina Alswiti ◽  
Farah Hosseinian

The potential of wheat bran (WB) addition as a prebiotic source were demonstrated using yogurt with probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis). Yogurts (with 4% WB) were significantly (P < 0.05) different in total bacterial counts (9.1 log CFU/mL), and total titratable acidity % (TTA, 1.4%) compared to controls during 28 days cold storage (4°C). Additionally, WB-total dietary fiber contents and their bound phenolic profiles were investigated as well as the antioxidant activity of WB-water extractable polysaccharides (WEP) was studied. HPLC analysis of alkaline hydrolyzed DF fractions showed that insoluble DF had higher phenolic acids (84.2%) content than soluble DF (15.8%). Also, crude-WEP showed stronger antioxidant activity compared to purified-WEP with an ORAC of 71.88 and 52.48 µmol TE/g, respectively. Here we demonstrate WB has potentials as a source of prebiotics, which may have the potentials for functional foods and nutraceutical applications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 627-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Flis ◽  
Wiesław Sobotka ◽  
Zofia Antoszkiewicz

Abstract The present review summarizes the results of 37 experiments in which different types and levels (from 0.5 to 29.7%) of fibrous supplements were used in the formulation of diets for weaned piglets. Diets were supplemented with different sources of insoluble dietary fiber (iDF), soluble dietary fiber (sDF), or mixed DF sources. Most of the applied DF sources decreased the ileal and fecal organic matter digestibility, and they often lowered crude protein digestibility. A moderate addition (1.5-8%) of iDF sources increased average daily feed intake (ADFI) and, frequently, average daily gains (ADG). Sources of sDF as well as high inclusion levels of fiber-rich feeds tended to decrease ADFI and ADG. Improved fecal consistency, decreased diarrhea incidence and antibiotic interventions were confirmed in piglets fed diets with added lignocellulose, cooked or raw oat hulls and wheat bran. The dietary inclusion of iDF rather than sDF sources improved gastrointestinal tract (GIT) development, enzyme activity and gut morphology. An increase in the counts of beneficial gut microbiota and the concentrations of short-chain fatty acids was stimulated by diets with addition iDF or sDF sources. Such diets also slowed down proteolytic fermentation which negatively affects the colonic mucosa. Some research findings indicate that iDF sources improve intestinal barrier function. The analyzed experimental data suggest that the addition of 1.5-2% of a lignocellulose preparation, 2% of oat hulls, 4-8% of coarse wheat bran to diets for weaned piglets may be recommended to promote GIT development and health, and to improve growth performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Jianhui Ma ◽  
Meng Yuan ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Yingxing Duan ◽  
Daijing Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mengxu Lei ◽  
Jihong Huang ◽  
Xiaoling Tian ◽  
Peng Zhou ◽  
Qi Zhu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document