scholarly journals The effectiveness and safety of D2 plus para-aortic lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Hui Zou ◽  
Xi Zhong ◽  
Jia-Le Zhang ◽  
Bao-Jun Huang ◽  
Hui-Mian Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resectable Gastric Cancer

Abstract Background Gastric cancer (GC) is among the malignant tumors of highest morbidity and mortality in the world, and has a profile of high lymph node metastasis rate. Lymph node clearance is a critical part of gastric cancer surgery, however, the extent of lymph node clearance, for example, whether to perform abdominal aortic lymph node dissection, remains considerably controversial. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of D2 plus para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALD) on survival and postoperative complications in patients with GC. Methods An electronic search was conducted through PubMed, Embase and cochrane library. The Q test and I 2 were used to assess heterogeneity. The publication bias was evaluated via funnel plots. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 14.0 (STATA, College Station, TX). Results 908 studies were retrieved via literature search and eight studies were finally included. There was no significant difference between D2 and D2+PALD in the 5-year survival rate after surgery (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97-1.03, P = 0.897; I 2 = 64.9%). Besides, the 30-day mortality (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.66-2.10, P = 0.590; I 2 = 0.0%) and the overall risk of postoerative complications (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.83-1.59, P = 0.411; I 2 = 35.5%) were comparable between D2 and D2+PALD. Conclusion Based on current literature body, compared with D2, D2+PALD does not prevail in terms of long-term survival or perioperative outcomes.

scholarly journals The effectiveness and safety of D2 plus para-aortic lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Hui Zou ◽  
Xi Zhong ◽  
Jia-Le Zhang ◽  
Bao-Jun Huang ◽  
Hui-Mian Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is among the malignant tumors of highest morbidity and mortality in the world, and has a profile of high lymph node metastasis rate. Lymph node clearance is a critical part of gastric cancer surgery, however, the extent of lymph node clearance, for example, whether to perform abdominal aortic lymph node dissection, remains considerably controversial. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of D2 plus para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALD) on survival and postoperative complications in patients with GC.Methods: An electronic search was conducted through PubMed, Embase and cochrane library. The Q test and I2 were used to assess heterogeneity. The publication bias was evaluated via funnel plots. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 14.0 (STATA, College Station, TX).Results: 908 studies were retrieved via literature search and eight studies were finally included. There was no significant difference between D2 and D2+PALD in the 5-year survival rate after surgery (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97-1.03, P = 0.897; I2 = 64.9%). Besides, the 30-day mortality (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.66-2.10, P = 0.590; I2 = 0.0%) and the overall risk of postoperative complications (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.83-1.59, P = 0.411; I2 = 35.5%) were comparable between D2 and D2+PALD.Conclusion: Based on current literature body, compared with D2, D2+PALD does not prevail in terms of long-term survival or perioperative outcomes.

scholarly journals Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianglei Ma ◽  
Xiaoyao Li ◽  
Shifu Zhao ◽  
Ruifu Zhang ◽  
Dejun Yang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Gastrectomy ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background To date, robotic surgery has been widely used worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy (RG) in gastric cancer patients to determine whether RG can replace laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG).Methods Pubmed, Cochrane Library, WanFang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and VIP databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before May 2020 that compared RG with LG. Next, two independent reviewers conducted literature screening and data extraction. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS),and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Random effects or fixed effects models were applied according to heterogeneity.Results A total of 19 studies including 7275 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 4598 patients were in the LG group and 2677 in the RG group. Compared with LG,RG was associated with longer operative time (WMD=−32.96 min; 95% CI:-42.08~-23.84, P<0.00001),less blood loss (WMD=28.66 ml; 95% CI: 18.59~38.73, P<0.00001),and shorter time to first flatus (WMD=0.16days; 95%CI:0.06~0.27, P=0.003).There was no significant difference between RG and LG in terms of the hospital stay (WMD=0.23days, 95 % CI:-0.53~0.98, P=0.56),overall postoperative complication (OR=1.07, 95 % CI:0.91~1.25, P=0.43),mortality (OR=0.67, 95% CI=0.24~1.90, P=0.45),the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD=-0.96, 95% CI:-2.12~0.20, P=0.10),proximal resection margin (WMD=-0.10 cm,95% CI:-0.29~0.09, P=0.30),and distal resection margin (WMD=0.15cm,95% CI:-0.21~0.52, P=0.41).No significant differences were found between the two treatments in overall survival(OS) (HR=0.95, 95% CI:0.76~1.18; P=0.64), recurrence-free survival(RFS) (HR=0.91, 95% CI:0.69~1.21;P=0.53), and recurrence rate (OR=0.90, 95% CI:0.67~1.21; P=0.50). Conclusions The results of this study suggested that RG is as acceptable as LG in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. RG can be performed as effectively and safely as LG. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of the robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Multimodal Treatments for Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Cheng ◽  
Ming Cai ◽  
Xiaoming Shuai ◽  
Jinbo Gao ◽  
Guobin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resectable Gastric Cancer

scholarly journals Efficacy of Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1141
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Marte ◽  
Andrea Tufo ◽  
Francesca Steccanella ◽  
Ester Marra ◽  
Piera Federico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Background: In the last 10 years, the management of patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) has changed from chemotherapy alone, towards a multidisciplinary treatment with liver surgery playing a leading role. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy for GCLM and to analyze the impact of related prognostic factors on long-term outcomes. Methods: The databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles from January 2010 to September 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies that reported the outcomes after hepatectomy for GCLM. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prognostic factors was performed. Results: We included 40 studies, including 1573 participants who underwent hepatic resection for GCLM. Post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 24.7% and 1.6%, respectively. One-year, 3-years, and 5-years overall survival (OS) were 72%, 37%, and 26%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 44%, 24%, and 22%, respectively. Well-moderately differentiated tumors, pT1–2 and pN0–1 adenocarcinoma, R0 resection, the presence of solitary metastasis, unilobar metastases, metachronous metastasis, and chemotherapy were all strongly positively associated to better OS and DFS. Conclusion: In the present study, we demonstrated that hepatectomy for GCLM is feasible and provides benefits in terms of long-term survival. Identification of patient subgroups that could benefit from surgical treatment is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting.

Risk of nodal disease in patients with MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162097586
Author(s):  
Pratik Tripathi ◽  
Zhen Li ◽  
Yaqi Shen ◽  
Xuemei Hu ◽  
Daoyu Hu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Nodal Disease ◽  
The Impact

Background: The impact of magnetic resonance imaging–detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) in distant metastasis is well known but its correlation with prevalence of lymph node metastasis is less studied. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of nodal disease in mrEMVI–positive and negative cases in rectal cancer. Methods: Following guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBase was carried out to identify relevant studies published up to May 2019. Results: Our literature search generated 10 studies (863 and 1212 mrEMVI–positive and negative patients, respectively). The two groups (mrEMVI–positive and negative) were significantly different in terms of nodal disease status (odds ratio [OR] 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12–4.67; p < 0.001). The prevalence of nodal disease was 75.90% vs 52.56% in the positive mrEMVI vs negative mrEMVI group, respectively ( p < 0.001). The prevalence of positive lymph node in positive mrEMVI patients treated with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT/CRT) (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.65–3.69; p < 0.001) was less compared with the patients who underwent surgery alone (OR 6.25; 95% CI 3.74–10.44; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The probability of positive lymph nodes in cases of positive mrEMVI is distinctly greater compared with negative cases in rectal cancer. Positive mrEMVI indicates risk of nodal disease prevalence increased by threefold in rectal cancer.

scholarly journals Kinesio Taping for Balance Function after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yijuan Hu ◽  
Dongling Zhong ◽  
Qiwei Xiao ◽  
Qiang Chen ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Balance Function ◽  
Balance Impairment ◽  
Kinesio Taping ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective. With the increasing social and economic burdens of balance impairment after stroke, the treatment for balance impairment after stroke becomes a major public health problem worldwide. Kinesio taping (KT) as a part of clinical practice has been used widely in the treatment of balance impairment after stroke. However, the clinical effects of KT for balance function have not been confirmed. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects and safety of KT for balance impairment after stroke. Methods. We conducted a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of KT for balance impairment after stroke. We searched the following databases: (1) English databases: EMBASE (via Ovid), MEDLINE (via Ovid), the Cochrane library, PubMed, and PEDro; (2) Chinese databases: China Biology Medicine (CBM), Wan Fang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and VIP. Besides, hand searches of relevant references were also conducted. We systematically searched from the inception to December 2018, using the keywords (Kinesio, Kinesio Tape, tape, or Orthotic Tape) and (stroke, hemiplegia, or hemiplegic paralysis) and (balance or stability). The search strategies were adjusted for each database. The reference lists of included articles were reviewed for relevant trials. For missing data, we contacted the authors to get additional information. Results. 22 RCTs involved 1331 patients, among which 667 patients in the experimental group and 664 patients in the control group were included. Results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with conventional rehabilitation (CR), there was significant difference in Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (MD=4.46, 95%CI 1.72 to 7.19, P=0.001), Time Up and Go Test (TUGT) (MD=-4.62, 95%CI -5.48 to -3.79, P < 0.00001), functional ambulation category scale (FAC) (MD=0.53, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.68, P < 0.00001), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-L) (MD=4.20, 95%CI 3.17 to 5.24, P < 0.00001), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) (MD=-0.38, 95%CI -0.49 to -0.27, P < 0.00001). The results of subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between KT and CR with ≤4 weeks treatment duration (< 4 weeks: MD=5.03, 95%CI -1.80 to 11.85, P=0.15; =4 weeks: MD=4.33, 95%CI -1.50 to 10.15, P=0.15), while there was significant difference with more than 4-week treatment duration (MD=4.77, 95%CI 2.58 to 6.97, P < 0.0001). Conclusions. Based on current evidence, KT was more effective than CR for balance function, lower limb function, and walking function in poststroke patients. Longer treatment duration may be associated with better effects. However, more well-conducted RCTs are required in the future.

scholarly journals Digital models and orthodontic diagnosis: what degree of reliability?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
ABDOUL Hafizou RABE ◽  
Fatima SALEK ◽  
Intissar El IDRISSI ◽  
Fatima ZAOUI ◽  
Hicham BENYAHIA
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Physical Models ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Digital Models ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
Plaster Models

Abstract  Background: Our study aims to evaluate, through a systematic review, the reliability of numerical models compared to conventional models on the main parameters of orthodontic diagnosis  Method: four databases were consulted: PubMed; Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Ebscohost. The research included published studies since 2010, meta-analysis studies, randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies. Results: Among 3811 selected references, only five studies met our inclusion criteria. In the systematic review, there were statistical differences between the digital models and the plaster models. However, this difference is clinically acceptable. On the other hand, there are some limitations, relative to the types of the severity of the congestion, the elapsed time to digitize, and the numerical means. Conclusion: The results of our systematic review have shown that there is no clinically significant difference between the numerical and physical models for the majority of diagnostic parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document