Manual Testing of Respiratory Muscles in Adults with Asthma: A Intra and Interrater Reliability and Validity Study
Abstract Background: Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) is a useful tool to evaluate ventilatory mechanics in adults with asthma. However, in the reviewed literature, there are few studies that report psychometric features of this test. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate MMT reliability and validity in respiratory muscles in adults with asthma.Methods: It was a cross-sectional study. Muscle strength (MMT and static respiratory pressures), sociodemographic and anthropometric variables related to the disease were evaluated. Measurements were carried out by two independent evaluators The reliability of MMT was analyzed with the weighted kappa and the convergent validity was evaluated by comparing the MTT and the respiratory pressure measurements using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The level of significance was p <0.05. Results: Twenty-six adults with stable asthma participated in the study. The intrarater reliability for MMT was between moderate and substantial (kappa=0.45-0.88) for all evaluated muscles while the interrater reliability was slight and fair for intercostal muscles (kappa=0.07-0.24), and fair and substantial (kappa=0.36-0.75) for other muscles. The convergent validity of MMT and respiratory pressures was low (r=0.20-0.48).Conclusions: MMT is a reliable measurement that can be used to evaluate respiratory muscle strength in adults with asthma. This study support MMT application for respiratory muscles at clinical settings when more objective measures such as MIP and MEP are not available. Considering that the MMT is a useful, practical, low-cost tool commonly used by physiotherapists, future studies could evaluate the convergent validity compared with dynamometry or electromyography of the respiratory muscles.