Association of Gravity Drainage and Complications Following Whipple: An Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Targeted Database

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hall BR ◽  
Zachary H Egr ◽  
Robert W Krell ◽  
James C Padussis ◽  
Valerie K Shostrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Delayed Gastric Emptying ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Soft Or ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Closed Drainage ◽  
Operative Drainage ◽  
Multivariable Adjustment ◽  
Optimal Type

Abstract Background: The optimal type of operative drainage following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear. Our objective is to investigate risk associated with closed drainage techniques (passive [gravity] vs. suction) after PD.Methods: We assessed operative drainage techniques utilized in patients undergoing PD in the ACS-NSQIP Pancreas-Targeted database from 2016-2018. Using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for characteristics of the patient, procedure, and pancreas, we examined the association between use of gravity drainage and postoperative outcomes.Results: We identified 9,665 patients with drains following PD from 2016-2018, of which 12.7% received gravity drainage. 61.0% had a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma or pancreatitis, 26.5% had a duct <3 mm, and 43.5% had a soft or intermediate gland. After multivariable adjustment, gravity drainage was associated with decreased rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio [OR] 0.804, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.659-0.981, P= 0.031), delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.830, 95%CI 0.693-0.988, P= 0.036), superficial SSI (OR: 0.741, 95% CI: 0.572-0.959, P=0.023), organ space SSI (OR: 0.791, 95% CI: 0.658-0.951, P=0.012), and readmission (OR: 0.807, 95% CI: 0.679-0.958, P=0.014) following PD.Conclusions: Gravity drainage is independently associated with decreased rates of CR-POPF, DGE, SSI, and readmission following PD. Additional prospective research will help determine which method is preferred.

scholarly journals Association of gravity drainage and complications following Whipple: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP targeted database

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley R. Hall ◽  
Zachary H. Egr ◽  
Robert W. Krell ◽  
James C. Padussis ◽  
Valerie K. Shostrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Delayed Gastric Emptying ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Soft Or ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Closed Drainage ◽  
Operative Drainage ◽  
Multivariable Adjustment ◽  
Drainage Technique ◽  
Optimal Type

Abstract Background The optimal type of operative drainage following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear. Our objective is to investigate risk associated with closed drainage techniques (passive [gravity] vs. suction) after PD. Methods We assessed operative drainage techniques utilized in patients undergoing PD in the ACS-NSQIP pancreas-targeted database from 2016 to 2018. Using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for characteristics of the patient, procedure, and pancreas, we examined the association between use of gravity drainage and postoperative outcomes. Results We identified 9665 patients with drains following PD from 2016 to 2018, of which 12.7% received gravity drainage. 61.0% had a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma or pancreatitis, 26.5% had a duct <3 mm, and 43.5% had a soft or intermediate gland. After multivariable adjustment, gravity drainage was associated with decreased rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio [OR] 0.779, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.653–0.930, p=0.006), delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.830, 95% CI 0.693–0.988, p=0.036), superficial SSI (OR 0.741, 95% CI 0.572–0.959, p=0.023), organ space SSI (OR 0.791, 95% CI 0.658–0.951, p=0.012), and readmission (OR 0.807, 95% CI 0.679–0.958, p=0.014) following PD. Conclusions Gravity drainage is independently associated with decreased rates of CR-POPF, DGE, SSI, and readmission following PD. Additional prospective research is necessary to better understand the preferred drainage technique following PD.

scholarly journals Construction of nomogram to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy utilizing the ACS-NSQIP pancreatectomy targeted database

HPB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S125-S126
Author(s):  
J Pastrana Del Valle ◽  
D. Mahvi ◽  
P. Wu ◽  
M. Fairweather ◽  
J. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Acs Nsqip

scholarly journals Comparison of surgical outcomes between isolated pancreaticojejunostomy, isolated gastrojejunostomy, and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
lyu yunxiao ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Yunxiao Cheng ◽  
Yueming Xu ◽  
WeiBing Du
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Delayed Gastric Emptying ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Major Complications

Abstract Background We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the following procedures after pancreaticoduodenectomy: isolated pancreaticojejunostomy, isolated gastrojejunostomy, and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. Methods We performed a systematic search of the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 1 January 2020. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using STATA 12.0 statistical software.Results Thirteen studies involving 1942 patients were included in this study. Pooled analysis showed that the major complication and reoperation rates following isolated pancreaticojejunostomy were lower than with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy (OR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.13–0.96, P=0.04 and OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.15–0.86, p=0.02, respectively), and that isolated pancreaticojejunostomy required longer operation time vs conventional pancreaticojejunostomy (WMD=43.61, 95% CI: 21.64–65.58, P=0.00). Regarding postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, clinically-relevant delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage, hemorrhage , reoperation, length of postoperative hospital stay, major complications, overall complications, and mortality, we found no significant differences for either isolated pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy or isolated gastrojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. Conclusions This study showed that isolated pancreaticojejunostomy was associated with fewer major complications and a lower reoperation rate, but required longer operation time vs conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. Considering the limitations, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required.

Sustaining Improvement: Implementation and Spread of a Surgical Site Infection Bundle

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1665-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara A. Russell ◽  
Hallie Chung ◽  
Christina Riad ◽  
Sarah Reardon ◽  
Kevork Kazanjian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Surgery ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Process Measures ◽  
Quality Metric ◽  
Effective Implementation ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Significant Challenge

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are considered a quality metric across surgical specialties and are a major cause of increased readmissions and overall costs to surgical patients. Bundled interventions have demonstrated efficacy in reducing SSIs in various surgical fields, yet the ability to sustain and spread interventions while continuing to reduce infection rates is a significant challenge. This study assessed the implementation and sustainability of an SSI bundle, which was initially piloted within the colorectal surgery division and then spread to additional general surgery services. Outcomes (risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP odds ratio and observed to expected (O:E) SSI rates) and process measures were monitored on run charts throughout the course of the intervention. By the end of the study period, ACS-NSQIP risk-adjusted odds ratios for SSIs decreased from 1.22 to 0.95 for colorectal procedure targeted and 1.32 to 1.04 for all general surgery procedures ( P < 0.05). O:E ratios showed similar reductions. SSI reductions were associated with process measure compliance. This study demonstrates that effective implementation within a single surgical division provides the foundation for spread of a SSI bundle, which results in continued and sustained reductions in SSI rates.

Discrepancy in Postoperative Outcomes between Auditing Databases: A NSQIP Comparison

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (8) ◽  
pp. 1294-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Lyman ◽  
Michael Passeri ◽  
Allyson Cochran ◽  
David A. Iannitti ◽  
John B. Martinie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Audit System ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Outcome Reporting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared

In 2014, ACS-NSQIP® targeted pancreatectomies to improve outcome reporting and risk calculation related to pancreatectomy. At the same time, our department began prospectively collecting data for pancreatectomy in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® Interactive Audit System (EIAS). The purpose of this study is to compare reported outcomes between two major auditing databases for the same patients undergoing pancreatectomy. The same 171 patients were identified in both databases. Clinical outcomes were then obtained from each database and compared to determine whether reported complication rates were statistically different between auditing databases. A combination of Wilcoxon rank sum and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to calculate statistical significance. No significant difference was appreciated in captured demographics between EIAS and NSQIP. Significant differences in reported rates for renal dysfunction, postoperative pancreatic fistula, return to the operative room, and urinary tract infection were noted between EIAS and NSQIP. Although significant differences in reported complication rates were demonstrated between EIAS and NSQIP for pancreatectomy, much of the discrepancy is attributable to subtle differences in definitions for postoperative occurrences between the two auditing databases. It is vital for surgeons to understand the exact definition that determines the complication rate for a given database.

scholarly journals Comparison of surgical outcomes between isolated pancreaticojejunostomy, isolated gastrojejunostomy, and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
lyu yunxiao ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Yunxiao Cheng ◽  
Yueming Xu ◽  
WeiBing Du
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Delayed Gastric Emptying ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register

Abstract Background We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the following procedures after pancreaticoduodenectomy: isolated pancreaticojejunostomy, isolated gastrojejunostomy, and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy.Methods We performed a systematic search of the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 1 January 2020. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using STATA 12.0 statistical software.Results Thirteen studies involving 1942 patients were included in this study. Pooled analysis showed that reoperation rates following isolated pancreaticojejunostomy were lower reoperation than with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy (OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.15–0.86, p=0.02, respectively), and that isolated pancreaticojejunostomy required longer operation time vs conventional pancreaticojejunostomy (WMD=43.61, 95% CI: 21.64–65.58, P=0.00). Regarding postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, clinically-relevant delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage, hemorrhage, reoperation, length of postoperative hospital stay, major complications, overall complications, and mortality, we found no significant differences for either isolated pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy or isolated gastrojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy.Conclusions This study showed that isolated pancreaticojejunostomy was associated with a lower reoperation rate, but required longer operation time vs conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. Considering the limitations, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required.

International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Definitions for Postpancreatectomy Complications: Applicability at a High-Volume Center

2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Dusch ◽  
A. Lietzmann ◽  
F. Barthels ◽  
M. Niedergethmann ◽  
F. Rückert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Pancreatic Surgery ◽  
Delayed Gastric Emptying ◽  
International Study ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage ◽  
International Study Group

Introduction: The perioperative morbidity following pancreas surgery remains high due to various specific complications: postoperative pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery has defined these complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical applicability, to validate the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition, and to evaluate the postoperative morbidity. Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, 769 patients underwent resection. Data were collected in a prospective database. Univariate examination was performed using the χ2-test. Continuous data were tested with the Mann–Whitney U-test. Student’s t-tests and Fisher’s exact tests were performed. Results: A total of 542 patients were included in this study. In all, 91 (16.8%) patients developed postoperative pancreatic fistula, 69 of them clinically relevant grades B and C postoperative pancreatic fistula. Grades B and C postoperative pancreatic fistulas were significantly associated with a longer hospital stay. The postoperative pancreatic fistula grade significantly correlated with re-operation. Totally, 32 (5.9%) patients developed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage grade was significantly associated with re-operation and 30-day mortality. In all, 14 of 19 patients with grade C postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (73.7%) were re-operated; 3 had a simultaneous postoperative pancreatic fistula C. Grade B postpancreatectomy hemorrhage significantly prolonged hospital stay. Grade C postpancreatectomy hemorrhage significantly prolonged intensive care unit stay. Grade C postpancreatectomy hemorrhage led to longer intensive care unit stay but a shorter hospital stay. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 131 (24.2%) patients. The delayed gastric emptying grade was significantly associated with re-operation. Nine of the re-operated patients had a simultaneous postoperative pancreatic fistula C. Grades A, B, and C delayed gastric emptying were associated with prolonged hospital- and intensive care unit stay. Conclusion: Delayed gastric emptying is the most common specific complication after pancreas resection, followed by postoperative pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage. The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definitions are well applicable in clinical routine and the different grades correlate well with severity of clinical condition, length of hospital or intensive care unit stay, and mortality. Their widespread use can contribute to a more reproducible and reliable comparison of surgical outcomes in pancreas surgery.

Central Venous Lines in Children With Lesser Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Optimal Type and Timing of Placement

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 3024-3029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. McLean ◽  
Christen J. Fisher ◽  
Beverly M. Snively ◽  
Allen R. Chauvenet
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Optimal Type

Purpose In pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the optimal time for central venous line (CVL) insertion and the optimal type of CVL (internal v external) is unclear. This study was undertaken to compare complication rates between early versus late line insertion, and between internal versus external lines in children with lesser risk ALL. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled onto Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) protocol 9201. Data regarding demographics, CVL types and insertion dates, blood counts, and complications were reviewed through week 25 of therapy. Results Of 697 patients enrolled onto POG protocol 9201, 362 patients had sufficient data for analysis. When compared to late line placement (> day 15 of induction), early CVL placement (≤ day 15 of induction) was associated with an increased risk of having a positive blood culture (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.0; P = .05). When compared with internal CVLs (“ports”), external CVLs were associated with a positive blood culture (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.5; P = .01), thrombosis (odds ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 10.3; P = .006), and CVL removal (odds ratio, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.7 to 11.6; P < .001). Conclusion In pediatric patients with lesser risk ALL, internal lines (ports) should be the preferred CVL type due to a lower risk of infectious and thrombotic complications. In addition, CVLs placed early in induction are associated with a higher risk of positive blood culture than those placed later in induction.

scholarly journals P-P03 Impact of routine nasogastric decompression versus no nasogastric decompression after pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes: A meta-analysis of available evidence

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled Ammar ◽  
Chris Varghese ◽  
Thejasvin K ◽  
Viswakumar Prabakaran ◽  
Stuart Robinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Delayed Gastric Emptying ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Nasogastric Decompression

Abstract Background This meta-analysis reviewed the current evidence on the impact of routine Nasogastric decompression (NGD) versus no NGD after pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes.  Methods PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting the role of nasogastric tube decompression after pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes were retrieved and analysed up to January 2021.  Results Eight studies with total of 1301 patients were enrolled of which 668 patients had routine NGD. Routine NGD was associated with a higher incidence of overall delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and clinically relevant DGE (OR = 2.51, 95% CI; 1.12 - 5.63, I2= 83%, P = 0.03, and OR = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.83 – 7.25, I2 = 54%, P &lt; 0.01, respectively). Routine NGD was also associated with a higher rate of Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2 complications (OR = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.05 – 9.28, I2 = 88%, P = 0.04), and increased length of hospital stay (MD = 2.67, 95% CI: 0.60 – 4.75, I2 = 97%, P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in overall complications (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.79 – 1.46, I2 0%, P = 0.66), or postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.86 – 1.72, I2 = 0%, P = 0.28) between the two groups. Conclusions Routine NGD may be associated with increased rates of DGE, major complications and longer length of stay after pancreatoduodenectomy. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document