scholarly journals High-dose Methotrexate and Rituximab Induction Regimen In Immunocompetent Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of Survival Predictors

Author(s):  
Andrew Burton DeAtkine ◽  
Moaaz Abdelrashid ◽  
Zach Tucker ◽  
James M. Markert ◽  
Jinsuh Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose:Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive tumor that is confined to the CNS. Although the provision of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) has remarkably improved outcomes in PCNSL patients, the optimal treatment regimens and standard MTX dose have been largely controversial. Herein, we sought to explore the impact of adjuvant Rituximab and different dosages of HD-MTX on survival outcomes of immunocompetent patients with PCNSL.Methods:In this study, we examined patients with PCNSL treated at a single NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center to evaluate their survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 51 immunocompetent patients with PCNSL who received their induction chemotherapy at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) between 2001 and 2019. Only adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL who had either HD-MTX alone or in combination with Rituximab were included. Patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival data were collected and analyzed.Results:There is no significant difference in survival among patients who received MTX alone versus MTX plus Rituximab. Furthermore, lower doses of MTX were associated with worse survival outcomes; however, this difference in survival was not significant when adjusted to age.Conclusion:Our experience challenges the role of Rituximab in PCNSL during induction therapy. Our study also highlights the shorter survival in elderly patients with PCNSL which can be related, to some extent, to the relatively lower doses of HD-MTX. There is an unmet need to establish a consensus on the most effective upfront regimen in PCNSL through prospective studies.

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522092745
Author(s):  
Stephanie F Matta ◽  
Leslie A Gieselman ◽  
Robert S Mancini

Introduction Delayed methotrexate clearance in several patients admitted to the oncology unit at a regional medical center necessitated the development of a pharmacist-driven protocol for supportive therapy with high-dose methotrexate. This performance improvement project evaluated the impact of the protocol on inpatient length of stay, patient safety, and clinical outcomes. Methods Retrospective data were collected over 14 months pre-implementation and prospective data were collected over 19 months post-implementation. Primary outcomes included mean length of stay and incidence of kidney injury. Secondary outcomes included myelosuppression, treatment delays, mucositis, protocol adherence, and pharmacist interventions. Chi-squared and unpaired two sample t-test were used for data analysis. Intervention A literature review of consensus recommendations for supportive care post high-dose methotrexate administration was conducted to develop the protocol. Education on implementation was provided to involved disciplines. Results One-hundred ten high-dose methotrexate admissions for 23 patients were analyzed: 24 pre-protocol and 86 post-protocol. Mean length of stay was 5.17 nights pre-protocol and 3.91 nights post-protocol ( p = 0.026). Incidence of kidney injury significantly decreased (16.7% pre-protocol versus 3.5% post-protocol; p = 0.0394). Lower incidences of all-grade anemia (83.3% versus 58.1%), neutropenia (62.5% versus 29.1%), and thrombocytopenia (58.3% versus 33.7%) as well as treatment delays (29.2% versus 11.6%; p = 0.036) were reported post protocol. No statistically significant difference in mucositis was detected. Pharmacist adherence to protocol was ≥80% resulting in 348 interventions with 99.4% provider acceptance. Conclusion The implementation of a pharmacist-driven high-dose methotrexate management protocol resulted in a statistically significant decrease in inpatient length of stay and kidney injury. Further studies are needed to assess the impact on additional outcomes.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1507-1513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. Nguyen ◽  
Arnab Chakravarti ◽  
Dianne M. Finkelstein ◽  
Fred H. Hochberg ◽  
Tracy T. Batchelor ◽  
...  

Purpose This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as salvage therapy for immunocompetent patients who failed initial high-dose methotrexate for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Patients and Methods The study cohort included 27 consecutive patients who failed initial high-dose methotrexate and then received salvage WBRT (median dose, 36 Gy). Actuarial survival was measured from the initiation of radiotherapy. Results Ten patients (37%) achieved a complete radiographic response (CR), and 10 patients (37%) a partial response to WBRT, for a 74% overall radiographic response rate. At the time of maximal response, Karnofsky performance status improved in 12 (44%) of 27 patients and at least stabilized in 67%. Median estimated survival from initiation of WBRT was 10.9 months (range, 0.3 to 63.7 months). The univariate predictor of longer survival was age less than 60 years at the time of WBRT (P = .028). Among patients who survived 4 months, achievement of a CR to WBRT by 4 months (P = .002) predicted longer survival. Late treatment-associated neurotoxicity was diagnosed in four patients (15%) and was significantly associated with total radiation doses greater than 36 Gy (P = .04). No patient treated with daily fractions less than 1.8 Gy developed late neurotoxicity. Conclusion For patients with PCNSL who experience treatment failure with methotrexate, WBRT provides high response rates (74%) and a median survival of 10.9 months. Age less than 60 years and response to WBRT predict post-WBRT survival. Modest rates of late neurotoxicity (15%) were seen and were associated with a total dose greater than 36 Gy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2034-2034
Author(s):  
Matthias Holdhoff ◽  
Guneet Sarai ◽  
Ahmed Abdelaziz ◽  
David Bonekamp ◽  
Stuart A. Grossman ◽  
...  

2034 Background: The current institutional standard for treatment of patients with newly-diagnosed primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSL) at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) consists of treatment with high-dose methotrexate plus rituximab (hd-MTX/R) every 2 weeks until complete response (CR), progression or unacceptable toxicities. Once CR is achieved, this is followed by monthly treatments for a total of up to one year for consolidation. Prior to 2008, the institutional standard had been treatment with hd-MTX alone. The benefit of adding rituximab to hd-MTX has not been formally evaluated. Methods: This is a retrospective study of HIV-negative adult patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL treated at JHH with either hd-MTX or hd-MTX/R as initial therapy. Patients were identified using the cancer center registry (1995-2012) and were included if they had received at least one cycle of therapy (intention-to-treat). Primary objectives were CR rate (patients with sufficient imaging data; centrally reviewed) and overall survival (OS, all patients included). Results: A total of 81 patients were analyzed (median age of 65 yrs; 52% male). 54 patients received hd-MTX alone (median age, 65 yrs) and 27 patients received hd-MTX/R (median age, 66 yrs). 37 and 24 patients in the two groups were evaluable for response, respectively. Among these, the CR rate was 51% in patients treated with hd-MTX alone (overall response rate, ORR, 76%) and 79% in patients treated with hd-MTX/R (ORR 96%). The median number of cycles to CR was 5 and 4.5, respectively. Median OS among all patients (both groups combined) was 26 months (95% CI: 11-44). Conclusions: These data show potential clinical benefit from the addition of rituximab to hd-MTX for newly diagnosed patients with PCNSL based on a higher CR rate. Analysis of OS benefit between patients treated with hd-MTX and hd-MTX/R is pending maturation of further survival data.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4358-4358
Author(s):  
Ilana N Cypes ◽  
Angel Mier-Hicks ◽  
Jordan Scott ◽  
Adrienne Groman ◽  
Pallawi Torka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) often present with neurologic complications such as focal defects, neuropsychiatric symptoms, increased intracranial pressure, aphasia, seizures, and ocular symptoms which require initiation of prophylactic or therapeutic anticonvulsants. Most anticonvulsants are notorious for their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug interactions. The cornerstone of PCNSL therapy is the utilization of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX). The pharmacokinetics of HD-MTX are uniquely sensitive to both disease biology and drug interactions. Due to the importance of both HD-MTX and anticonvulsants in PCNSL patients, these medications are frequently given in concert with one another despite theoretical and proven drug interactions published in the literature. This is a retrospective analysis of patients treated with a modified R-MPV regimen (rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine alternating with intrathecal methotrexate) and the effects of various anticonvulsants on HD-MTX clearance. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age with a biopsy proven diagnosis of PCNSL at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center who received R-MPV between January 2002 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective analysis. The electronic health record of each patient was reviewed for specific patient demographics, laboratory results, confounding drug interactions, toxicity, and treatment outcomes. Descriptive statistics were computed for all categorical variables. The time to MTX clearance in hours and the potential impact of concomitant use of various anticonvulsants were assessed using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test in the case of ordinal responses and the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's Exact test for categorical variables where appropriate. Results: A total of 67 patients met the inclusion criteria of which 53 patients (79.1%) received anticonvulsants (189 cycles of R-MPV) and 14 did not (69 cycles of R-MPV). Patients who had seizures or frontal brain PCNSL were more likely to receive anticonvulsants (p <0.001). When considering all possible medication interactions with HD-MTX, use of any interacting medication within 48 hours prior to HD-MTX was a predictor of delayed clearance (p = 0.0398). The most common confounding interaction seen in this population were with proton pump inhibitors. Levetiracetam was the most common anticonvulsant used at any point in time during treatment (83.1%). Compared to no anticonvulsant, levetiracetam did not significantly prolong HD-MTX clearance (52.6h v. 72.7h, p = 0.1586). Other anticonvulsants utilized included phenytoin (24.5%), gabapentin (3.8%), valproate (3.8%), carbamazepine (1.9%), lacosamide (1.9%), lamotrigine (1.9%), and phenobarbital (1.9%). Of the patients who received an anticonvulsant, 11 received more than one over the treatment period. Time to clearance of HD-MTX for patients not on an anticonvulsant was 53.8 hours compared to a clearance time of 68.2 hours for those who received an anticonvulsant (p = 0.0571). Patients who received anticonvulsants had a significantly higher complete response rate (79.2% vs 35.7%, p = 0.009), longer progression free survival (25.4 mo vs 3 mo, p = 0.014) and overall survival (56.6 mo vs 4.6 mo, p = 0.002) compared to those who did not (Table 1). There was no difference in grade 3/4 toxicities between anticonvulsants and no anticonvulsants except for thrombocytopenia (p = 0.047) and respiratory side effects (p = 0.035). Conclusion: Anticonvulsants are an essential component to PCNSL therapy in patients on HD-MTX. They are well tolerated, do not alter HD-MTX clearance in a clinically significant manner and may help improve patient outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Torka: TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2945
Author(s):  
Mélanie Mercier ◽  
Corentin Orvain ◽  
Laurianne Drieu La Rochelle ◽  
Tony Marchand ◽  
Christopher Nunes Gomes ◽  
...  

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with extra nodal skeletal involvement is rare. It is currently unclear whether these lymphomas should be treated in the same manner as those without skeletal involvement. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of combining high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) with an anthracycline-based regimen and rituximab as first-line treatment in a cohort of 93 patients with DLBCL and skeletal involvement with long follow-up. Fifty patients (54%) received upfront HD-MTX for prophylaxis of CNS recurrence (high IPI score and/or epidural involvement) or because of skeletal involvement. After adjusting for age, ECOG, high LDH levels, and type of skeletal involvement, HD-MTX was associated with an improved PFS and OS (HR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1–0.3, p < 0.001 and HR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.04–0.3, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients who received HD-MTX had significantly better 5-year PFS and OS (77% vs. 39%, p <0.001 and 83 vs. 58%, p < 0.001). Radiotherapy was associated with an improved 5-year PFS (74 vs. 48%, p = 0.02), whereas 5-year OS was not significantly different (79% vs. 66%, p = 0.09). A landmark analysis showed that autologous stem cell transplantation was not associated with improved PFS or OS. The combination of high-dose methotrexate and an anthracycline-based immunochemotherapy is associated with an improved outcome in patients with DLBCL and skeletal involvement and should be confirmed in prospective trials.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (19) ◽  
pp. 2229-2232
Author(s):  
Kathryn Lurain ◽  
Thomas S. Uldrick ◽  
Ramya Ramaswami ◽  
Mark N. Polizzotto ◽  
Priscila H. Goncalves ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyao Yu ◽  
Huaping Du ◽  
Xueshi Ye ◽  
Lifei Zhang ◽  
Haowen Xiao

AbstractWith the exception of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), there is currently no defined standard treatment for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). This review focused on first-line induction and consolidation treatment of PCNSL and aimed to determine the optimal combination of HD-MTX and the long-term beneficial consolidation methods. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE identified 1407 studies, among which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed by using Stata SE version 15. Forest plots were generated to report combined outcomes like the complete response rate (CRR), overall survival, and progression-free survival. We also conducted univariate regression analyses of the baseline characteristics to identify the source of heterogeneity. Pooled analysis showed a CRR of 41% across all HD-MTX-based regimens, and three- and four-drug regimens had better CRRs than HD-MTX monotherapy. In all combinations based on HD-MTX, the HD-MTX + procarbazine + vincristine (MPV) regimen showed pooled CRRs of 63% and 58% with and without rituximab, respectively, followed by the rituximab + HD-MTX + temozolomide regimen, which showed a pooled CRR of 60%. Pooled PFS and OS showed that post-remission consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was associated with the best survival outcome, with a pooled 2-year OS of 80%, a 2-year PFS of 74%, a 5-year OS of 77%, and a 5-year PFS of 63%. Next, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) + chemotherapy showed a pooled 2-year OS of 72%, 2-year PFS of 56%, 5-year OS of 55%, and 5-year PFS of 41%, with no detectable CR heterogeneity throughout the entire treatment process. In HD-MTX-based therapy of newly diagnosed PCNSL, MPV with or without rituximab can be chosen as the inductive regimen, and the rituximab + HD-MTX + temozolomide regimen is also a practical choice. Based on our study, high-dose chemotherapy supported by ASCT is an efficacious approach for consolidation. Consolidation with WBRT + chemotherapy can be another feasible approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document