A mixed-methods evaluation of the uptake of novel differentiated ART delivery models in a national sample of health facilities in Uganda
Abstract INTRODUCTIONSince 2017, Uganda has been implementing differentiated antiretroviral therapy services (DARTS) to improve the quality of HIV care and health-system efficiencies. The Ministry of Health endorsed five models. The community-based models include Community Client-Led Drug Delivery (CCLAD) and Community Drug Distribution Points (CDDPs), with facility-based models being either Fast Track Drug Refill (FTDR), Facility Based Group (FBG) or Facility-Based Individual Management (FBIM). It is unclear what the uptake of DARTS is since roll-out in 2017. We set out to assess the extent of uptake of DARTS models and to describe barriers to uptake of either facility-based or community-based models.METHODSBetween August and December 2019, we conducted a mixed-methods study entailing a cross-sectional health facility survey (n=116) and in-depth interviews (n=18) with ART clinic managers in ten case-study facilities as well as six focus group discussions (56 participants) with patients enrolled in DARTS models. Facilities were selected based on the 10 geographic sub-regions of Uganda. Statistical analyses were performed in STATA (v13) while qualitative data were analyzed by thematic approach. The qualitative arm of our study was dominant.RESULTSMost facilities 63 (57%) commenced implementation of DARTS in 2018. The most implemented facility-based model was Fast Track Drug Refill (FTDR) implemented in 100 (86%) of health facilities. Community Client-Led ART Delivery (CCLAD) was the most popular community model implemented in more than a half of facilities (63/116 or 54%). Community Drug Distribution Points (CDDP) model had the lowest uptake and was implemented in only 33 (24.88%) facilities. Overall, there has been a higher uptake of facility-based models. Barriers to enrollment in community-based models include; HIV-related stigma and a fear of breach of confidentiality of HIV status, low enrollment of adult males in community models. Health-system constraints include insufficient training of health workers in DARTS and inadequate funding to facilities for implementing community-based models.CONCLUSIONTo the best of our knowledge this is the first study reporting national DARTS coverage in Uganda. There is need to devise stigma-reduction interventions to enhance uptake of community models and increased donor and government funding for community models to maximize DARTS potential for achieving health-system efficiencies.