Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance is risky for development of proximal instrumented fracture after posterior instrumentation.
Abstract Backgrounds: Postoperative fracture of the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) is thought to be as fracture type of proximal junctional failure (PJF), which usually needs revision surgery for salvage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of spinopelvic parameters, such as the pelvic incidence (PI) angles, sacral slope (SS) angles, and pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and proximal local kyphosis (PLK) angle on the development of fracture type of proximal junctional failure after posterior instrumentation. Methods This was a retrospective 1:3 matched case-control cohort study: 24 patients in the study group and 72 patients in the control group. The weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and bone mineral density (BMD) with T score were recorded. In addition to spinopelvic parameters, PI-LL and spinopelvic realignment score were calculated. Results More comorbidities (CCI, p = 0.002), poorer bone density (T score, p = 0.001) were noted in the study group. Before surgery, the study group had significantly lower LL (p = 0.046), SS (p = 0.043), and significantly higher PLK (p < 0.001), PT (p = 0.044) than the control group. Postoperatively, the study group had significantly higher PLK (p < 0.001 ) and lower LL (p = 0.031) than the control group; the degree of PI-LL ( p = 0.007) remained significantly higher in the study group. Both preoperative (p = 0.026) and postoperative (p = 0.045) spinopelvic realignment scores was worse in the study goup. Conclusions Preoperative and postoperative lower LL/spinopelvic realignment score, and higher PLK/PI-LL were significantly associated with instrumented fracture at upper instrumented vertebrae. An appropriate LL and a lower PLK should be obtained at surgery to prevent the development of instrumented fracture.