scholarly journals The trend of morbidity and mortality of Coronavirus disease 2019 under the first-level public health emergency response in China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingya Xu ◽  
Xiling Lin ◽  
Xiaowen Pan ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emergency Response ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
World Health ◽  
Public Health Emergency Response ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background The ongoing outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to declaration of public health emergency of international concern by World Health Organization and the first-level public health emergency response in China. We aimed to share the Joint Prevention and Control Mechanism taken in Mainland China and evaluate the effectiveness.Methods A powerful Joint Prevention and Control Mechanism was adopted to fight against COVID-19 in Mainland China. Data were collected from the daily epidemic reports released by the national and provincial health commissions of China from January 21 to April 6, 2020. Global data were collected from daily situation reports by World Health Organization.Results As of April 6, 2020, there were 81,740 confirmed COVID-19 cases (32 new) in Mainland China. The case fatality ratio was 4.74% and 0.85% in and outside Hubei respectively. It is gratifying to see that there were up to 22 provinces reporting zero new infections, but it can’t be ignored that there were 1,196,651 confirmed cases (68,700 new) reported in over 221 countries and territories outside China and the total death number were 69,274, nowadays China is facing great challenges of imported cases.Conclusions Great achievements have been made in controlling the spread of COVID-19 in Mainland China, but it is still a major challenge worldwide. The comprehensive and powerful control measures taken by Mainland China have proved to be effective and might be applicable to other regions.

scholarly journals Overcoming the Pandemic: Analysing the Ongoing Challenges in the Prevention of COVID-19 in India

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 630-652
Author(s):  
Puneeta Ajmera ◽  
Jaseela Majeed ◽  
Ramesh K. Goyal ◽  
Sheetal Yadav ◽  
Debraj Mukhopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
World Health ◽  
Family Welfare ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Recent Outbreak ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
And Control

World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the recent outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a Pandemic and a global public health emergency. The eventual scope and consequences of this outbreak are uncertain at present as the condition is swiftly evolving. The purpose of this article is to cumulate existing published data and researches, identify the challenges with reference to India and develop a comprehensive preventive plan to prevent the spread of this deadly pandemic. The authors explored WHO situation dashboards, the web portal of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of India and press reports of different countries, published literature on coronavirus transmission, textbooks, scientific and medical journals and several other sources to identify ongoing challenges in the fight against COVID-19 in India. After an exhaustive literature search, 15 ongoing challenges in the fight against novel COVID-19 especially with reference to India have been identified. After a thorough analysis of all these challenges along with the lessons from the International community, a preventive plan has been established to be devised by different agencies from our personal perspectives to overcome the challenges which may assist decision-makers in the prevention and control of COVID-19 in India.

scholarly journals A Literature Review of 2019 Novel Coronavirus During the Early Outbreak Period: Epidemiology, Causes, Clinical Manifestation and Diagnosis, Prevention and Control

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasmita Poudel Adhikari ◽  
Sha Meng ◽  
Yuju Wu ◽  
Yuping Mao ◽  
Ruixue Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Antiviral Treatment ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
World Health ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Infected People ◽  
And Control

The 2019-nCoV has been identified as the cause of an outbreak of respiratory illness in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China beginning in December 2019. This epidemic had spread to 19 countries with 11,791 confirmed cases, including 213 deaths, as of January 31, 2020. The World Health Organization declared it as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. This study analyzed and discussed 70 research articles published until January 31, 2020 for a better understanding of the epidemiology, causes, clinical diagnosis, prevention and control of this virus. Studies thus far have shown origination in connection to a seafood market in Wuhan, but specific animal association has not been confirmed. The reported symptoms include fever, cough, fatigue, pneumonia, headache, diarrhea, hemoptysis, and dyspnea. Preventive measures such as masks, hand hygiene practices, avoidance of public contact, case detection, contact tracing, and quarantines are effective for reducing the transmission. To date, no specific antiviral treatment is proven effective, hence, infected people primarily rely on symptomatic treatment and supportive care. Although these studies had relevance to control a public emergency, more research need to be conducted to provide valid and reliable ways to manage this kind of public health emergency in both short- and long- term.

scholarly journals A scoping review of 2019 Novel Coronavirus during the early outbreak period: Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasmita Poudel Adhikari ◽  
Sha Meng ◽  
Yuju Wu ◽  
Yuping Mao ◽  
Ruixue Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Clinical Manifestation ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Antiviral Treatment ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
World Health ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background: The 2019-nCoV has been identified as the cause of an outbreak of respiratory illness in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China beginning in December 2019. This epidemic had spread to 19 countries with 11791 confirmed cases, including 213 deaths, as of January 31, 2020. The World Health Organization declared it as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.Methods: A scoping review of 65 research articles published until January 31, 2020 were analyzed and discussed for a better understanding of the epidemiology, causes, clinical diagnosis, prevention and control of this virus. The research domains, publishing dates, journal language, and authors’ affiliations, as well as methodological characteristics were analyzed. All findings and statements that are mentioned regarding the outbreak in this review are based on published information as listed in the references.Results: Most of the publications were in English language (89.23%). The largest proportion of articles were related to causes (38.46%) and majority (67.69%), and were published by Chinese scholars. Research articles initially focused on causes while there was an increase of the articles related to prevention and control over time. Studies thus far have shown origination in connection to a seafood market in Wuhan, but specific animal association has not been confirmed. The reported symptoms include fever, cough, fatigue, pneumonia, headache, diarrhea, hemoptysis, and dyspnea. Preventive measures such as masks, hand hygiene practices, avoidance of public contact, case detection, contact tracing, and quarantines are being discussed for reducing the transmission. To date, no specific antiviral treatment is proven effective, hence, infected people primarily rely on symptomatic treatment and supportive care. Conclusions: There has been a rapid surge in research in response to the outbreak of 2019-nCoV. During this early period, published research primarily explored the epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, as well as prevention and control of the novel coronavirus. Although these studies had relevance to the control of a public emergency, more high-quality research need to be conducted to provide valid and reliable ways to manage this kind of public health emergency in both short-and long-terms.

scholarly journals Facts and Reflections on Initial Public Health Emergency Response to SARS and COVID-19 Pandemics in Mainland China: A Retrospective Comparative Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Zhu ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Tiantian Zhang ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Ruiming Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Emergency Response ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
Peak Time ◽  
Pathogen Identification ◽  
Public Health Emergency Response ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

Abstract Background: Since December 2019, 2019-nCoV has emerged in Wuhan, China, the fast pace of transmission is wreaking global public health crisis. Country’s reaction speed is critical for the control of public health emergency (PHE), especially in the early stage of an outbreak. Compared with SARS pandemic, whether has the efficiency of initial public health emergency response to COVID-19 in mainland China been improved? And whether is there still existing vulnerabilities in current PHE system? Studies on this topic are relatively few. We tried to find the answers, evidences and alternatives. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study. The speed of hospital reporting, pathogen identification and government decision-making between SARS and COVID-19 were compared by selecting 5 critical events from initial public health emergency response timeline. Besides, combining with the two pandemics' progress curves, we discussed the characteristics of their peak time.Results:(1) SARS completed the entire initial public health emergency response in 127 days, and COVID-19 completed in 44 days. Response speed has been shorted nearly by 3 times. (2) Both the first SARS and COVID-19 cases were reported in 19 days. It doesn't appear that hospital reporting speed becomes faster. (3) The accumulated time completing pathogen identification were 118 days for SARS and 31 days for COVID-19. The speed has been improved by more than 3 times. (4) 9 days after the completion of pathogen identification, national government made emergency policies for SARS while the interval between pathogen identification and national government's decision-making for COVID-19 was 13 days. (5) The peak time of SARS came about 80 days later than that of COVID-19. But both the two pandemics' peak occurred about 20 days after the national government's decision-making, and then the curves went down dramatically.Conclusions: The speed of initial public health emergency response to pandemic has been improved due to faster identification. However, some deficiencies and challenges in early alert and authorities' decision-making still remain. Therefore, Chinese government should put more stress on improving hospital's sensitivity to new emerging infectious diseases and timeliness of government's decision-making.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Pandemic: Perception, Practices and Preparedness in Nigeria

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace I. Olasehinde ◽  
Paul A. Akinduti ◽  
Olayemi O. Akinnola ◽  
Abiodun F. Ipadeola ◽  
Glory P. Adebayo
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Disease Outbreaks ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Viral Disease ◽  
World Health ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
First Case ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
And Control

Since Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic was declared a public health emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization (WHO) on the 30th of January, 2020. Nigeria, with 343 cases and 10 deaths as at April 14, 2020 is classified as one of the countries at high risk of importation of the disease from China. The ability to limit and control local transmission after importation depends on the application and execution of strict measures of detection, prevention and control. The initial response of some percentage of the population was of doubt due to the ignorance of the far-reaching effect of the virus. More than 1,700 leaders of religious groups and communities in all 36 States and FCT were therefore sensitized to increase awareness level and consequences of COVID-19 among the populace. Major response activities were initiated before the first case was reported and were upgraded within weeks after the number of cases began to rise. Based on previous experience of perception, and awareness of other viral disease outbreaks, COVID-19 infection prevention and control interventions recommended by WHO are yet to be fully entrenched in the Nigerian public health system in order to reduce the general risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 from infected individuals. There is therefore the need to execute strict measures of detection, prevention and control and drive compliance with the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) and WHO guidelines in Nigeria.

scholarly journals Questionnaire Survey on the Current Situation and Experience in Prevention and Control Measures at Urology Clinics During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Liang Zhu ◽  
Hai-Hong Jiang ◽  
Ming-Hui Jiang ◽  
Wen-Li Liu ◽  
Zi-Lu Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
World Health ◽  
Questionnaire Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
New Normal ◽  
Prevention And Control Measures ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
And Control

COVID-19, the coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus 2; ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme 2; S protein, spiked glycoprotein; TMPRSS2, transmembrane serine protease 2; WHO, World Health Organization.Purpose: Although the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has been viably controlled in China, a new normal in healthcare strategies has become standard in China and worldwide. We conducted a questionnaire study to disseminate the experience from China in terms of urology outpatient prevention and control measures under standardized prevention policies against COVID-19.Participants and Methods: From May 3, 2020 to June 25, 2020, we conducted an anonymous cross-sectional questionnaire study, focused on the status of and experiences with outpatient urology prevention and control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. The targeted respondents were urologists in mainland China, covering all levels of hospitals and clinics.Results: A total of 216 (97%) valid responses were collected. We found that 183 (85%) respondents were from outside of Hubei province in China. One-hundred-and-fifty-eight (73%) respondents believed that SARS-CoV-2 could be detected in urine, and that protection against urine exposure was needed. Over 80% of respondents recommended WeChat application or similar online video meetings for virtual outpatient consultations. The suggested flowcharts and recommendations to prevent new cases were easy to understand and approved by most physicians, which could provide reference for outpatient prevention and control. We still need to make adequate preparations under the new normal of the COVID-19 Epidemic, especially for those suspected of being infected.Conclusions: Although the scientific validation of the questionnaire is limited, it provides a first snapshot of the experiences relating to the prevention and control measures in urology clinics in China, and can inform future policies in this field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document