scholarly journals Clinical Practice and Post-Operative Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroscopy: Comparison Between Polish Experts and Non-Experts.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Bąkowski ◽  
Kamilla Bąkowska-Żywicka ◽  
Tomasz Piontek
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Knee Arthroscopy ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Meniscus Suture ◽  
Surgical Expertise ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Suturing Techniques

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical practices between polish expert and non-expert arthroscopy knee surgeons.Methods: 205 registered orthopedic surgeons took part in surveys. The survey included 35 questions regarding general arthroscopy and postoperative management, including physician’s level of expertise, arthroscopy anesthesia, postoperative treatment, rehabilitation and procedures performed. Comparisons were made between knee arthroscopy experts (> 100 arthroscopies performed per year) and non-experts (≤ 100 cases) on aspects of patient care.Results: The most important finding of this study is an agreement in almost all aspects of knee arthroscopy approach. A consensus between polish surgeons was noticed in choosing regional anesthesia for knee arthroscopy, no need for knee braces nor knee medications, using LMW heparin as thromboprophylaxis, 1-2 days hospitalization, recommendation of rehabilitation and magnetic resonance as a diagnostic test for meniscus damage. Surgical expertise was significantly associated with the performance of meniscus sewing procedures (p = 0.009). Experts recommended starting rehabilitation already on the day of surgery (p=0.007) and more likely used objective physical tests (p=0.003). Nonexpert surgeons recommended longer period from meniscus suture to a full range knee motion (p=0.001) and admitted that patient’s age does matter for meniscus repair qualification (0.002).Conclusions: Clinical practice varies among orthopeadists performing knee arthroscopy procedures, based on their level of expertise. Polish knee arthroscopy experts agreed with non-experts in the type of anesthesia during knee arthroscopy and numerous aspects of postoperative treatment. Surgical expertise was associated with the performance of advanced meniscus suturing techniques.

scholarly journals Clinical practice and postoperative rehabilitation after knee arthroscopy vary according to surgeons’ expertise: a survey among polish arthroscopy society members

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Bąkowski ◽  
Kamilla Bąkowska-Żywicka ◽  
Tomasz Piontek
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroscopy ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Meniscus Suture ◽  
Surgical Expertise ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Background Meniscus repair is a challenging task in knee arthroscopy. Currently, there are a variety of arthroscopic methods available for meniscus repair. The purpose of this study was to determine a consensus in meniscus tear treatment in the environment of Polish orthopaedists. Methods A total of 205 registered orthopaedic surgeons participated in the surveys. The survey consisted of 35 questions regarding general arthroscopy and postoperative management, including physicians’ level of expertise, anaesthesia, postoperative treatment, rehabilitation and procedures performed. Comparisons were made between knee arthroscopy experts (> 100 arthroscopies performed per year) and non-experts (≤ 100 cases) on aspects of patient care. Results The most important finding of this study was the agreement among almost all aspects of the knee arthroscopy approach. Consensus among Polish surgeons was noticed in choosing regional anaesthesia for knee arthroscopy, the lack of need for knee braces and knee medications, the of use of LMW heparin for thromboprophylaxis, 1–2 days of hospitalization, the recommendation of rehabilitation and the use of magnetic resonance as a diagnostic test for meniscus damage. Surgical expertise was significantly associated with the performance of meniscus suture procedures (p = 0.009). Experts recommended starting rehabilitation on the day of surgery (p = 0.007) and were more likely to use objective physical tests (p = 0.003). Non-expert surgeons recommended a longer period from meniscus suture to full-range knee motion (p = 0.001) and admitted that patient age does matter for meniscus repair qualification (p = 0.002). Conclusions There is consensus among almost all issues of meniscus tear treatment in the environment of Polish orthopaedists; however, the issues of rehabilitation and the use of advanced meniscus repair techniques are associated with surgical expertise.

scholarly journals Clinical practice and post-operative rehabilitation after knee arthroscopy varies according to surgeon's expertise: a survey among Polish Arthroscopy Society members.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Bąkowski ◽  
Kamilla Bąkowska-Żywicka ◽  
Tomasz Piontek
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroscopy ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Meniscus Suture ◽  
Surgical Expertise ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Background: Meniscal repair has received increasing attention. Currently, there is a variety of arthroscopic methods of meniscus repair available. The purpose of this study was to determine a consensus in meniscus tear treatment in the environment of Polish orthopedists.Methods: 205 registered orthopedic surgeons took part in surveys. The survey consisted of 35 questions regarding general arthroscopy and postoperative management, including physician’s level of expertise, arthroscopy anesthesia, postoperative treatment, rehabilitation and procedures performed. Comparisons were made between knee arthroscopy experts (> 100 arthroscopies performed per year) and non-experts (≤ 100 cases) on aspects of patient care.Results: The most important finding of this study is an agreement in almost all aspects of knee arthroscopy approach. A consensus between polish surgeons was noticed in choosing regional anesthesia for knee arthroscopy, no need for knee braces nor knee medications, using LMW heparin as thromboprophylaxis, 1-2 days hospitalization, recommendation of rehabilitation and magnetic resonance as a diagnostic test for meniscus damage. Surgical expertise was significantly associated with the performance of meniscus sewing procedures (p = 0.009). Experts recommended starting rehabilitation already on the day of surgery (p=0.007) and more likely used objective physical tests (p=0.003). Non-expert surgeons recommended longer period from meniscus suture to a full range knee motion (p=0.001) and admitted that patient’s age does matter for meniscus repair qualification (p=0.002).Conclusions: There is a consensus in almost all issues of meniscus tear treatment in the environment of the Polish orthopedists, however the rehabilitation issues and the use of advanced meniscus repair techniques is associated with surgical expertise.

scholarly journals Clinical practice and postoperative rehabilitation after knee arthroscopy vary according to surgeons’ expertise: a survey among Polish Arthroscopy Society members.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Bąkowski ◽  
Kamilla Bąkowska-Żywicka ◽  
Tomasz Piontek
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroscopy ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Meniscus Suture ◽  
Surgical Expertise ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Background: Meniscus repair is a challenging task in knee arthroscopy. Currently, there are a variety of arthroscopic methods available for meniscus repair. The purpose of this study was to determine a consensus in meniscus tear treatment in the environment of Polish orthopaedists.Methods: A total of 205 registered orthopaedic surgeons participated in the surveys. The survey consisted of 35 questions regarding general arthroscopy and postoperative management, including physicians’ level of expertise, anaesthesia, postoperative treatment, rehabilitation and procedures performed. Comparisons were made between knee arthroscopy experts (> 100 arthroscopies performed per year) and non-experts (≤ 100 cases) on aspects of patient care.Results: The most important finding of this study was the agreement among almost all aspects of the knee arthroscopy approach. Consensus among Polish surgeons was noticed in choosing regional anaesthesia for knee arthroscopy, the lack of need for knee braces and knee medications, the of use of LMW heparin for thromboprophylaxis, 1-2 days of hospitalization, the recommendation of rehabilitation and the use of magnetic resonance as a diagnostic test for meniscus damage. Surgical expertise was significantly associated with the performance of meniscus suture procedures (p = 0.009). Experts recommended starting rehabilitation on the day of surgery (p=0.007) and were more likely to use objective physical tests (p=0.003). Non-expert surgeons recommended a longer period from meniscus suture to full-range knee motion (p=0.001) and admitted that patient age does matter for meniscus repair qualification (p=0.002).Conclusions: There is consensus among almost all issues of meniscus tear treatment in the environment of Polish orthopaedists; however, the issues of rehabilitation and the use of advanced meniscus repair techniques are associated with surgical expertise.

Klein with Lacan: A Study on the Reception of Lacanian Ideas in Uruguay and Its Effects on Clinical Practices (1955–82)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-361
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Grau-Pérez ◽  
J. Guillermo Milán
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Material ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Discursive Approach ◽  
The Way ◽  
Clinical Cases

In Uruguay, Lacanian ideas arrived in the 1960s, into a context of Kleinian hegemony. Adopting a discursive approach, this study researched the initial reception of these ideas and its effects on clinical practices. We gathered a corpus of discursive data from clinical cases and theoretical-doctrinal articles (from the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s). In order to examine the effects of Lacanian ideas, we analysed the difference in the way of interpreting the clinical material before and after Lacan's reception. The results of this research illuminate some epistemological problems of psychoanalysis, especially the relationship between theory and clinical practice.

THE ROLE OF EBM AND CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN GENERATING RESEARCH AND INTERVENTIONS IN NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES: A RATIONAL MODEL FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristhian David Morales-Plaza
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Neglected Tropical Diseases ◽  
Tropical Diseases ◽  
Rational Model ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Vulnerable Communities

Guarantee better clinical practices among clinicians who attend NTDs in developing countries as well as provide education in vector control in hotspot vulnerable communities

scholarly journals The Diagnosis and Therapy of Degenerative Knee Joint Disease: Expert Consensus from the Chinese Pain Medicine Panel

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Huang ◽  
Yan-Qing Liu ◽  
Li-Shuang Liang ◽  
Xue-Wu Lin ◽  
Tao Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Knee Joints ◽  
Reproduction Rate ◽  
Pain Specialist ◽  
Chinese Association ◽  
The One ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Based Medicine

At present, there are many constantly updated guidelines and consensuses on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoarthritis both at home and abroad. The recommendations established using methods of evidence-based medicine has experienced strict research on controlling bias and promoting reproduction rate. As a result, the previous evidence was reevaluated, and a lot of changes were provoked in the diagnosis and treatment concept of osteoarthritis. However, several methods not recommended by foreign guidelines are still in use in the current clinical practice in China. On the one hand, Chinese experts have not reached extensive consensus on whether it is necessary to make changes according to foreign guidelines. On the other hand, almost all the current relevant guidelines are on osteoarthritis, but the lesions around knee joints which, as a whole, bear the largest weight in human body, cannot be ignored. For this purpose, Chinese Association for the Study of Pain (CASP) organized some leading experts to formulate this Chinese Pain Specialist Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative knee osteoarthritis (DKOA) in combination with the guidelines in foreign countries and the expert experience of clinical practice in China. The consensus, which includes the definition, pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical manifestation, diagnostic criteria, and treatments of DKOA, is intended to be used by first-line doctors, including pain physicians to manage patients with DKOA.

scholarly journals Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: JSH Consensus Statements and Recommendations 2021 Update

Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-43
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Yusuke Kawamura ◽  
Kiyoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Ryosuke Tateishi ◽  
Kazuya Kariyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Consensus Statements

The Clinical Practice Manual for Hepatocellular Carcinoma was published based on evidence confirmed by the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma along with consensus opinion among a Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) expert panel on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines are based on original articles with extremely high levels of evidence, expert opinions on HCC management in clinical practice or consensus on newly developed treatments are not included. However, the practice manual incorporates the literature based on clinical data, expert opinion, and real-world clinical practice currently conducted in Japan to facilitate its use by clinicians. Alongside each revision of the JSH Guidelines, we issued an update to the manual, with the first edition of the manual published in 2007, the second edition in 2010, the third edition in 2015, and the fourth edition in 2020, which includes the 2017 edition of the JSH Guideline. This article is an excerpt from the fourth edition of the HCC Clinical Practice Manual focusing on pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of HCC. It is designed as a practical manual different from the latest version of the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines. This practice manual was written by an expert panel from the JSH, with emphasis on the consensus statements and recommendations for the management of HCC proposed by the JSH expert panel. In this article, we included newly developed clinical practices that are relatively common among Japanese experts in this field, although all of their statements are not associated with a high level of evidence, but these practices are likely to be incorporated into guidelines in the future. To write this article, coauthors from different institutions drafted the content and then critically reviewed each other’s work. The revised content was then critically reviewed by the Board of Directors and the Planning and Public Relations Committee of JSH before publication to confirm the consensus statements and recommendations. The consensus statements and recommendations presented in this report represent measures actually being conducted at the highest-level HCC treatment centers in Japan. We hope this article provides insight into the actual situation of HCC practice in Japan, thereby affecting the global practice pattern in the management of HCC.

Cyberbullying, student nurses’ ethical awareness and the Covid-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 096973302110102
Author(s):  
Ka Young Kim ◽  
Jeong Sil Choi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Nursing Intervention ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Hierarchical Regression ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Ethical Awareness ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cyberbullying Victimization ◽  
Cyber Ethics

Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic has increased cyber communication, causing nursing students’ clinical practice to be held in cyberspace. Thus, it is essential to ensure that nursing students develop comprehensive cyber ethics awareness. Moreover, cyberbullying is becoming more widespread and is an increasingly relevant new concept. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the experiences of cyberbullying among nursing students during clinical practice and determine the effects of cyberbullying victimization and cyber environments on their cyber ethics awareness. Research design: Data for this descriptive cross-sectional study were collected in July 2020 using a self-reported questionnaire and analyzed using hierarchical regression. Participants and research context: The study included data from 291 nursing students with more than 6 months of clinical experience who were enrolled in two nursing universities in two cities in South Korea. Ethical considerations: This study was conducted after obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board of G University. Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants. Results: Cyberbullying victimization experiences during clinical practice were few. The most common cyberbullies of work- and person-related cyberbullying were nurses and classmates, respectively. Discussion: Cyber ethics awareness was affected by cyber anonymity and the perceived seriousness of cyberbullying; cyberbullying related to clinical practices was a new factor that significantly affected cyber ethics awareness. Conclusions: Hospitals and nursing universities should develop a multi-dimensional, comprehensive, and effective nursing intervention education program to be integrated into the nursing curriculum to enhance cyber ethics awareness and reduce cyberbullying of nursing students.

scholarly journals Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Priya Patel ◽  
Andrew Houck ◽  
Daniel Fuentes
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
The United States ◽  
Institution Type ◽  
Respiratory Therapists ◽  
Respiratory Management ◽  
Surfactant Administration ◽  
Practice Variations ◽  
Almost All

Variability in neonatal clinical practice is well recognized. Respiratory management involves interdisciplinary care and often is protocol driven. The most recent published guidelines for management of respiratory distress syndrome and surfactant administration were published in 2014 and may not reflect current clinical practice in the United States. The goal of this project was to better understand variability in surfactant administration through conduct of health care provider (HCP) interviews. Questions focused on known practice variations included: use of premedication, decisions to treat, technique of surfactant administration and use of guidelines. Data were analyzed for trends and results were communicated with participants. A total of 54 HCPs participated from June to September 2020. In almost all settings, neonatologists or nurse practitioners intubated the infant and respiratory therapists administered surfactant. The INSURE (INtubation-SURrfactant-Extubation) technique was practiced by 83% of participants. Premedication prior to intubation was used by 76% of HCPs. An FiO2 ≥ 30% was the most common threshold for surfactant administration (48%). In conclusion, clinical practice variations exist in respiratory management and surfactant administration and do not seem to be specific to NICU level or institution type. It is unknown what effects the variability in clinical practice might have on clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Disabling stroke in persons already with a disability

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Young ◽  
Robert W. Regenhardt ◽  
Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi ◽  
Michael Ashley Stein
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Stroke Research ◽  
Scant Attention

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and a leading cause of adult disability worldwide. More than a third of individuals presenting with strokes are estimated to have a preexisting disability. Despite unprecedented advances in stroke research and clinical practice over the past decade, approaches to acute stroke care for persons with preexisting disability have received scant attention. Current standards of research and clinical practice are influenced by an underexplored range of biases that may hinder acute stroke care for persons with disability. These trends may exacerbate unequal health outcomes by rendering novel stroke therapies inaccessible to many persons with disabilities. Here, we explore the underpinnings and implications of biases involving persons with disability in stroke research and practice. Recent insights from bioethics, disability rights, and health law are explained and critically evaluated in the context of prevailing research and clinical practices. Allowing disability to drive decisions to withhold acute stroke interventions may perpetuate disparate health outcomes and undermine ethically resilient stroke care. Advocacy for inclusion of persons with disability in future stroke trials can improve equity in stroke care delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document