scholarly journals The Age Threshold of the 8th Edition AJCC Classification Is Useful for Indicating Patients with Aggressive Papillary Thyroid Cancer in Clinical Practice .

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Kaliszewski ◽  
Dorota Diakowska ◽  
Łukasz Nowak ◽  
Beata Wojtczak ◽  
Jerzy Rudnicki

Abstract Background: Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is unique among cancers in that patient age is a consideration in staging. One of the most important modifications in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification, which was introduced in 2018, was to increase the age cutoff for risk stratification in PTC from 45 to 55 years. However, whether this cutoff is useful in clinical practice remains controversial. In the present study, we assessed how well this new age threshold stratifies patients with aggressive PTC.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features and overall survival rate of 523 patients with PTC admitted to and surgically treated at a single surgical center. We divided the patients into two groups according to age at PTC diagnosis: ≥55 years and <55 years. Results: We found that the rates of tumor progression, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and distant metastasis were significantly higher in patients ≥55 years than in those <55 years; consequently, TNM stages were significantly higher in older than in younger patients (p<0.05 for all parameters). The risk of tumor progression (T3+T4) was nearly two-fold higher and the risk of LNM (N1) more than four-fold higher in older than in younger patients (p<0.05 for both). No patients <55 years old but 19 patients >55 years old (9.8% of the total group) showed distant metastasis. The rates of microcalcification, vascular and capsular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, irregular tumor shape, multifocality, bilaterality and multiplicity of foci were significantly higher in older than in younger patients (p<0.05 for all). The rate of disease-free survival was significantly lower in older (86.6%) than in younger (98.7%) patients (p<0.0001), and the rate of overall survival was significantly lower in older (90.3%) than in younger (99.4%) patients (p<0.0001).Conclusions: PTC is more aggressive in patients aged ≥ 55 years than in their younger counterparts. This age therefore effectively stratifies PTC patients with a poor prognosis, indicating it is likely to be useful in clinical practice.

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1618-1624 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fraser ◽  
C. Go ◽  
A. Aniss ◽  
S. Sidhu ◽  
L. Delbridge ◽  
...  

Head & Neck ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 2549-2554
Author(s):  
Earl Abraham ◽  
David Roshan ◽  
Bryan Tran ◽  
Susannah Graham ◽  
Christopher Lehane ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Cangang Zhang ◽  
Yanan Zhu ◽  
Xi Ding ◽  
Yikun Zhou ◽  
...  

The immunosuppressive microenvironment is associated with poor prognosis in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC); however, the molecular mechanisms involved are unknown. Among triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell (TREM) family, we found that TREM1 expression in PTC was significantly higher than that in normal tissues. TREM1 overexpression was associated with BRAFV600E profiles and advanced tumor stages. Furthermore, TREM1 mRNA expression was negatively correlated with promoter methylation status. Specifically, hypomethylation of CpG site cg06196379 in the TREM1 promoter was related with poor patient disease free survival (DFS) and a high PTC recurrence rate. Mechanistically, TREM1 was mainly expressed in malignant epithelial cells but not macrophages in PTC by single-cell analysis. PTC tissues with high TREM1 levels had enhanced infiltration of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and decreased infiltration of CD8+ T cells. Our study confirms that hypomethylation-mediated overexpression of TREM1 in PTC cells promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment by enhancing Treg infiltration. We recommend the future use of therapeutic strategy targeting TREM1 for the treatment of PTC.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mu-Hung Tsai ◽  
Shang-Yin Wu ◽  
Tsung Yu ◽  
Sen-Tien Tsai ◽  
Yuan-Hua Wu

Abstract Background and purpose Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the established treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, there is no evidence supporting routine adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to demonstrate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival and distant metastasis in high-risk N3 NPC patients. Materials and methods We linked the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Cause of Death database to obtain data. Clinical N3 NPC patients were divided as those receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and platinum (PF) chemotherapy and those receiving no chemotherapy after CCRT. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We compared overall survival, disease-free survival, local control, and distant metastasis in both groups using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results We included 431 patients (152 and 279 patients in the adjuvant PF and observation groups, respectively). Median follow-up was 4.3 years. The 5-year overall survival were 69.1% and 57.4% in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy and observation groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–0.84; p = 0.003), even after adjusting for baseline prognostic factors (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43–0.86; p = 0.005). Distant metastasis-free survival at 12 months was higher in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy group than in the observation group (98% vs 84.8%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with freedom from distant metastasis (HR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.46; p = 0.003). Conclusion Prospective evaluation of adjuvant PF chemotherapy in N3 NPC patients treated with definitive CCRT is warranted because adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and decreased risk of distant metastasis.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e0197007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Gong ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Wenshuang Wu ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Anping Su ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document