How To Handle Disaster? – Evaluation of a Course for Disaster Medicine and Humanitarian Assistance for Undergraduate Medical Students
Abstract Background: Disaster medicine is a component of the German medical education since 2003. However, studies have shown some inconsistencies within the implementation of the national curriculum, and limits with the number of students trained over the years. Facing the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and other disasters, it became much more important to train medical students in disaster medicine on a coordinated basis.Methods: The University Clinic for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in Tübingen, Germany, expanded the existing curriculum of undergraduate disaster medicine training with fundamentals of humanitarian medicine, integrating the experience with distance learning, interactive teaching and simulation sessions. Survey tools were used to assess participants’ previous experiences and interest in the field of disaster medicine, to compare the self-reported degree of knowledge before and after training, and the programme’s quality evaluation. A mandatory pre- and post-test of knowledge was also administered to evaluate learner outcomes. The prospective and cross-sectional study evaluates the pilot course Disaster Medicine and Humanitarian Assistance carried out for third-, fourth- and fifth- year medical students over five semesters during the period between 2018 and 2020.Results: Data was collected from 107 students over five training sessions. Out of a sample of 82 students, the subjective perception of knowledge increased after the course (t [81] = 24.426, p < .001), alongside with the interest in engaging in the field of disaster medicine (t[81 ] = 7.031, p < .001). 102 students entered the mandatory knowledge assessment, with the rate of correct answers passing from 73.27% in the pre-test to 95.23% in the post-test (t [101] = 18.939, p < .001). The 93.46% of the medical students (N = 100) graded the training received with an excellent overall score (1.01 out of 6).Discussion: The study indicates a significant increase in students’ understanding of disaster medicine through the use of both subjective and objective measures, as well as an increase interest in the field of disaster and humanitarian medicine. The educational programme appears to address the deficiencies documented in previous studies, and possible adaptation with virtual reality approaches could expand access to a larger audience.Conclusion: The programme offers an effective and comprehensive tool to address the urgent need of quality education for medical students, suggesting integrated strategies to implement disaster medicine training.