scholarly journals Critical care demand and intensive care supply for patients in Japan with COVID-19 at the time of the state of emergency declaration in April 2020: a descriptive analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Fujii ◽  
Kiichi Hirota
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
The State ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Medical Institutions ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Care Capacity

Abstract Background : The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), threatened to overwhelm Japan’s intensive care capacity due to the rising numbers of infected patients. This study aimed to determine the number of critically ill patients with COVID-19 who required intensive care, including mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), during the pandemic and to compare these patient numbers with Japan’s overall intensive care capacity. Results : Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine datasets were used to obtain the number of confirmed patients with COVID-19 who had undergone mechanical ventilation and ECMO between February 15 and June 4 2020, to determine and compare intensive care unit (ICU) and attending bed needs for patients with COVID-19, and to estimate peak ICU demands in Japan. In total, 17968 ICU days, 15171 mechanical ventilation days, and 2797 ECMO days were attributable to patients with COVID-19. There was a median (interquartile range) 143 (63-255) patients in ICU, 124 (51-225) patients on mechanical ventilation, and 18 (15-36) patients on ECMO machines. During the epidemic peak in late April, 11443 patients (1.03 per 10000 adults) had been infected, 373 patients (0.034 per 10000 adults) were in ICU, 312 patients (0.028 per 10000 adults) were receiving mechanical ventilation, and 62 patients (0.0056 per 10000 adults) were on ECMO machines per day. The number of infected patients at the peak of the epidemic was 651% of total designated beds and the number of patients requiring intensive care at the peak of the epidemic was 6.0% of total ICU beds in Japan, 19.1% of total board-certified intensivists in Japan and 106% of total designated medical institutions for Category II infectious diseases in Japan, respectively. Conclusions : Following the state of emergency declaration on April 7 2020, the number of patients with COVID-19 and the number of critically ill patients continued to rise, exceeding the number of designated beds but not exceeding ICU capacity. Urgent nationwide and regional planning is needed to prevent an overwhelming burden on ICUs in relation to critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Japan.

scholarly journals Critical care demand and intensive care supply for patients in Japan with COVID-19 at the time of the state of emergency declaration in April 2020: a descriptive analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Fujii ◽  
Kiichi Hirota
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
The State ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Medical Institutions ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Care Capacity

AbstractBackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), threatened to overwhelm Japan’s intensive care capacity due to the rising numbers of infected patients. This study aimed to determine the number of critically ill patients with COVID-19 who required intensive care, including mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), during the pandemic and to compare these patient numbers with Japan’s overall intensive care capacity.MethodsJapanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine datasets were used to obtain the number of confirmed patients with COVID-19 who had undergone mechanical ventilation and ECMO between February 15 and June 4 2020, to determine and compare intensive care unit (ICU) and attending bed needs for patients with COVID-19, and to estimate peak ICU demands in Japan.ResultsIn total, 17968 ICU days, 15171 mechanical ventilation days, and 2797 ECMO days were attributable to patients with COVID-19. There was a median (interquartile range) 143 (63-255) patients in ICU, 124 (51-225) patients on mechanical ventilation, and 18 (15-36) patients on ECMO machines. During the epidemic peak in late April, 11443 patients (1.03 per 10000 adults) had been infected, 373 patients (0.034 per 10000 adults) were in ICU, 312 patients (0.028 per 10000 adults) were receiving mechanical ventilation, and 62 patients (0.0056 per 10000 adults) were on ECMO machines per day. The number of infected patients at the peak of the epidemic was 651% of total designated beds and the number of patients requiring intensive care at the peak of the epidemic was 6.0% of total ICU beds in Japan, 19.1% of total board-certified intensivists in Japan and 106% of total designated medical institutions for Category II infectious diseases in Japan, respectively.ConclusionsFollowing the state of emergency declaration on April 7 2020, the number of patients with COVID-19 and the number of critically ill patients continued to rise, exceeding the number of designated beds but not exceeding ICU capacity. Urgent nationwide and regional planning is needed to prevent an overwhelming burden on ICUs in relation to critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Japan.

scholarly journals Critical Care Demand and Intensive Care Supply for Patients in Japan with COVID-19 at the Time of the State of Emergency Declaration in April 2020: A Descriptive Analysis

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 530
Author(s):  
Yosuke Fujii ◽  
Kiichi Hirota
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Medical Institutions ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Care Capacity

Background and objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is overwhelming Japan’s intensive care capacity. This study aimed to determine the number of patients with COVID-19 who required intensive care and to compare the numbers with Japan’s intensive care capacity. Materials and Methods: Publicly available datasets were used to obtain the number of confirmed patients with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) between 15 February and 19 July 2020 to determine and compare intensive care unit (ICU) and attending bed needs for patients with COVID-19, and to estimate peak ICU demands in Japan. Results: During the epidemic peak in late April, 11,443 patients (1.03/10,000 adults) had been infected, 373 patients (0.034/10,000 adults) were in ICU, 312 patients (0.028/10,000 adults) were receiving mechanical ventilation, and 62 patients (0.0056/10,000 adults) were under ECMO per day. At the peak of the epidemic, the number of infected patients was 651% of designated beds, and the number of patients requiring intensive care was 6.0% of ICU beds, 19.1% of board-certified intensivists, and 106% of designated medical institutions in Japan. Conclusions: The number of critically ill patients with COVID-19 continued to rise during the pandemic, exceeding the number of designated beds but not exceeding ICU capacity.

scholarly journals Risk factors for death among critically ill patients with acute renal failure

2006 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldo Bezerra da Silva Júnior ◽  
Elizabeth De Francesco Daher ◽  
Rosa Maria Salani Mota ◽  
Francisco Albano Menezes
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Acute Renal Failure ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Liver Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Urine Volume

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Acute renal failure is a common medical problem, with a high mortality rate. The aim of this work was to investigate the risk factors for death among critically ill patients with acute renal failure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort at the intensive care unit of Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Fortaleza. METHODS: Survivors and non-survivors were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish risk factors for death. RESULTS: Acute renal failure occurred in 128 patients (33.5%), with mean age of 49 ± 20 years (79 males; 62%). Death occurred in 80 (62.5%). The risk factors most frequently associated with death were hypotension, sepsis, nephrotoxic drug use, respiratory insufficiency, liver failure, hypovolemia, septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction, need for vasoactive drugs, need for mechanical ventilation, oliguria, hypoalbuminemia, metabolic acidosis and anemia. There were negative correlations between death and: prothrombin time, hematocrit, hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, arterial pH, arterial bicarbonate and urine volume. From multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for death were: need for mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.15; p = 0.03), hypotension (OR = 3.48; p = 0.02), liver failure (OR = 5.37; p = 0.02), low arterial bicarbonate (OR = 0.85; p = 0.005), oliguria (OR = 3.36; p = 0.009), vasopressor use (OR = 4.83; p = 0.004) and sepsis (OR = 6.14; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant risk factors for death among patients with acute renal failure in intensive care units, which need to be identified at an early stage for early treatment.

scholarly journals Experiences of the Intensive Care Unit of Hospital Raja PerempuanZainab II in handling the Massive Evacuation of Critically-Ill Patients during Flood Disaster.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 224
Author(s):  
WI Wan Nasruddin ◽  
ZA Nor Hidayah ◽  
A Nazri ◽  
WI Wan Azzlan ◽  
I Ruwaida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Life Support ◽  
The State ◽  
Flood Disaster ◽  
Water Levels ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Set Up

In December 2014, Malaysia had suffered nationwide floods after unprecedented monsoon rains overwhelmed several parts of the country. The East Coast areas of Malaysia were especially badly affected, specifically for the state of Kelantan, whereby a total of 170,000 victims were evacuated to the evacuation centres. This was the worst flood in the last 40 years and has been referred to by the locals as ‘Bah Kuning’. As a tertiary centre for the state of Kelantan with a total number of hospital beds of 937, HRPZ II was also badly compromised during this time. The electricity supply to the main hospital building was shut-down during this period and the hospital had managed to maintain its operations hUP_(ÛT_e power from a generator which had faced the risk of being shut down if the water levels had increased further. These issues might have caused a worse impact viaa possible loss of electrical and oxygen supply and non-functional life support systems. In relation to this flood disaster, the Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit of HRPZ II would like to share the experiences of handling ventilated and critically ill-patients for evacuation during the massive floods in 2014 from the ICU of Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II to “an open stage with no facilities”. During this time, we had a total of 19 patients in our 21-bedded Intensive Care Unit. The challenge was the need to evacuate all the critically ill patients and to set-up a new ICU in a safer place immediately at the time.International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 02 No. 04 October’18. Page : 224-227

scholarly journals Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care expert consensus statement on the use of lung ultrasound in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (ITACO)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Vetrugno ◽  
Francesco Mojoli ◽  
Andrea Cortegiani ◽  
Elena Giovanna Bignami ◽  
Mariachiara Ippolito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Italian Society ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Consensus Statements

Abstract Background To produce statements based on the available evidence and an expert consensus (as members of the Lung Ultrasound Working Group of the Italian Society of Analgesia, Anesthesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care, SIAARTI) on the use of lung ultrasound for the management of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods A modified Delphi method was applied by a panel of anesthesiologists and intensive care physicians expert in the use of lung ultrasound in COVID-19 intensive critically ill patients to reach a consensus on ten clinical questions concerning the role of lung ultrasound in the following: COVID-19 diagnosis and monitoring (with and without invasive mechanical ventilation), positive end expiratory pressure titration, the use of prone position, the early diagnosis of pneumothorax- or ventilator-associated pneumonia, the process of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, and the need for radiologic chest imaging. Results A total of 20 statements were produced by the panel. Agreement was reached on 18 out of 20 statements (scoring 7–9; “appropriate”) in the first round of voting, while 2 statements required a second round for agreement to be reached. At the end of the two Delphi rounds, the median score for the 20 statements was 8.5 [IQR 8.9], and the agreement percentage was 100%. Conclusion The Lung Ultrasound Working Group of the Italian Society of Analgesia, Anesthesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care produced 20 consensus statements on the use of lung ultrasound in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. This expert consensus strongly suggests integrating lung ultrasound findings in the clinical management of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

scholarly journals Association of multiple glycemic parameters at intensive care unit admission with mortality and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila Bellaver ◽  
Ariell F. Schaeffer ◽  
Diego P. Dullius ◽  
Marina V. Viana ◽  
Cristiane B. Leitão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Glycemic Variability ◽  
Stress Hyperglycemia ◽  
Critically Ill Adults ◽  
Ill Adults

AbstractThe aim of the present study was to investigate the association of multiple glycemic parameters at intensive care unit (ICU) admission with outcomes in critically ill patients. Critically ill adults admitted to ICU were included prospectively in the study and followed for 180 days until hospital discharge or death. Patients were assessed for glycemic gap, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, glycemic variability, and stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR). A total of 542 patients were enrolled (30% with preexisting diabetes). Patients with glycemic gap >80 mg/dL had increased need for renal replacement therapy (RRT; 37.7% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.025) and shock incidence (54.7% vs. 37.4%, p = 0.014). Hypoglycemia was associated with increased mortality (54.8% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.004), need for RRT (45.1% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (MV; 72.6% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.024), and shock incidence (62.9% vs. 35.8%, p < 0.001). Hyperglycemia increased mortality (44.3% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.031). Glycemic variability >40 mg/dL was associated with increased need for RRT (28.3% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.002) and shock incidence (41.4% vs.31.2%, p = 0.039). In this mixed sample of critically ill subjects, including patients with and without preexisting diabetes, glycemic gap, glycemic variability, and SHR were associated with worse outcomes, but not with mortality. Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were independently associated with increased mortality.

Pleural Effusion Outcomes in Intensive Care: Analysis of a Large Clinical Database

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Marjorie Bateman ◽  
Ala Alkhatib ◽  
Thomas John ◽  
Malhar Parikh ◽  
Fayez Kheir
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Icu Stay

Background: Pleural effusions are common in critically ill patients. However, the management of pleural fluid on relevant clinical outcomes is poorly studied. We evaluated the impact of pleural effusion in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: A large observational ICU database Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III was utilized. Analyses used matched patients with the same admission diagnosis, age, gender, and disease severity. Results: Of 50 765, 3897 (7.7%) of critically ill adult patients had pleural effusions. Compared to patients without effusion, patients with effusion had higher in-hospital (38.7% vs 31.3%, P < .0001), 1-month (43.1% vs 36.1%, P < .0001), 6-month (63.6% vs 55.7%, P < .0001), and 1-year mortality (73.8% vs 66.1%, P < .0001), as well as increased length of hospital stay (17.6 vs 12.7 days, P < .0001), ICU stay (7.3 vs 5.1 days, P < .0001), need for mechanical ventilation (63.1% vs 55.7%, P < .0001), and duration of mechanical ventilation (8.7 vs 6.3 days, P < .0001). A total of 1503 patients (38.6%) underwent pleural fluid drainage. Patients in the drainage group had higher in-hospital (43.9% vs 35.4%, P = .0002), 1-month (47.7% vs 39.7%, P = .0005), 6-month (67.1% vs 61.8%, P = .0161), and 1-year mortality (77.1% vs 72.1%, P = .0147), as well as increased lengths of hospital stay (22.1 vs 16.0 days, P < .0001), ICU stay (9.2d vs 6.4 days, P < .0001), and duration of mechanical ventilation (11.7 vs 7.1 days, P < .0001). Conclusions: The presence of a pleural effusion was associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients regardless of disease severity. Drainage of pleural effusion was associated with worse outcomes in a large, heterogeneous cohort of ICU patients.

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Critically Ill Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Admitted in an Intensive Care Unit: A Single Center Experience. Hospital De Clínicas, Montevideo, Uruguay

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 6017-6017
Author(s):  
Carolina Oliver ◽  
Adriana Peixoto ◽  
Cecilia Guillermo ◽  
Juan Zunino ◽  
Mariana Stevenazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies

Abstract Introduction: patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) admitted in intensive care units (ICU) have been traditionally seen as patients with very poor prognostic. Recently reports have informed that mortality has dropped and nowadays is in the order of 40-60 %, this is still high but closer to mortality in non-malignant patients admitted in an ICU. In an attempt to change this view we perform a study in order to evaluate the results and prognostic factors that contribute to mortality in HM patients who need critical care assistance. Methods: a retrospective study in 62 patients with HM who were admitted in ICU in the University Hospital, Hospital de Clinicas from Uruguay from 2003 to 2012. These 62 patients had 82 admissions, which are the population of our trial. Statistical analysis: Values are expressed as mean +/- standard deviation (SD), median and percentages. Comparison variable most used: discharge of ICU: dead or alive. Both groups were compared using Student's t test and Chi square. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Overall survival with Kaplan Meier. Significance p<0.05. Results: 50% of the episodes were in men. The median age was 56 years old (17-80). The distribution according to HM was: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma 40.2%, Acute Myeloid Leukemia 23.2%, Multiple Myeloma 13.4%, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 7.3%, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 4.9%, Hodgkin Lymphoma 3.7%, other 3.7%, Myeloproliferative Neoplasm 2.4% and aplasia 1.2%. The mortality during ICU’s treatment was 47.6%. The causes of death in ICU were: septic shock: 74.4%; disease progression: 10.3%; Other: 7.7%; refractory respiratory failure: 5,1%; severe hemorrhage: 2.6%. Median days of overall survival in ICU were 11 days (CI 1.9 to 20.06). In table 1 we show the univariate analysis of prognostic factors. The parameters that showed a significant difference were; underlying diagnosis of ALL, presence of central catheter line prior to entering ICU; need for mechanical ventilation, diagnosis of septic shock, use and hours of vasopressors and the value of APACHE II. Of the 47 patients who required mechanical ventilation 33 died (70.2%), this is a risk factor for death, with an OR of 1.83 (CI: 1.1 to 3.02). The diagnosis on admission to ICU septic shock is a significant risk factor for death with an OR of 0.449 (CI: 0.351 to 0.574). In the multivariable analysis, admission to ICU for mechanical ventilation, use of mechanical ventilation at some point and use of vasopressors were statistically significant. TABLE 1. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors: Alive Death P value Diagnostic ALL Yes: 0 No: 43 Yes: 4 No: 35 0,03 Type of Chemotherapy Standard: 19High dose: 11Allogeneic SCT: 1Purine analogs: 1No Chemotherapy: 11 Standard: 19High dose: 11Allogeneic SCT: 0Purine analogs: 1No Chemotherapy: 8 0,920,430,340,940,58 Neutropenic No data: 8 Yes: 14 No: 29 Yes: 17 No: 14 0,304 Catheter No data: 2 Yes: 16 No: 26 Yes: 24 No: 14 0,025 Cretinine, mean (SD) 1,53 ±(1,55) 1,75 ±(1,17) 0,66 Urea, mean (SD) 68,2 ±(53,41) 89,27 ±(61,24) 0,09 Prothrombin time, mean (SD) 68,36 ±(21,37) 59,65 ±(20,67) 0,87 PAFI, mean (SD) 301,63 ±(110,41) 290,24 ±(123,25) 0,22 Bilirubin, mean (SD) 1,2 ±(1,78) 1,5 ±(2,49) 0,701 Use of mechanical Ventilatory Yes: 14 No: 29 Yes: 33 No: 6 <0,001 Septic Shock at admission Yes: 0 No: 43 Yes: 4 No: 35 0,032 Use of vasopressor Yes: 7 No: 36 Yes: 31 No: 8 < 0,001 Hours of vasopressors 46,29 86,63 0,023 Renal replacement Therapy Yes: 3 No: 40 Yes: 8 No: 31 0,074 APACHE II 17,05 ± (8,24) 20,66 ± (6,00) 0,042 SOFA at admission 4,99 ± (3,84) 7,32 ± (3,24) 0,35 SOFA at 48 hours 3,89 ± (3,83) 9,20 ± (4,43) 0,13 Conclusions: this is the first report on the impact of prognostic factors in the outcome of HM patients admitted to ICU in Hospital de Clinicas. HM patient’s acute complications are strong factors that contribute to prognostic in critically ill patients and not only the hematologic disease per se or presence of neutropenia or type of chemotherapy. The mortality rate in this series is similar to international reports and also in patients without HM admitted in ICU. Therefore, we support the idea that survival in critically ill HM patient is related with the intercurrent complication in a significant part, and we have to make more efforts to improve results in this area by working together with intensive care medicine physicians. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document