scholarly journals Psychosocial Distress Among Cancer Patients: A single Institution Experience at the State of Qatar

Author(s):  
Azza Adel Hassan ◽  
Azar Naveen Saleem ◽  
Saad Jobran Eziada ◽  
Abdelsadiq Bashir ◽  
Amna Gameil ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The prevalence of psychosocial distress is up to 45% among cancer patients. It is crucial to identify and treat distress. The aim of the study is to report on the prevalence of distress among cancer patients, analyze the variable causes of distress and to study the effect of the disease stage using the Distress Thermometer. Methods We studied distress among 3 groups, each consisting of 100 patients: those initially diagnosed, patients undergoing treatment, and patients who were referred to the palliative team. Different variables such as time of screening, sex, age, nationality, and tumor type were analyzed.Results There was an overall distress incidence of 62% (level ≥ 4) and out of that 17% of the patients had severe distress (level >7). Similarly, there was 75% of distress among patients who were referred to palliative care, compared to 56% of patients at initial diagnosis and 54% for those undergoing cancer treatments. In addition, women (69%) had more distress (53%). Expatriates had high distress, compared to Qataris (64.3% versus 51%). Breast (69%) and lung (70%) cancer patients had the highest level of distress. Physical causes of distress were the most common followed by emotional causes.Conclusion There is a substantially higher overall incidence of distress among cancer patients in Qatar. Distress should be assessed in patients at cancer diagnosis and at the time of disease progression. Screening alone isn’t enough, the different causes of distress should be identified and addressed by the appropriate interventions.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23193-e23193
Author(s):  
Deepali Pandey ◽  
Masood Pasha Syed ◽  
Shekhar Patil ◽  
Mohamed Hassan ◽  
Matthew Frederick ◽  
...  

e23193 Background: Psychosocial distress is common in cancer patients. It can cause decreased treatment adherence, lesser treatment satisfaction, low quality of life, and lower survival rate. Distress management is critical to improving cancer survivorship. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) is widely used to assess psychosocial problems in cancer patients in five categories - practical, family, emotional, spiritual and physical problems. The aim of our study is to identify the distress pattern in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in our center using DT adapted from the NCCN. Methods: This is a retrospective study. Total 192 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy were included, who were screened with DT at initial visit. Patients were asked to rate their level of distress from 0-10 on DT and select categories. We collected data on distress score, selected categories, age, gender, and primary cancer site. Distress score < 4 were defined as low and = > 4 as high. Our objective was to evaluate distress categories and if distress level (high vs low) is dependent on age ( < 65 vs = > 65), gender, and primary cancer site (top 7 cancer types in our clinic by volume). Statistical test used - Chi-square. Results: Median age - 66.5 years (range: 29-96); Gender: Male/Female - 44.3%/55.7%. Median distress score - 3. Low distress was reported by 55.2% and high distress by 44.8%. Cancer types: Breast (29.7%); Lung (17.7%); Prostate (10.9%); Hematological malignancies (7.3%); Lymphoma (6.7%); Urothelial (6.7%); Head and Neck (6.2%); Others (13.4%). Overall, physical problems were the most common (63.5%) followed by emotional (56.3%), practical and family (32.3%), and spiritual (2.1%). Among patients with high distress, 84.9% reported emotional problems, while 83.7% reported physical problems. Distress level was not dependent on age, gender and primary cancer site. Conclusions: Emotional and physical problems are the most common problems among our study population with high distress level which requires further interventions/referrals. Identifying psychosocial needs of cancer patients with DT can help optimize their care.


Author(s):  
Livia Costa de Oliveira ◽  
Karla Santos da Costa Rosa ◽  
Ana Luísa Durante ◽  
Luciana de Oliveira Ramadas Rodrigues ◽  
Daianny Arrais de Oliveira da Cunha ◽  
...  

Background: Advanced cancer patients are part of a group likely to be more susceptible to COVID-19. Aims: To describe the profile of advanced cancer inpatients to an exclusive Palliative Care Unit (PCU) with the diagnosis of COVID-19, and to evaluate the factors associated with death in these cases. Design: Retrospective cohort study with data from advanced cancer inpatients to an exclusive PCU, from March to July 2020, with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Diagnostic of COVID-19 and death were the dependent variables. Logistic regression analyses were performed, with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: One hundred fifty-five patients were selected. The mean age was 60.9 (±13.4) years old and the most prevalent tumor type was breast (30.3%). Eighty-three (53.5%) patients had a diagnostic confirmation of COVID-19. Having diabetes mellitus (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-6.6) and having received chemotherapy in less than 30 days before admission (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.2-12.2) were associated factors to diagnosis of COVID-19. Among those infected, 81.9% died and, patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 30% (OR: 14.8; 95% CI 2.7-21.6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) >21.6mg/L (OR: 9.3; 95% CI 1.1-27.8), had a greater chance of achieving this outcome. Conclusion: Advanced cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy in less than 30 days before admission and who had diabetes mellitus were more likely to develop Coronavirus 2019 disease. Among the confirmed cases, those hospitalized with worse KPS and bigger CRP were more likely to die.


2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Cavanna ◽  
Camilla Di Nunzio ◽  
Pietro Seghini ◽  
Elisa Anselmi ◽  
Claudia Biasini ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 5085-5085
Author(s):  
Hikmat Abdel-Razeq ◽  
Shadi B Hijjawi ◽  
Hazem Abdulelah ◽  
Yousef Ismael ◽  
Rula Amarin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5085 Anemia is the most common hematological abnormality in cancer patients. Unfortunately, it is often under-recognized and under-treated. The pathogenesis of cancer anemia is complex and most of the time multifactorial; involving factors related to the tumor itself or its therapy. Recombinant human erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) was widely used to prevent and treat cancer and chemotherapy-related anemia. However, many recent studies involving patients with different kind of cancers at different stages of their disease suggested a negative impact on disease progression and survival when such ESA were used to keep Hemoglobin (Hb) at a higher level. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced revisions and warning to restrict ESA indications. This report describes the prevalence of anemia in cancer patients and its management given the recent confusion and uncertainties. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive adult cancer patients admitted to regular medical units between Jan and Dec, 2008. Patients admitted to Leukemia, Bone Marrow Transplantation and Intensive Care Units were excluded. Demographic features, reasons for admission, primary cancer diagnosis and disease stage were determined. All patients with Hb value < 12 g/dL at any time during admission were considered anemic. Treatment offered for anemia was also reviewed. Subsequent admissions for the same patients during the study period were also followed up. Results 959 patients (51% males, median age 55 years, range 18- 91) admitted 1862 times were included. Reasons for admission at time of enrollment included chemotherapy (23%), infections including neutropenic fever (20%), palliative and supportive care (15%). Other reasons included pulmonary, neurological, renal and electrolyte imbalances. Primary cancer diagnosis included: Gastrointestinal (21%), Breast (16%), Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma (16%), and Lung (11%). At time of enrollment, 55% of patients had advanced stage disease. Anemia at any time during admission was detected in 755 (78.7%) patients. Mean Hb value for anemic patients was 9.51 g/dL (range 3.5-11.9, median 9.6). Severe anemia (Hb < 8) was documented in 16.7%, moderate anemia (Hb 8-10) in 41.9% and mild anemia (Hb > 10) in 41.5% of the patients. Majority (69%) of the patients were not offered any treatment for their anemia. Among the total group, blood transfusion was offered for 25%, supplements (including iron, folate and or vitamin B12) for 3.3%. ESA were offered for only 1.1%. Few patients (2.1%) had combined treatment. Mean Hb value at which treatment was started was 8 g/dL, while mean Hb for the patients who were not treated was 10.2 g/dL. Most of the patients (94%) with severe anemia, 32% with the moderate, and 5% of the patients with mild anemia were treated as shown in the table. Conclusions Anemia among adult cancer patients admitted to regular medical units is quiet common. Given the recent FDA warning and the many confusing studies, the prevalence of anemia in cancer patients was found to be high; many of such patients were not offered any treatment. The threshold to start treatment was highly dependent on its severity. Blood transfusion was the most common treatment method. Quality improvement projects should be implemented to better recognize and treat anemia in cancer patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 187-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Mullai

187 Background: Distress is a multifactorial, emotional experience that may interfere with patients’ ability to cope with cancer and its treatment. Recognizing and managing distress may benefit patients. The Commission on Cancer requires implementation of Standard 3.2, Psychosocial Distress Screening in 2015 and integrating distress intervention in cancer care. This study evaluates patients’ perception on benefits in this regard. Methods: Patients were screened at least once at a pivotal medical visit using a questionnaire that included various aspects of stress. NCCN’s Psychosocial Distress Screening Tool was used to measure seriousness of distress. Patients marked their distress level on a scale of 1 to 10. A threshold of 5 was set as a trigger point to start addressing distress. Results: Answers from 311 cancer patients (male 61%; female 39%) were evaluated since January 2015. A majority of patients had breast cancer (29%), followed by lung (18%), GI (18%), and hematological (12%) malignancies. The mean distress score was 3.72 (male 3.14; female 3.97). 131 patients had a score above five. Age group, 40-49 years had a higher distress (4.79) compared to others. Esophageal cancer (1%) had the highest mean score 7.33 followed by head & neck cancer (4%) with 5.67. In most patients, anxiety about cancer and its treatment was the cause of distress. However, they did not want any additional psychosocial intervention except for talking to their oncologist and primary physician. The distress of some patients was family related and they were unsure of the help needed. Two patients refused screening stating the questions were intrusive. Conclusions: Coordinated psychosocial care may benefit cancer patients with significant distress. NCCN tool helps to assess the severity of patients’ distress and to determine the need for intervention. The results (mean score of 3.72) suggest most cancer patients need no major intervention or special psychosocial counseling other than discussing with their physician and family, which is done routinely in most oncology practices. However, when stress is expressed, this tool does help the treating physicians to determine the specific area and degree of stress, to focus on the type of help needed for the patient, and to channel resources appropriately.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 75-75
Author(s):  
Marisa R Moroney ◽  
Breana Hill ◽  
Jeanelle Sheeder ◽  
Jennifer Robinson Diamond ◽  
Melony Avella-Howell ◽  
...  

75 Background: ASCO guidelines recommend patients with advanced cancer receive early integrated specialty palliative care based on evidence of multiple clinical benefits. To our knowledge, there is no literature evaluating utilization of specialty palliative care in Phase I clinical trial patients, but there is limited data demonstrating underutilization of palliative care services in patients with life-threatening diseases including advanced cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of ovarian cancer patients enrolled in Phase I clinical trials at one institution from 2008 to 2018. Charts were reviewed for patient and disease characteristics including age, disease stage, number of chemotherapy regimens and date of death. Charts were also reviewed to determine if and when patients received specialty palliative care services. Results: A total of 121 patients with ovarian cancer were enrolled in Phase I clinical trials. Median age at time of Phase I enrollment was 59 years (range 33-88). 87% of patients had advanced stage disease: 60% Stage III and 27% Stage IV. Median number of chemotherapy regimens received prior to Phase I enrollment was 5 (range 1-13). Median survival was 311 days (95%CI 225.9-396.1). Of the 121 patients, 4 (3.3%) received specialty palliative care prior to Phase I enrollment, 7 (5.8%) within 30 days after enrollment, and 53 (43.8%) more than 30 days after enrollment. 57 patients (47.1%) never received specialty palliative care. Conclusions: Ovarian cancer patients enrolled in Phase I clinical trials have advanced cancer – defined by ASCO as disease that is late-stage and life limiting with a prognosis less than 24 months – and should therefore receive early integrated specialty palliative care. This study demonstrates that a significant portion of Phase I ovarian cancer patients are either receiving no or late integration of specialty palliative care. Further work needs to focus on increasing early integration of specialty palliative care in this population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Schulte ◽  
K. Brooke Russell ◽  
Wendy Pelletier ◽  
Laura Scott-Lane ◽  
Gregory M. T. Guilcher ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Salimah H. Meghani ◽  
Kristin Levoy ◽  
Kristin Corey Magan ◽  
Lauren T. Starr ◽  
Liana Yocavitch ◽  
...  

Background: National oncology guidelines recommend early integration of palliative care for patients with cancer. However, drivers for this integration remain understudied. Understanding illness concerns at the time of cancer treatment may help facilitate integration earlier in the cancer illness trajectory. Objective: To describe cancer patients’ concerns while undergoing cancer treatment, and determine if concerns differ among African Americans and Whites. Methods: A 1-time, semi-structured qualitative interview was conducted with a purposive subsample of cancer patients participating in a larger study of illness concerns. Eligible patients were undergoing cancer treatments and had self-reported moderate-to-severe pain in the last week. Analysis encompassed a qualitative descriptive approach with inductive thematic analysis. Results: Participants (16 African American, 16 White) had a median age of 53 and were predominantly females (72%) with stage III/IV cancer (53%). Illness concerns were largely consistent across participants and converged on 3 themes: symptom experience (pain, options to manage pain), cancer care delivery (communication, care coordination and care transitions), and practical concerns (access to community and health system resources, financial toxicity). Conclusions: The findings extend the scope of factors that could be utilized to integrate palliative care earlier in the cancer illness trajectory, moving beyond the symptoms- and prognosis-based triggers that typify current referrals to also consider diverse logistical concerns. Using this larger set of concerns aids anticipatory risk mitigation and planning (e.g. care transitions, financial toxicity), helps patients receive a larger complement of support services, and builds cancer patients’ capacity toward a more patient-centered treatment and care experience.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23007-e23007
Author(s):  
Lorena Ostios-García ◽  
Jesus Miranda Poma ◽  
Darío Sánchez Cabrero ◽  
Laura Gutiérrez Sainz ◽  
Julia Villamayor Sánchez ◽  
...  

e23007 Background: The aim of our study was to determine if an unscheduled hospitalization in advanced cancer patients is a good time for palliative care referrals, and if this indicator could be improved with some other prognostic score. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study, which included all patients with unscheduled hospitalization in the medical oncology service from January 2011 to December 2013. In order to improve the accuracy of the analysis we considered only first admissions of each patient. We excluded patients with scheduled and unindicated hospitalization. The main variable was survival after an unscheduled hospitalization. We collected the following variables: demographic (age, sex, date of birth, date of death and place of death), tumor type, clinical variables (reason for admission, date of hospitalization, assessment by the palliative care unit during hospitalization, date of last chemotherapy and ECOG), analytical variables (albumin, lymphocytes and lactate dehydrogenase) and a prognostic nomogram developed by our team. Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 1,180 patients. Table summarizes the main sociodemographic characteristics, the type of tumor, and the functional status of patients according to the ECOG scale. After two years of follow-up, 816 (69%) patients had died. The median overall survival was 188 days (161-214). Patients with breast and gynecological cancer had the longest survival, while patients with melanoma, gastric cancer, lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer had the poorest survival. 676 patients (58%) were readmitted during the following year. Readmissions meant a significant decrease of survival. The stage of the oncological disease and performance status measured by ECOG had a clear relationship with survival time. Prognostic nomogram showed high accuracy to predict the probability of survival. Median survival for different quartile was respectively: 348, 139, 68 and 31 days (p < 0´000). Conclusions: The median survival of patients after an unscheduled hospitalization was around 6 months. Been admitted seems a good indicator to introduce specific palliative care. The use of other prognostic scores, as a prognostic nomogram, could help to select patient’ groups with poorer survivals. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhea Sharma ◽  
Joseph McCollom

Background and Hypothesis: Palliative care, though designed improve quality of life in patients diagnosed with a grave illness, is widely stigmatized as an “end of life” service. Cancer diagnosis has been known to cause mental stress on patients; the added stigmatization of palliative care with death is a barrier to care, especially in gastric cancer patients whose delay in treatment can result in poor cancer prognosis and outcomes. Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) intervention is promising is an ideal intervention in this case, yet, understudied in palliative oncology. Successful CBT intervention can combat guilt, denial and stigma, leading to more positive outlook on life and palliative care. We hypothesize that CBT intervention will increase stage 3/4 gastric cancer patients’ acceptance to start palliative care early in their cancer treatment by decreasing associated stigma.     Experimental Design and Results: Study will be an interventional, unblinded, randomized clinical trial with an experimental and control group. A CBT video intervention will be used, preceded and followed by a pre-/post session questionnaire generated from IU’s RedCap. Full intervention will have 4 sessions, with experimental groups divided into those receiving <2, 3 or full 4 sessions. All individuals age 18+ with a recent stage 3/4 gastric cancer diagnosis, who have the ability to provide consent/comprehend the CBT video will be illegible to participate in the study. A spearman’s correlation will be used to test significance of CBT. A negative trend is predicted between CBT intervention and palliative care stigma; as the number of CBT sessions increase, palliative care stigma should decrease accordingly.    Potential Impact: CBT’s effectiveness in alleviating stigma faced by patients with advanced gastric cancer can suggest more psychosocial training for physicians to move away from disease centered approach to one that implements ways that eradicate social barriers to care.   


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document