scholarly journals Base on the Public Scientific Quality Improvement Research on Risk Early Warning of Online Shopping

Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Li ◽  
Lixia Cao ◽  
Tonghui Wang ◽  
Xiangchu Feng

Abstract In order to improve the scientific quality of the public, the Chinese Association for Science and Technology has put forward a call to combine popular science education with leisure and entertainment. In view of the fact that online shopping involves a wide range of areas, and the people pay more attention to it, the paper completed the innovation of online shopping risk warning science knowledge, the design of popular science mechanism and the dissemination of popular science knowledge. The paper used complex network’s knowledge discovery methods and decision theory to design online shopping risk warning science knowledge; Using the complex network public opinion dissemination trust analysis realize the dissemination of popular science knowledge and promote the improvement of the public's quality of popular science. The spread of risk early warning science knowledge in the network shows that the risk early warning mechanism designed can achieve the purpose of improving public science knowledge when the reward and punishment measures are appropriate.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Мария Григорьевна Алпатова ◽  
Мария Игоревна Щеглова ◽  
Elmira Kalybaevna Adil’bekova ◽  
Nuradin Alibaev ◽  
Arunas Svitojus

The conference is a major international forum for analyzing and discussing trends and approaches in research in the field of basic science and applied research. We provide a platform for discussions on innovative, theoretical and empirical research. The form of the conference: in absentia, without specifying the form in the collection of articles. Working languages: Russian, English Doctors and candidates of science, scientists, specialists of various profiles and directions, applicants for academic degrees, teachers, graduate students, undergraduates, students are invited to participate in the conference. There is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final. The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important. Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Изабелла Станиславовна Чибисова ◽  
Диана Ильгизаровна Шарипова ◽  
Альфия Галиевна Зулькарнаева ◽  
Ксения Александровна Дулова ◽  
Садег Амирзадеган ◽  
...  

The conference is a major international forum for analyzing and discussing trends and approaches in research in the field of basic science and applied research. We provide a platform for discussions on innovative, theoretical and empirical research. The form of the conference: in absentia, without specifying the form in the collection of articles. Working languages: Russian, English Doctors and candidates of science, scientists, specialists of various profiles and directions, applicants for academic degrees, teachers, graduate students, undergraduates, students are invited to participate in the conference. There is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final. The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important. Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian Claire Marshall

Recent global events and anthropogenic changes to the natural environment have raised concerns about the quality of drinking water consumed by the public throughout the world. Traditional chemical testing is slow and is not performed for all possible contaminants, necessitating the development of innovative new technology to detect and mitigate threats to human health. The development of a multi-species, early-warning biomonitoring technology, based on behavioural and physiological changes in aquatic organisms, greatly furthers this goal. In this study, changes in movement behaviour and respiration rates were examined in three aquatic species, Daphnia magna, Hyalella azteca and Lumbriculus variegates, exposed to varying concentrations of TBT and atrazine, using digital video analysis and direct oxygen measurement. Different parameters of movement were examined and evaluated for inclusion in a multi-species, early-warning biomonitoring technology and the utility of incorporating these parameters into a model to determine classes and concentrations of various contaminants is discussed. An evaluation of whether or not direct measurement of oxygen consumption rates is feasible and useful for inclusion in a multi-species, early-warning biomonitoring technology is also discussed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian Claire Marshall

Recent global events and anthropogenic changes to the natural environment have raised concerns about the quality of drinking water consumed by the public throughout the world. Traditional chemical testing is slow and is not performed for all possible contaminants, necessitating the development of innovative new technology to detect and mitigate threats to human health. The development of a multi-species, early-warning biomonitoring technology, based on behavioural and physiological changes in aquatic organisms, greatly furthers this goal. In this study, changes in movement behaviour and respiration rates were examined in three aquatic species, Daphnia magna, Hyalella azteca and Lumbriculus variegates, exposed to varying concentrations of TBT and atrazine, using digital video analysis and direct oxygen measurement. Different parameters of movement were examined and evaluated for inclusion in a multi-species, early-warning biomonitoring technology and the utility of incorporating these parameters into a model to determine classes and concentrations of various contaminants is discussed. An evaluation of whether or not direct measurement of oxygen consumption rates is feasible and useful for inclusion in a multi-species, early-warning biomonitoring technology is also discussed.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shokhruzbek R. Ruziev ◽  
Татьяна Владимировна Панкова ◽  
Jakhongir Qakhramon ugli Qodirov ◽  
Кристина Витальевна Машковцева ◽  
Илья Дмитриевич Белокозович ◽  
...  

Social Sciences: Achievements and Prospects is a major international forum for the analysis and debate of trends and approaches in social science research. The journal provides a space for innovative theoretical as well as empirical contributions to issues that transcend the framework of the traditional disciplines. Given its international orientation, contributions of a comparative or crosscultural nature are particularly welcome. Social Sciences: Achievements and Prospects aimsto contribute to overcoming fragmentation and overspecialization in current socialscience research. Comprehensive and original contributions will tend to be of a tentative nature, trying out new avenues on terrains that are far from being well known. The journal welcomes trend reports on intellectually stimulating new developments to make them more widely known and to offer a space to assess their significance in answering key questions ofscholarship in ourtime. There is one blind verification processin the journal.All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept orreject the article.The editor's decision isfinal. The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important. Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Анастасия Александровна Веселова ◽  
Илья Сергеевич Камаев ◽  
Сергей Иванович Благинин ◽  
Анатолий Леонидович Суркаев ◽  
Ольга Александровна Марданшина ◽  
...  

The conference is a major international forum for analyzing and discussing trends and approaches in research in the field of basic science and applied research. We provide a platform for discussions on innovative, theoretical and empirical research. The form of the conference: in absentia, without specifying the form in the collection of articles. Working languages: Russian, English Doctors and candidates of science, scientists, specialists of various profiles and directions, applicants for academic degrees, teachers, graduate students, undergraduates, students are invited to participate in the conference. There is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final. The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important. Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Мархабо Эшонкуловна Шукурова ◽  
Юлия Владимировна Чистобаева ◽  
Шахзода Ёркиновна Махмудова ◽  
Алина Николаевна Головач ◽  
Елена Владимировна Башкирцева ◽  
...  

The conference is a major international forum for analyzing and discussing trends and approaches in research in the field of basic science and applied research. We provide a platform for discussions on innovative, theoretical and empirical research.Working languages: Russian, English Doctors and candidates of science, scientists, specialists of various profiles and directions, applicants for academic degrees, teachers, graduate students, undergraduates, students are invited to participate in the conference.There is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal.Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final.The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model /methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important.Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaxin Gao ◽  
Zhu Li ◽  
Zijun Mao

Abstract Background In the current era of big data, it is critical to address people's demand for health science knowledge. At present, the traditional mode of communicating scientific health knowledge and information technology are interchangeable, resulting in the emergence of a new mode of communicating health science knowledge. To publicize health education and popular science knowledge in a targeted way, to meet the public's needs, and to understand how the public's demand for subjects, contents, and forms of health science service has changed in the epidemic era, the investigation of public's demand for health information and popular science knowledge was conducted. Objective This study aims to understand the differences in demand for health science popularization service providers, contents, channels, forms, and facilities among Chinese citizens with different genders, ages, education levels, economic conditions, and living environments, and to provide reasonable recommendations for developing health science popularization. Methods Questionnaire Star was used to conduct a large sample of random online surveys. In Wuhan, Hubei Province, 2184 questionnaires were issued, 8 invalid questionnaires were eliminated, and 2176 were recovered, with an effective rate of 99.6%. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 was utilized to analyze the survey data. Results (1) In health science popularization service providers selected by the public, the proportion of government departments or government collaboration with other institutions exceeded 73%, indicating that health science popularization services are public goods; (2) access to health science popularization services was lower in township areas than in urban areas (P < 0.001); (3) internet media and communicating with acquaintances, which have the highest popularity rate, were also the two channels that were least trusted by the public; and (4) the differences in contents and service channels of health science popularization among residents with different genders, ages, education levels, economic status, and living environments were statistically significant. Conclusions (1) It is recommended to establish an integrated health science popularization service model with multi-center supply. Government departments, medical institutions, and media should cooperate effectively to provide health science popularization services. (2) The government should pay attention to the fairness of health education and strengthen the supply of health science popularization services in township areas. (3) It is critical to strengthen the public's ability to discriminate network information and pay attention to scientific thinking cultivation. (4) Health science popularization service providers must focus on the differences between public demands and improve the connotation of health science services.


2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Ptochos ◽  
Dimitrios Panopoulos ◽  
Kostas Metaxiotis ◽  
Dimitrios Askounis ◽  
John Psarras

2019 ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
Yuliia Vozniuk

The emphasis is on dynamic processes and actualization of specific models and means of word formation in the modern Ukrainian language. The concept of neosemantization is described, which reflects a wide range of methods for updating nominative units, as well as hyponyms: internal (introspective) word formation, secondary nomination, semantic derivation, lexico-semantic way of word formation. The reasons for the quantitative and qualitative modification in the terminological system of the publishing and printing sphere are outlined: the development of the editorial specialty, the tendency of increasing the volume of Ukrainian-language scientific, popular science, educational, periodical professional literature, the growth of the number of Ukrainian translations of foreign-language professional literature. It is proved that the characteristic feature of term creation at the present stage of the development of the printing and publishing sphere is intensive scientific work in the field of national lexicography, the search for optimal models of terminology, taking into account the peculiarities of the Ukrainian resource of terminological systems. For this purpose, the types of semantic derivation are analyzed on the examples of lexemes represented in the terminological dictionaries of the public-polygraphic sphere and scientific and educational works that represent the particular branch of scientific knowledge (aparat, blok, liniika, korydor, khvist, spusk, holovka, vhaniaty, vyhaniannia etc.). Various methods of verbalization of concepts about processes and phenomena of this branch, optimal ways of termination taking into account features of the Ukrainian language resource of terminological systems on the basis of the theory of G. Paul about varieties of semantic changes are considered: 1) narrowing; 2) amplification and 3) the transfer of the value of the already existing word to another object of the nomination, metaphorization of its available values. A comparative analysis of semantic changes was made based on academic general dictionaries (Dictionary of the Ukrainian language in 11 volumes (1970-1980) and Dictionary of the Ukrainian language in 11 volumes. Additional volume in two books (2017) and the edition “Norms of the Ukrainian Scientific and Technical Language. Interpretative Dictionary of Terms in the Publishing, Printing and Packaging Sector” edited by P. Talanchuk etc. (2006). The active development of the modern Ukrainian publishing and printing terminology system is demonstrated, as evidenced by the emergence of new terms-the generic notions of this sphere of Ukrainian society, as well as the creation of new terms-hyponyms to clarify already known concepts. It is shown that the verbalization of such new concepts is carried out based on both specific and borrowed resources of the nomination. In this area, we observe a system of external, inter-systemic and intra-system polysemy, different types of semantic derivation, the consequences of which are the termination or secondary termination of the studied words, intra-language migration of terms. The multidisciplinary nature of the printing industry is generalized and the necessity of determining the semantic content of the defined terms and their standardization within the limits of the studied terminology system is generalized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document