Public Oral Health Services Coverage and Socioeconomic Indicators’ Effect on The Number of Hospitalized Cases of Oral Cancer in Brazil

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldelany Ramalho Freire ◽  
Deborah Ellen Wanderley Gomes Freire ◽  
Elza Cristina Farias de Araújo ◽  
Edson Hilan Gomes de Lucena ◽  
Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti

Abstract Background: Oral cancer still representing one of the most frequent neoplasms worldwide, especially in developing countries. Socioeconomic factors and access to health services may be associated with the risk of oral cancer. This study analyzed the frequency of new hospitalized cases of oral cancer in Brazil, according to socioeconomic variables and data on oral health coverage in its public health system. Methods: Observational study, with a retrospective cohort design, whose sampling units was composed of all Brazilian cities that registered at least one hospitalized case of oral cancer in the National Cancer Institute database, between 2002-2017. For each city included, were collected the population size, Municipal Human Development Index (M-HDI), Gini Coefficient, as well as data regarding oral health coverage in primary care and the number of Dental Specialized Center (DSC). The COX regression was used to determine the risk ratio for a city to present a new hospitalized case of oral cancer, and the effect of the predictor variables on the incidence of cases was verified by the Hazard Ratio measure. Accumulated risk curves were obtained for the adjusted model, and for each variable. Results: All predictor variables were considered significant in the regression model (p<0.05). Cities above 50 thousand inhabitants, with high or very high M-HDI, more unequal (Gini>0.4), with less oral health coverage in primary care (<50%) and without the presence of DSC demonstrated a greater accumulated risk of having 1 or more hospitalized cases of oral cancer. Conclusions: The risk of hospitalization for oral cancer in Brazil is greater in cities with a larger population size, more developed, with greater inequality of income distribution and with less availability of public oral health services.

Author(s):  
Aldelany R. Freire ◽  
Deborah E. W. G. Freire ◽  
Elza C. F. de Araújo ◽  
Edson H. G. de Lucena ◽  
Yuri W. Cavalcanti

Background: Oral cancer is a frequent neoplasm worldwide, and socioeconomic factors and access to health services may be associated with its risk. Aim: To analyze effect of socioeconomic variables and the influence of public oral health services availability on the frequency of new hospitalized cases and mortality of oral cancer in Brazil. Materials and Methods: This observational study analyzed all Brazilian cities with at least one hospitalized case of oral cancer in the National Cancer Institute database (2002–2017). For each city were collected: population size, Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI), Gini Coefficient, oral health coverage in primary care, number of Dental Specialized Centers (DSC) and absolute frequency of deaths after one year of the first treatment. The risk ratio was determined by COX regression, and the effect of the predictor variables on the incidence of cases was verified by the Hazard Ratio measure. Poisson regression was used to determine factors associated with higher mortality frequency. Results: Cities above 50,000 inhabitants, with high or very high MHDI, more unequal (Gini > 0.4), with less oral health coverage in primary care (<50%) and without DSC had a greater accumulated risk of having 1 or more cases (p < 0.001). Higher frequency of deaths was also associated with higher population size, higher MHDI, higher Gini and lower oral health coverage in primary care (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The number hospitalization and deaths due to oral cancer in Brazil was influenced by the cities’ population size, the population’s socioeconomic status and the availability of public dental services.


2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1728-1732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Riter ◽  
Russell Maier ◽  
David C. Grossman

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio Vinicius de Gouveia Affonso ◽  
Igor Gonçalves de Souza ◽  
Emerson Souza da Rocha ◽  
Eny Maria Goloni-Bertollo ◽  
Fabiana de Campos Gomes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To investigate the influence of sociodemographic factors and variables related to oral health services in oral and oropharyngeal cancer mortality in Brazil. Results: The mortality rate was higher in men than in women; the Southeast and South regions had the highest rates, which increased with age. Regarding APC analysis, men aged 57 years or more and those born from the 1920s to 1955, presented the highest mortality rate, while women born between the 1920s and the 1930s had a higher rate ratio. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression showed that black men living in the Midwest region had the lowest survival rate. Considering the correlations, the North and Northeast regions presented mortality rates inversely proportional to FPDC and NSTB, while the Southeast presented it only to FPDC. Conclusions: The sociodemographic variables analyzed exhibited an influence on mortality and survival rates in relation to oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Regarding the oral health services, it was observed that preventive and diagnostic procedures are not being performed, which may be exacerbating the increase in the mortality rates observed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Zhu ◽  
K. Close ◽  
L.P. Zeldin ◽  
B.A. White ◽  
R.G. Rozier

Objectives: To determine the oral health screening and referral practices of pediatric providers, their adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics oral health guidelines, and barriers to adherence. Methods: Providers in 10 pediatric practices participating in the North Carolina Quality Improvement Initiative, funded by the Child Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009, were asked to complete a 91-item questionnaire. Questions on risk assessment and referral practices were based on those recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Adherence to oral health guidelines was assessed by practitioners’ evaluation of 4 vignettes presenting screening results for an 18-mo-old child with different levels of risk and caries status. Respondents chose referral recommendations assuming adequate and inadequate dentist workforces. Logit models determined the association between barriers specified in Cabana’s framework and adherence (count of 6 to 8 adherent vignettes vs. 0 to 5). Results: Of 72 eligible providers, 53 (74%) responded. Almost everyone (98.1%) screened for dental problems; 45.2% referred in at least half of well-child visits. Respondents were aware of oral health guidelines, expressed strong agreement with them, and reported confidence in providing preventive oral health services. Yet they underreferred by an average of 42% per vignette for the 7 clinical vignette-workforce scenarios requiring an immediate referral. Frequently cited barriers were providers’ beliefs that 1) parents are poorly motivated to seek dental care, 2) oral health counseling has a small effect on parent behaviors, 3) there is a shortage of dentists in their community who will see infants and toddlers, and 4) information systems to support referrals are insufficient. Conclusion: Pediatric clinicians’ beliefs lead to a conscious decision not to refer many patients, even when children should be referred. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Evidence suggests that the primary care–dental referral process needs improvement. This study identifies barriers to delivering recommended preventive oral health services in pediatrics. The information can be used to improve the screening and referral process and, thus, the quality of preventive oral health services provided in primary care. Results also can guide researchers on the selection of interventions that need testing and might close gaps in the referral process and improve access to dental care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Juliana Leandro dos Santos ◽  
Raquel Conceição Ferreira ◽  
Leonardo de Paula Amorim ◽  
Anna Rachel Soares Santos ◽  
Antônio Paulo Gomes Chiari ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the annual variation of oral health and primary care coverage, the tooth extraction ratio, and the average of supervised toothbrushing in Brazilian municipalities according to social development and population size. METHODS: Public secondary data were analyzed. The outcomes were health service indicators (oral health coverage, primary health care coverage, tooth extraction ratio, and average of supervised tooth brushing) estimated for all Brazilian municipalities annually from 2008 to 2015. Mixed-effect multilevel regression models with random intercept and slopes were fitted with a cross-interaction term to estimate the annual percent variation according to the Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI) and population size. RESULTS: Municipalities with low MHDI presented an annual increase in oral health and primary care coverage of 2.65% and 2.23%, respectively, which was significantly higher than municipalities with medium and high MHDI. Oral health and primary care coverage were 69.26% and 35.00% lower among municipalities with a large population. Municipalities with medium and high MHDI showed an annual decrease in tooth extractions of 5.15% and 5.02%, respectively. An annual decrease was observed in the average of supervised toothbrushing of 9.81% and 4.57% in municipalities with low and medium MHDI, respectively. The tooth extraction ratio was higher among larger municipalities; the relation is inverse for supervised toothbrushing. CONCLUSIONS: The access to primary care and oral health services increased in Brazil, while a decrease occurred in mutilating treatment and provision of preventive actions, with disparities among municipalities with different MHDI levels over time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-46
Author(s):  
Karma Tenzin ◽  
Tshewang Gyeltshen ◽  
Gyan P Bajgai ◽  
Sonam Nyedup ◽  
Choki Choki ◽  
...  

Introduction: Bhutan’s healthcare approach in achieving the sustainable development goal 3 (SDG 3) has been largely through primary healthcare as enshrined in the universal health coverage (UHC). Bhutan has forged a unique primary healthcare model in which oral health is integrated in its primary care initiatives. The Oral Health program under the Department of public health was established in 1999 with clear line objectives. The program has achieved commendable successes over the years. However, with changing needs, enhancing and mainstreaming of oral health and dentistry in the country must be accorded a top priority. This is particularly important as the Oral Health Policy and service standards were drafted fourteen years ago in 2007. The 2021 World Health Orgnization (WHO) agreement “to provide basic oral health services to all”, to which Bhutan is signatory, needs to be strictly implemented. Therefore, oral health dialogue was conducted to deliberate on the oral health systems in the country with experts from the field who were from within and outside Bhutan. This oral health policy dialogue generated important themes such as strategic and competent workforce, capacity development, need to transform oral health services in more people centric ways and mainstreaming oral health in other health policies.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0247101
Author(s):  
Ana Graziela Araujo Ribeiro ◽  
Rafiza Félix Marão Martins ◽  
João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci ◽  
Núbia Cristina da Silva ◽  
Thiago Augusto Hernandes Rocha ◽  
...  

Objective Compared indicators of potential access to oral health services sought in two cycles of the Program for Improvement of Access and Quality of Primary Care (PMAQ-AB), verifying whether the program generated changes in access to oral health services. Methods Transitional analysis of latent classes was used to analyze two cross-sections of the external evaluation of the PMAQ-AB (Cycle I: 2011–2012 and Cycle II: 2013–2014), identifying completeness classes for a structure and work process related to oral health. Consider three indicators of structure (presence of a dental surgeon, existence of a dental office and operating at minimum hours) and five of the work process (scheduling every day of the week, home visits, basic dental procedures, scheduling for spontaneous demand and continuation of treatment). Choropleth maps and hotspots were made. Results The proportion of elements that had one or more dentist (CD), dental office and operated at minimum hours varied from 65.56% to 67.13 between the two cycles of the PMAQ-AB. The number of teams that made appointments every day of the week increased 8.7% and those that made home visits varied from 44.51% to 52.88%. The reduction in the number of teams that reported guaranteeing the agenda for accommodating spontaneous demand, varying from 62.41% to 60.11% and in the continuity of treatment, varying from 63.41% to 61.11%. For the structure of health requirements, the predominant completeness profile was "Best completeness" in both cycles, comprising 71.0% of the sets at time 1 and 67.0% at time 2. The proportion of teams with "Best completeness" increased by 89.1%, the one with "Worst completeness" increased by 20%, while those with "Average completeness" decreased by 66.3%. Conclusion We identified positive changes in the indicators of potential access to oral health services, expanding the users’ ability to use them. However, some access attributes remain unsatisfactory, with organizational barriers persisting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Heriberto Fiuza Sanchez ◽  
Raquel Conceição Ferreira ◽  
Andrea Maria Duarte Vargas ◽  
Marcos Azeredo Furquim Werneck ◽  
Efigênia Ferreira e Ferreira

OBJECTIVE: To construct and validate a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of oral health services in primary health care, from patients. METHODS: Initially a theoretical model of evaluation of Primary Health Care was elaborated, based on the evaluation of primary care and integrality in primary care. This model served as the basis for the script of a focus group with patients, aiming to verify the attributes perceived as important for such evaluation. The focus group results substantiated the first version of the questionnaire. Content validation was performed through a committee of experts (five teachers/researchers) and face validation in two pre-tests (37 patients each pre-test). For construct validation, factor analysis was performed and reliability (Kappa coefficient) and internal consistency (Cronbach&#39;s alpha) were verified. RESULTS: Thirty questions were considered for exploratory factor analysis. The anti-image matrix of covariances showed the need to exclude fourteen questions (values &lt;0.5). After this initial analysis, 16 questions remained in the questionnaire. The KMO test, considering the 16 questions, presented a value of 0.84. Cronbach&#39;s alpha was 0.919. The final version contains 16 questions divided into two dimensions: my health unit and the care in my health unit. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire allows a strategy that easily evaluates oral health services in primary care, based on the perception of patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document