scholarly journals A retrospective observational study of Chlorine Dioxide effectiveness to covid19-like symptoms prophylaxis in relatives living with COVID19 patients

Author(s):  
Manuel Aparicio-Alonso ◽  
Carlos Dominguez-Sanchez ◽  
Marina Banuet-Martinez

Abstract To date, there is no effective prophylactic agent to prevent COVID-19. However, the development of symptoms similar to covid19 could be prevented with an aqueous solution of chlorine dioxide (ClO2). This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of an aqueous solution of ClO2 (CDS) as a prophylactic agent in 1,163 family members living with positive/suspected COVID19 patients. Prophylactic treatment consisted of 0.0003% chlorine dioxide solution (CDS) orally for at least fourteen days. Family members in whom no reports of the development of covid19-like symptoms were found in the medical history were considered successful cases. The efficacy of CDS in preventing covid19-like symptoms was 90.4% (1,051 of 1,163 relatives did not report any symptoms). The comorbidities, sex and severity of the illness of the sick patient did not contribute to the development of symptoms similar to covid19 (P = 0.092, P = 0.351 and P = 0.574, respectively). However, older relatives were more likely to develop covid19-like symptoms (ORa = 4.22, P = 0.002). There was no evidence of alterations in blood parameters or in the QTc interval in relatives who consumed CDS. The recent findings regarding Chlorine Dioxide justify designing clinical trials to assess its efficacy for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Author(s):  
Manuel Aparicio Alonso ◽  

To date, there is no effective prophylactic agent to prevent COVID-19. However, the development of symptoms similar to covid19 could be prevented with an aqueous solution of chlorine dioxide (ClO2). This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of an aqueous solution of ClO2 (CDS) as a prophylactic agent in 1,163 family members living with positive/suspected COVID19 patients. Prophylactic treatment consisted of 0.0003% chlorine dioxide solution (CDS) orally for at least fourteen days. Family members in whom no reports of the development of covid19-like symptoms were found in the medical history were considered successful cases. The efficacy of CDS in preventing covid19-like symptoms was 90.4% (1,051 of 1,163 relatives did not report any symptoms). The comorbidities, sex and severity of the illness of the sick patient did not contribute to the development of symptoms similar to covid19 (P = 0.092, P = 0.351 and P = 0.574, respectively). However, older relatives were more likely to develop covid19-like symptoms (ORa = 4.22, P = 0.002). There was no evidence of alterations in blood parameters or in the QTc interval in relatives who consumed CDS. The recent findings regarding Chlorine Dioxide justify designing clinical trials to assess its efficacy for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monirah A. Albabtain ◽  
Yahya Alhebaishi ◽  
Ola Al-Yafi ◽  
Hatim Kheirallah ◽  
Adel Othman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rivaroxaban has been recently introduced for the management of non-valvular intra-cardiac thrombosis with variable results. We aimed to compare the results of the off-label use of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in the management of patients with left ventricle (LV) thrombus. This research is a retrospective study conducted on 63 patients who had LV thrombus from January to December 2016. We compared patients treated with warfarin (n=35) to patients who had rivaroxaban (n=28), and study outcomes were time to thrombus resolution, bleeding, stroke, and mortality. Results The median duration of treatment was 9.5 (25th-75th percentiles: 6-32.5) months for rivaroxaban and 14 (3-41) months for warfarin. Thrombus resolution occurred in 24 patients in the warfarin group (68.6%) and 20 patients in the rivaroxaban group (71.4%). The median time to resolution in the warfarin group was 9 (4-20) months and 3 (2-11.5) months in the rivaroxaban group. Thrombus resolution was significantly faster in patients on rivaroxaban (p= 0.019). Predictors of thrombus resolution were thrombus surface area (HR: 1.21; CI 95% (1.0-1.46); p= .048) and the use of rivaroxaban (HR: 1.92; CI 95% (1.01-3.65); p= 0.048). There was no difference in stroke, bleeding, and mortality between both groups. Conclusion Rivaroxaban was as effective and safe as warfarin in managing patients with left ventricle thrombus. Larger randomized clinical trials are recommended to confirm our findings.


2004 ◽  
Vol 242 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresio Avitabile ◽  
Vincenza Bonfiglio ◽  
Michele Reibaldi ◽  
Benedetto Torrisi ◽  
Alfredo Reibaldi

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (S11) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan L. Zimbroff ◽  
Michael H. Allen ◽  
John Battaglia ◽  
Leslie Citrome ◽  
Avrim Fishkind ◽  
...  

Acute agitation is a common psychiatric emergency often treated with intramuscular (IM) medication when rapid control is necessary or the patient refuses to take an oral agent. Conventional IM antipsychotics are associated with side effects, particularly movement disorders, that may alarm patients and render them unreceptive to taking these medications again. Ziprasidone (Geodon®) is the first second-generation, or atypical, antipsychotic to become available in an IM formulation. Ziprasidone IM was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2002 for the treatment of agitation in patients with schizophrenia. In October 2004, a roundtable panel of physicians with extensive experience in the management of acutely agitated patients met to review the first 2 years of experience with this agent. This monograph, a product of that meeting, discusses clinical experience to date with ziprasidone IM and offers recommendations on its use in various settings.In clinical trials, patients treated with ziprasidone IM demonstrated significant and rapid (within 15-30 minutes) reduction in agitation and improvement in psychotic symptoms, agitation, and hostility to an extent greater than or equal to that attained with haloperidol IM. Tolerability of ziprasidone IM was superior to that of haloperidol IM, with a lower burden of movement disorders. Clinical trials have also shown that ziprasidone IM can be administered with benzodiazepines without adverse consequences. Transition from IM to oral ziprasidone has been well tolerated, with maintenance of symptom control. The most common adverse events associated with ziprasidone IM were insomnia, headache, and dizziness in fixed-dose trials and insomnia and hypertension in flexible-dose trials. No consistent pattern of escalating incidence of adverse events with escalating ziprasidone doses has been observed. Changes in QTc interval associated with ziprasidone at peak serum concentrations are modest and comparable to those seen with haloperidol IM. Results of randomized clinical trials of ziprasidone IM have been corroborated in studies in real-world treatment settings involving patients with extreme agitation or a recent history of alcohol or substance abuse. In these circumstances, clinically significant improvement was seen within 30 minutes of ziprasidone IM administration, without regard to the suspected underlying etiology of agitation. Agents with a good safety/tolerability profile, such as ziprasidone IM, may be more cost effective long term than older agents, due to reduced incidence of acute adverse effects (eg, acute dystonia) that often require extended periods of observation. Additional trials of ziprasidone IM in agitated patients in a variety of clinical settings are warranted to generate comparative risk/benefit data with conventional agents and other second-generation antipsychotics.


Author(s):  
Alexandre González-Rodríguez ◽  
Mary V. Seeman

Delusional disorders (DD) are difficult conditions for health professionals to treat successfully. They are also difficult for family members to bear. The aim of this narrative review is to select from the clinical literature the psychosocial interventions that appear to work best for these conditions and to see whether similar strategies can be modeled or taught to family members so that tensions at home are reduced. Because the content of men’s and women’s delusions sometimes differ, it has been suggested that optimal interventions for the two sexes may also differ. This review explores three areas: (a) specific treatments for men and women; (b) recommended psychological approaches by health professionals, especially in early encounters with patients with DD; and (c) recommended psychoeducation for families. Findings are that there is no evidence for differentiated psychosocial treatment for men and women with delusional disorder. What is recommended in the literature is to empathically elicit the details of the content of delusions, to address the accompanying emotions rather than the logic of the presented argument, to teach self-soothing techniques, and to monitor behavior with respect to its safety. These recommendations have only been validated in individual patients and families. More rigorous clinical trials need to be conducted.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4820-4820
Author(s):  
Arturo Soto-Matos ◽  
Sergio Szyldergemajn ◽  
Javier Gomez ◽  
Sonia Extremera ◽  
Bernardo Miguel-Lillo ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4820 Background Aplidin (plitidepsin) is a cyclic depsipeptide of marine origin, with activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and T-cell NHL[1],[2]. Some depsipeptides have been linked to increased cardiac toxicity in the literature[3]. PharmaMar Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Trials Data Management databases were reviewed for cardiac adverse events (CAEs) occurring during clinical trials evaluating plitidepsin as single-agent as of November 2008. Data were analyzed for potential risk factors associations with the occurrence of CAE by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results Forty-six of the 578 patients (8.0%) treated had at least one CAE. Eleven patients of 578 (1.9%) had CAE related to plitidepsin, none of them with fatal outcome. CAEs were retrospectively classified into 3 main groups after clinical review of all available data. The most frequent type of CAE were rhythm abnormalities (RA) (n=31; 5.4%), whereas atrial fibrillation (AF)/flutter accounted for most cases (n=15; 2.6%). Most events occurred randomly during plitidepsin treatment. Of note, no cases of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias have been reported to date. The myocardial injury events (MI) (n=17; 3.0%) included possible ischemic related events as well as non-ischemic events. Finally, miscellaneous events (M) (n=6; 1.0%) included all other cardiac events that did not fit into the aforementioned categories. None of the M events was related to plitidepsin Demographic, clinical and pharmacological variables were explored by univariate and multivariate analysis. Significant association was found with prostate or pancreas cancer diagnosis (p=0.002), known baseline cardiac risk factors (p=0.002), myalgia at baseline (p=0.004), lower hemoglobin levels (p= 0.006) and ≥ grade 2 hypokalemia (p=0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed all these associations. Importantly, treatment related variables, such as plitidepsin dose, number of cycles or schedule of administration did not result in any statistically significant association. Serial ECGs performed before and after plitidepsin administration (n=136) did not show any relevant effect on QTc interval. None of the PK parameters analyzed (Cmax and AUC from day 0 to day 28) had any significant impact on the probability of developing a CAE. Conclusions CAEs observed to date in plitidepsin trials fit into three clinical categories. The most frequent type observed was AF/atrial flutter, although its incidence was not different to what is reported in age-matched healthy population[4]. All other events were relatively infrequent. No dose-cumulative pattern was observed; moreover, neither plitidepsin dose nor schedule was associated with occurrence of CAEs. Relevant predisposing factors identified in univariate and multivariate analyses were related to patient's baseline and/or disease-related characteristics rather than to drug exposure or treatment-related variables. Data available on 578 adult patients with advanced cancer treated with singe-agent plitidepsin support a favorable cardiac safety profile. Disclosures: Soto-Matos: PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Szyldergemajn:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Gomez:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Extremera:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Miguel-Lillo:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Alfaro:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Coronado:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Lardelli:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Roy:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Corrado:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Yovine:PharmaMar SAU: Employment. Kahatt:PharmaMar SAU: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3675-3675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy D. Shapiro ◽  
Ellis J. Neufeld ◽  
David L. Cooper

Abstract Abstract 3675 Background: The FDA-approved label for recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa), for treatment of bleeding episodes and prevention of bleeding in surgical or invasive procedures in CHwI patients, recommends initial dosing with 90 mcg/kg as a bolus injection. Patients typically require 2–3 injections for bleed resolution. Based upon three clinical trials comparing a single dose of 270 mcg/kg to 3 doses of 90 mcg/kg, the single-dose 270 mcg/kg rFVIIa regimen was approved by the EMA in March 2007 for treatment of mild-to-moderate bleeds in hemophilic inhibitor patients. Published reports indicate that rFVIIa dosing utilized in clinical practice varies widely. Furthermore, the broad adoption of home treatment makes it difficult to estimate how frequently higher doses (doses > 90 mcg/kg) are used, particularly in the US, and whether or not higher doses pose safety concerns, namely development of thromboembolism. Objectives: To report the frequency of use of higher doses of rFVIIa for on-demand or prophylactic treatment in clinical trials and registries that included safety monitoring, particularly for occurrence of thromboembolic events (TEs). Methods: Data for on-demand treatment of bleeds with rFVIIa in patients with CHwI, were obtained from two published, prospective, randomized studies, one prospective, observational diary study in the US, and the ongoing US-based Hemophilia and Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS) registry database. Data on prophylactic use of rFVIIa in patients with CHwI were obtained from a published, prospective, randomized trial. Information on demographics, rFVIIa dosing, and frequency of TEs were collected and reported using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 232 CHwI patients reported 20,496 rFVIIa doses administered either for on-demand treatment of 2,286 bleeding episodes or prophylactic treatment for 1,885 days. The majority (81%) of patients were diagnosed with hemophilia A and reported an inhibitor titer range of 0.5 – 20,000 BU, and 9% of patients were diagnosed with hemophilia B. Whites comprised 72% of patients for whom race information was available. Patient age ranged from < 1 year to 62 years, and adults (>18 years old) comprised 37% of the patients studied. All five data sources included use of rFVIIa doses > 90 mcg/kg, the dose recommended in the current US label. Doses of rFVIIa > 120 mcg/kg, > 160 mcg/kg and >240 mcg/kg comprised 40.2% (8,232 doses), 25.9% (5,316 doses) and 8.0% (1,644 doses), respectively, of the 20,496 doses administered to all patients, and comprised 30.8% (1,171 doses), 27.3% (1,037) and 12.1% (460), respectively, of the 3,800 doses administered specifically to adults (>18 years old). No TEs were reported across the five data sources irrespective of the dose administered. Conclusions: A comprehensive review of data of over 20,000 rFVIIa doses used for either prophylactic or on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes demonstrates the frequent use and safety of rFVIIa doses above the US FDA-approved dose. The absence of TEs in 8,232 higher doses (i.e. doses > 120 mcg/kg, including 460 doses > 240 mcg/kg in adults) suggests TEs are likely uncommon at doses up to 300 mcg/kg, and reaffirm the low TE incidence (0.2%) reported in CHwI trials at standard doses (≤ 90 mcg/kg). Substitution of fewer high doses in place of more frequent lower doses may provide improved compliance and avoid the need for short interval repetitive dosing. Evaluation of additional data sources such as the ongoing European ONE Registry, the recently completed PRO-PACT study (retrospective global chart review for assessment of prophylactic treatment), UKHCDO, and other global registries in countries where 270 mcg/kg dosing has been approved for clinical use, will enlarge the current data set and provide even better estimates of the frequency of use of higher doses of rFVIIa and occurrence of TEs across a larger, more global population. Disclosures: Shapiro: Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. Off Label Use: rFVIIa dosing for approved indications above the PI recommendations. Neufeld:Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Cooper:Novo Nordisk Inc.: Employment.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15089-e15089
Author(s):  
Ian D. Schnadig ◽  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Hsingwen Chung ◽  
Rahul Dhanda ◽  
Melissa Halm ◽  
...  

e15089 Background: Sunitinib is a first-line therapy for patients (pts) with aRCC. As a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), it is associated with toxicities that may impact dosing; dose reductions may result in inferior clinical outcomes (Motzer, 2011 ASCO GU, abstract LBA308). This retrospective study was initiated by USON to evaluate dosing patterns of first-line sunitinib, and its association with toxicities and outcomes in community practices. Methods: Pts with aRCC who started first-line sunitinib between June 1, 2007 and May 31, 2011 at 17 USON practices were identified; clinical data were extracted by chart review from iKnowMed electronic medical records that were linked to USON retail pharmacy database. Pts who were enrolled in clinical trials or receiving care for other primary tumors were excluded. Results: Pt characteristics: N=134; median age = 64 years (range 41–87); ECOG PS 0/1 = 85%; clear cell RCC = 81%; and nephrectomy = 61%. Objective response rate was 16%. Overall survival (OS) was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval 11.9–20.8). Median treatment duration was 4 cycles (range 1–19): 27 pts (20.1%) received only 1 cycle of sunitinib (23 at full dose [50 mg] and 4 at <full dose); 107 pts (79.9%) received >1 cycle of sunitinib (53 received full dose; 35 started at full dose but were dose-reduced; 14 always received <full dose; 5 started at <full dose but were dose-increased to 50 mg). Overall, 45 pts were dose-reduced, principally (93%) due to toxicities; 67% of all dose reductions occurred in the first 3 cycles. 121 pts discontinued sunitinib after completing at least 1 cycle, mostly due to disease progression (PD; 44%) or toxicities (17%); 74% of all discontinuations occurred within the first 5 cycles. Conclusions: RCC pts in community practices commonly undergo sunitinib dose reductions in the first 3 cycles due to toxicities, and discontinue therapy within the first 5 cycles due to PD. The median number of cycles and OS were lower than those reported in clinical trials (Motzer JCO 2009;27:3584–3590). More selective TKIs are needed to reduce toxicities, optimize dosing, and potentially improve outcomes. Funded by a grant from AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document