National Power and a National Economic Strategy.

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Economic Strategy ◽  
National Economic ◽  
National Power

scholarly journals Analyzing the Critical Factors of Influence on the Implementation of the National Economic Strategy – 2030

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (525) ◽  
pp. 6-13
Author(s):  
M. R. Lychkovska ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Institutions ◽  
The State ◽  
Economic Strategy ◽  
Effective Implementation ◽  
Innovation Potential ◽  
Current State ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
Factors Of Influence

The article is aimed at generalizing the essential content of the concept of «creativity» in the context of the components that comprise it; analyzing the main factors influencing them; identifying tendencies and particularities of the manifestation of an unproductive type of creativity against the background of the development of the crisis of trust and their devastating impact on the country’s economy; substantiating the importance of drawing attention to these problems in forming the main tasks of the State policy on the effective implementation of the Strategy–2030. The article generalizes approaches to the interpretation of the concept of «creativity». Four of its types are allocated: technological (inventiveness); economic (entrepreneurship), as well as artistic and cultural creativity. It is underlined that different types of creativity should not be considered incompatible; on the contrary, they should inspire each other, and the interaction between them creates an important synergistic effect. It is argued that the factors that combine different types of creativity are innovation, entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial abilities. It is substantiated that creativity, in all forms of its manifestation, innovativeness and entrepreneurship should become end-to-end qualities that will combine all 20 directions of the Strategy. Precisely these factors should be taken into account in determining strategic goals, ways to achieve them and in the tasks of the State economic policy. It is emphasized that in order for these factors to be turned from innovation potential into a resource of development, the necessary element is motivation. It is defined that motivation can generate two types of creativity – productive and unproductive. It is proved that unproductive creativity inhibits socio-economic development, or even destroys it. The main tendencies, types and features of the manifestation of unproductive type of creativity in different stakeholders in the context of the «crisis of trust» are allocated and analyzed. Based on the analysis of the current state of trust in social institutions, it is determined that it is very low. It is underlined that under such conditions, the «crisis of trust» will continue to motivate and provoke the development of an unproductive type of creativity in all its forms and can become a multiplier for the development of negative socio-economic events that will make the implementation of the National Economic Strategy very problematic.

National Economic Power. Dynamic Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (38) ◽  
pp. 22-36
Author(s):  
Alicja Paluch ◽  
Henryk Spustek
Keyword(s):  
System Analysis ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
The Other ◽  
Economic Power ◽  
Dynamic Aspect ◽  
Descriptive Model ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Economic Sphere ◽  
National Power

The national power can be considered in a static and dynamic aspect as well. This applies to all dimensions of the national power, both military and non-military, including the economic one presented in this article. The national power, treated in a static sense as one of the leading features of the state and estimated over a given period, can only be descriptive. On the other hand, it gains a new dimension in a dynamic sense that consists in the possibility of developing the research into a prognostic area. Therefore, this approach to the issue of the national power has been presented here. The research hypothesis is that on the basis of available statistical data it is possible to construct a verifiable dynamic descriptive model of the national economic power, which enables comparative analyses of the group of selected countries. The research took advantage of statistical methods of selecting variables for linear models and methods of system analysis, including multi-criteria, taxonomic method of comparative analysis. Analyses that have been performed allowed to create a dynamic descriptive model of the national power in the economic sphere. The constructed model was positively verified based on the available figures for the selected group of countries. The conducted calculations suggest that it is possible to use this model for further analyses of the national power in the economic sphere.

China's inter-regional carbon emissions: An input-output analysis under considering national economic strategy

2018 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 794-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Pan ◽  
Wulin Pan ◽  
Yongdong Shi ◽  
Shan Liu ◽  
Bo He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Emissions ◽  
Input Output ◽  
Output Analysis ◽  
Economic Strategy ◽  
Input Output Analysis ◽  
National Economic

Analysis on Changdexincheng Development Driving Force Factors

2014 ◽  
Vol 587-589 ◽  
pp. 98-101
Author(s):  
Rui Feng Sun ◽  
Li Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Driving Force ◽  
Economic Strategy ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Economic Zone ◽  
City Construction ◽  
The City

Driven by the national economic strategy, Changdexincheng will put forward a higher request to the city construction as a starting and guiding area of the "Changdongbei" economic zone, as well as analyze the driving force, dug deeper potential, summarize the main driving force factors of its development, and provide reference for development of similar cities.

Manajemen Ekonomi Outopilot: Kegagalan Negara Mencari Identitas?

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-152
Author(s):  
Mukhaer Pakkanna
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
National Economy ◽  
The State ◽  
Political Democracy ◽  
Economic Democracy ◽  
Quality Of Democracy ◽  
Economic Disparities ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Production And Distribution

Political democracy should be equivalent to the economic development of the quality of democracy, economic democracy if not upright, even the owner of the ruling power and money, which is parallel to force global corporatocracy. Consequently, the economic oligarchy preservation reinforces control of production and distribution from upstream to downstream and power monopoly of the market. The implication, increasingly sharp economic disparities, exclusive owner of the money and power become fertile, and the end could jeopardize the harmony of the national economy. The loss of national economic identity that makes people feel lost the “pilot of the state”. What happens then is the autopilot state. Viewing unclear direction of the economy, the national economy should clarify the true figure.

Economic Development in 2006 and the Future of the Russian Economy: The Non-Resource-Based Sector Potential (The Economic Report of All-Russia Business Union “Delovaya Rossiya”)

2007 ◽  
pp. 27-45
Author(s):  
B. Titov ◽  
I. Pilipenko ◽  
A. Danilov-Danilyan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Free Market ◽  
Economic Report ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
The Social ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Investment Capital ◽  
Export Industries ◽  
Sustainable Economic Growth

The report considers how the state economic policy contributes to the national economic development in the midterm perspective. It analyzes main current economic problems of the Russian economy, i.e. low effectiveness of the social system, high dependence on export industries and natural resources, high monopolization and underdeveloped free market, as well as barriers that hinder non-recourse-based business development including high tax burden, skilled labor deficit and lack of investment capital. We propose a social-oriented market economy as the Russian economic model to achieve a sustainable economic growth in the long-term perspective. This model is based on people’s prosperity and therefore expanding domestic demand that stimulates the growth of domestic non-resource-based sector which in turn can accelerate annual GDP growth rates to 10-12%. To realize this model "Delovaya Rossiya" proposes a program that consists of a number of directions and key groups of measures covering priority national projects, tax, fiscal, monetary, innovative-industrial, trade and social policies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document