A Framework for Analyzing the Productivity Costs of Soil Erosion in the United States

Author(s):  
Pierre Crosson ◽  
Paul Dyke ◽  
John Miranowski ◽  
David Walker
2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Sullivan ◽  
Vahram Ghushchyan ◽  
Holly R. Wyatt ◽  
Eric Q. Wu ◽  
James O. Hill

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 752-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. Warren

About 15 years ago, I heard several speakers saying that our crop yields were “leveling off.” This stimulated me to assemble data on the subject. The result is shown in Table 1, which gives the U.S. average yields for 10-yr periods during this century for nine crops. The increases are spectacular, varying from two- to sevenfold. Factors contributing to these increases differ from crop to crop. To obtain information on this subject, several experts on each crop were consulted, and their conclusions are summarized in the following text. Only those factors contributing to increased yields are covered. However, great improvements in efficiency of production, product quality, and reduction in soil erosion also have occurred as cultivars and production practices have changed. For most of the crops, increases in yields started in the 1940s and have increased dramatically during the rest of the century. We have not attempted to predict the future at this time, but the rate at which yields are increasing does not appear to be slowing.


GCB Bioenergy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Khanal ◽  
Robert P. Anex ◽  
Christopher J. Anderson ◽  
Daryl E. Herzmann ◽  
Manoj K. Jha

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4803-4803
Author(s):  
Adrian R Levy ◽  
Laura Dysart ◽  
Yogesh Patel ◽  
Andrew Briggs ◽  
John Schneider ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION Little is known about the productivity loss experienced by patients and their caregivers due to treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) in countries of different economic status. Some insurers in the United States and other countries require pharmaceutical manufacturers to submit economic evaluations on direct medical costs alone, which excludes productivity costs such as absenteeism, presenteeism, time lost from normal activities, and burden of illness to society. Productivity costs are particularly consequential for PNH because substantial time commitments are required from patients and their caregivers for the intravenous administration of treatment (eculizumab or ravulizumab) at infusion clinics. When patients rely on unpaid caregivers, a complete accounting of costs needs to include caregivers' time loss. However, lost productivity for PNH patients and their caregivers has not been reported. The objective of this study was to assess productivity loss for PNH patients and caregivers due to PNH treatments administered at infusion clinics in France, Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. METHODS With a cost-consequence approach and published inputs, productivity costs were estimated for PNH patients who were treated with eculizumab once every 2 weeks (q2w) or ravulizumab once every 8 weeks (q8w) only in infusion clinics in 7 countries for 2 years. Inputs included the estimated PNH patient population size (prevalence: 1 in 500,000 of country population size; Schuller Y, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015), the published mean annual income (World Bank, 2019), and assumption that all were employed. Total duration of therapy required for treatment was estimated by considering travel time to the infusion center, wait time in the clinic for medication preparation, infusion time for loading and maintenance doses, and recovery time (240 minutes for eculizumab and 330 minutes for ravulizumab) and was assumed to be the same across all countries. Lost wages were estimated using the human capital approach based on the hourly wage rate, which was derived from each country's 2018 gross national income per capita and assumed a 40-hour work week. Costs for each country were converted to 2018 USD. In the baseline analysis for each country, we did not consider caregivers. We then undertook 11 simulations (each composed of 1000 iterations) in which patient population size and lost wages were treated as normally distributed random variables and the proportion of patients with caregivers increased by 10% intervals. RESULTS The mean annual income varied 6-fold between the included countries. The table shows the total productivity loss due to eculizumab and ravulizumab treatment for a population of PNH patients and a 10% increase in caregivers in each country. For eculizumab, lost productivity ranged from $344,000 in Russia to $4.3 million in the United States, without caregivers. Within each country, the lost productivity due to ravulizumab treatment was reduced by approximately three-quarters relative to eculizumab treatment due to the less frequent dosing and ranged from $123,000 in Russia to $1.5 million in the United States, without caregivers. When the individual effects of population size and lost wages were isolated, the latter had larger proportionate effects in lower-income countries (data not shown). CONCLUSIONS Omitting productivity costs related to unpaid caregiving in PNH underestimates the total burden of illness on society. Switching from a q2w to a q8w treatment results in substantial savings to the patient's productivity. This study showed that this effect was numerically greater in higher-income countries (United States and Germany), in which the opportunity cost of a patient's time is greater. In chronic diseases such as PNH that require lifelong therapies, when the value of treatment is assessed, the burden of illness on society and the relative treatment effect should be considered. Disclosures Levy: Alexion: Consultancy. Dysart:Alexion: Consultancy. Patel:Alexion: Employment. Briggs:ALK: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; CVRx: Consultancy; Bayer Steering Committee: Consultancy; Sword Health: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy. Myren:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Tomazos:Alexion: Employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3.5) ◽  
pp. HSR19-102
Author(s):  
Chizoba Nwankwo ◽  
Shelby L. Corman ◽  
Ruchit Shah ◽  
Youngmin Kwon

Background: An estimated 12,820 women in the United States will be diagnosed with CxCa in 2018, with 4,210 deaths from the disease. The economic burden of CxCa, both in terms of healthcare costs and lost productivity, has not been adequately studied. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study that evaluated the direct and indirect costs of CxCa using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) for prevalent CxCa cases and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) for deaths due to CxCa. Total healthcare costs and number of work days missed were compared between CxCa cases and controls in MEPS, using propensity scores calculated from baseline demographics and comorbidities. Missed work was converted to costs using the average hourly wage for women in 2015. Per-patient incremental healthcare and lost work productivity costs were then multiplied by the number of prevalent cases of CxCa in 2015 obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). NCHS data on the age-stratified number of CxCa deaths per year (1935–2015) and life expectancy data from the Social Security Administration were then used to calcluate the number of women who would be alive in 2015 if they had not died from CxCa and the lost earnings resulting from early mortality. The primary study outcome was the total direct and indirect cost of CxCa in 2015, calculated as the sum of the incremental direct healthcare costs, incremental lost productivity costs due to missed work, and lost productivity costs resulting from early death due to CxCa. Results: An estimated 257,524 women were alive with CxCa in 2015. Total healthcare costs were $4,221 higher, and an additional 0.37 work days were missed in women with CxCa compared to propensity-matched controls. Of the 488,475 women who died of CxCa prior to 2015, 108,832 would be alive in 2015 and 38,540 would be part of the workforce. Lost earnings in 2015 attributable to these deaths totaled $2.19 billion. The total economic burden of CxCa in the United States in 2015 was thus estimated at $3.3 billion (Table 1). Conclusions: CxCa was responsible for nearly $3.3 billion in direct and indirect costs in 2015. Early death among women with CxCa was the biggest driver of total economic burden.


2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 947-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Angel ◽  
Michael A. Palecki ◽  
Steven E. Hollinger

Abstract Soil erosion is a major global challenge. An increased understanding of the mechanisms driving soil erosion, especially the storms that produce it, is vital to reducing the impact on agriculture and the environment. The objective of this work was to study the spatial distribution and time trends of the soil erosion characteristics of storms, including the maximum 30-min precipitation intensity (I30), storm kinetic energy of the falling precipitation (KE), and the storm erosivity index (EI) using a long-term 15-min precipitation database. This is the first time that such an extensive climatology of soil erosion characteristics of storms has been produced. The highest mean I30, KE, and EI values occurred in all seasons in the southeastern United States, while the lowest occurred predominantly in the interior west. The lowest mean I30, KE, and EI values typically occurred in winter, and the highest occurred in summer. The exception to this was along the West Coast where winter storms exhibited the largest mean KE and EI values. Linear regression was used to identify trends in mean storm erosion characteristics for nine U.S. zones over the 31-yr study period. The south-central United States showed increases for all three storm characteristics for all four seasons. On the other hand, higher elevations along the West Coast showed strong decreases in all three storm characteristics across all seasons. The primary agricultural region in the central United States showed significant increases in fall and winter mean EI when there is less vegetative cover. These results underscore the need to update the storm climatology that is related to soil erosion on a regular basis to reflect changes over time.


2018 ◽  
pp. 74-95
Author(s):  
Hannah Holleman

This chapter presents evidence that knowledge of both the dangers presented by soil erosion and the means to successfully address it exist deep in the memory and experience of agricultural societies and were understood by the white settlers who colonized North America. Yet, even as knowledge of the problem and efforts to contain it in the United States and around the world grew, so did the erosion crisis. As the erosion crisis developed in colonial societies, addressing its root causes was out of the question for those in charge because doing so “may well require a social and political revolution.” Colonial officials and colonists could not consider the radical social change needed to address the root cause of extreme socio-ecological crises because such change would threaten the racialized colonial social order. This is the denial represented by green capitalist and colonial approaches to ecological problems, which dominated early conservationists' attempts to address soil erosion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document