scholarly journals Relation between Health Care Providers´ Compliance with Central Venous Catheter Care Bundle Elements and The Length of Stay in Cardiac Care Units, National Heart Institute.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 87-93
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Cardiac Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Heart Institute

Central Venous Catheter Securement: Using the Healthcare and Technology Synergy Model to Take a Closer Look

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Macklin ◽  
Paul L. Blackburn
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Bacterial Migration ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Delay Of Treatment ◽  
Catheter Replacement

Abstract Proper securement provides a safe vascular access device environment for both patients and health care providers. Successful securement protects central venous catheters from several sources of failure until the end of therapy by preventing central venous catheter movement during all phases of care. Movement causes vein trauma, bacterial migration, distal tip location variation, loss of dressing integrity, and even total dislodgement. Any of these events can have serious consequences, including catheter-related bloodstream infection, thrombosis, delay of treatment, catheter replacement, and potential hemorrhage, all of which can be life-threatening events, and increase costs. We review patient issues, practice issues, and the types of securement currently used in clinical settings.

Management and Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections in the ICU

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (04) ◽  
pp. 508-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niccolò Buetti ◽  
Jean-François Timsit
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Catheter Removal ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Frequent Event

AbstractCentral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) are a frequent event in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. In contrast to other nosocomial infections, most risk factors for CR-BSI are linked to the device and can be prevented efficiently. Rates of CR-BSI higher than 1 per 1,000 catheter days are no longer acceptable. A continuous quality improvement program is effective to reduce them. Key elements of prevention of CR-BSI are hand hygiene, avoidance of insertion of unnecessary catheters, full sterile barrier precautions at insertion, preferential use of subclavian venous insertion site, cutaneous antisepsis with 2% chlorhexidine alcoholic preparation, use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings, immediate replacement of moistened or detached catheter dressings, and removal of catheters as soon as possible. Audit and feedback of the process of care, infection rates, and periodic re-education of health care providers are other instrumental tools in the prevention of CR-BSI. Catheter removal is the main therapeutic intervention, especially recommended in the case of sepsis or shock. While awaiting culture results, an empiric antimicrobial treatment of CR-BSI should target gram-positive microorganism (i.e., Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative coverage should be based on clinical variables, patients' risk factors, and previous colonization status. While a short course of antimicrobials (7 days) is sufficient for noncomplicated CR-BSI, a longer course of 14 days should be preferred for uncomplicated S. aureus and Candida CR-BSI. In case of persisting fever or positive blood culture after 3 days despite adequate antimicrobial therapy and catheter removal, catheter-related complications (e.g., endocarditis, thrombophlebitis, septic metastasis) should be ruled out.

scholarly journals Attributable Cost and Length of Stay for Patients With Central Venous Catheter—Associated Bloodstream Infection in Mexico City Intensive Care Units A Prospective, Matched Analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Higuera ◽  
Manuel Sigfrido Rangel-Frausto ◽  
Victor Daniel Rosenthal ◽  
Jose Martinez Soto ◽  
Jorge Castañon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Mexico City ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Length Of Icu Stay

Background.No information is available about the financial impact of central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infection (BSI) in Mexico.Objective.To calculate the costs associated with BSI in intensive care units (ICUs) in Mexico City.Design.An 18-month (June 2002 through November 2003), prospective, nested case-control study of patients with and patients without BSI.Setting.Adult ICUs in 3 hospitals in Mexico City.Patients and Methods.A total of 55 patients with BSI (case patients) and 55 patients without BSI (control patients) were compared with respect to hospital, type of ICU, year of hospital admission, length of ICU stay, sex, age, and mean severity of illness score. Information about the length of ICU stay was obtained prospectively during daily rounds. The daily cost of ICU stay was provided by the finance department of each hospital. The cost of antibiotics prescribed for BSI was provided by the hospitals' pharmacy departments.Results.For case patients, the mean extra length of stay was 6.1 days, the mean extra cost of antibiotics was $598, the mean extra hospital cost was $11,591, and the attributable extra mortality was 20%.Conclusions.In this study, the duration of ICU stay for patients with central venous catheter-associated BSI was significantly longer than that for control patients, resulting in increased healthcare costs and a higher attributable mortality. These conclusions support the need to implement preventive measures for hospitalized patients with central venous catheters in Mexico.

scholarly journals Effect of Central Venous Catheter Care Bundle Implementation on Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Gehan A. F. Atia
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Catheter Care

Context: Central venous access device (CVAD) bundles for insertion and maintenance demonstrate a reduction in the frequency of complications and bloodstream infection when implemented with compliance monitoring, with the reported success of CVAD bundles. Aim: This study aimed to examine the effect of central venous catheter care bundle implementation on outcomes of critically ill patients. Methods: Quasi-experimental research (pre/post-test design) used to achieve the aim of this study. The study conducted at general and surgical intensive care units affiliated to Menoufia University and teaching hospital. Two study samples recruited in this study. All nurses working at the ICUs, as mentioned above, were recruited in this study. They were 6o critical care nurses. A convenient sample of all available critically ill patients at the time of the study was subjected to treatment via a central venous catheter. Four study tools used to collect the data of this study. These are a structured interview questionnaire, CVC nurses’ knowledge assessment questionnaire, nurses’ compliance assessment checklists, and patient complications assessment records. Results: The study result showed a highly statistically significant difference between pre and post-test knowledge scores of studied nurses regarding assisting line insertion, removal, maintenance, care, and infection control practices. Besides, a highly statistically significant difference between pre and post-test scores of nurses’ compliance to central venous catheter care practices of assisting in CVC insertion, blood sample withdrawal, medication and fluid administration, CVP measurements, CVC removal, and the management of central venous line complications. The study also revealed a highly statistically significant difference between the study and control group patients regarding the central venous catheter complications. However, signs of infection were the most frequent complications in both groups. Conclusion. The study concluded that a statistically significant difference between pre and post nurses’ knowledge and compliance with the CVC care bundle. The patients’ outcomes were also improved significantly after the implementation of the CVC care bundle compared to the controls. The study recommended the adoption of the current care bundle that should be disseminated and updated following the international organizations’ recommendation for implementing evidence-based practices for successful central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention.

CE Article: Central Venous Catheter Infection in Canadian Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients: A 5-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Olivia Saqui ◽  
G. Fernandes ◽  
J. Allard
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Catheter Infection ◽  
Significant Health

Highlights A lower CVC infection rate suggests an improvement in practice and education. CVC infection remains a complication that often requires significant health care resources. Use of tunneled CVC and patient education on catheter care reduces CVC infection rates.

Awareness of ventilator and central venous catheter bundles among critical care providers in Nigeria

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Abdullahi S Ibrahim ◽  
Halima S Kabara ◽  
Adebayo Adeyinka ◽  
Louisdon Pierre
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Central Venous

Clinical Performance of a New Transparent Chlorhexidine Gluconate Central Venous Catheter Dressing

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Olson ◽  
James M. Heilman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Or Education

Abstract As the sciences of vascular access and infection prevention rapidly advance healthcare professionals are often faced with new technologies designed to help, but which are often so complicated to use that they cause unforeseen problems. As a vascular access team at a major mid-western hospital, we evaluated the ease-of-use and the performance characteristics of a new transparent catheter dressing, 3M Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN) containing the antimicrobial chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), with a variety of central venous catheters insertion sites in comparison to a standard non-antimicrobial dressing Tegaderm® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN). Following IRB approval, sixty-three consenting patients were enrolled and randomized; 33 in the CHG antimicrobial dressing group and 30 in the standard dressing group. Thirty six patients had peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), 20 had intrajugular insertions (IJ), and 7 had subclavian insertions. The new 3M Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN) was evaluated for its ability to permit visualization of the insertion site, ease of use, ease of using correctly, ability to secure the catheter and absorb exudates and remain transparent. The new 3M Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN) was found to be as easy to use in central venous catheter care clinical practice as the standard of care non-antimicrobial transparent adhesive dressing. No additional training or education was required to properly use it. This dressing was applied and removed like standard transparent adhesive dressings, but offered many advantages over standard dressings. Advantages include that it is antimicrobial, handles moderate bleeding, remains transparent and appears to offer greater catheter securement than the Tegaderm® (3M Health Care™, St. Paul, MN) standard dressing. The CHG gel pad also conformed well to the catheter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document