Potential Effect of Anti-Inflammatory Treatment on Reducing the Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 639-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Chighizola ◽  
Tommaso Schioppo ◽  
Francesca Ingegnoli ◽  
Pier Luigi Meroni
2020 ◽  
pp. 32-44
Author(s):  
D. I. Trukhan ◽  
D. S. Ivanova ◽  
K. D. Belus

Rheumatoid arthritis is a frequent and one of the most severe immuno-inflammatory diseases in humans, which determines the great medical and socio-economic importance of this pathology. One of the priority problems of modern cardiac rheumatology is an increased risk of cardiovascular complications in rheumatoid arthritis. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, traditional cardiovascular risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (metabolic syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, smoking and hypodynamia) and a genetic predisposition are expressed. Their specific features also have a certain effect: the “lipid paradox” and the “obesity paradox”. However, chronic inflammation as a key factor in the development of progression of atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction plays a leading role in morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases in rheumatoid arthritis. This review discusses the effect of chronic inflammation and its mediators on traditional cardiovascular risk factors and its independent significance in the development of CVD. Drug therapy (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticosteroids, basic anti-inflammatory drugs, genetically engineered biological drugs) of the underlying disease also has a definite effect on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A review of studies on this problem suggests a positive effect of pharmacological intervention in rheumatoid arthritis on cardiovascular risk factors, their reduction to a level comparable to the populations of patients not suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. The interaction of rheumatologists, cardiologists and first-contact doctors (therapist and general practitioner) in studying the mechanisms of the development of atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis will allow in real clinical practice to develop adequate methods for the timely diagnosis and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasiliki-Kalliopi Bournia ◽  
George Kitas ◽  
Athanasios D. Protogerou ◽  
Petros P. Sfikakis

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael James ◽  
Susanna Proudman ◽  
Les Cleland

Meta- and mega-analysis of randomised controlled trials indicate reduction in tender joint counts and decreased use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with fish-oil supplementation in long-standing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Since non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs confer cardiovascular risk and there is increased cardiovascular mortality in RA, an additional benefit of fish oil in RA may be reduced cardiovascular risk via direct mechanisms and decreased non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Potential mechanisms for anti-inflammatory effects of fish oil include inhibition of inflammatory mediators (eicosanoids and cytokines), and provision of substrates for synthesis of lipid suppressors of inflammation (resolvins). Future studies need progress in clinical trial design and need to shift from long-standing disease to examination of recent-onset RA. We are addressing these issues in a current randomised controlled trial of fish oil in recent-onset RA, where the aim is to intervene before joint damage has occurred. Unlike previous studies, the trial occurs on a background of drug regimens determined by an algorithm that is responsive to disease activity and drug intolerance. This allows drug use to be an outcome measure whereas in previous trial designs, clinical need to alter drug use was a ‘problem’. Despite evidence for efficacy and plausible biological mechanisms, the limited clinical use of fish oil indicates there are barriers to its use. These probably include the pharmaceutical dominance of RA therapies and the perception that fish oil has relatively modest effects. However, when collateral benefits of fish oil are included within efficacy, the argument for its adjunctive use in RA is strong.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 318.2-319
Author(s):  
A. Syngle ◽  
N. Garg ◽  
K. Chauhan

Background:Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of premature mortality and sudden death in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Conventional CV risk factors and disease specific risk factors are responsible for endothelial dysfunction (ED) in RA. ED is the barometer of CV health and key initial event in atherosclerosis. Tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, is in clinical use since 2012 and has had the most extensive development program in RA, but its impact on ED has not yet been explored in humans.Objectives:To investigate the impact of tofacitinib on endothelial dysfunction in RAMethods:40 RA patients fulfilling the 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis classification criteria with active disease (DAS28>3.2) were randomized to receive 24 weeks of treatment with Tofacitinib (5mg bd, n=20) and placebo (n=20) as an adjunct to existing stable antirheumatic drugs. Primary endpoints included endothelial dysfunction assessed by FMD using Angiodefender and lipids were estimated at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. The secondary end points included: DAS28, ESR, CRP, HAQ-DI and cardiovascular risk using SCORE chart assessed at week 0 and 12.Results:At baseline, endothelial function was impaired and levels of inflammatory measures were elevated in both groups. CV risk SCORE was high and HAQ-DI was impaired at baseline. After treatment, FMD improved significantly in the tofacitinib group from (8.16±1.38% to 10.98±2.33%, p≤0.05) as compared to placebo (7.12±0.25% to 8.04±0.30%, p=0.35) (Fig. 1A). DAS28 (Fig. 1B), ESR and CRP (Fig. 1C) levels improved significantly in tofacitinib group as compared to placebo (p≤0.05). Tofacitinib significantly decreased HAQ-DI and SCORE (Fig. 1D) values as compared to placebo. There was significant increase in HDL (p≤0.05) after treatment with tofacitinib as compared to placebo. After 12 weeks of treatment, FMD and HDL increased by 34.55% and 13.58% respectively where as DAS28, ESR and CRP decreased by 37.40%, 36.10% and 76.59% respectively in the tofacitinib group. Significant negative correlation was observed between FMD and DAS28 (r= -0.50, p≤0.05) and CRP (r= -52, p≤0.05) after treatment with tofacitinib where as no such correlation was found in placebo group.Figure 1.Impact of Tofacitinib on FMD, DAS 28, CRP & SCOREConclusion:First study to show that tofacitinib, apart from its anti inflammatory activity, improves endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk in RA. Thus, JAK inhibition with tofacitinib has vasculoprotective and cardioprotective effect mediated through anti-inflammatory and probably other mechanisms. This study would stimulate further research in exploring the vasculoprotective and cardioprotective potential of tofacitinib in RA.References:[1]Tofacitinib reversed endothelial dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanistic insights from the rat adjuvant-induced arthritis model. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2747Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 1502-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike J.L. Peters ◽  
Alper M. van Sijl ◽  
Alexandre E. Voskuyl ◽  
Naveed Sattar ◽  
Yvo M. Smulders ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Bruzzese ◽  
Cesare Hassan ◽  
Lorenzo Ridola ◽  
Angelo Zullo

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahil Taheri ◽  
Shahram Molavynejad ◽  
Parvin Abedi ◽  
Elham Rajaei ◽  
Mohammad Hosein Haghighizadeh

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dietary education on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Method: In this randomized clinical trial, 112 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned into two groups, intervention and control. Dietary education was provided for the intervention group in 4 sessions; anthropometric measurements, serum levels of RF, triglycerides, cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and fasting blood sugar were measured before and three months after intervention. Data was analyzed using SPSS software and appropriate statistical tests. Results: The mean of total cholesterol (p <0.001), triglycerides (p = 0.004), LDL (p <0.001), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.003), FBS and BMI (p <0.001) were decreased significantly in the intervention group after education compared the control group. Conclusion: Traditional care for rheumatoid arthritis patients is not enough. Patients need more education in order to improve their situation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document