scholarly journals Keefektifan cooperative learning CRH dan NHT ditinjau dari sikap dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Noor Laila Atini ◽  
Ali Mahmudi

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan cooperative learning  tipe Course Review Horay (CRH) dan tipe Numbered Heads Together  (NHT) yang ditinjau dari sikap siswa terhadap matematika dan prestasi belajar matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non equivalent group design. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua kelompok eksperimen. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar matematika dan angket sikap siswa terhadap matematika. Untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan kedua model pembelajaran digunakan analisis one sample t-test. Selanjutnya untuk membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan kedua model pembelajaran data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji T2 Hotelling, dan independent t-testuntuk menentukan model pembelajaran manakah yang lebih efektif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif CRH dan NHT efektif ditinjau dari sikap siswa terhadap matematika dan prestasi belajar matematika dan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe CRH lebih efektif dibanding model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT ditinjau dari sikap siswa terhadap matematika dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa.Kata kunci: pembelajaran kooperatif, CRH, NHT, sikap siswa terhadap matematika, prestasi belajar matematika siswa The effectieveness of cooperative learning CRH and NHT in terms of attitudes and mathematics learning achievement of students AbstractThis study aims to describe the effectiveness of cooperative learning Course Review Horay (CRH) type and Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type in terms of student’s attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics learning achievement. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. It involved two experimental groups. The data collecting instruments consisted of a mathematics learning achievement test and questionnaires for students’ attitudes towards mathematics. To test the effectiveness of the mathematics learning through the CRH and NHT cooperative learning model, the one-sample t-test was carried out. Then, to compare the effectiveness of the two model, the data were analyzed using the T2 Hotelling test, and the independent t test to find out which of the two model was more effective. The results of the study show that mathematics learning through the CRH and NHT cooperative learning is effective in terms of student’s attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics learning achievement and the CRH cooperative learning model is more effective than the NHT cooperative learning model in terms of student’s attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics achievement of student’s. Keywords: cooperative learning, CRH, NHT, student’s attitude toward mathematics, mathematics achievement of student’s.

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Herlina Herlina

The purpose of this study was to compare the learning achievement using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions with cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modification of guided discovery in terms of verbal abality. Based on the results of the study concluded that (1) based on a model of learning, the mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions as good with mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifications guided discovery, both onstudents who have the high verbal skills, medium and low, (2) base on terms of verbal skills, mathematics achievement of students who have high verbal ability is better than mathematics achievement of students who have medium and low verbal ability, and mathematics achievement of students have medium verbal skillsbetter than mathematics achievement of students have the ability low verbal skills. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan prestasi belajar yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing ditinjau dari kemamuan verbal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa (1) berdasarkan model pembelajaran, prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions sama baiknya dengan prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang dikenai model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing,baik pada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi, sedang dan rendah, (2) ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal, peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang dan rendah, dan peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal rendah.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Andriani Suzana

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk: mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT; membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan pendekatan CTL setting TGT ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan sikap matematika siswa SMP kelas VII dalam belajar bangun datar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT pada masing-masing variabel, digunakan uji one sample t-test. Selanjutnya, untuk membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT, data dianalisis menggunakan uji T2 Hotteling’s. Jika terdapat perbedaan keefektifan, maka dilakukan uji lanjut t-univariat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: pembelajaran matematika menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan sikap matematika siswa, namun tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis; tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting TGT ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan sikap matematika siswa.  Kata Kunci: pendekatan CTL setting NHT, pendekatan CTL setting TGT, prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, sikap matematika siswa The Comparison of the Effectiveness of CTL Approach of NHT Type and CTL Approach of TGT Type in Learning Planes AbstractThis research aims to: describe the effectiveness of teaching mathematics by using the CTL approach of NHT type and the CTL approach of TGT type; compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type in terms of mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, and mathematics attitude of 7th grade junior high school students in learning planes. This research is a quasi-experimental research with the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. To determine the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type on each variable, one sample t-test was used. Furthermore, to compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type, the data were analyzed using a multivariate test of T2 Hotteling’s. If there were differences in effectiveness, then further study of t-univariate was done to determine certain variables that contributed to the overall difference. The results showed that: the teaching of mathematics using the CTL approach of NHT type and using the CTL approach of TGT type are effective in terms of mathematics learning achievement and mathematics attitude, but is not effective in terms of mathematical communication ability; there is no difference between the effectiveness of teaching using the CTL approach of NHT type and teaching using the CTL approach of TGT type in terms of mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, and mathematics attitude. Keywords: CTL approach of NHT type, CTL approach of TGT type, mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, mathematics attitudes of students.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-702
Author(s):  
Nunung Supita Elisa ◽  
Nurul Hikmah ◽  
Muhammad Turmuzi ◽  
Arjudin Arjudin

This research aims to determine whether or not there is an effect of the TTW cooperative learning model on the mathematics learning achievement of class VIII students of SMPN 2 Batukiang Utara in the 2020/2021 academic year. This type of research is a quasi experiment with the posttest only control design with nonequivalent groups. The subjects in this study were class VIII A as the experimental class using the TTW learning model and VIII B as the Kontron class with the direct learning model. The data collection technique used a research instrument in the form of a description test. The statistical analysis used in this study is the t test and the effect size test. Based on the data analysis, the results of the posttest showed that the experimental class average was 62.28 and the control class was 51.25. This indicates that learning with the TTW cooperative model is better than direct learning. Data analysis with t-test at a significant level of 5% , namely 4.03≥1.67, and the effect size test with d = 1.17 (high). So it can be concluded that the type of cooperative learning model (TTW) affects the mathematics learning achievement of class VIII students of SMPN 2 Batukliang Utara in the 2020/2021 school year


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Herlina Herlina

The purpose of this study was to compare the learning achievement using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions with cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modification of guided discovery in terms of verbal abality. Based on the results of the study concluded that (1) based on a model of learning, the mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions as good with mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifications guided discovery, both on students who have the high verbal skills, medium and low, (2) base on terms of verbal skills, mathematics achievement of students who have high verbal ability is better than mathematics achievement of students who have medium and low verbal ability, and mathematics achievement of students have medium verbal skillsbetter than mathematics achievement of students have the ability low verbal skills.   Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan prestasi belajar yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing ditinjau dari kemamuan verbal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa (1) berdasarkan model pembelajaran, prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions sama baiknya dengan prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang dikenai model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing, baik pada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi, sedang dan rendah, (2) ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal, peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang dan rendah, dan peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal rendah.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I MADE MAWA . ◽  
PROF.DR. I MADE CANDIASA, MI.Komp. . ◽  
Dr. KETUT AGUSTINI, S.Si, M.Si. .

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan media Geogebra terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Penelitian ini termasuk quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan non equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. Populasi penelitian siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Abang sebanyak 340 orang. Sampel penelitian adalah kelas VIII B, VIII D dan VIII H sebanyak 102 orang, yang diambil secara random. Data yang dikumpulkan adalah motivasi dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Data dianalisis dengan teknik MANCOVA pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) terdapat perbedaan motivasi dan prestasi belajar matematika antara siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan media GeoGebra, model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD, dan model pembelajaran konvensional, (2) terdapat perbedaan motivasi belajar matematika antara siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan media GeoGebra, model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD, dan model pembelajaran konvensional, dan (3) terdapat perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan media GeoGebra, model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD, dan model pembelajaran konvensional. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dengan media Geogebra berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa.Kata Kunci : STAD, Media Geogebra, Motivasi, Prestasi Belajar Matematika ABSTRACT This study aimed to finding out the effect of STAD cooperative learning with Geogebra to motivation and achievement mathematics learning. This research employed non equivalence pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study were 340 students of eighth grade at SMP Negeri 1 Abang. The sample were 102 students of the class VIII B, VIII D and VIII H that selected by random sampling technique. The data was collected through motivation questionare and mathematics achievement test. The data were analyzed using multivariat analysis of covarians . The result of this study showed that (1) there was a significant different on motivation and achievement mathematics learning to students who learned with STAD cooperative learning with Geogebra, STAD cooperative learning, and conventional learning; (2) there was a significant different on motivation mathematics learning to students who learned with STAD cooperative learning with Geogebra, STAD cooperative learning, and conventional learning; (3) there was a significant different on achievement mathematics learning to students who learned with STAD cooperative learning with Geogebra, STAD cooperative learning, and conventional learning. Based on the research finding, it can be concluded that STAD cooperative learning with Geogebra has effect to motivation and acheivement mathematics learning.keyword : STAD, Geogebra, Motivation, Mathematics Learning Achievement


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rini Dwi Astuti ◽  
Agus Maman Abadi

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan: (1) keefektifan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan sikap belajar matematika, (2) keefektifan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan sikap belajar matematika, (3) model pembelajaran yang lebih efektif antara tipe Jigsaw dibandingkan dengan tipe TAI ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan sikap belajar matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu yang menggunakan dua kelompok eksperimen. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan meliputi: (1) one sample t-test yang digunakan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan Jigsaw dan TAI pada masing-masing variabel; (2) analisis multivariat yang digunakan untuk mengetahui ada tidaknya perbedaan keefektifan Jigsaw dan TAI secara simultan; (3) uji lanjut dengan prosedur Bonferroni, yang digunakan untuk mengetahui model pembelajaran yang lebih efektif antara Jigsaw dan TAI ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan sikap belajar matematika siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan sikap belajar matematika; (2) pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan sikap belajar matematika; (3) tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan tipe TAI ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan sikap belajar matematika. Kata kunci: Jigsaw, TAI, kemampuan penalaran matematika, sikap belajar matematika   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW AND TAI LEARNING IN TERMS OF  STUDENTS’ REASONING COMPETENCE AND MATHEMATICS LEARNING ATTITUDE Abstract This research aims to describe: (1) the effectiveness of cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type seen from the students’ reasoning competence and mathematics learning attitude, (2) the effectiveness of cooperative learning model of TAI type seen from the students’ reasoning competence and mathematics learning attitude, (3) the more effective learning model between the Jigsaw type or TAI type, in terms of students’ reasoning competence and mathematics learning attitude. This research was a quasi-experimental study using two experimental groups. The data analysis techniques consisted of: (1) the one sample t-test carried out to investigate the effectiveness of the Jigsaw-type and the TAI-type in each variable; (2) the multivariate analysis carried out to investigate the difference in the effectiveness of the Jigsaw-type and the TAI-type on two dependent variables simultaneously; (3) the post-hoc test involving the Bonferroni procedure carried out to analyze which one was more effective between the Jigsaw-type and the TAI-type in terms of students’ reasoning competence and mathematics learning attitude. The results of the research show that: (1) the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw is effective seen from the reasoning competence and mathematics learning attitudes; (2) the cooperative learning model of TAI is effective seen from the reasoning competence and mathematics learning attitudes; (3) there is no difference in the effectiveness, between the Jigsaw type and TAI type cooperative learning models in terms of reasoning competence and mathematics learning attitudes. Keywords: Jigsaw, TAI, mathematical reasoning competence, mathematic learning attitude


Author(s):  
Nurul Farida

The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models (STAD by problem solving method, STAD, and conventional) on mathematics achievement viewed from student creative attitude. The type of the research was a quasi experimental research. The population was the students in grade VIII junior high school in Central Lampung Regency. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by problem solving method type give better mathematics learning achievement than STAD type and conventional and then students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type give better mathematics learning achievement than conventional (2) For students who middle and low creative attitude, students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by problem solving method type give better mathematics learning achievement than STAD type and conventional and then students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type give better mathematics learning achievement than conventional. 


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Lidiana Fitri ◽  
Nofianti ' ◽  
Susilawati '

The research about application of word Square cooperative learning model has been done to improve student’s achievement in colloid matter at 11th SMKN 2 Pekanbaru. The purpose of this research was to know if the application of Word Square cooperative learning model could increase student achievement in colloid matter. Subject of this research were students at XI Kimia 1 class and XI Kimia 2 class in academic year 2011/2012. XI Kimia 1 class was randomly selected as experiment class and XI Kimia 2 class as control class. Research results revealed that application cooperative learning Word Square model was capable to improve student’s achievement in colloid matter. This research pretest-posttest design by using t-test (t arithmetic> t table; 3.49 > 1.67). The application this model capable to increase students achievement in colloid matter about 13.71%.Keywords: cooperative learning, Word Square, colloid and learning achievement


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Erny Untari

The purposes of this study are to determine: (1) which one have a better mathematics achievement, students who taught by cooperative learning model STAD or TPS type. (2) which one have a better mathematics achievement, students who have high, middle, or low achievement motivation. (3) is there any interaction between learning model and achievement motivation towards mathematics achievement. This study is a quasi experimental research with 2x3 factorial design. The population of this study is all students XI Grade SMA N 1 Kwadungan in academic year 2016/2017. Sampling was done by random technique. The total of sample is 28 students, with details of 14 students for class experiment one and 14 students for class experiment two. The instruments used to collect data are test of prior knowledge in mathematics, achievement motivation questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The trial of test instrument includes content validity, difficulty level, discrimination power, and reliability. The testing of hypothesis uses two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell. The testing of hypothesis concludes that (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type have better mathematics achievement than students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type. (2) Students who have high achievement motivation have better mathematics achievement than students who have middle and low achievement motivation, also students who have middle achievement motivation have better mathematics achievement than students who have low achievement motivation. (3) There isn’t interaction between learning model and achievement motivation towards mathematics achievement.


CENDEKIAWAN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sri Muryaningsih

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan sikap rasa ingin tahu dan prestasi belajar peserta didik mata pelajaran matematika melalui model pembelajaran matematika realistik. Jenis Penelitian ini yaitu Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) yang terdiri dari dua siklus, satu siklus terdiri dari dua kali pertemuan. Subjek penelitian adalah peserta didik kelas V SD UMP. Tahapan kegiatan setiap siklus terdiri atas perencanaan (planning), Pelaksanaan tindakan (action), Observasi (observing) dan Refleksi (Reflecting). Pengumpulan data rasa ingin tahu dengan menggunakan lembar observasi rasa ingin tahu peserta didik sedangkan untuk mengumpulkan data prestasi belajar peserta didik dengan menggunakan lembar evaluasi yang diberikan pada setiap akhir pertemuan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan model pembelajaran matematika realistik (PMR) dapat meningkatkan sikap rasa ingin tahu dan prestasi belajar peserta didik pada materi keliling dan luas bangun datar pada kelas IV SD UMP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document