scholarly journals Возникновение множественных сбоев под действием протонов в статических ОЗУ с технологической нормой 90 nm

Author(s):  
Н.А. Иванов ◽  
О.В. Лобанов ◽  
В.В. Пашук ◽  
М.О. Прыгунов ◽  
К.Г. Сизова

AbstractThe occurrence of single-event upsets (SEUs) in 90-nm SRAM integrated circuits irradiated by 1000-MeV protons has been investigated. The experimental data were analyzed and processed, and the results showed the possibility of multiple cell upsets in the integrated circuits studied.

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 2591-2598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Andrew Clemens ◽  
Brian D. Sierawski ◽  
Kevin M. Warren ◽  
Marcus H. Mendenhall ◽  
Nathaniel A. Dodds ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K.A. Serrels ◽  
N. Leslie ◽  
T.R. Lundquist ◽  
P. Vedagarbha ◽  
K. Erington ◽  
...  

Abstract By inducing two-photon absorption within the active layer of a 28nm test chip, we demonstrate nonlinear laser-assisted device alteration and single-event upsets by temporarily perturbing the timing characteristics of sensitive transistors. Individual qualitative and quantitative evaluations are presented for both techniques, with lateral resolutions demonstrated with sub-100nm performance. A simplistic signal response rate comparison analysis of these two technologies is also presented.


Electronics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 927
Author(s):  
Guoqing Yang ◽  
Junting Yu ◽  
Jincheng Zhang ◽  
Xiangyuan Liu ◽  
Qiang Chen

A large amount of data needs to be stored in integrated circuits when data are being processed. The integrated circuits contain a large amount of static random access memory (SRAM) due to its high level of integration and speed. SRAM units should be as small as possible to achieve higher storage density. In this work, the features of single cell upsets (SCUs) and multiple cell upsets (MCUs) in a full custom SRAM are tested for a 40 nm bulk CMOS technology node, and Ge (linear energy transfer (LET) = 37.3 MeV cm2/mg), Cl (LET = 13.1 MeV cm2/mg), Al (LET = 8.6 MeV cm2/mg), O (LET = 3.1 MeV cm2/mg), and Li (LET = 0.5 MeV cm2/mg) particles are used. The test results show that the total single cell upset events are 2,000,147, 1,124,269, 413,100, 311,311, and 47,815 under the irradiation of Ge, Cl, Al, O, and Li, respectively. Moreover, due to single event upset reversal mechanism, multiple cell upsets significantly decrease. The total multiple cell upset events are 10, 4, 0, 0, and 0 under the irradiation of Ge, Cl, Al, O, and Li, respectively. There are a lot of single cell upsets appearing under Ge, Cl, Al, O, and Li exposure. The number is increasing with increasing LET, which means that well contacts still need optimization in the full custom SRAM. Close spacing of well contacts or increasing contacts are the approaches used to drain the excess carriers quickly, and error detection and correction (EDAC) is used for SRAM technology. The features show that SCUs have become a major source of soft errors for the full custom SRAM. Combining close spacing of well contacts with error detection and correction (EDAC) and a well engineering scheme are used to reduce single cell upsets, although there are a few MCUs which are inevitable. Radiation hardened by design schemes needs to be further improved.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3234
Author(s):  
Yueh Chiang ◽  
Cher Ming Tan ◽  
Tsi-Chian Chao ◽  
Chung-Chi Lee ◽  
Chuan-Jong Tung

Neutron radiation on advanced integrated circuits (ICs) is becoming important for their reliable operation. However, a neutron test on ICs is expensive and time-consuming. In this work, we employ Monte Carlo simulation to examine if a proton test can replace or even accelerate the neutron test, and we found that 200 MeV protons are the closest to resembling neutron radiation with five main differences. This 200 MeV concur with the suggestion from National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA, Washington, DC, USA). However, the impacts of the five differences on single event effects (SEEs) require future work for examination.


2019 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
YinYong Luo ◽  
FengQi Zhang ◽  
Chen Wei ◽  
LiLi Ding ◽  
XiaoYu Pan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document