scholarly journals Assessment of the diagnostic value of CEA, CA125, and CRP and their cut-off point for discrimination of exudative pleural effusions

Bionatura ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1944-1947
Author(s):  
Hanie Raji ◽  
Seyed Hamid Borsi ◽  
Mehrdad Dargahi MalAmir ◽  
Ahmad Reza Asadollah Salmanpour
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Tumor Marker ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Mean

Pleural effusion is divided into exudative and transudative effusion, and the distinction between exudate and transudate requires multiple investigations of biochemical parameters and their comparison in pleural fluid and serum. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of CEA, CA125, and CRP and their cut-off point for discrimination of exudative pleural effusions. This epidemiological and cross-sectional study was performed on 50 patients aged between 18 to 90 years with the diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz in 2018 and 2019. Demographic and clinical information of patients were collected. The pleural effusion was diagnosed based on physical examination and chest radiography. Pleural effusion was confirmed by thoracentesis. A pleural fluid sample was taken from all patients, and the levels of CEA, CA125, and CRP markers were measured in the pleural fluid. Differentiation of transudate and exudate pleural effusions was performed using Light criteria. The mean CEA and CA125 level of pleural fluid were significantly higher, and the mean CRP level of pleural fluid was significantly lower in patients with malignant diagnoses (P <0.05). Cut-off value with highest sensitivity and specificity in differentiating types of exudative pleural effusions was obtained for CEA tumor marker (greater than 49.8), CA125 tumor marker (greater than 814.02), and CRP marker (less than 7.56). Also, in differentiating types of exudative pleural effusions, CEA tumor marker had sensitivity (89.03%) and specificity (78.42%); CA125 tumor marker had sensitivity (53.18%) and specificity (62.44%), and CRP marker had sensitivity (82.16%), and specificity (89.05%) were. Although the tumor markers had high specificity in the present study, the low sensitivity of some of these tumor markers reduced their diagnostic value. On the other hand, given the numerous advantages of tumor markers, such as low cost and non-invasive, combining them with another can increase the diagnostic value and accuracy.

scholarly journals Differentiating transudative and exudative pleural effusion by pleural fluid cholesterol

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Ayyali Ambresh ◽  
Mallanna S Mulimani
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Blood Sample ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Biochemical Tests ◽  
Cross Sectional

Background: Pleural effusion is one of the common condition encountered in day to day practise. Pleural effusions represent a very common diagnostic task to the physician. A correct diagnosis of the underlying disease is essential to rational management. Today there are a number of laboratory tests available to differentiate exudates and transudates which are considered cost effective to the patients, so this study was designed for the measurement of pleural fluid cholesterol to differentiate transudative and exudative pleural effusions (sensitivity-97.8%, specificity-100%) with the advantage that a contemporary blood sample is not required, thereby lowering cost of diagnostic procedure. Objectives: To study the diagnostic value of Pleural fluid Cholesterol in differentiating transudative and exudative pleural effusions. Methodology: This cross sectional descriptive study was conducted on patients of pleural effusion (n=60)age >18 years patients with definitive clinical diagnosis and evidenced by radiological diagnosis of pleural effusion were taken as inclusion criteria. Results: The results showed majority of the patients were males (63.3%) and females (36.7%). According to lights criteria 46 patients were exudates and 14 patients were transudates and according to Pleural fluid Cholesterol criteria 45 patients were exudates and 15 patients were transudates with sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 100% and accuracy of 98.3%.Conclusion: The pleural fluid cholesterol criteria were found to be the most efficient criteria. Since this parameter involves the measurement of only pleural fluid values of cholesterol, it has following advantages-Economically it reduces number of biochemical tests and Simpler as there is no need to take simultaneous blood sample at the time of thoracocentesis.

scholarly journals Application of Computed Tomography (CT) Attenuation Values in Diagnosis of Transudate and Exudate in Patients with Pleural Effusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Keshab Sharma ◽  
PS Lamichhane ◽  
BK Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Hounsfield Units ◽  
Fluid Analysis ◽  
Ct Attenuation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Attenuation Values

Background: Pleural effusion is the pathologic accumulation of fluid in the pleural space. The fluid analysis yields important diagnostic information, and in certain cases, fluid analysis alone is enough for diagnosis. Analysis of pleural fluid by thoracentesis with imaging guidance helps to determine the cause of pleural effusion. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in characterizing pleural fluid based on attenuation values and CT appearance. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 100 patients admitted to Gandaki Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal between January 1, 2017 and February 28, 2018. Patients who were diagnosed with pleural effusion and had a chest CT followed by diagnostic thoracentesis within 48 hours were included in the study. Effusions were classified as exudates or transudates using laboratory biochemistry markers on the basis of Light’s criteria. The mean attenuation values of the pleural effusions were measured in Hounsfield units in all patients using a region of interest with the greatest quantity of fluid. Each CT scan was also reviewed for the presence of additional pleural features. Results: According to Light’s criteria, 26 of 100 patients with pleural effusions had transudates, and the remaining patients had exudates. The mean attenuation of the exudates (16.5 ±1.7 HU; 95% CI, range, -33.4 – 44 HU) was significantly higher than the mean attenuation of the transudates (11.6 ±0.57 HU; 95% CI, range, 5 - 16 HU), (P = 0.0001). None of the additional CT features accurately differentiated exudates from transudates (P = 0.70). Fluid loculation was found in 35.13% of exudates and in 19.23% of transudates. Pleural thickening was found in 29.7% of exudates and in 15.3% of transudates. Pleural nodule was found in 10.8% of exudates which all were related to the malignancy. Conclusion: CT attenuation values may be useful in differentiating exudates from transudates. Exudates had significantly higher Hounsfield units in CT scan. Additional signs, such as fluid loculation, pleural thickness, and pleural nodules were more commonly found in patients with exudative effusions and could be considered and may provide further information for the differentiation.

scholarly journals A study to know the various causes of pleural effusion and role of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase enzyme in tuberculous pleural effusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1231
Author(s):  
Avdhesh Kumar ◽  
Brijesh Kumar ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Verma ◽  
Anand Kumar ◽  
R. K. Mathur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Background: India has the maximum burden of both non MDR tuberculosis (TB) and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) TB, as per data reported in Global TB Report 2018 and tuberculosis is remains one of the most common cause of pleural effusions.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Department of Respiratory Diseases and a total of 110 patients with pleural effusion were included in the study, which were enrolled for treatment from July 2018 to June 2019.Results: One hundred and ten patients with pleural effusion were enrolled during the study period. There were 65 males (59%) and 45 (40.9%) females.  The overall mean age for males and females were 44.4±18.84 years (35-87 years) and 38.28±17.66 years (35-87 years) respectively. Tuberculous Pleural Effusion group (TPE) seen in 82 patients. Right sided pleural effusion (69.5 %) were more common than left sided (30.4 %). In TPE group the mean pleural fluid ADA level were 86.41±38.08 IU/L (range: 14-195 IU/L). The Malignant Pleural Effusion (MPE) group included 21 patients. In MPE group the mean pleural fluid ADA level were 34.10±32.88 IU/L (range: 8-144 IU/L). The difference in pleural fluid ADA levels between TPE and MPE group was statistically highly significant.Conclusions: Tuberculous pleural effusion was the most common cause of pleural effusion in present study and observed in 74.5% cases.

Determination of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen in pleural fluid and serum from patients with pleural effusion

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Villena ◽  
J. Echave-Sustaeta ◽  
A. Lopez-Encuentra ◽  
P. Martin-Escribano ◽  
J. Estenoz-Alfaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusions ◽  
Cytologic Analysis

As a tool for differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusions, we evaluated the diagnostic value of the assay of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in pleural fluid and serum, and of the pleural fluid TPS/serum TPS ratio in patients with pleural effusion. We studied prospectively 147 consecutive patients who had pleural effusions: 43 malignant pleural effusions and 104 benign pleural effusions. TPS levels were measured by RIA. The sensitivity and specificity of these measurements were: TPS in pleural fluid (cutoff 20,000 U/L): 0.21 and 0.98; TPS in serum (cutoff 300 U/L): 0.31 and 0.96; pleural fluid TPSI serum TPS ratio (cutoff 1200): 0.07 and 0.99. All these values enhanced the sensitivity of cytologic analysis of pleural fluid. However, we conclude that TPS assay in pleural fluid and serum, and the pleural fluid TPSI serum TPS ratio have limited diagnostic value in patients with pleural effusion.

scholarly journals Potential diagnostic value of pleural fluid cytokines levels for tuberculous pleural effusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neda Dalil Roofchayee ◽  
Majid Marjani ◽  
Neda K. Dezfuli ◽  
Payam Tabarsi ◽  
Afshin Moniri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Parapneumonic Effusion ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
New Biomarkers ◽  
High Level

AbstractPatients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) or malignant pleural effusions (MPE) frequently have similar pleural fluid profiles. New biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of TPE are required. We determined whether cytokine profiles in the PE of patients could aid the differential diagnosis of TPE. 30 patients with TPE, 30 patients with MPE, 14 patients with empyema (EMP) and 14 patients with parapneumonic effusion (PPE) were enrolled between Dec 2018 and 2019. The levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, IL-27, CXCL8, CCL-1 and IP-10 were determined in PE by ELISA along with measurements of adenosine deaminase (ADA). The best predictors of TPE were combined ADA.IL-27 [optimal cut-off value = 42.68 (103 U ng/l2), sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.28%], ADA [cut off value 27.5 (IU/l), sensitivity 90%, specificity 96.5%] and IL-27 [cut-off value = 2363 (pg/ml), sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 98.3%, p ≤ 0.0001]. A high level of IL-6 [cut-off value = 3260 (pg/ml), sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.2%], CXCL8 [cut-off value = 144.5 (pg/ml), sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 58.6%], CCL1 [cut-off value = 54 (pg/ml), sensitivity 100%, specificity 70.7%] and IP-10 [cut-off value = 891.9 (pg/ml), sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 48.3%] were also predictive of TPE. High ADA.IL-27, ADA and IL-27 levels differentiate between TPE and non-TPE with improved specificity and diagnostic accuracy and may be useful clinically.

scholarly journals STUDY OF PLEURAL FLUID TO SERUM CHOLINESTERASE RATIO TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN TRANSUDATE AND EXUDATE AND ITS CORRELATION WITH LIGHT'S CRITERIA

2020 ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Manohar MR ◽  
Deepti Shetty ◽  
Vikram VM
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Clinical Condition ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Serum Cholinesterase ◽  
P Value ◽  
Good Sensitivity ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
The Mean

Background: Pleural effusion is a common clinical condition faced in everyday practice. The first step in the management of pleural effusion is its differentiation into transudates and exudates. Light’s criteria is the most widely used parameter to differentiate pleural effusions but studies have shown that Light’s criteria misclassifies a significant amount of cases. Methods: Study included 125 patients who had pleural effusion who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Duration of the study was 12 months. Results: Accordingly the mean value of this ratio was 0.10 + 0.05 in the transudates group and 0.39 + 0.14 in the exudates group. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p-value < 0.001). This ratio misclassified 5 cases. Among them 2 (3.2%) were transudates that were misdiagnosed as exudates and 3 (4.8%) were exudates that were misdiagnosed as transudates.In this study Light’s criteria misclassified 13 cases in total with a sensitivity of 91.9% and a specificity of 87.3%. Conclusions: Light’s criteria has a good sensitivity and specificity but P/S ChE was the most efficient parameter in differentiating between transudates and exudates in this study.

scholarly journals Potential diagnostic value of pleural fluid cytokines levels for tuberculous pleural effusion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neda Dalil Roofchayee ◽  
Majid Marjani ◽  
Neda K.Dezfuli ◽  
Payam Tabarsi ◽  
Afshin Moniri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
New Biomarkers ◽  
High Level

Abstract Background: Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is one of the most common forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Patients with tuberculous or malignant pleural effusions (MPE) frequently have similar clinical manifestations and pleural fluid profile. New biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of TPE are required. Objective: We sought to determine of whether cytokine profiles in the pleural effusion of patients were suitable as tools for the differential diagnosis of TPE. Methods: 30 patients with TPE, 30 patients with MPE, 14 patients with empyema and 14 patients with parapneumonic effusion were enrolled consecutively from the Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Tehran, Iran between Dec 2018-Dec 2019. The levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, IL-27, CXCL-8, CCL-1 and IP-10 were determined in pleural effusions by ELISA along with measurements of adenosine deaminase (ADA). Results: The levels of all analytes measured except IL-18 were higher in TPE compared with non-TPE subjects (all p < 0.01). The best predictors of TPE were combined ADA.IL-27 (optimal cut-off value = 42.68 103.U.ng/L2, sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.28%, p ≤ 0.0001), ADA (optimal cut off value 27.5 IU/L, sensitivity 90%, specificity 96.5%, p ≤ 0.0001) and IL-27 (optimal cut-off value = 2363 pg/ml, sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 98.3%, p ≤ 0.0001). A high level of IL-6 (optimal cut-off value = 3260 pg/ml, sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.2%, p ≤ 0.0001), CXCL-8 (optimal cut-off value = 144.5 pg/m, sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 58.6%, p ≤ 0.0001), CCL-1 (optimal cut-off value = 54 pg/mL, sensitivity 100%, specificity 70.7%, p ≤ 0.0001) and IP-10 (optimal cut-off value = 891.9 pg/mL, sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 48.3%, p = 0.0001) were also predictive of TPE. Conclusion: High ADA.IL-27, ADA and IL-27 levels differentiate between TPE and non-TPE with improved specificity and diagnostic accuracy.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of Adenosine deaminase enzyme (ADA) in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-315
Author(s):  
Haroon Ur Rasheed ◽  
Ejaz Hassan Khan ◽  
Mohsin Shafi ◽  
Ahmad Rafiq ◽  
Ambreen Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Adenosine Deaminase ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Colorimetric Method ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
Systemic Examination

Objective: To study the diagnostic accuracy of Adenosine deaminase enzyme (ADA) in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE).Material and Methods: It was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in the Pulmonology departments of Lady Reading and Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar and department of Pathology, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar from April 2015 to Jan 2016. A total of 210 tuberculous and non-tuberculous pleural effusion patients were selected through consecutive non-probability sampling techniques. After physical and systemic examination, 3cc of pleural fluid was taken. ADA was estimated by Non-Guisti and Galanti method through the simple colorimetric method. All the data was entered in a specially designed proforma and SPSS v16 was used for statistical analysis.Results: Out of 210 tuberculous and non-tuberculous pleural effusions, the commonest cause of pleural effusion was tuberculosis followed by malignancy. In our study, Pleural fluid ADA levels have sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value( PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.5%, 92.3%, 92.4%, and 96% respectively in differentiating tuberculous pleural effusions from non-tuberculous lymphocytes predominant pleural effusions. Conclusion: Tuberculosis is the commonest infectious disease worldwide. A pleural fluid ADA level of ≥ 35 U/L in lymphocyte-predominant effusions makes mycobacterium tuberculosis most likely etiology. This test is not only very sensitive and specific but also it is very cheap, quick, and easy to perform by routine colorimetric method.  

scholarly journals Role of pleural fluid interleukin-6, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio in distinguishing tuberculous and malignant pleural effusions

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 492
Author(s):  
Venny Singgih ◽  
Ketut Suryana ◽  
Ida Ayu Jasminarti Dwi Kusumawardani ◽  
Ni Wayan Candrawati ◽  
I. Gede Ketut Sajinadiyasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Differential Count ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusions

Background: Pleural effusion is caused by various disease, including tuberculosis infection and malignancy. To determine the etiology, immunologic parameters are needed to distinguish tuberculous and malignant pleural effusions, including pleural fluid interleukin-6 (IL-6), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR).Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, conducted at Sanglah General Hospital in Denpasar from March 2020 to September 2020. Pleural fluid IL-6 and leucocyte differential count were measured from subjects with tuberculous and malignant pleural effusions.Results: There were 22 tuberculous pleural effusion subjects with mean pleural fluid IL-6 9269.017±902.211 pg/ml, median (range) pleural fluid NLR 0.123 (0.044-9.449), and MLR 0.065 (0.044-0.355). There were 31 subjects with malignant pleural effusions, with mean pleural fluid IL-6 8212.146±2022.350 pg/ml, median pleural fluid NLR 0.189 (0.015-2.599), and MLR 0.065 (0.010-0.254). Pleural fluid IL-6 in tuberculous pleural effusions were significantly higher (p=0.014). With a pleural fluid IL-6 cut-off ≥9147.959 pg/ml, sensitivity of 63.6% and specificity of 64.5% were obtained. Pleural fluid NLR and MLR of the two groups were not significantly different (p=0.807 and p=0.116).Conclusions: Pleural fluid IL-6 in tuberculous pleural effusions is higher than malignant pleural effusions, with a cut-off of ≥9147.959 pg/ml, tuberculous pleural effusions can be diagnosed with sensitivity of 63.6% and specificity of 64.5%. There is no difference in pleural fluid NLR and MLR in tuberculous and malignant pleural effusions.  

Comparison of Heffner Criteria and Light Criteria in Differentiating Exudative and Transudative Pleural Effusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-145
Author(s):  
Krishna Chandra Devkota ◽  
S Hamal ◽  
PP Panta
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Pleural Space ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Exudative Pleural Effusion

Pleural effusion is present when there is >15ml of fluid is accumulated in the pleural space. It can be divided into two types; exudative and transudative pleural effusion. Tuberculosis and parapneumonic effusion are the common cause of exudative pleural effusion whereas heart failure accounts for most of the cases of transudative pleural effusion. This study was a hospital based cross sectional study performed at Nepal Medical College during the period of January 2016-December 2016. A total of 50 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Pleural effusion was confirmed by clinical examination and radiology. After confirmation of pleural effusion, pleural fluid was aspirated and was analysed for protein, LDH, cholesterol. The Heffner criteria was compared with Light criteria to classify exudative or transudative pleural effusion. Among 50 patients, 30 were male and 20 were female. The mean age of patient was 45.4±21.85 years. The sensitivity and specificity of using Light criteria to detect the two type of pleural effusion was 100% and 90.9%, whereas using Heffner criteria was 94.87%, 100% respectively(P<0.01). There are variety of causes for development of pleural effusion and no one criteria is definite to differentiate between exudative or transudative effusion. In this study Light criteria was more sensitive whereas Heffner criteria was more specific to classify exudative pleural effusion. Hence a combination of criteria might be useful in case where there is difficulty to identify the cause of pleural effusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document