scholarly journals Russian Economic Pressures and Energy Stakes in the EU Eastern Neighbourhood

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Ioana Sandu
Keyword(s):  
Energy Resources ◽  
Energy Strategy ◽  
Eastern Partnership ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Small Countries ◽  
Economic Profile ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Eu ◽  
Geopolitical Context

<p><em>Perceived by the six small countries of the Eastern Partnership as one of their most fearsome adversary, Russia has permanently made its presence visible, all the more in its proximity. Thus, Russian energy resources, that most of the EU members and neighbours covet, have been the subject of numerous debates on the trajectory of energy corridors and have amplified the EU pursuit of developing its own energy strategy and reducing dependence on exterior resources.</em></p><p><em>Caught in the middle, the “sandwiched” Eastern partners have chosen either to cooperate economically and join the EU side, or to stumble and hesitate between the two, or to adhere to their direct enemy, by joining the Eurasian Economic Union. Regardless of their option, they all try to balance their economic profile with the geopolitical context and to adjust their policies so that they gain a respectful status in the region.</em><em></em></p>

Legal Principles of Family Taxation

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Оксана Журавлева ◽  
Oksana Zhuravleva
Keyword(s):  
Family Policy ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Tax Legislation ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
National Family ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Tax Deduction ◽  
The Eu

The article focuses on the tax legal basis for family policy realization in Russia. The subject of the research is the principles of family taxation, their definition and implementation in the domestic legislation. Russian tax legislation is based on individual taxation of physical persons’ income. Taxation depends on a family’s status only for tax residents of the RF. There are some deviations in the implementation of the principles of equality and fairness in the tax legislation, which deal with the double deduction and in some situations may cause the infringement of taxpayers’ rights. The comparative analysis of the national Russian tax legislation and the Agreement between EAEU (Eurasian Economic Union) countries shows that national family tax deduction is not applicable to all EAEU residents. In this article, the author also examines the EU experience in this sphere. On the basis of the study, the author concludes that the participation of the RF in EAEU requires harmonization of some tax legislation’s institutions for implementation of the principle of equality in family taxation.

Towards an Enhanced Institutional Structure of the Eurasian Economic Union

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 102-111
Author(s):  
Igor V. Pilipenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
European Union ◽  
Institutional Structure ◽  
Governance Structures ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Integration Process ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Commission ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Eu

This article considers how to enhance the institutional structure of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in order to enable timely decision-making and implementation of governance decisions in the interests of Eurasian integration deepening. We compare the governance structures of the EAEU and the European Union (EU) using the author’s technique and through the lens of theories of neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism elaborated with respect to the EU. We propose to determine a major driver of the integration process at this stage (the College of the Eurasian Economic Commission or the EAEU member states), to reduce the number of decision-making bodies within the current institutional structure of the EAEU, and to divide clearly authority and competence of remaining bodies to exclude legal controversies in the EAEU.

scholarly journals Nothern European Lessons for Eurasian Integration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-91
Author(s):  
L. S. Voronkov
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Regional Integration ◽  
Nordic Countries ◽  
The Other ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Eu

The paper is dedicated to the differences between the classical instruments for regulating interstate political and trade-economic relations from those used in the development of regional integration processes. Traditionally, the Eurasian Economic Union is compared with the European Union, considering the EU as a close example to follow in the development of integration processes. At the same time, there exist the other models of integration. The author proposes to pay attention to the other models of integration and based on the analysis of documents, reveals the experience of Northern Europe, which demonstrates effective cooperation without infringing on the sovereignty of the participants. The author examines the features of the integration experience of the Nordic countries in relation to the possibility of using its elements in the modern integration practice of the Eurasian Economic Union.

scholarly journals Differences between the European and Eurasian Good Pharmacovigilance Practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-84
Author(s):  
A. V. Matveev ◽  
A. E. Krasheninnikov ◽  
E. A. Matveeva ◽  
B. K. Romanov
Keyword(s):  
Marketing Authorisation ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Current Version ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Expert Analysis ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Systems Effectiveness ◽  
The Eu

Good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) were prepared based on the GVP of the European Medicines Agency that have been in force in the European Union (EU) since 2012. The EAEU GVP have been in force in the Russian Federation and the other EAEU member states since 2016. It is important to identify potential differences between the current regulations in order to harmonise requirements for the pharmacovigilance systems in the EU and EAEU. The aim of the study was to analyse and compare GVP requirements in the EU and EAEU. The analysis helped to identify differences in the structure and contents of GVP sections, the definitions of terms (EU GVP definitions are more detailed and supported by examples, subsections, and references to other documents). Moreover, supplements and annexes to the EU GVP contain figures, templates, examples, algorithms, and tables, which are missing in the EAEU GVP. Expert analysis of these differences as applied to assessment of the pharmacovigilance systems’ effectiveness, and practical activities of marketing authorisation holders, medicine developers, and regulatory authorities, demonstrated that the two GVPs are sufficiently harmonised and have very few differences. However, the number of differences between the documents increases, as changes are made to the EU GVP. A more comprehensive harmonisation of the EAEU GVP with the current version of the EU GVP will make it possible to develop and use uniform pharmacovigilance documents in the EU and EAEU, and will facilitate the introduction of EAEU medicines into the global pharmaceutical market.

Digitalization features of integration associations (on the example of the EU and the EAEU)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
IGOR PANKRATOV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Transformation ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Common Information ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Common Information Space ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
Industry Structures ◽  
Theoretical Foundations ◽  
The Eu

The article provides and analyzes the theoretical foundations and practices of digitalization of integration associations on the example of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Studying the program documents on digitalization (digital agendas), the authors identified the features and risks of the digital transformation of various integration associations. The article describes the digitalization of integration associations as a concept and logic of interaction between citizens, business entities, industry structures, government bodies of countries participating in an integration association in a common information space. These ideas are expressed in the form of explicit algorithms, specifications, and standards unified for each participating country and implemented in the form of integrated information systems of B2B, B2G, G2G formats with a single coordination and monitoring center.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of removing the barriers and limitations impeding functionality of Single Services Market of the EAEU

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Evgenii Vladimirovich Pustovalov
Keyword(s):  
Research Result ◽  
International Agreement ◽  
Trade In Services ◽  
Member States ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
National Courts ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Economic Union

The subject of this research is the process of establishment of the regime of Single Services Market of the EAEU, taking into account the approved algorithms with regards to the plans for liberalization of services marker by separate sectors, as well as prescribed by the law of the Union mechanisms of maintaining such regime that would allow removing barriers and limitations impeding its functionality. The author particularly examines the removal of barriers pertaining to trade in services via realization of the pacta sunt servanda principle; direct and indirect application of law of the Union by the national courts; work of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union; development and implementation of the specialized mechanism of removing barriers and limitations impeding functionality of the Single Services Market. The research result consists in systematization of mechanisms that might be used to ensure compliance with the regime of Single Services Market. The author formulates recommendations on concluding the international agreement within the framework of EAEU, focused on regulation of administrative cooperation of the competent agencies of the member-states in terms of separate sectors of services, as well as regulation of the work of special commission authorized to consider requests of the services market participants, and deliver the binding for EAEU member-states decisions.

scholarly journals PROBLEMS OF REGULATION OF INFORMATION INTERMEDIACY IN THE FIELD OF TRADE WITHIN THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2(42)) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Sergey Sergeevich Lapin
Keyword(s):  
Special Kind ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Main Condition ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Economic Union

This article aims to identify the position of the institution of information intermediacy within the framework of a combination of the aspects of disclosure of relations, the subject of which is information that is conceived as an intangible good of a special kind, the main condition for the existence of which is an indissoluble connection with the material carrier, with the aspect of international legal trends in the course of neighborhood integration that have been the most relevant for our country for many years. The status of the main participants in these legal relations related to the transfer of material, its placement, as well as the procedure for implementing the organizational foundations of their activities, is not sufficiently disclosed in the considered Eurasian legal field, which gives grounds for further consolidation of the regulatory framework in this area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document