scholarly journals Improved harmonization of critical characterization assays across cell therapies

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1661-1678
Author(s):  
Francis Karanu ◽  
Lindsey Ott ◽  
Debra Aub Webster ◽  
Lisa Stehno-Bittel
Keyword(s):  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Cellular Therapies ◽  
Regulatory Authorities ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
Cell Banking ◽  
Global Standardization ◽  
Us Fda

The field of cell therapy has blossomed, providing exciting new options for treating a variety of diseases. While few cell therapy products have US FDA approval, there are thousands of cell treatments at various stages of development, pointing to a potential revolutionary shift in patient care. The expanding number and nature of cellular therapies necessitate greater standardization. Several international organizations are collaborating to pursue some level of global standardization, especially concerning cell banking. However, less harmonization surrounds assays used for critical quality characterization including: identity, purity, safety and potency. Frequently, there is divergence regarding the terms describing the characterization assays across regulatory authorities and guidances. This review summarizes the critical quality assays currently used for different categories of cell therapies. Areas of harmonization and an absence of standardization are highlighted. We propose potential solutions to facilitate harmonization of critical quality characterization assays and the language used to describe them.

scholarly journals 'Off-the-shelf’ allogeneic antigen-specific adoptive T-cell therapy for the treatment of multiple EBV-associated malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001608
Author(s):  
Debottam Sinha ◽  
Sriganesh Srihari ◽  
Kirrliee Beckett ◽  
Laetitia Le Texier ◽  
Matthew Solomon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Adoptive T Cell Therapy ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
In Vivo Models ◽  
Hla Alleles ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Wide Range

BackgroundEpstein-Barr virus (EBV), an oncogenic human gammaherpesvirus, is associated with a wide range of human malignancies of epithelial and B-cell origin. Recent studies have demonstrated promising safety and clinical efficacy of allogeneic ‘off-the-shelf’ virus-specific T-cell therapies for post-transplant viral complications.MethodsTaking a clue from these studies, we developed a highly efficient EBV-specific T-cell expansion process using a replication-deficient AdE1-LMPpoly vector that specifically targets EBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) and latent membrane proteins 1 and 2 (LMP1 and LMP2), expressed in latency II malignancies.ResultsThese allogeneic EBV-specific T cells efficiently recognized human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched EBNA1-expressing and/or LMP1 and LMP2-expressing malignant cells and demonstrated therapeutic potential in a number of in vivo models, including EBV lymphomas that emerged spontaneously in humanized mice following EBV infection. Interestingly, we were able to override resistance to T-cell therapy in vivo using a ‘restriction-switching’ approach, through sequential infusion of two different allogeneic T-cell therapies restricted through different HLA alleles. Furthermore, we have shown that inhibition of the programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1 axis in combination with EBV-specific T-cell therapy significantly improved overall survival of tumor-bearing mice when compared with monotherapy.ConclusionThese findings suggest that restriction switching by sequential infusion of allogeneic T-cell therapies that target EBV through distinct HLA alleles may improve clinical response.

scholarly journals Next-generation cell therapies: the emerging role of CAR-NK cells

Hematology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 570-578
Author(s):  
Rafet Basar ◽  
May Daher ◽  
Katayoun Rezvani
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Natural Killer ◽  
Γδ T Cells ◽  
Antigen Receptors ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Immune Effector ◽  
Effector Cells ◽  
Immune Effector Cells

Abstract T cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have revolutionized the field of cell therapy and changed the paradigm of treatment for many patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. Despite this progress, there are limitations to CAR-T cell therapy in both the autologous and allogeneic settings, including practical, logistical, and toxicity issues. Given these concerns, there is a rapidly growing interest in natural killer cells as alternative vehicles for CAR engineering, given their unique biological features and their established safety profile in the allogeneic setting. Other immune effector cells, such as invariant natural killer T cells, γδ T cells, and macrophages, are attracting interest as well and eventually may be added to the repertoire of engineered cell therapies against cancer. The pace of these developments will undoubtedly benefit from multiple innovative technologies, such as the CRISPR-Cas gene editing system, which offers great potential to enhance the natural ability of immune effector cells to eliminate refractory cancers.

scholarly journals Potential strategies against resistance to CAR T-cell therapy in haematological malignancies

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592096296
Author(s):  
Qing Cai ◽  
Mingzhi Zhang ◽  
Zhaoming Li
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Haematological Malignancies ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a rapidly developing method for adoptive immunotherapy of tumours in recent years. CAR T-cell therapies have demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in the treatment of patients with haematological malignancies. A 90% complete response (CR) rate has been reported in patients with advanced relapse or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, while >50% CR rates have been reported in cases of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and partial B-cell lymphoma. Despite the high CR rates, a subset of the patients with complete remission still relapse. The mechanism of development of resistance is not clearly understood. Some patients have been reported to demonstrate antigen-positive relapse, whereas others show antigen-negative relapses. Patients who relapse following CAR T-cell therapy, have very poor prognosis and novel approaches to overcome resistance are required urgently. Herein, we have reviewed current literature and research that have investigated the strategies to overcome resistance to CAR T-cell therapy.

Single-arm oncology trials and the nature of external controls arms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Hashmi ◽  
Jeremy Rassen ◽  
Sebastian Schneeweiss
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Aggregate Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
External Control ◽  
Calendar Time ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Us Fda

Aim: Single-arm trials with external control arms (ECAs) have gained popularity in oncology. ECAs may consist of primary data from previous trials, electronic health records (EHRs) or aggregate data from the literature. We sought to provide a description of how such studies achieve similarity of patients, comparability of data quality and outcome assessment. Materials & methods: In a stratified convenience sample of 15 studies, five used primary data from trials as ECAs, five used secondary data from EHRs and five used aggregate data from the literature. Data were collected from the published literature and public web resources, blinded to the eventual approval decision. Results: Studies using ECAs from primary data and EHR data displayed methods to achieve comparability of information, including matched baseline characteristics. Aggregate data from published studies did not attempt to match covariates. The EHR controls often showed calendar time overlap for collecting information while trial data were mostly historic. Outcome data were not consistently reported across studies. US FDA approval was only seen when primary data from trials or EHR data were used as the ECA, however no ECA in this sample directly contributed to approval. Discussion: In this nonsystematic review of ECAs for single-arm trials, the ECAs derived from primary data collected by other trials or EHRs show patterns of patient comparability, time overlap, and realistic methodological approaches to achieving balance between treatment arms. They are often submitted to regulators while literature-derived aggregate findings as ECA may serve as benchmarks for pipeline decisions.

Luspatercept in the treatment of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Rami S Komrokji
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor Beta ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Erythroid Differentiation ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Fda ◽  
Terminal Erythroid Differentiation

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway is key to hematopoiesis regulation. Increased activation of this pathway contributes to ineffective terminal erythroid differentiation in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Luspatercept is a novel fusion protein that traps TGF-β ligands preventing them from binding to Type II TGF-β receptors, thereby decreasing phosphorylated SMAD2/3 resulting in the downstream effect of promoting erythropoiesis. Seminal clinical trials using luspatercept, PACE-MD and MEDALIST, demonstrated impressive efficacy in the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia in intermediate risk or lower MDS had led to the US FDA approval for this indication. This review summarizes luspatercept mechanisms of action, efficacy/safety data supporting its use and ongoing clinical trials in MDS.

scholarly journals Progenitor Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Injury: A Review of the State of Current Clinical Trials

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Walker ◽  
Matthew T. Harting ◽  
Shinil K. Shah ◽  
Mary-Clare Day ◽  
Ramy El Khoury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Neurological Injury ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Potential Efficacy ◽  
Cord Injury

Recent preclinical work investigating the role of progenitor cell therapies for central nervous system (CNS) injuries has shown potential neuroprotection in the setting of traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord injury (SCI), and ischemic stroke. Mechanisms currently under investigation include engraftment and transdifferentiation, modulation of the locoregional inflammatory milieu, and modulation of the systemic immunologic/inflammatory response. While the exact mechanism of action remains controversial, the growing amount of preclinical data demonstrating the potential benefit associated with progenitor cell therapy for neurological injury warrants the development of well-controlled clinical trials to investigate therapeutic safety and efficacy. In this paper, we review the currently active or recently completed clinical trials investigating the safety and potential efficacy of bone marrow-derived progenitor cell therapies for the treatment of TBI, SCI, and ischemic stroke. Our review of the literature shows that while the preliminary clinical trials reviewed in this paper offer novel data supporting the potential efficacy of stem/progenitor cell therapies for CNS injury, a great deal of additional work is needed to ensure the safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of progenitor cell therapy prior to widespread clinical trials.

scholarly journals A pilot study of clinical cell therapy for patients with vascular dementia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-150
Author(s):  
Yunliang Wang ◽  
Xiaoling Guo ◽  
Yanqiu Liu ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Clinical Dementia Rating ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Group Patient ◽  
Verbal Recall ◽  
Human Lifespan ◽  
Age Related

Background:Vascular dementia (VD) is a series of clinical and neurophysiological manifestations caused by cerebrovascular disease. As the human lifespan increases, the number of people affected by age-related dementia is growing at an alarming pace, but no proved therapeutic methods can stop it from getting worse.Objective:To investigate the neurorestorative effects of injecting olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), Schwann cells (SCs), and olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) into olfactory sub-mucosa in VD patients.Methods:A pilot study of double-blind randomized controlled cell therapies was conducted in VD patients (n = 5). Cells were injected into the patients’ olfactory sub-mucosa. Two patients received OEC treatment, one received SC treatment, one ORN treatment, and one OEC combined with ORN. Mental state and cognitive function were observed before treatment and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) was performed before treatment and 12 months after treatment.Results:The directional function score on the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) in the patient who received SC treatment had increased slightly 1 and 3 months after treatment. The scores for orientation, attention, delayed verbal recall, and repetition increased in the ORN group patient 1 month after treatment. The orientation and repetition scores of the ORN group patient continued to increase 3 months after treatment. The scores for attention, delayed verbal recall, and phase 3 command decreased in the OEC and the OEC + ORN group patients after treatment assessment Scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale also improved in the ORN group patient. Clinical and MRI or CT examinations did not find any side effects from the cell therapy or transplanting procedure.Conclusion:All of the cell transplantations were found to be safe. ORN was shown to be a promising therapy for VD patients. Phase II clinical trials of ORN, SC, and OEC therapy are required to verify their effects on VD symptoms, especially ORNs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document