scholarly journals IMPLIKASI POLITIK KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM UUPLH

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
David Aprizon Putra
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Political Elites ◽  
Political Choice ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Set Up

Political Law is one of the discourses that control the existence of law.One of the realm of law that has recently received the spotlight and serious attention. Particularly related to the legal political option is the environment law that increasingly strong day include criminal law enforcement in law enforcement. There are some weak things that then have negative implications, against the enforcement of environmental laws related to the lack of cautious political choice. Since 1982 in Law No. 4 of 1982 on the Principles of Environmental Management which was changed in 1997 into Law No. 27 of 1997 on Environmental Management, the legal politics of criminal law policy has been conducted, that the criminal law policy in the realm of the environment is already a choice of legal politics in the realm of environmental law. Law Number 32 Year 2009 About PPLH as the latest generation, adds Chapter XV of the Criminal Code in its charge of 23 Articles. Law Number 32 Year 2009 contains a much more complete criminal provision than Law Number 23 Year 1997. Although there is still much to be fixed on the provisions of Law Number 32 Year 2009. Base on research shows that there are special procedural laws that regulate formal law enforcement. It is based on the principle of ultimum remedium which means that the implementation of the criminal law must wait until the effectiveness of administrative law is upheld. To minimize obstacles in enforcing environmental laws which are sometimes used by political elites to seek profit, formal laws against environmental crimes should be set up specifically with the Act.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Imam Budi Santoso ◽  
Taun Taun
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Water Quality Standards ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The enforcement of environmental law in Indonesia today is growing , environmental laws and regulations are continuously equipped for sustainable development. But, enforcement of environmental law is still not as expected, in environmental law enforcement there are several ways of settlement that must be taken, administratively, alternatives dispute resolution and criminal law, but in criminal law enforcement regulated in Article 100 paragraph (2) of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, criminal acts can only be applied if the administrative sanction is not complied with or violation is more than one time, then in explanation point 6 of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, enforcement of environmental criminal law should pay attention to the principle of ultimum remedium which requires the application of criminal law enforcement as a last resort after the implementation of administrative law enforcement is deemed unsuccessful, and the application of the ultimum remedium principle applies only to certain offensive crimes, namely the prosecution of violations of waste water quality standards, emissions, and disturbances. However, if it is related to the legality principle contained in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and the basis of criminal abrogation, the ultimum remedium principle is contradictory, criminal law should continue based on the principle of legality and stopped by the ultimum remedium principle on the basis of criminal sanction, whereas the basis of criminal abrogation has been clearly defined in the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Imam Budi Santoso ◽  
Taun Taun
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Water Quality Standards ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The enforcement of environmental law in Indonesia today is growing , environmental laws and regulations are continuously equipped for sustainable development. But, enforcement of environmental law is still not as expected, in environmental law enforcement there are several ways of settlement that must be taken, administratively, alternatives dispute resolution and criminal law, but in criminal law enforcement regulated in Article 100 paragraph (2) of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, criminal acts can only be applied if the administrative sanction is not complied with or violation is more than one time, then in explanation point 6 of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, enforcement of environmental criminal law should pay attention to the principle of ultimum remedium which requires the application of criminal law enforcement as a last resort after the implementation of administrative law enforcement is deemed unsuccessful, and the application of the ultimum remedium principle applies only to certain offensive crimes, namely the prosecution of violations of waste water quality standards, emissions, and disturbances. However, if it is related to the legality principle contained in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and the basis of criminal abrogation, the ultimum remedium principle is contradictory, criminal law should continue based on the principle of legality and stopped by the ultimum remedium principle on the basis of criminal sanction, whereas the basis of criminal abrogation has been clearly defined in the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI POLITIK PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2009TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP TERHADAP UPAYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
David Aprizon Putra
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Abstract: Since 1982 in Law Number 4 of 1982 concerning Environmental Management Principles which was later amended in 1997 to become Law Number 27 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management, legal politics regarding criminal law policy has been carried out. Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Protection and Management of the Environment (UUPPLH) as the latest generation, has included criminal provisions in Chapter XV, which consists of 23 articles. The results of the study show that criminal law enforcement against formal offenses has a special procedural law, because it relates to the principle of ultimum remedium, meaning that the use of criminal law against formal offenses must wait until administrative law enforcement is declared ineffective. In order to avoid difficulties in enforcing environmental law that is sometimes used by certain elites to seek profits by looking at the gap in the weak regulations in the laws and regulations, the legislation, especially regarding formal law, must be clearly arranged, firm, not multiple interpretations.Keywords: Politic Criminal Law Enforcement, Environmental Law Enforcement

Design and Development of the Environmental Protection Mobile Enforcement System

2014 ◽  
Vol 937 ◽  
pp. 526-530
Author(s):  
Ya Qiong Wang ◽  
Ying Jiong Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Internet Of Things ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Shanxi Province ◽  
Environmental Status ◽  
Supervision And Management ◽  
And Function

With analyzing the environmental status of law enforcement and job demands, the environmental protection mobile enforcement system was developed based on Android platform and SOA architecture. Using this system, the ability of environmental law enforcement supervision and management was improved, and various environmental administrative law enforcement issues were solved under the limited environmental management resource. Taking Shanxi Province as an example, the environmental protection mobile enforcement system was designed and developed in term of data integration, sharing resources, standardize management and function expansion. This system can been connected to the environmental Internet of Things system which was proved practical.

scholarly journals Environmental law and reconciliation with a representative of power under criminal law of Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 244 ◽  
pp. 12021
Author(s):  
Sergey Zakharchuk
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Statistical Information ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
First Time ◽  
Order Of Administration

Domestic criminal legislation provides for possibility of releasing from criminal liability a person who has committed a crime of small or medium gravity for the first time, provided that he/she has reconciled with the victim and made amends for the harm caused. Comparative legal analysis shows that similar norms are found in the criminal laws of foreign states. The article discusses issues related to the possibility of terminating a criminal case in connection with the reconciliation of parties in the event that a victim is a representative of authorities. As a result of analysis of scientific positions on this issue, as well as corresponding law enforcement practice, ambiguity in approaches to its solution was revealed. The presence of certain contradictions in the area under study is also confirmed by statistical information. The author substantiates the position on the need to establish a ban on exemption from criminal liability in connection with reconciliation with the victim, if a crime is committed against justice or the order of administration, and the victim is a representative of authorities. In this case, the victim acts as an additional objective manifestation of encroachment, and therefore, reconciliation cannot eliminate the harm done to the interests of the state - the main object of criminal encroachment. In order to resolve the problem, it is proposed to amend Article 76 of Criminal Code of Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Deconstruction of the ultimum remedium basic concept on protection and management tropical biodiversity

2021 ◽  
Vol 912 (1) ◽  
pp. 012045
Author(s):  
D K Dewi ◽  
A Syahrin ◽  
Suhaidi ◽  
M Ekaputra ◽  
T A D Putra
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Water Quality Standards ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Tropical Biodiversity ◽  
Biological Potential ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

Abstract The biological potential in Indonesia is no longer managed and protected. So far Indonesia has had biologically related laws and regulations, but its implementation is still weak and less effective. Therefore, Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management or called UUPPLH mentioned the management and protection of biodiversity based UUPPLH namely two principles in law of criminal provision, the principle of remedium ultimum which is an effort, and the principle of premium remedium that takes care of the law. So far many mistakes in interpreting the application of the principle of remedium ultimum which is said to make it difficult for law enforcement to enforce environmental criminal laws and can shackle law enforcements in carrying out task of environmental law enforcement. In addition, it is also said that the principle of remedium ultimum can also harm the environment due to violations of waste water quality standards, emissions, and disturbances that take precedence is the administration of administrative sanctions, meaning that there is no deterrent effect on perpetrators. Therefore, it is necessary to deconstruct the principle of remedium ultimum in the proper enforcement of environmental criminal law including structuring and enforcement (compliance) which can also be a view of criminal law that can be used as an instrument in the framework of protection and management of tropical biodiversity, especially the environment and can bring consequences for the intertwining of criminal law with administrative law. The results of the research are based on UUPPLH that can protect biodiversity by Indonesia and reconstruct the principle of ultimum remedium in environmental law. Research methods using normative legal research on philosophical.

scholarly journals PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN MENJADI DASAR TERINTEGRASI DALAM PEMBANGUNAN SUATU WILAYAH BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 32 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

LEGALITAS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Farahwati Farahwati
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Natural Environment ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Judicial Procedures ◽  
Environmentally Sound

The environment on earth as regulated in Law No. 32 of 2009concerning Environmental Protection and Management, thatenvironmental management consists of the natural environment inaccordance with the understanding of ecosystem life and socialenvironment that is illustrated by the existence of human groups both insociety and in families and refers to the understanding of humanity(humanism), so that includes understanding about between nations,interregion and the built environment (originally thought to be man-made;man-made environment).Development needs to pay attention to environmental conditionsthat exist from the physical side (soil, water, air), biotics (flora, fauna),and culture (culture, interactions between people). Environmental qualityconditions will tend to continue to decline if not balanced with the conceptof sustainable development planning in an effort to preserve the existingenvironmental functions.The implementation of environmentally sound development and thecontrolled use of natural resources wisely is the main objective ofenvironmental management. Sustainable development is very closelyrelated to environmental management programs and policies.The nature of environmental law enforcement in sustainabledevelopment covers all environmental law systems with the aim ofprotecting and properly managing the environment and is an activity toimplement and apply just environmental laws and take legal actionagainst any violations or deviations of law committed by legal subjectseither through judicial procedures or through non-judicial procedures.Legal norms are the most dominant rules that are enforced with powerand for their violations subject to certain sanctions that have beenestablished by the State.

scholarly journals ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 22-37
Author(s):  
H. Bachrul Amiq
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Pollution ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Better Than

Enforcement of administrative sanctions is part of the enforcement of administrative environmental laws. Law enforcement of the administrative environment itself can be done in a preventive and repressive manner. Administrative law enforcement that is preventive is done through supervision, while repressive law enforcement is done through the application of administrative sanctions. Supervision and application of administrative sanctions aims to achieve the adherence of the public to the legal norms of the administrative environment. Good supervision as part of preventive environmental law enforcement will prevent the violation of administrative law norms. Thus, environmental pollution resulting from such breaches can be avoided. This is better than the enforcement of repressive administrative sanctions after the offense. However, it does not mean that the review of enforcement of administrative sanctions is unimportant.

scholarly journals SINERGI PELAKSANAAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN INDONESIA

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Eka Merdekawati Djafar
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Law

Enforcement of environmental laws is expected to be carried out in synergy by law officers who are scattered in various law enforcement agencies in general and particularly in relation to environmental management. Understanding of the substance of environmental law should not be done partially adherence to environmental laws, both by the public and law enforcement officers itself so to create a legal substance is completely and thoroughly that understanding can be removed to the sectoral legislation. Likewise strongly support the creation of culture law enforcement of environmental law implementation synergies among law enforcement officers. It is intended that the law enforcement agencies have the same perception of the implementation of environmental law enforcement. Keyword : “ Law enforcement” and “ Environmental Law”

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document