scholarly journals Deconstruction of the ultimum remedium basic concept on protection and management tropical biodiversity

2021 ◽  
Vol 912 (1) ◽  
pp. 012045
Author(s):  
D K Dewi ◽  
A Syahrin ◽  
Suhaidi ◽  
M Ekaputra ◽  
T A D Putra
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Water Quality Standards ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Tropical Biodiversity ◽  
Biological Potential ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

Abstract The biological potential in Indonesia is no longer managed and protected. So far Indonesia has had biologically related laws and regulations, but its implementation is still weak and less effective. Therefore, Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management or called UUPPLH mentioned the management and protection of biodiversity based UUPPLH namely two principles in law of criminal provision, the principle of remedium ultimum which is an effort, and the principle of premium remedium that takes care of the law. So far many mistakes in interpreting the application of the principle of remedium ultimum which is said to make it difficult for law enforcement to enforce environmental criminal laws and can shackle law enforcements in carrying out task of environmental law enforcement. In addition, it is also said that the principle of remedium ultimum can also harm the environment due to violations of waste water quality standards, emissions, and disturbances that take precedence is the administration of administrative sanctions, meaning that there is no deterrent effect on perpetrators. Therefore, it is necessary to deconstruct the principle of remedium ultimum in the proper enforcement of environmental criminal law including structuring and enforcement (compliance) which can also be a view of criminal law that can be used as an instrument in the framework of protection and management of tropical biodiversity, especially the environment and can bring consequences for the intertwining of criminal law with administrative law. The results of the research are based on UUPPLH that can protect biodiversity by Indonesia and reconstruct the principle of ultimum remedium in environmental law. Research methods using normative legal research on philosophical.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI POLITIK KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM UUPLH

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
David Aprizon Putra
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Political Elites ◽  
Political Choice ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Set Up

Political Law is one of the discourses that control the existence of law.One of the realm of law that has recently received the spotlight and serious attention. Particularly related to the legal political option is the environment law that increasingly strong day include criminal law enforcement in law enforcement. There are some weak things that then have negative implications, against the enforcement of environmental laws related to the lack of cautious political choice. Since 1982 in Law No. 4 of 1982 on the Principles of Environmental Management which was changed in 1997 into Law No. 27 of 1997 on Environmental Management, the legal politics of criminal law policy has been conducted, that the criminal law policy in the realm of the environment is already a choice of legal politics in the realm of environmental law. Law Number 32 Year 2009 About PPLH as the latest generation, adds Chapter XV of the Criminal Code in its charge of 23 Articles. Law Number 32 Year 2009 contains a much more complete criminal provision than Law Number 23 Year 1997. Although there is still much to be fixed on the provisions of Law Number 32 Year 2009. Base on research shows that there are special procedural laws that regulate formal law enforcement. It is based on the principle of ultimum remedium which means that the implementation of the criminal law must wait until the effectiveness of administrative law is upheld. To minimize obstacles in enforcing environmental laws which are sometimes used by political elites to seek profit, formal laws against environmental crimes should be set up specifically with the Act.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Imam Budi Santoso ◽  
Taun Taun
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Water Quality Standards ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The enforcement of environmental law in Indonesia today is growing , environmental laws and regulations are continuously equipped for sustainable development. But, enforcement of environmental law is still not as expected, in environmental law enforcement there are several ways of settlement that must be taken, administratively, alternatives dispute resolution and criminal law, but in criminal law enforcement regulated in Article 100 paragraph (2) of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, criminal acts can only be applied if the administrative sanction is not complied with or violation is more than one time, then in explanation point 6 of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, enforcement of environmental criminal law should pay attention to the principle of ultimum remedium which requires the application of criminal law enforcement as a last resort after the implementation of administrative law enforcement is deemed unsuccessful, and the application of the ultimum remedium principle applies only to certain offensive crimes, namely the prosecution of violations of waste water quality standards, emissions, and disturbances. However, if it is related to the legality principle contained in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and the basis of criminal abrogation, the ultimum remedium principle is contradictory, criminal law should continue based on the principle of legality and stopped by the ultimum remedium principle on the basis of criminal sanction, whereas the basis of criminal abrogation has been clearly defined in the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Imam Budi Santoso ◽  
Taun Taun
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Water Quality Standards ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The enforcement of environmental law in Indonesia today is growing , environmental laws and regulations are continuously equipped for sustainable development. But, enforcement of environmental law is still not as expected, in environmental law enforcement there are several ways of settlement that must be taken, administratively, alternatives dispute resolution and criminal law, but in criminal law enforcement regulated in Article 100 paragraph (2) of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, criminal acts can only be applied if the administrative sanction is not complied with or violation is more than one time, then in explanation point 6 of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, enforcement of environmental criminal law should pay attention to the principle of ultimum remedium which requires the application of criminal law enforcement as a last resort after the implementation of administrative law enforcement is deemed unsuccessful, and the application of the ultimum remedium principle applies only to certain offensive crimes, namely the prosecution of violations of waste water quality standards, emissions, and disturbances. However, if it is related to the legality principle contained in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and the basis of criminal abrogation, the ultimum remedium principle is contradictory, criminal law should continue based on the principle of legality and stopped by the ultimum remedium principle on the basis of criminal sanction, whereas the basis of criminal abrogation has been clearly defined in the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI POLITIK PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2009TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP TERHADAP UPAYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
David Aprizon Putra
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Abstract: Since 1982 in Law Number 4 of 1982 concerning Environmental Management Principles which was later amended in 1997 to become Law Number 27 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management, legal politics regarding criminal law policy has been carried out. Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Protection and Management of the Environment (UUPPLH) as the latest generation, has included criminal provisions in Chapter XV, which consists of 23 articles. The results of the study show that criminal law enforcement against formal offenses has a special procedural law, because it relates to the principle of ultimum remedium, meaning that the use of criminal law against formal offenses must wait until administrative law enforcement is declared ineffective. In order to avoid difficulties in enforcing environmental law that is sometimes used by certain elites to seek profits by looking at the gap in the weak regulations in the laws and regulations, the legislation, especially regarding formal law, must be clearly arranged, firm, not multiple interpretations.Keywords: Politic Criminal Law Enforcement, Environmental Law Enforcement

scholarly journals ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 22-37
Author(s):  
H. Bachrul Amiq
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Pollution ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Better Than

Enforcement of administrative sanctions is part of the enforcement of administrative environmental laws. Law enforcement of the administrative environment itself can be done in a preventive and repressive manner. Administrative law enforcement that is preventive is done through supervision, while repressive law enforcement is done through the application of administrative sanctions. Supervision and application of administrative sanctions aims to achieve the adherence of the public to the legal norms of the administrative environment. Good supervision as part of preventive environmental law enforcement will prevent the violation of administrative law norms. Thus, environmental pollution resulting from such breaches can be avoided. This is better than the enforcement of repressive administrative sanctions after the offense. However, it does not mean that the review of enforcement of administrative sanctions is unimportant.

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals The Implementation of the Strict-Liability Principle to the Perpetrators of Forest and Land Burning

2020 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 314-333
Author(s):  
Hafrida Hafrida ◽  
Helmi Helmi ◽  
Bunga Permatasari
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Forest Fires ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Strict Liability ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Diplomatic Relations ◽  
Main Principle ◽  
Health Quality ◽  
Court Proceedings

The massive forest and land fires in Indonesia have been raging and caused haze disaster. The haze disaster is not suffered only in Indonesian territory, but it has become a transnational disaster resulting in extensive economic and health quality losses. In addition, the disaster has led damage to agricultural land and disruption of diplomatic relations among affected states. The number of perpetrators of forest and land fires that increase annually shows that the enforcement of criminal law is relatively ineffective. This article covers the problem whether the principle of strict liability can be applied to the perpetrators of forest burning. In 2019, forest fires in the Jambi Province had took placed in estimated 165.86.58 hectares. The forest fire is the main source of transnational haze disaster. Law enforcement on forest fires in Jambi has not provided a deterrent effect yet. There are forty-six companies acquiring fires in their concession land areas. Unfortunately, only four of them reached court proceedings and only two companies were declared guilty by the court. Therefore, as a deterrent effort, the principle of strict liability can be applied as the main principle to handle perpetrators of forest burning.

scholarly journals Aspek Hukum dalam Penyelenggaraan Bisnis Perhotelan

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 1033
Author(s):  
Hernawati RAS ◽  
Dani Durahman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
National Development ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Consumer Rights ◽  
Hospitality Business ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

The development of the law as part of a national development known as law reform is carried out thoroughly and integratedly. The hospitality business is growing rapidly as the economy develops, within the restrictions on the scope of the Hotel's business, there is a legal device that regulates the permit and protection of consumers. Hospitality businesses that do not have amdal permits Environmental law enforcement can be done by sanctioning administrative sanctions. Administrative sanctions, settlement of environmental issues outside the court and even criminal sanctions have been stipulated in Law No. 32 of 2009. The aspect of protection to Hospitality Consumers must be in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 8 of 1999, hospitality business must provide legal certainty in providing protection to consumers where currently there are still many hotels that do not provide information about consumer rights and obligations and the development of social responsibility (social responsebility). 

scholarly journals Formulation Policy Regarding the Smuggling of Lobster Seeds in Indonesia

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Ayu Izza Elvany
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
Illegal Fishing ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

This paper analyzes how formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling regulated in Indonesian law to optimize the effectiveness of illegal fishing enforcement, considering penal policy is the basis of criminal law operationalization. This research uses both statute approach and conceptual approach as legal research methods to analyze the issued legal problem. Fishery law in Indonesia regulated in Law No. 45 of 2009 amending Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fishery, especially Articles 88 and 16 paragraph (1) which cover the formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling enforcement. This study will be analyzed into three aspects which are the conduct (the criminal offense), criminal liability, and sentencing system. The result shows that law enforcement regarding the smuggling of lobster seeds in Indonesia is ineffective due to the nonexistence of corporate criminal liability in the fishery law and its sentencing system is lack of both the specific minimum penalty regulation and the penal measures as criminal punishment. However, the draft of the fishery law has already set corporate criminal liability; hence it also regulates the penal measures, in the form of secondary sanctions. Nevertheless, instead of enacting the specific minimum penalty, the draft only determined the maximum penalty as well. Keywords: Formulation Policy, Fishery Law, Lobster Seeds Smuggling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document